Connect with us

Editorials

‘Amityville Uprising’ Wraps Up an Unofficial Trilogy with an Amityville Zombie Movie [The Amityville IP]

Published

on

A line of bloody zombies

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

With Amityville Uprising, Thomas J. Churchill joins illustrious company as the only director of three Amityville films (the other is Dustin Ferguson, who we’ll return to in a few months).

After kicking off his run with Amityville Harvest (2020) which focused on a film crew interviewing a vampire, Churchill’s second entry was 2001’s “werewolf in a women’s half-way house” title Amityville Moon. Now he’s back for his third film in the “series,” a self-referential zombie outing.

What makes the new film intriguing is less the details of the plot – which include a chemical explosion at a military base with unleashes red acid rain on Amityville and reanimates the dead – but how the film acts as the last part of an unofficial Amityville trilogy.

The same issues that plagued Churchill’s previous entries pop up here: too many characters, incomprehensible geography during action sequences, and a narrative that is simultaneously undercooked and overly complicated. But there’s something compulsively watchable in how Churchill (who writes and directs) uses the film to pay homage to horror greats while also embedding easter egg callbacks to his own Amityville films.

At its core, Amityville Uprising is a combination of Assault on Precinct 13, The Mist, and Dawn of the Dead.

The film opens with an aerial shot of a(n unconvincing) chemical explosion at Fort Johnson military base, which releases a deadly red mist into the air. As Amityville’s residents go about their day, the film zeroes in on the short-staffed employees of the local jail/morgue whose lives shift from mundane normalcy to zombie apocalypse.

The “business as usual” includes dealing with Mrs. Chen (Jocelyn Hew), an irate woman seeking to pay a traffic ticket, Sgt. Thomas Dash (Scott C. Roe)’s teen son Jimmy (Kole Benfield) arriving unexpectedly, and the transfer of alleged serial killer Joe Gallo (Micah Fitzgerald) whose presence invites the attention of reporter Gerri Tarver (Alysha Young).

As the day proceeds (complete with Assault on Precinct 13-style time cards), the drama at the jail is frequently interrupted by news and weather updates (evoking Dawn of the Dead). The dangers of the outside world are revealed via establishing shots of the town under a deluge of red rain, as well as a few sequences when characters get caught outside and melt horribly (shout-out to Lisa Lex for the gooey make-up).

Naturally everything goes to hell when the power is cut, bodies begin reanimating and survivors become infected. This is, unfortunately, also when Amityville Uprising is at its most generic. While one character – Sam Cooper (Michael Cervantes)’s initial attack and subsequent crawling along the darkened corridors of the station is mildly suspenseful, the film’s entire last act is a litany of overly familiar zombie tropes.

Despite earlier efforts to establish the layout of the building, the production unsuccessfully shoots and lights the same stretch of corridor for the film’s last act, which makes it hard to figure out where individuals are meant to be, or  suspend disbelief that the characters are actually been separated.

Despite the tired and underwhelming zombie elements, Churchill’s willingness to close the loop on his two previous Amityville films is very fun and understated.

This principally involves the presence of Cervantes, whose character is there to file a missing person’s report for his sound editor brother Scratch (aka Cervantes’ character from Amityville Harvest). At one point Officer Malloy (Troy Formin) puts up missing person posters for Christina and Nancy Weingarten, Jennifer Barrett, and Lana Hill – the murdered members of Harvest’s documentary crew. Finally, there’s a brief mention of a “troubled women’s center”, which is, of course, the setting of Amityville Moon (Cervantes notably played Father Michael in that film).

None of these references are introduced with a heavy handed wink or a nudge; they’re simply present for those who are aware of Churchill’s tenure in the Amityville world. Considering how obvious his use of Dawn and Assault is, I was appreciative of how the homages to his efforts are underplayed.

3 skulls out of 5

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Acting! The range of performances is pretty wild. Cooper, Roe, and Tank Jones as Lt. Howie Stevenson fare best, in part because their roles are relatively down to earth. On the opposite end of the spectrum is stuntman Mike Ferguson whose Detective Lance McQueen is wooden and uncooperative, as well as Fitzgerald as the serial killer, who offers nothing interesting or nuanced in his performance.
  • The Worst: Lew legitimately is given nothing to work with. Mrs. Chen is grating from her first scene to her death, but not even in a “this character is a foil” kind of way. Every time she speaks or appears on screen, the film immediately becomes insufferable.
  • Dialogue! Case in point: when Mrs. Chen is repeatedly delayed from paying her ticket, she begins yelling at various officers. This includes such gems as “Serve and protect! So serve!” and “Talking to you is like talking to the wall!” It would be laughable if it didn’t stop the film dead in its tracks each and every time.
  • Premium Dialogue! With that said, my (unironic) favorite exchange is as follows: Mrs. Chen (to Lt. Stevenson): “I hope you get diabetes. It’s right around the corner from (pause) high blood pressure.” To which Stevenson retorts: “Yeah, I know. It’s right around the corner from ‘you’re being rude’ lane and ‘take a seat’ boulevard.” It’s the equivalent of a sick burn for an insufferable character.
  • Nihilism! Bonus points to Churchill for ending his trilogy on an extremely nihilistic end. It’s darker than both of the films it is referencing, that’s for sure.

Next Time: We’re headed back to the cornfield to talk about Amityville Scarecrow 2 (2022) director Adam Cowie’s sequel to Amityville Scarecrow. Who’s excited for more random British accents?!

Joe is a TV addict with a background in Film Studies. He co-created TV/Film Fest blog QueerHorrorMovies and writes for Bloody Disgusting, Anatomy of a Scream, That Shelf, The Spool and Grim Magazine. He enjoys graphic novels, dark beer and plays multiple sports (adequately, never exceptionally). While he loves all horror, if given a choice, Joe always opts for slashers and creature features.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading