Connect with us

Editorials

‘Amityville Scarecrow 2’ – The Killer Scarecrow Returns for Another Round [The Amityville IP]

Published

on

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

One year after the release of Amityville Scarecrow, we get the sequel Amityville Scarecrow 2 (2022). Unlike other sequels in the “franchise,” however, this second entry boasts an entirely new creative team. Stepping in as director is Adam Cowie, while Craig McLearie takes over writing duties.

Amityville Scarecrow 2 picks up two years after the events of the first film. Adult sisters Tina (Amanda-Jade Tyler) and Mary (Kate Sandison) are no longer estranged, and they’re still aiming to re-open the cursed family campground, though they’re rapidly running out of money.

Mary’s daughter Harriet (Sofia Lacey) is also still around, though she confides in boyfriend Dylan (Dan Robins) that she’s ready to move on. She just can’t find the words to tell her mother.

In addition to the family drama, there’s a new crop of characters working to get the campground ready for its grand opening in two weeks. In addition to Mya (Giedre Jackyte) and Robert (Stephen Saley), the two Red Shirts who die in the extended ten minute opening, there’s stringy-banged Lily (Heaven-Leigh Spence), bitchy Margot (Elspeth Foster), and utterly forgettable Cindy (Hannah Adams), as well as horny couple Simon (Genna Loskutnikov) and Beth (Chrissie Wunna).

Naturally most of these characters bite it when the killer scarecrow returns for a new round of violence. The real question is how can the killer be supernatural pedophile Lester when he was set ablaze in the finale of the first film?

Of the newbies, only Margot and Lily make any impression, though it’s extremely easy to confuse them. Just like its predecessor, Amityville Scarecrow 2 has a problem with casting interchangeable white women with dark hair and then doing nothing to distinguish them as characters.

Ironically, despite the change in writer, Amityville Scarecrow 2 suffers many of the same script problems. There’s an emphasis on inane character beats that don’t really matter, a tendency to have characters repeat dialogue, and there’s barely enough plot to justify the 80 minute runtime. For example: Mya and Robert’s deaths are needlessly drawn out, though it doesn’t help that their sequence immediately follows nearly four minutes of opening credits.

The resulting film feels needlessly stretched out (it’s easy to imagine someone screaming “just get it to feature length!”).

The reality is that no one is coming to Amityville Scarecrow 2 looking for three dimensional characters and nuanced plot, though, right? Alas this is where the change in director hurts the sequel the most. Cowie shoots action scenes very differently than Mundy did; the new director opts for close-up shots and busy camera movements, which obscures (and often confuses) what is happening onscreen.

Where Amityville Scarecrow had bland, unexciting action sequences, Amityville Scarecrow 2 has visually incomprehensible set-pieces.

Alas this is a tepid, forgettable Amityville entry. If the first film coasted by on its familial melodrama, the second merely offers more of the same (only now it’s less interesting). Without exciting kills or even vaguely memorable characters, Amityville Scarecrow 2 doesn’t have much to recommend.

2 skulls out of 5

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Psycho Homage: The truth is that this is a 1.5 star film, but several clunky homages to Hitchcock’s infamous horror film earns it a miniature boost. These include Dylan’s “We all go a little mad sometimes” and the way Cindy’s shower stabbing is filmed.
  • Sister/Mother: Harriet’s desire to break away from the family land and embark on her own journey could be compelling, but it’s hurt by the fact that she barely shares any scenes with her mother. In fact, it’s easy to forget that she’s not Tina’s daughter since those two characters spend most of their screen time together.
  • Tin-Earned Dialogue: The first film struggled with its dialogue, and the sequel continues that tradition. My favorite is the recurring insistence throughout Amityville Scarecrow 2 that the events of the first film were a long time ago, followed or preceded by another character exclaiming “it’s just 2 years!” is hilarious.
  • Roast a Dead Character: There’s an exchange where Tina and Mary bemoan the fact that Tina’s husband (and Mary’s cheating ex) died without updating his life insurance, which is why the farm is hurting financially. It’s such random jab at a dead character from the first film!
  • Nudity! Not since Amityville Vibrator have we seen this much overt nudity, though it would be nice if Cindy was given something (anything!) more to do than a) have sex with Simon or b) lather her breasts in the shower. It’s quite lecherous.
  • Glamping! It’s hard not to guffaw at Harriet’s pep talk to her fellow counsellors that they want “Amityville Farm Glamping” to become (this is a direct quote) “a high end glamping spot that will attract attention from all over the world.” Not only are we hanging fairy lights from derelict cars for ambience, but the caravans look the exact same as they did in the first film (which is to say: abandoned and decrepit). Either Harriet is delusional, or this is an absolutely baffling incongruity between the script and the set design.
  • Finale: The killer reveal, while not entirely surprising, is a welcome change of pace. Rather than lean into the supernatural evil angle of the first film, it’s revealed that Dylan is the secret grandson of Lester. This would have played better if Dylan were more of a character throughout the film, however; instead it’s something of a shoulder shrug.

Next Time: it only took thirty five entries, but writer/director Michael Stone finally realized that the “franchise” is worth parodying, which is how we get Amityville Gas Chamber (2022).

Joe is a TV addict with a background in Film Studies. He co-created TV/Film Fest blog QueerHorrorMovies and writes for Bloody Disgusting, Anatomy of a Scream, That Shelf, The Spool and Grim Magazine. He enjoys graphic novels, dark beer and plays multiple sports (adequately, never exceptionally). While he loves all horror, if given a choice, Joe always opts for slashers and creature features.

Editorials

‘Devil’s Due’ – Revisiting the ‘Abigail’ Directors’ Found Footage Movie

Published

on

Devil's Due

Expectations can run high whenever a buzzworthy filmmaker makes the leap from indie to mainstream. And Radio Silence Matt Bettinelli-Olpin, Tyler Gillett, Chad Villella and former member Justin Martinez — certainly had a lot to live up to after V/H/S. This production collective’s rousing contribution to the 2012 anthology film not only impressed audiences and critics, the same segment also caught the attention of 20th Century. This led to the studio recruiting the rising talent for a hush-hush found-footage project later titled Devil’s Due.

However, as soon as Radio Silence’s anticipated first film was released into the wild, the reactions were mostly negative. Devil’s Due was dismissed as a Rosemary’s Baby rehash but dressed in different clothes; almost all initial reviews were sure to make — as well as dwell on — that comparison. Of course, significant changes were made to Lindsay Devlin’s pre-existing script; directors Bettinelli-Olpin and Gillett offered up more energy and action than what was originally found in the source material, which they called a “creepy mood piece.” Nevertheless, too many folks focused on the surface similarities to the 1968 pregnancy-horror classic and ignored much of everything else.

Almost exactly two years before Devil’s Due hit theaters in January of 2014, The Devil Inside came out. The divisive POV technique was already in the early stages of disappearing from the big screen and William Brent Bell’s film essentially sped up the process. And although The Devil Inside was a massive hit at the box office, it ended up doing more harm than good for the entire found-footage genre. Perhaps worse for Radio Silence’s debut was the strange timing of Devil’s Due; the better-received Paranormal Activity: The Marked Ones was released earlier that same month. Despite only a superficial resemblance, the newer film might have come across as redundant and negligible to wary audiences.

Devil's Due

Image: Allison Miller in Devil’s Due.

The trailers for Devil’s Due spelled everything out quite clearly: a couple unknowingly conceives a diabolical child, and before that momentous birth, the mother experiences horrifying symptoms. There is an unshakable sense of been-there-done-that to the film’s basic pitch, however, Bettinelli-Olpin and Gillett knew that from the beginning. To compensate for the lack of novelty, they focused on the execution. There was no point in hiding the obvious — in the original script, the revelation of a demonic pregnancy was delayed — and the film instead gives the game away early on. This proved to be a benefit, seeing as the directors could now play around with the characters’ unholy situation sooner and without being tied down by the act of surprise.

At the time, it made sense for Radio Silence’s first long feature to be shot in the same style that got them noticed in the first place, even if this kind of story does not require it. Still and all, the first-person slant makes Devil’s Due stand out. The urgency and terror of these expectant parents’ ordeal is more considerable now with a dose of verisimilitude in the presentation. The faux realism makes the wilder events of the film — namely those times the evil fetus fears its vessel is in danger — more effective as well. Obviously the set-pieces, such as Samantha pulling a Carrie White on three unlucky teens, are the work of movie magic, but these scenes hit harder after watching tedious but convincing stretches of ordinariness. Radio Silence found a solid balance between the normal and abnormal.

Another facet overlooked upon the film’s initial release was its performances. Booking legitimate actors is not always an option for found-footage auteurs, yet Devil’s Due was a big-studio production with resources. Putting trained actors in the roles of Samantha and Zach McCall, respectively Allison Miller and Zach Gilford, was desirable when needing the audience to care about these first-time parents. The leads managed to make their cursory characters both likable and vulnerable. Miller was particularly able to tap into Samantha’s distress and make it feel real, regardless of the supernatural origin. And with Gilford’s character stuck behind the camera for most of the time, the film often relied on Miller to deliver the story’s emotional element.

Devil's Due

Image: Allison Miller in Devil’s Due.

Back then, Radio Silence went from making viral web clips to a full-length theatrical feature in a relatively short amount of time. The outcome very much reflected that tricky transition. Bettinelli-Olpin and Gillett indeed knew how to create these attention-grabbing scenes — mainly using practical effects — but they were still learning their way around a continuous narrative. The technical limitations of found footage hindered the story from time to time, such as this routine need to keep the camera on the main characters (or see things from their perspective) as opposed to cutting away to a subplot. There is also no explanation of who exactly compiled all this random footage into a film. Then again, that is an example of how the filmmakers strove for entertainment as opposed to maintaining every tradition of found footage. In the end, the directors drew from a place of comfort and familiarity as they, more or less, used 10/31/98 as the blueprint for Devil’s Due’s chaotic conclusion. That is not to say the film’s ending does not supply a satisfying jolt or two, but surely there were hopes for something different and atypical.

Like other big film studios at that time, 20th Century wanted a piece of the found-footage pie. What distinguished their endeavor from those of their peers, though, was the surprising hiring of Radio Silence. Needless to say, the gamble did not totally pay off, yet putting the right guys in charge was a bold decision. Radio Silence’s wings were not completely clipped here, and in spite of how things turned out, there are flashes of creativity in Bettinelli-Olpin and Gillett’s unconventional approach to such a conventional concept.

Radio Silence has since bounced back after a shaky start; they participated in another anthology, Southbound, before making another go at commercial horror. The second time, as everyone knows, was far more fruitful. In hindsight, Devil’s Due is regarded as a hiccup in this collective’s body of work, and it is usually brought up to help emphasize their newfound success. Even so, this early film of theirs is not all bad or deserving of its unmentionable status. With some distance between then and now, plus a forgiving attitude, Devil’s Due can be seen as a fun, if not flawed first exposure to the abilities of Radio Silence. And, hopefully, somewhere down the line they can revisit the found-footage format.

Devil's Due

Image: Allison Miller and Zach Gilford in Devil’s Due.

Continue Reading