Editorials
Slashing into ‘Urban Legends: Final Cut’ 25 Years Later
Urban Legend (1998), directed by Jamie Blanks and written by Silvio Horta, tends to rank last whenever it’s stacked against the two heavyweights of the 1990s slasher revival. Yet of the three, which includes Scream and I Know What You Did Last Summer, Urban Legend arguably has the more unique logline. That movie didn’t shy away from self-awareness and pop culture, and it certainly delivered a familiar shot of high-concept revenge, but the underlying gimmick was—and still is—fresh. So much so that really no other slasher movie has quite embraced the idea of urban legends as methodology since then. That is, of course, other than the sequels.
More unrealistic than a killer whose crimes are fashioned after modern myths is the academic environment shown in Urban Legends: Final Cut (2000). The first of the two sequels—Urban Legends: Bloody Mary would go straight to video in 2005—doesn’t exactly offer an accurate depiction of the film school experience, much less the process to get a student’s project produced. That said, the setting is perfect for this kind of story. The line between reality and fiction is always susceptible to some degree of blurriness, but now the new element of filmmaking adds to the confusion, not to mention the horror.
Appropriately, the Pendleton University killings from the first movie have become an urban legend in Final Cut. Keep in mind that series of publicized murders isn’t even that old. Nevertheless, it’s a story Loretta Devine’s returning character knows by heart, given how the security guard was fired for not going along with the university’s massive cover-up. In the same breath, Devine’s Reese inadvertently inspires Jennifer Morrison’s Amy, the struggling cinema student hoping to step out of her famous father’s shadow.

Image: Jennifer Morrison and Loretta Devine in Urban Legends: Final Cut.
Amy’s search for the perfect starting material, for a narrative feature, has ended with the bane of many a film school teacher—the horror genre. To her surprise, though, Professor Solomon (Hart Bochner) is on board with his pupil’s shift from documentaries to fiction. With Amy’s proposed movie then comes the inevitable body count that occurs whenever characters in the horror genre dig up buried pasts.
Whodunnit plots are evergreen in slashers, although in something of a refreshing change, Final Cut doesn’t opt for the standard revenge angle from the previous movie and its contemporaries. To play on the namesake of the story’s coveted Hitchcock Award for best thesis film, director John Ottman and writers Harris Boardman and Scott Derrickson landed on a more adult motivation for their villain. There’s new meaning to “cutthroat competition” as Amy’s project is soon met with misfortunes—a friend’s supposed suicide and the mysterious disappearances of cast and crew members—that, in the end, all amount to one person’s convoluted effort to take credit for someone else’s work. Being willing to kill for gain and opportunity is as plausible as pure payback.
As a whole, the Urban Legend franchise offers an assortment of popular myths as well as deeper cuts to go with the kills. The first movie made entire scenes out of widespread ghost stories like “Aren’t You Glad You Didn’t Turn on the Light?” and “The Killer in the Backseat,” whereas in Final Cut, the selection is skewing towards obscure (chicken tumor pus is mistaken for mayonnaise) or recent (“The Midnight Scream“). Jacinda Barrett’s set-piece alone, practically a foreshadowing of the “gorno” era to come, is an especially nasty spin on “The Kidney Theft” after the lack of follow-through in the original movie.

Image: The killer is on the prowl in Urban Legends: Final Cut.
Also from Final Cut, “Humans Can Lick Too” would have felt like déjà vu at the time to anyone who had already seen the partly urban legend-motifed anthology Campfire Tales. In an unexpected turn, though, “Humans Can Lick Too” only becomes the backdrop for another piece of dangerous lore; Jessica Cauffiel’s character stopped being the comic relief as she’s butchered on the “Lick” set, and her demise is then caught on video and later watched by an unaware audience. This Peeping Tom-ish reference to snuff films is evidence of Ottman’s long-established career, prior to his solo directorial debut, as both an editor and scorer.
The original Urban Legend is not without its highs, but unlike Ghostface in Scream and the Fisherman in I Know What You Did Last Summer, the movie’s parka-clad villain, save for Rebecca Gayheart’s performance, isn’t memorable or even suitable for merchandising. What’s worse is how Summer beat Urban Legend to the punch by prominently featuring a hook-brandishing madman as its antagonist. The Fisherman, who by the way, was essentially manifested from an in-story retelling of “The Hook.” So surely this development caused Blanks and Horta’s own movie to settle for a more generic-looking killer, one whose incredibly themed slayings pick up the slack whenever the wardrobe and weapons are underwhelming.
As for Final Cut, the killer’s identity is just as concealed as before. An overstuffed cast, along with several red herrings, helps in maintaining the mystery for as long as possible. Initially you begin to wonder if the fencing masked culprit is really Reese, the resentful security guard whose demotion is part of a ploy to protect Pendleton’s dark legacy. Or is it Amy’s fellow would-be filmmakers? Travis (Matthew Davis) apparently took his own life, but in a bit of a soap opera tactic, now he suddenly has a twin. Finally, Anson Mount’s surly Toby, who doesn’t hide his issue with Amy also submitting a horror feature for the Hitchcock Award, is far too obvious to ever consider a suspect. The same goes for a lowly P.A. who’s always looking shifty on Amy’s set (Derek Aasland).

Image: Jennifer Morrison meets the killer in Urban Legends: Final Cut.
Ruling out Reese, a fishy twin and a bitter rival leaves us with a lot of supporting characters as suspects, one of whom might have subscribed to the Brenda (Gayheart) method of deception; they stick close to their enemy. Thankfully, the sequel doesn’t repeat history and instead serves up a perpetrator who satisfies this movie’s Hitchcockian hankering. In what feels like a nod to his own slasher roots, Hart Bochner’s role dons a second disguise, à la Terror Train, while pursuing his prey. The unmasking doesn’t have the same enjoyment to it as that of Brenda, but the soundstage-set standoff between the surviving players, plus the clever callback to Reese’s Coffy-inspired gun, is the perfect endcap to this twisted take on film school.
Final Cut isn’t a legitimate continuation of its predecessor, but as a largely standalone story, one with an occasional giallo quality to its aesthetic and a self-reflexive plot to keep you engaged, the sequel is a cut above other lower-profile slashers from the same era. With its distinct setting, and a layered execution of the core theme, Urban Legend’s follow-up is a more entertaining movie than its negative reviews would suggest. If anything, Final Cut plays better now than it did back then.

Image: The cast of Urban Legends: Final Cut.
Editorials
‘Bloodlust: Subspecies III’ Remains One of Full Moon’s Greatest Achievements
The problem with filming sequels back-to-back is that, unless you can afford expensive reshoots, there’s no easy way to adjust course in between movies if fans react badly to where the story is headed. That’s why it’s important to have a complete narrative thought out well in advance lest you accidentally kill a budding franchise.
However, this isn’t always the case. Every once in a while, it seems like the cinema gods smile upon certain chaotic productions and gift moviegoers with complete franchises that feel like more than the sum of their hastily produced parts. Ted Nicolaou’s Bloodlust: Subspecies III is precisely one of these miraculous pictures, with the raw talents of the artists involved (as well as the continued support from Romania) turning the feature into an effective conclusion for a series that kind of made things up as the filmmakers went along.
That’s why I’d like to invite my fellow readers to join me on this third part of our journey through the Subspecies franchise as we look into Bloodlust and talk about how it remains a surprisingly satisfying finale to the original trilogy.
A Trilogy Planned on the Fly

Released only a year after Bloodstone found plenty of success in rental stores and mail-in VHS catalogues worldwide, 1994’s Bloodlust was produced at the same time as its predecessor in (mostly) the same locations and with the same team. This means that the movie benefited from all the same upgrades as Bloodstone, with the crew now being more experienced with the ins and outs of surviving a low-budget Romanian production and the cast really settling into their characters.
At this point, everything from location scouting to the makeup process had been streamlined, with Wayne Toth and Norman Cabrera, the main duo behind special effects, even switching out time-consuming prosthetics for latex gloves in order to speed up Anders Hove’s monstrous transformation. The titular “subspecies” demons were also once again relegated to a mere cameo appearance due to the laborious puppetry required to bring them to life.
The only real hiccup came from the fact that actress Denice Duff had replaced the first film’s Michelle (Laura Mae Tate) and was immediately expected to portray the character as both an innocent victim in part II and as a secondary villain in part III. According to behind-the-scenes interviews, the hectic production schedule that blended two different movies meant that Duff would often find herself having to alternate between two incredibly different versions of Michelle during the same shooting day – though it’s obvious that she’s having more fun with Bloodlust’s more traditionally vampiric version of her character.
In the finished film, we pick things up immediately where the previous entry left off as Rebecca (Melanie Shatner) is forced to leave her vampire sister Michelle (Duff) behind in the dungeons of Castle Vladislav due to the rising sun. This allows Mummy (Pamela Gordon) to use Michelle’s blood to revive the vicious Radu (Hove) so that he may continue his quest for the coveted Bloodstone – a magical artifact that perpetually drips the Blood of Saints.
Meanwhile, the dreamy US embassy agent Mel (Kevin Blair) agrees to help Rebecca plan a rescue mission, though they’re unaware that Radu has become infatuated with Michelle during his attempts to guide her growing bloodlust. This all culminates in a climactic confrontation meant to tie up all of the series’ loose ends in one of Full Moon Pictures’ most ambitious productions.
The Evolution of Radu

Like its predecessor, Bloodlust: Subspecies III was also warmly received by fans who argued that the series was an even bigger success than Full Moon’s other major horror franchise, Puppet Master. This praise wasn’t unanimous, however, as 1994 had seen the rise of a more modern breed of sexy vampire popularized by Anne Rice, with old-school Nosferatu like Radu being viewed as obsolete when compared to the likes of Lestat and Gary Oldman’s take on Dracula.
In a way, one might argue that Nicolaou’s film is something of a swan song for the classic vampire story, as Bloodlust combines all of the traditional elements we tend to associate with these tales into a single tragic yarn that ties a neat little bow on Radu’s story as well as the old-fashioned monster movies that he represents. The finale remains shocking despite the fact that this is the third time we see Radu get brutally killed onscreen, with the brief tease that he may one day return feeling more like a nod towards the nature of evil rather than sequel bait.
The film dabbles a bit in gothic romance and even explores the inherent power fantasy behind transforming into an immortal creature of the night, but the filmmakers never lose sight of Radu as a demonic force even when he’s willing to betray his beloved Mummy for Michelle’s sake. In fact, his twisted “love” for his fledgling makes him even creepier as we get the feeling that his passion comes from a dark and disturbing place.
Anders Hove is at his absolute best in this film, with the effects department boosting his moments of what the younger generation would call “aura farming” whenever Radu emerges from shadows like a 90s version of Count Orlok. There are even a couple of surprisingly effective jump-scares here, which is why I’d argue that Bloodlust cements Radu as one of the most memorable cinematic vampires of all time despite his humble origins.
Subspecies Saves Its Best For Last

Nicolaou and Vlad Panescu also saved the best for “last” (more on that in a bit) regarding the film’s visuals, with the cinematography and overall atmosphere of Bloodlust absolutely surpassing what we saw in the previous films. Everything feels appropriately climactic this time around (including the wonderful soundtrack that was co-composed alongside an authentic Romanian orchestra), and I appreciate how this is the fastest-paced entry in the trilogy since the film doesn’t need to waste time setting anything up.
Bloodlust still suffers from some of the same low-budget blemishes as its predecessors, but there’s so much creative passion here that no amount of wonky effects work or stilted dialogue can get in the way of appreciating the flick’s gothic grandeur. That’s why it’s not surprising that the movie’s definitive(-ish) ending would later be retconned as fans begged for more Radu.
Of course, the next entry in this series would be a different kind of vampiric endeavor altogether, with the filmmakers attempting to engage with the same trends that ultimately killed Radu and his antiquated kin. That, however, is a story for another time. For now, I’ll merely insist that Bloodlust: Subspecies III remains a highlight of Full Moon’s expansive catalogue and is definitely worth seeking out today.
You must be logged in to post a comment.