Editorials
Titan of Television: A History of King Kong on the Small Screen
It’s hard to overstate the impact of Merian C. Cooper’s King Kong. What began as a passion project inspired by tales of real-life encounters with Komodo Dragons ultimately morphed into a cultural sensation worthy of being referred to as The Eighth Wonder of the World.
In fact, the 1933 film would go on to inspire everything from the rise of Kaiju flicks to the effects-driven blockbusters that we still see today – and that’s not even mentioning the immediate sequels and rip-offs that flooded cinema screens in the months and years following the original release.
This legacy is still going strong nearly a century later, with our favorite colossal ape having been featured in several major films, comics, and even video games in just the past couple of years. With the upcoming second season of Apple TV’s Monarch: Legacy of Monsters shifting focus from Godzilla to Kong, we thought that this would be the perfect moment to look back on Kong’s previous appearances on the small screen in order to better understand his impact on popular culture.
So ready your sea legs and lock away your blonde scream queens because we’re setting off on an expedition to Skull Island!
Much like the Universal Monsters before him, King Kong had a second shot at success when the original film premiered on American television sets in March of 1956. This major network event reintroduced the character to a whole new generation of cinephiles, with the ensuing buzz from the re-release (and its yearly reruns) leading to renewed interest in stories about the giant ape.

The King Kong Show
Initially, this only led to a new wave of branded toys, clothing, and other assorted merchandise, but 1966 would see the release of Videocraft International and Toei Animation’s The King Kong Show. An animated series produced in Japan but targeted towards the western market, this short-lived series (which was executive produced by Arthur Rankin Jr. and Jules Bass) reimagined Kong as more of a lovable pet than a true monster, with the giant ape accompanying the adventurous Bond family as they faced all sorts of sci-fi tropes alongside their furry friend.
While the show was popular enough, fans complained that it only barely resembled the monstrous ape that we know and love, which is likely why production was discontinued after a mere 25 episodes. However, the very same year that the show went off the air, we’d see a copyright-friendly knock-off of Kong in another Rankin/Bass production, namely the TV movie Mad Monster Party. This underrated stop-motion special also got a prequel in 1972, where the off-brand Kong returned as “Modzoola”, proving that the giant ape would forever be synonymous with creature features.
Of course, it was only with the heavily marketed 1976 remake of Kong that the character would become popular enough to re-enter popular culture as more than a stop-motion oddity from the 1930s. While John Guillermin’s disastrous (and oddly ecologically-minded) remake was considered a flop back in the day, it still led to a new wave of Kong cameos and the occasional reference in shows like The Muppets and even Doctor Who, as well as a plethora of cartoon parodies.

Kong: The Animated Series
And yet, we have to skip forward to 2000 to see Kong officially grace television screens again with the release of Kong: The Animated Series, a personal favorite that felt like BKN’s answer to 1998’s popular Godzilla: The Animated Series. While the project was originally meant to be a futuristic re-imagining of Kong, the finished show ended up pivoting to a combination of sci-fi and fantasy as a clone of the original Ape (and his human “little bro” Jason Jenkins) fights against evil gods, mad scientists, and an assortment of giant monsters.
While this action-packed show didn’t exactly become a household name, it was successful enough to warrant a couple of handheld video games as well as two direct-to-video movies meant to capitalize on the success of Peter Jackson’s 2005 remake of the original film. Ironically, Legendary’s Monsterverse seems to have inherited many of the same ideas as the animated series, including the re-characterization of Kong as more of a guardian figure than a monster, as well as the inclusion of cryptids and a whole ecosystem of gigantic creatures coexisting with an advanced ancient civilization.
Once the hype surrounding the 2005 remake died down, Kong stepped away from television until resurfacing in 2016 via a bizarre Netflix series targeted towards young children. A futuristic story completely unrelated to the then-budding Monsterverse (as Kong: Skull Island would only release a year later), Kong: King of the Apes followed the titular primate as he joined forces with three kids in order to fight robotic dinosaurs controlled by a vengeful scientist.

Kong: King of the Apes
While the show didn’t leave much of an impression despite lasting two full seasons, it was notable for being Kong’s first foray into 3D animation as well as his first streaming series. By its end in 2018, however, Kong had already re-entered public consciousness as a fully-fledged member of the Monsterverse and Godzilla’s western rival. And with brand synergy becoming all the rage due to the rise of multi-media franchises with expanded universes, it made sense for Legendary to finally bring these titans to the small screen without resorting to barely related spin-offs. That brings us to 2023’s underrated Netflix show Skull Island, a deconstruction of family-friendly adventure cartoons and Kong’s final animated appearance before finally making his live-action debut on TV in Monarch: Legacy of Monsters.
Though the first season of Monarch focused more on the aftermath of Godzilla’s discovery and ultimate resurgence in 2014, the latest season promises to explore Kong’s place in this post-Titan world as well as secrets of Skull Island that weren’t revealed in the 2017 film – making it a must-watch for fans of Cooper’s iconic creation.
There’s no telling what the future holds for the Eighth Wonder of the World (I personally wouldn’t mind more animated shows like the action-packed Skull Island), but I think it’s safe to say that Kong will continue to roar his way onto TV screens – and many other forms of media – for decades to come.

Skull Island. Cr. COURTESY OF NETFLIX © 2023
Editorials
The Mark of the Beast: The Lasting Impact of ‘The Omen’ at 50
Of the three films that make up the Diabolical Trinity of classic religious horror films—Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), and The Omen (1976)—The Omen is the most purely entertaining.
While Rosemary’s Baby digs into the societal shifts of the 60s and The Exorcist explores spiritual tensions between faith and doubt in an ever-shifting world, The Omen seems most interested in just telling a thrilling story. It achieves this by blending two major trends of the 1970s, the devil movie and the paranoid thriller, into one crackling adventure yarn. In the process, The Omen has sparked fear and curiosity about what could happen in the “end times” if such events are to occur.
After seeing The Exorcist, producer Harvey Bernhard contacted writer David Seltzer and said something along the lines of, “Hey, write me one of those.” Seltzer, having never read the Bible, thought it would be an interesting challenge, so, according to various interviews, he read the Bible and several commentaries in search of a story. Then he stumbled upon a passage in the book of Revelation, the image of a great Beast rising out of the sea, that sparked his imagination. In the commentaries, he found that the sea represented politics in some interpretations of the text, and he began building his story on that foundation.
Seltzer has told this story often, and I am inclined to believe him. However, from there, much of the theological-sounding lore of The Omen was created purely by Seltzer. Many of the ideas surrounding The Antichrist in the film appear to be drawn much more from the pop-eschatology sensation of the 1970s, The Late Great Planet Earth by Hal Lindsay, than any Biblical source.
Lindsay’s book was the bestselling nonfiction book of the 1970s and re-popularized views of the “last days” that had been dying along with fundamentalism for decades, namely Dispensationalism, Millennialism, and the Pre-Tribulation Rapture. In dispensationalism, history is broken into several epochs of time (or dispensations) that culminate in the return of Christ and his thousand-year (millennial) reign.
Before this return, a seven-year Tribulation will occur in which the Antichrist comes to power and persecutes all who oppose him, culminating in a battle between the forces of good and evil at the valley of Megiddo, usually called Armageddon. Of course, in this worldview, the true believers in Jesus will be lifted out, or raptured, before all this takes place. Since the publication and popularity of The Late Great Planet Earth, this has been the prominent belief in Evangelical and Fundamentalist Christian circles, though Roman Catholic, Orthodox, and mainline Protestant denominations largely reject it.
Lindsay also did something unique that had not been the case even in dispensationalist circles before him—he posited that the creation of the modern state of Israel in 1948 started the countdown to Armageddon. Fans of the film will immediately realize where Seltzer ran with this idea in the first line of the poem created for the movie: “When the Jews return to Zion…”
Damien Thorn and the Creation of Horror’s “Innocent Villain”

Seltzer’s next inspiration focused on the idea of the Antichrist as a child, what he would call the film’s “innocent villain.” In watching The Omen, it is readily apparent that Damien Thorn (Harvey Stephens) does not really do anything evil beyond a bit of normal kid mischief. Even the moment in which Damien knocks Kathy Thorn (Lee Remick) over a second-floor railing can be read as an accident orchestrated by Damien’s diabolically connected nanny, Mrs. Baylock (Billie Whitelaw). The film takes this idea of the innocent villain a step further by casting Gregory Peck, best known for playing arguably the greatest father in film history, Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird (1962), as Damien’s earthly father, an element that greatly satisfied Seltzer.
The New Testament itself says very little about the Antichrist and certainly nothing about his childhood. In fact, the word antichrist is used twice (1 John 2:18 and 2 John 7 for the curious) and refers to groups of people, not a particular person. There is also a passage in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12 in which the writer (usually attributed to Paul) discusses “The Man of Lawlessness” who will “exalt himself over everything that is called God” and “proclaim himself to be God.”
Then there is the Beast of Revelation chapter 13 with “seven heads and ten horns” that Seltzer latched onto, which has been interpreted in a multitude of ways over the centuries. Powerful people throughout history, from Charlemagne, various Popes during the Protestant Reformation era, Napoleon and Hitler, to modern politicians, including Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump, have all had the label placed on them by various circles. Even religious leaders like Billy Graham have not escaped being called the Antichrist.
Lindsay and modern dispensationalists are certain the Antichrist will be a 21st-century individual as they are equally certain that the Rapture, Tribulation, and return of Christ are imminent, likely within their lifetime. Many scholars and theologians, however, interpret these passages as symbolic representations of the Roman Empire and the first-century Caesars who persecuted, tortured, and murdered Christians and Jews who refused to submit to Imperial rule and worship them as gods. For example, that the Beast from the sea in Revelation has seven heads is symbolic of the famous seven mountains of Rome, with the 10 horns referring to rulers and magistrates of the Empire.
But this is all really of no matter to Seltzer and the story of The Omen. Instead of being concerned with any historical or theological accuracy, he instead built his own lore, which sends Robert Thorn and photographer Keith Jennings (David Warner) on a globetrotting investigation into the nature of the Antichrist and how to stop him. Some of this lore includes the child being born of a jackal, the reaction of animals, the protective cult that arises around Damien, the daggers of Megiddo, and maybe most interesting of all, the peculiar flaws in Jennings’s photographs that presage the ways certain individuals will die.
All these aspects are where the paranoid thrillers come in, as films like Blow Up (1966), Z (1969), The Conversation (1974), The Parallax View (1974), 3 Days of the Condor (1975), and All the President’s Men (1976) were all the rage at the time. Especially in the wake of the Watergate scandal, the idea of journalists (like Jennings) as ordinary heroes who could bring down the powerful, nefarious forces in the world was exactly what audiences craved. And what greater hidden evil force was there than the Devil? This is also why the device of the daggers of Megiddo is so important to a movie like this. If Damien is indeed the Antichrist, there must be a way to stop him, though in the Biblical text, the only power capable of destroying the Devil is God Himself.
The Mark of the Beast, 666, and the Film’s Most Famous Religious Symbolism

The piece of lore created for the movie with the most solid Biblical grounding is the Mark of the Beast. Revelation describes a mark on the forehead or hand of those who worship the Beast and his image. Again, this is symbolic language differentiating those who belong to the power of the Roman Empire and those who belong to Christ, who have the Mark of the Lamb. In Seltzer’s hands, the mark is very literal, a birthmark that is borne by not only the Antichrist but all his followers, meaning they are marked from before birth as belonging to Satan, and there is no escaping it. This is all rather distressing to the priest Father Brennan (Patrick Troughton), who betrays his mark by warning Thorn about Damien and pays the price by memorably being impaled by a spire that falls from a church steeple after being struck by lightning.
Why is the mark three sixes? Again, this is drawn from a passage in Revelation that states that the Beast can be identified by calculating his number. In Biblical scholarship, this is believed to be the sum of the name of a man transferred into Hebrew numerology, a practice in which each Hebrew letter also represents a number. Using this method, the number of the name Caesar Nero, which many believe to be the most logical choice, is six hundred sixty-six. In the film and elsewhere, this number is changed to three individual sixes. According to the film, this represents the Diabolical Trinity (a designation also unique to the film) made up of Satan, the Antichrist, and the False Prophet. That Damien carries this unique birthmark under his hair convinces Robert that the child is the Antichrist, and it’s up to him to destroy him.
Part of what makes The Omen great is its ambiguity. Damien could be the Antichrist, or he could be at the center of a series of coincidences. Director Richard Donner stated in interviews that he believed Robert Thorn had gone insane by the end of the film, which, to Donner, is the only explanation for why Thorn would attempt to kill an innocent child. However, that enigmatic smile in the final shot suggests that Damien does embody a spirit of great evil. The sequels, however, all but erase this ambiguity.
In audiences, The Omen sparked a renewed interest in the concept of the Antichrist and the dispensationalist interpretation of the end times that continues to echo throughout the last five decades. Around the time of the film’s release, even Elvis Presley was photographed brandishing a paperback copy of Seltzer’s novelization. Dispensationalist authors like Hal Lindsay, Tim LaHaye, and John Hagee have made millions publishing books and giving lectures about the Antichrist and the end of the world.
The Legacy of The Omen, 50 Years Later

Though A Thief in the Night (1972) preceded The Omen in initial release, it gained quite a resurgence (along with the ability to create three sequels) in the wake of the popularity of The Omen and went on to scar the psyches of Evangelical children for decades. Hal Lindsay was also able to release a film version of The Late Great Planet Earth in 1978, complete with narration and a brief onscreen appearance from Orson Welles.
In the 1990s, the Left Behind series became a cultural phenomenon, spawning twelve books in the core series, a YA spinoff series, video games, and a movie series (2000-2005) starring Kirk Cameron. A bigger studio adaptation of the first book was released in 2014, starring Nicolas Cage. 20th Century Fox and The Omen got in on the renewed “end-of-the-world” vigor by releasing a remake of the original film on June 6, 2006. The franchise was revived once again in 2024 with The First Omen, which explores ideas of the Antichrist and the motivations of those in power in our current religious, social, and political context.
But despite all the sequels, spinoffs, rip-offs, remakes, and “end times” money grabs of the last 50 years, the original version of The Omen remains untouchable. Its greatest strength is that it seeks, first and foremost, to entertain. And it does so admirably.
After half a century, its influence can be felt in horror, the culture at large, and even in various faith circles. It is a testament to the power of story and film that, consciously or unconsciously, fans of The Omen and those who have never seen it alike are, to this very day, marked by the Beast.

You must be logged in to post a comment.