Connect with us

Editorials

‘The Last Voyage of the Demeter’ – 8 Things We Learned from the Blu-ray Commentary Track

Published

on

last voyage of demeter review

The legend of Dracula is explored from a new angle with The Last Voyage of the Demeter, based on “The Captain’s Log,” the seventh chapter in Bram Stoker’s influential novel.

The film’s home video release includes an audio commentary with director André Øvredal (Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark, The Autopsy of Jane Doe) and producer Bradley J. Fischer (Shutter Island, Black Swan), among other special features.

Here are eight things I learned from the Last Voyage of the Demeter commentary:


Last Voyage of the Demeter Corey Hawkins

1. The Last Voyage of the Demeter spent 21 years in development.

Phoenix Pictures acquired the rights to the film, originally titled Demeter, over two decades before the movie made its way to the screen.

“It’s been a solid 21 years since my producing partners, Mike Medavoy, Arnie Messer, and I, optioned the screenplay that we adapted into this film,” Fischer explains at the beginning of the commentary.

“And I’ve been part of it for something like three years, I think,” adds Øvredal. “We started on it before the filming before the pandemic and worked through the pandemic, and obviously filmed mid-pandemic.”

David Slade (30 Days of Night), Neil Marshall (The Descent), Marcus Nispel (The Texas Chainsaw Massacre), Robert Schwentke (Red), and Stefan Ruzowitzky (Deadfall) are among the directors who were attached to the project at various points during its incubation.


2. The movie shares filming locations with Gladiator.

The sequences at the Bulgarian port at the beginning of the film were shot in Malta, sharing filming locations with Ridley Scott’s Gladiator.

“Inside that building is where Russell Crowe first emerges into the coliseum in Gladiator through that corridor,” gushes Fischer. “We were giving ourselves our own self-guided tour of those sets.”


Dracula in the rain aboard the Demeter

3. The script was written on spec.

Screenwriter Bragi F. Schut (Escape Room) used “The Captain’s Log” as “narrative guide posts” to flesh out the fractured story into a feature. It was written as a spec script, meaning that it was done unsolicited in the hopes of being sold as opposed to being commissioned.

The gamble paid off, as Fischer was attracted to the focus on the novel’s pivotal sequence, which is often overlooked in Dracula adaptations. He explains:

“This story of the Demeter has appeared in various Dracula films — from Nosferatu, the 1922 Weimar period [F.W.] Murnau film, to [Francis Ford] Coppola’s Dracula — this story that we’ve dramatize for the entirety of the film, that we told with this movie, really amounted to not much more than shoe leather, sort of connective tissue in other Dracula movies over the years.”

Schut receives a story credit in addition to sharing writing credit with Zak Olkewicz (Bullet Train).


4. Dracula’s wolf form was intended to appear in the movie.

In the original novel, Dracula is a shapeshifter who can also take the form of a wolf, in addition to the more well-known bat. The lycan appears in film’s alternate opening, included on the disc, after the captain’s corpse is revealed tied to the ship’s helm.

“While so many people know Dracula the character, not that many people know the story, and not many people know that he, in addition to a bat, takes the form of a wolf in some instances. What we discovered in test screenings was that some people were confused about all of these various forms that he took,” Fischer reveals.

The wolf would have later returned when he claims his first human victim in the movie, Petrofsky, but that was replaced with the emaciated version of Dracula once the opening was changed.

“We really had a very spirited debate about whether we should stick to the wolf in that scene or whether the burden of that potentially for a wide audience was too much. I think what we landed on actually is not a compromise, because I think what it does is it sort of dramatizes him in more of the man form than in the lycan form. And I think it’s pretty scary… I hope!” note Fischer.


The Last Voyage of the Demeter Corey Hawkins

5. The original script was all men.

Schut’s original script did not have the character of Anna, Dracula’s unwitting stowaway played by Aisling Franciosi, and instead focused on the all-male crew.

“It was actually the first note I gave Bragi, because the initial spec script did not have a woman on board,” says Fischer. “It was just a fully male crew.”

The film nearly featured two other women, albeit as corpses, that were discovered by Clemens and Anna to have been stowed away by Dracula for nourishment. The sequence can be seen among the deleted scenes on the disc.


6. It was important to show Dracula speak.

Although Dracula only speaks a few words in the film, it was important to the filmmakers to show that he was an intelligent being rather than merely a feral animal. Fischer explains:

“It was really important that, while we did embrace this concept of the more feral, animalistic Dracula, he wasn’t just an animal, he wasn’t just this sort of lower-level intelligence that’s simply pursuing blood to consume and didn’t have higher faculties. So we wanted to make sure, especially where the movie goes as he evolves and where it ends with him in the tavern, that when he gets to London he’s able to mingle and mix into society.”

He continues, “Even though it’s brief and not very involved, the fact that he can speak and communicate was something that we wanted to make sure was there so that we could distinguish him from just some beast.”


The Last Voyage of the Demeter Review

7. Woody Norman’s reaction to seeing the creature for the first time is genuine.

The first scene shot with Javier Botet as Dracula was when he preys on Toby, played by 12-year-old Woody Norman. Norman didn’t see the creature until that moment in order to elicit a genuine reaction.

“To scare Woody, we didn’t let Woody see him in the full gear so that when we actually shot the close ups of Woody reacting to seeing him, he literally walked up in front of him for the first time as we were filming Woody,” Øvredal says.

A prosthetic was made for an insert shot of Dracula sinking his fangs into Toby’s neck, but it had to be cut for time. “I guess the scene is scary enough as is, but that would have been nice,” laments Fischer.


8. The film has nods to The Amityville Horror, The Beastmaster, and more.

While Nosferatu was a key inspiration on the creature design, and Alien has been cited as a major influence on the film, the commentary reveals nods to several other classic films.

When the crew explores the hold, objects ominously illuminated by a lantern are “a little homage to The Amityville Horror, the haunted house with the two eyes,” says Øvredal.

An American Werewolf in London was used as a point of reference when the monster kills Petrofsky. Dracula’s wings were influenced by Coppola’s take on Dracula, while a scene in which he envelopes Anna in the wings was inspired by The Beastmaster.


The Last Voyage of the Demeter is available now on Blu-ray, DVD, and Digital.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading