Connect with us

Interviews

[Set Report] ‘Hostel: Part III’ Delivers An Even Darker Sin City

Published

on

Hostel 3 Hostel Part III

I arrived in Detroit to find it a ghost town. A major American city, emptied of people, skeletal skyscrapers jutting blankly against the callous sky. I was there to visit the set of Hostel: Part III, the upcoming direct-to-DVD sequel which arrives in stores two days after Christmas.

This time around, the setting was relocated from the strange and barbaric Slovokian village of the first two films to the more familiar confines of Las Vegas, also barbaric but in its own, distinctly American, way (the production was planning on shooting in Sin City for a total of four days following their departure from Detroit)… The shoot that day was taking place in the old Detroit Masonic Temple, a neo-gothic complex fronted by a 14-story ceremonial building. Located in the city’s Cass Corridor, the enormous structure includes a total of 1,037 rooms, including the stunning 4,400-seat Masonic Temple Theater, a 1,500-seat cathedral, an enormous 17,500-square foot drill hall (used for events as varied as business conventions and roller derby matches) and two large ballrooms.

With its imposing size, eerie exterior and a dizzying maze of dark rooms and hallways that positively drip with history, the Temple complex is prime horror-movie real estate. And thanks to Michigan’s then-generous tax incentives, two such films were currently shooting there on the day of our visit: “Hostel” and the Amy Heckerling horror-comedy “Vamps” starring Sigourney Weaver and Alicia Silverstone. Given the immense size of the complex, of course, I doubt the productions were ever forced to battle for space.

Hostel Part 3 III

Upon arriving, the film’s unit publicist quickly ushered myself and one other journalist inside, leading us first into an airless, vaguely depressing windowless room where we were given free reign over the cold, picked-over leftovers from that afternoon’s catering. Following that, we were guided through a labyrinth of crepuscular corridors to the day’s set – a space made up to look like an ordinary suburban basement, complete with stairs leading down from the non-existent home upstairs. In the crowded room next door, grips, production assistants, ADs, technicians and other assorted members of the crew scurried about in the near-dark, preparing to shoot an apparently-violent climactic scene that we never actually had the opportunity to see being filmed.

But no matter. Model/actress/music-video vixen Kelly Thiebaud – a statuesque brunette – was brought over a few minutes after we entered the claustrophobic space to talk about playing “Amy”, the fiancee of lead character “Scott” (Brian Hallisay). Sadly for the wide-eyed beauty, she wouldn’t be traveling to Vegas with the production later that month once they’d finished shooting in the Motor City.

I’m only doing the beginning and the end [of the movie],” she told us. “They go off to their bachelor party and I’m not around, of course. So I’m not a part of any of the like slaughtering or anything like that, until the end! Until the end, yeah…then I get to have a little fun, you know?

She laughed then, and later revealed that the basement set currently being prepped would serve as the location of a blood-drenched third-act twist. Thankfully Thiebaud isn’t squeamish.

I don’t get queasy. Blood doesn’t bother me or like body parts being chopped off or anything like that,” she told us. “The psycho-thriller movies I get kind of freaked out about. I can’t watch them by myself. But like blood, and gory stuff like that, I’m fine with.

At one point during the interview, Thiebaud set off a whoopee cushion that I hadn’t seen previously, and for a few brief seconds I actually believed I’d just witnessed the rare occurrence of an extraordinarily beautiful woman farting publicly. But no. The presence of the gag device was all in the name of creating some on-set levity.

I’ve been like cracking jokes with [director Scott Spiegel] with my whoopee cushion and everything like that,” she told us before going on to praise the helmer. “[He] just [has] a lot of energy and [gets] really excited…he makes you feel really good.

A longtime friend of Sam Raimi and Bruce Campbell, Spiegel co-penned “Evil Dead II” with the former and wrote and directed the 1999 direct-to-video “From Dusk Till Dawn” sequel as well as the low-budget ’89 supermarket-slasher “Intruder”. He also formed Raw Nerve Productions alongside “Hostel I-II” writer/director Eli Roth and franchise producer Boaz Yakin, neither of whom, notably, is listed in the IMDB credits for “Hostel: Part III”.

I haven’t seen him on set,” said Thiebaud of Roth. “No, not at all. I mean, I know he’s one of the producers but um…he hasn’t been here.

Following our brief interview with the actress, production designer Robb Wilson King, who served in the same capacity on the second film alongside Roth and received his first credit as such on Wes Craven’s 1982 comic-book adaptation “Swamp Thing”, took us on an extended tour of the historic complex.

With a head of long, wavy gray hair and a seemingly boundless enthusiasm for his job, King certainly looked the part of the old-school creative type as he breathlessly took us through several sets, most memorably a room on one of the upper floors that had been transformed into a Las Vegas hotel suite and the complex’s cavernous aforementioned drill hall, dressed up to look like the high-tech Vegas gambling operation run by the Hunting Club.

King, whose other horror credits include Steve Miner’s “Friday the 13th Part III”, Sean S. Cunningham’s “The New Kids” and Craven’s “The Hills Have Eyes Part II”, had done a superb job altering the interiors of the old building to suit the film’s Sin City setting, particularly given the presumably humble budget he was given to work with.

The walk-through also gave us the chance to take in some of the complex’s other spectacular sights; I can still picture the darkened, once-vibrant bowels of the rooms and passageways we traveled through – the richly detailed woodwork, gothic chandeliers and delicate ceiling frescoes speaking to the heart and dedication that had gone into its construction. Taking in the bruised, haunted beauty of the complex was an alternately distressing and awe-inspiring experience, a feeling that could easily describe my reaction to the city itself – a desolate, undernourished metropolis whose glorious past seemed to echo through the gray, barren streets and off the faded exteriors of its spectacular skyscrapers.

Hostel Part 3 III

This city has great bones, you know?” said John Hensley, best known for his role as Matt McNamara in “Nip/Tuck” who here stars as “Justin”, one of the four unlucky bachelor party attendees in the film. “And it provides such a fantastic environment. …I was really I guess sort of wary of coming here to shoot this movie. Only because I thought ‘how can you shoot a movie set in Vegas in Detroit?’ And I kinda get it now. It sort of offers a little bit of everything to everyone.

Interestingly, Hensley originally auditioned for a role in the first “Hostel” but was beat out for the part by actor Jay Hernandez.

I really loved that script; actually it reminded me…structurally of ‘From Dusk ‘Til Dawn’“, Hensley told us when he sat down for an interview. “And you know, I tend to be a little apprehensive about sequels in general, but when I read ‘Hostel III’, to me, in all honesty…while it certainly [keeps] the elements of having the Hunting Club, and grotesque and gruesome killings, story-wise it’s a real departure from the other two, in that I feel personally that this story is a little more evolved. What I really like about it is to me it’s very reminiscent of ‘The Hangover’, except everybody dies.

The film also, according to the actor, has something to say about where we are as a country.

It’s very reflective, I think, on the sort of decadent nature of Americans in particular at this point,” he said, liberally extrapolating on the film’s premise. “I think it’s no mistake that it takes place in America. Not just for a change of venue and location. I mean, in this movie we’re introduced to the concept of people betting on when another human being’s going to die. Or when another human being is going to start begging for their family. There’s an actual betting room where people can play the odds of when this poor bastard who’s getting his face peeled off is gonna start screaming for mercy. To me, that’s a legitimate comment on where we’re going. If you turn on your television, it’s stomach-turning the bullshit that’s packaged for entertainment today. It’s decadent, you know? And decadence, historically speaking…is one of the biggest symptoms of a society’s collapse.

Whether you buy into the metaphorical weight Hensley ascribes to the film’s scenario or not, the character he plays is quite literally on the verge of collapse.

He’s got a condition where he has to walk with a crutch,” he explained. “And it sort of plays on the fact that while he’s one of the guys, he’s not one of the guys. He’s sort of the constant outsider. He doesn’t get the girl, you know? They go to a bar, he knows he’s the one out of the four that’s going home alone. And this sort of inspires a trace of anger in him that offers him I think the ability to look at things with that cynical eye. …You know, he’s not really subject to the allure of a pretty girl because he knows there’s not a chance in hell he’s gonna get her. So he can sort of see that his friends are getting taken without really knowing where or why, if that makes sense.

As with Thiebaud, Hensley had had no contact whatsoever with Roth by the time of our visit. Here he is, responding to a question about the amount of creative control given to Spiegel as a director in a franchise that up to this point had been Roth’s creative brainchild:

“You know what, I can’t speak for Eli, I don’t know Eli, you know what I mean?” he said. “I’ve had no sort of interaction with him. But I can certainly tell you as an actor working on this that Scotty’s enthusiasm serves as the fuel, the pump, [with] which this machine runs…so yeah, perhaps you’re right. I really have no idea, but whoever is pulling the strings behind the scenes has certainly seemed to entrust Scotty with what thus far has proven to be a pretty legitimate franchise.

A franchise, of course, which is known for its top-notch gore effects – the creation of which were spearheaded by Howard Berger in the first two films and by Berger’s former partner Robert Kurtzman here.

We’ve got some serious players on the effects side of this thing, which is kind of great to show up and see that you’ve got people like Gary [Jones]…and all those guys like just really throwing it down in a pretty significant way,” said Hensley. “As you all know better than I, that’s a pretty vital component of any movie like this.

Another vital component of any “Hostel” movie is, of course, the assortment of beautiful women which serve as the bait to reel in the Hunting Club’s unsuspecting victims, and in this third entry that bait comes in the form of actresses Sarah Habel and Zulay Henao, who play a pair of enticing Vegas call girls.

We’re the temptresses of the deal, obviously,” said Habel, a fair-skinned brunette.

But not so much the way it’s been in the past couple of movies,” added Henao, a chipper Colombian-American beauty. “We’re kind of the victims in a sense as well.

Hostel Part 3 III

Indeed, in “Hostel: Part III” the women are under the impression they’ve been paid to entertain the members of the bachelor party and nothing more. When they figure out what’s really going on, Habel is the one who comes out swinging.

My girl is…hard core,” Habel told us. “She’s tough, tougher than the guys in a lot of ways. It’s fun for me. If you really knew me, I’m not very tough. It’s a fun kind of reversal for me personally.

[My character is] more shy and more earthy, they call it,” noted Henao, before adding: “I’ve never played a hooker before. So it’s pretty fun to go through the thoughts in your mind and just kind of create a backstory for them, have fun with the whole wardrobe and just kind of the whole seduction aspect of it. It’s fun.”

Depending on which actor you talk to, the messier aspects of working in horror can also be a part of the appeal. While she wasn’t clear on whether her character gets killed in “Hostel: Part III” or not, Habel has “bitten the dust” in several earlier roles.

I’ve ‘died’ four times in my life,” she said of her acting career thus far, which includes a role in another direct-to-DVD threequel, “The Butterfly Effect 3: Revelations”. “It’s always the most fun. I love to be a part of the gore. Just to be able to see what they can do with the effects makeup. That’s a whole different part of the game. It’s cool and it’s an art form in itself and I love to be a part of it because you know it’s not real. I like the gore in that it’s sort of imaginative in these movies.

[SPOILER ALERT] Again, while Habel left her own character’s fate up in the air, Henao couldn’t help but drop a few hints as to the nature of her call girl’s gory end.

I’m not getting killed or chopped up in a typical way. It’s pretty gross,” she said. “Let’s put it this way: I was going to have a double because it’s so messed up.

Yummy.

The last of the day’s interviews was not with Spiegel, unfortunately (we were told he was too busy to speak with us), but with actor Chris Coy, who plays “Travis”, the “number one henchman” of “Flemming” (played by German actor Thomas Kretschmann), the manager of the Vegas hostel where Scott and his friends are lured.

He’s…kind of a collector of unlucky souls I guess,” said Coy when he sat down with us. “Once in the hostel, I’m kind of like the garbage man insurance policy, whatever. If shit goes bad then I take everybody else and get the hell out of dodge.

Coy himself knows a few things about hostels – he was living in one when the first “Hostel” hit theaters in 2006.

I was in a band in L.A. and we were getting kicked out of hostels left and right,” he told us. “[At the time the movie came out] we were staying at this hostel on Sunset called The Vibe and there was a word on top of it that just said ‘Hostel’ and it was all bloody and shit and I didn’t know that there was a movie coming out called ‘Hostel’ [that The Vibe was promoting]. I just thought that was the sign for that hostel and that was a really strange choice, you know?

Coy noted that the extreme change in location for this third installment is a large part of the new film’s appeal.

The other two, it’s like if you go to the middle of nowhere, you might get chopped up. Well, duh,” he said. “In this one, it’s like, Vegas. You can be on your way to lose your money and end up losing your life, just get snatched up. So it’s different in that aspect. …This one definitely has it’s share of torture in it, but there’s kind of like a good story going on too.

Not to mention more than a few red herrings.

There’s…so many misdirects, so many times where you say to yourself, ‘I know what’s going to happen’ and then [he claps his hands together]. I’ve been a fan of horror my whole life and I was surprised over and over again reading the script,” he said. “They did a really good job with misdirects, especially in the opening.

The film also gave Coy, an admitted long-time horror fanatic, the opportunity to work with Spiegel, a man who played a role in some of his favorite horror films.

‘The Intruder is this great horror film that he made years and years ago. It’s one of the greatest slasher films ever, if you ask me. [And] of course ‘Evil Dead’ and ‘Evil Dead 2’, ” he said. “So it’s a dream. He’s fucking awesome.

Like many horror fans, Coy enjoys the “guilty pleasure” splatter flicks as much as the more prestigious titles in the genre.

[I] even [like] the shitty Bruce Campbell stuff,” he told us. “I love bad horror films too. There’s something awesome about that, where there is no story of value whatsoever and it’s just blood and guts. Sometimes that’s exactly what you want.

Interviews

“Be Not Afraid”: Andrea Perron Shares the Chilling True Story Behind ‘The Conjuring’ [Interview]

Published

on

Pictured: 'The Conjuring'

Welcome back to DEAD Time. I hope you left a light on for me because this month we’re going inside The Conjuring house to find out the real story of what happened to Carol and Roger Perron when they moved their five daughters into a house in Burrillville, Rhode Island in the early 1970s.

In 2013, director James Wan unleashed the terrifying horror film The Conjuring, which was based on the case files of paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren and told the story of a family tormented by a demonic force after moving into their new home. In real life, the Warrens did investigate the activity in the Perron home, but the story goes a bit differently. You may think you know what really happened inside that house based on the horror movie alone, but you would be mistaken. The true story is much, much scarier.

Bloody Disgusting was delighted to have the opportunity to chat with Andrea Perron, the oldest of the five Perron daughters, who was witness to the paranormal activity in the family’s home. Andrea is a lecturer and the author of the trilogy of books, House of Darkness House of Light, which tells the story of what her family experienced while living in the house in Rhode Island for a decade. Read on for our exclusive interview.


Bloody Disgusting: Your family moved into the old Arnold Estate in 1970, correct? How long after you moved into the house did your family begin to experience unusual activity?

Andrea Perron: We bought the house in December of 1970, but we didn’t move in right away because my mother didn’t want to move during Christmas. My mother found the farm for sale and our family went to the farm a number of times and we loved it and we all felt like it was home to us. It was an original colonial home and a farm and 200 acres of land it was a big deal. My parents paid $72,000 for the house and back in 1970 that was a lot of money. All of the times we visited the house with Mr. Kenyon, who was the owner, none of us remembered having anything strange or otherworldly or mystical happen. We just enjoyed the property and the land, and the place itself was just so incredibly enticing. None of us have any memory of seeing anything strange or weird there until the day we moved in. It was as though the spirits were all just holding their breath [laughs] waiting for us to get there and live there.

The first thing that happened was my father opened up the back of the moving truck and handed me a box. We were in the middle of a snow and sleet and ice event, and the wind was whipping around, and it was freezing cold. I went into the nearest door with the box that was marked kitchen and my mother had already come in with my baby sister April and had gone into the kitchen. April was only five, she was too young to help unpack or help unload boxes, so she just stayed with mom. I walked into the parlor and took a right into the living room and Mr. Kenyon was packing a box of his wife’s china. I stopped and started chatting with him and then I picked up the box and turned to go into the kitchen through the front foyer, and there was a man standing there that I thought was oddly dressed. He seemed like flesh and blood to me to the extent that as I walked past him, I said, “Good morning, sir.” I didn’t see him when I walked into the room, but he was standing in the corner of the door when I picked up the box. So, I walked into the kitchen, and I remember asking my mother who that man was with Mr. Kenyon. Her response was, “There’s nobody with Mr. Kenyon. His son is on the way, but he’s not here yet.” So, I’m sure at the age of twelve, I assumed that a neighbor had stopped by, and my mom didn’t know it.

I went back outside to the moving van and meanwhile, my sister Christine walked in, and she saw him and walked into the kitchen and asked my mom the same question. Mom was busy; she had discovered that Mr. Kenyon had not packed anything in the kitchen. So, Christine asked who the man was. Then my sister Cindy walked through with her box, and she saw him and asked mom about the man that was with Mr. Kenyon and made some comment that he was dressed funny. Then Nancy walked in behind Cindy and said, “Cindy, did you see that man with Mr. Kenyon? I did, but he just disappeared.” That was our introduction to the farm, and it all happened within the first five minutes. Right before he left, Mr. Kenyon asked my father to go for a walk with him. He said to my father, “Roger, for the sake of your family, leave the lights on at night.” My father didn’t know how to interpret that statement. In his mind, Mr. Kenyon was saying that we were moving into a new house with one bathroom on the first floor and the girls would be sleeping upstairs, and that he should leave lights on, so the kids don’t go tumbling down the stairs in the middle of the night. That’s how he interpreted what Mr. Kenyon said to him. Over the first few months we were living there, we were told by various people in the area that there was never a time when it was dark outside that every light in the house would not be on.

BD: I read that you described the house as “a portal cleverly disguised as a farmhouse.” What led you to believe the house was a portal?

AP: It wasn’t just the house, it’s the property. The barn is as active as the house is. And the property is as active as both the house and the barn. There’s an awful lot of elemental activity. There’s tons of extraterrestrial activity there. And I think it has something to do with the fact that the farm is built on top of an ancient river which was lost during the last Ice Age. It’s known as the Lost River of New Hampshire, but it actually runs all the way underground. It’s buried about 700 feet underground. And on certain days when the water is very heightened and rushing, you can actually feel the vibration of it in the land. And you can lay on the stone walls and feel the stones vibrating from the river rushing underneath our feet. And it goes directly underneath the farm, but also there are two creeks or tributaries to the Nipmuc River, which runs right along the bottom of the property just beyond the stone wall that marks the backyard. So, the river is maybe 700 or 800 yards away.

I think it has something to do with all the water that it is surrounded by. Somebody sent me a drone shot of the farm from high enough up that it was probably, the drone was probably at least 3,000 feet. And it was the most interesting photograph that I have ever seen of the farm because from the angle that the shot was taken directly over it, it looks like a pyramid in the middle of a forest.

BD: Do you have an idea of how many spirits or entities you were dealing with in the house?

AP: Well, I can tell you that there were at least a dozen of them that we were very familiar with that we saw over and over and over again. Another interesting thing too is that the, none of us had any fear of this spirit that we saw that first day moving in. It was, it was not that kind of a vibe at all. In fact, he appeared to be very sweet-natured and cheerful, and he was really focused on Mr. Kenyon. But within the first couple of nights that we lived there, my sister Cindy came crawling into bed with me and she was obviously upset. She was only eight years old and asked if she could sleep with me. And I said, “Of course.” Then I pulled back the quilt and she hopped down.

I’m like, “What’s wrong?” And she said that she could hear voices in her room. Well, the upstairs of the house, every door opens into the next bedroom. And we had all of the doors open because the house was cold and that was the way, you know, to keep the heat moving instead of being trapped in one room or the other. And it was a new house to us even though it was 250 years old. And so, we always left the doors open between our bedrooms. And when she came in, she kept saying, “I hear voices. There’s voices in the room and I’m scared and it got louder and louder. I can’t believe you didn’t hear it.” I can’t believe it didn’t wake you up.” And at first, she was at that time sharing a room with Christine. And my sister Christine has a tendency to talk in her sleep from time to time.

So, I think I just assumed that Chris was doing that. And I asked her, and she said, “No, it’s not me.” She said, “It’s a whole bunch of voices and they’re all talking at the same time. And they’re all saying the same thing.” So naturally I asked her what they were saying, and her response was, “There are seven dead soldiers buried in the wall. There are seven dead soldiers buried in the wall” over and over and over. And she said all the voices were what you would describe as monotone, even though she did not use that word. She didn’t know that word at that time. But she said they all sounded the same. Like they were all talking together, and they all had basically the same voice. And they were all saying the same thing at the same time. And they were all around her bed to the point where the floorboards were shaking. The bed was shaking. And she put the pillow over her head to try to muffle the sound. And when it became so loud that she couldn’t tolerate it anymore, that’s when she jumped out of bed and ran into my room and got in bed with me. And about three years ago, the house, I mean, nothing could be buried in the walls of the house because the house is just clapboard with horsehair plaster. That’s it. There’s no insulation. There’s no, you know, there’s some eaves that go up under the roof line. But there’s just, there’s no place that bodies could have ever been stored or hidden.

So, it didn’t make any sense. But over the years other people speculated maybe there’s someone buried out near the retaining wall behind the house or down around the stone walls. And so, the previous owner, not the woman that owns it now, but the previous owners had some people come in with ground penetrating radar. And sure enough, they found seven distinct anomalies under the stone wall at the bottom of the property just before you go into the cow pasture. And because it is illegal to exhume anything in the state of Rhode Island, all they could do is offer the photographs as evidence. But there it is. There are seven distinct images that are buried just behind the stone wall on the side of the cow pasture. And that’s where they found whatever they found. But when you consider that that house was completed as it stands now in 1736, the property was originally deeded in 1680. And the house was finished as it is now 40 years before the signing of the Declaration of Independence. And so, it really is truly an original colonial home. And it survived the Revolutionary War.

It survived the door rebellion. The King Phillips War, the Civil War. And at the time of the Civil War, the owners, and it was all through marriage. It was eight generations of one extended family that built and then lived in the South for hundreds of years. And we were the first outsiders. We have absolutely no familial attachment to the Richardson family or the Arnold family. And that house was passed through marriage because at that time women were not allowed to own property. So, through marriage it became the Arnold estate, but it actually is the Richardson Arnold homestead.

The Real ‘Conjuring’ House – Photo Credit: Visit Rhode Island

BD: At what point did Ed and Lorraine Warren become involved? There were a few things I read that made it sound like they just showed up at your house because they’d heard about the case.

AP: Yes, they really did. They just showed up at our house. Just one day they just showed up.

BD: So, your family had no idea they were coming?

AP: Well, it’s actually a little bit more complicated than that. We’d already been there for about two and a half years. A group of college students came to the house. Keith Johnson and his twin brother, and some of their friends, were paranormal investigators. And Keith said that my mother had called him and asked him to come check the house out. And my mother said, “I never called anybody.” I never told anybody other than our closest friends about the activity in the house.” Our attorney, Sam, knew. Our babysitter, Kathy, knew. And my mother’s friend, Barbara, knew. And she can’t remember anybody else that she ever said a word to about it. It was a very taboo subject back then. And, yeah, nobody wanted to open Pandora’s box. It was way more than a can of worms. It was just not something that people would talk about except for some of my peers at school, kids that had grown up in that town and knew the reputation of the house, which we were never warned about before we moved in. But, you know, I guess the best way to look at this is that the college students that came, we will never know why they showed up. Keith said my mother called him.

My mother said, “I never called anybody.” But there was some reason, and this is a spirit thing. There is some reason that he was drawn to that house and brought his team and had such extraordinary experiences on the one afternoon that they spent there that he sought out. Ed and Lorraine Warren, he and his team sought them out. They were speaking. His team was from Rhode Island College, and the Warrens were doing a lecture in the fall of that year at the University of Rhode Island. And they told the Warrens about our predicament and where we lived and who we were. The Warrens came the night before Halloween in 1973. It was either the night before Halloween or the night after Halloween. When they showed up at the door, my mother let them in the house. It was freezing out and she offered them a cup of coffee and presumed that they were lost because the farm is very remote. And then they identified themselves. My mother had absolutely no idea who they were. She had never heard their names before. And Mrs. Warren walked over to our old black stove in the kitchen, and she put her hand over her eyes and her other hand on the corner of the stove and became very quiet. And she said, “I sense a malignant entity in this house. Her name is Bathsheba.” Now, Mrs. Warren knew absolutely nothing about the history of the house or the area. Nothing. And she plucked that name out of thin air.

Bathsheba Sherman never lived in that house. She lived at the Sherman farm, which was about a mile away. There were only a few homesteads in the area at that time. She was born in 1812 and she died in 1885. And there were stories that she was in that house and had an infant in her care and that the baby died. The autopsy revealed that a needle had been impaled at the base of its skull and it was ruled that the baby’s death was from convulsions. My mother only found one article about it and it was stored in the archives of Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts. She read about an inquest in the town of Burillville, Rhode Island. So, there was apparently a hearing in the neighboring town of Gloucester. And apparently there was an inquest and Bathsheba was questioned by a judge about her involvement with the death of the child. And apparently, she was very convincing that she had absolutely nothing to do with it. So it never went to a jury. There was never a formal indictment. It was let go and she was dismissed from the inquest. But in the court of public opinion, this young woman who had just married Judson Sherman was tried and convicted in the court of public opinion. And there were all kinds of accusations and innuendos and rumors that circulated around her for years and years, all the years of her life, that she had something to do with it.

Oh my God, if you were to ever go there and just go to a few of the graveyards around that farm, you would stumble over one little, tiny gravestone after another after another. I mean, infant mortality rates were through the roof. And it was actually bad luck to name your baby before it reached one year old. And Bathsheba Sherman was by some, I guess, accused of practicing witchcraft. She was apparently a very beautiful woman and the other women in town were threatened by her. It was back in the time when folklore and old wives tales and the accusation of being a witch could get you killed up in San Luis, which was just like an hour north of where we were living. And had it been a little bit different time, she could have paid with her life for being accused of that. But instead, it was just a vicious rumor that circulated that she had killed the baby for making a deal with the devil for eternal youth and beauty. We listen to all of that now and say, “Well, that’s just stupid. You know, that’s just superstitious nonsense. The woman would not be buried in the middle of hallowed ground in the Riverside Cemetery in Harrisville next to her husband and all of her children had there been any proof that she was a practicing witch.” I will spend the rest of my life defending her because even though I don’t know for certain if she had anything to do with the death of that child, I don’t think it’s fair to accuse someone of murder unless you have some evidence as proof. And there was no evidence back then. There was no DNA. There was nothing. And so, I just don’t think that she had anything to do with that.

I think that it was a very unfair condemnation of her. But unfortunately, the Warrens were asking my mother to be able to do an investigation of the house. My mother told her what she knew about the history of the house. After Lorraine came up with that name, my mother said, “Well, I’ve been doing some historical research on this property and some surrounding properties in the area.” And she showed Lorraine her notebook that was filled with stories and birth certificates and death certificates. On her second or third visit, Mrs. Warren asked for the notebook, and it was filled with descriptions of the spirits in the house. It was filled with drawings of the spirits that my mother had seen. And Mrs. Warren asked if she could borrow that thick notebook of absolutely invaluable information. And she wanted to make Xerox copies of it, so it tells you what time in history that was. My mother begrudgingly handed it over to her with the promise that she would get it back. But she never did return it. Mrs. Warren kept it. It was our understanding that when the movie The Conjuring was made that that notebook was sold as part of her case files. And it’s gone. We never ever saw it again. My mother asked for it back.

My mother felt that it was part of her legacy to her children. Mrs. Warren perceived it to be a haunted item and didn’t think that it belonged in the house. So, she told my mother she would return it, but then she never did and like 15 years later, she sold it. A number of things that we had found on the property went missing when they came one night with their team. It was the night of the séance that they foisted upon my mother, insisting that she was being oppressed and that she was right on the verge of possession and if they didn’t intervene on her behalf at that point that she would be lost. That was the most horrible night of my life. I was 15 when that happened. And I remember it like it just happened. It was absolutely traumatizing. I suffer PTSD from it. I swear to you I do. It was just a few minutes, but in those few minutes, I saw the dark side of existence and that is why I choose deliberately to live in the light. I will never let anything that evil touch me. I never will.

The Warrens only came maybe five times over the course of about a year and a half. And the last time that they came was after the séance. And when my father threw them out of the house that night along with their entourage, they left that house with my mother unconscious on the parlor floor. They came back to see if she had survived that night because when they left that house, they didn’t know if she was dead or alive. It was horrible. I don’t want to disparage them. They can’t defend themselves. Mrs. Warren, I think her heart was in the right place. I mean, she was a collector of objects. Their paranormal museum didn’t make itself. Every investigation she ever did, she had something from that investigation that went into their paranormal museum. And I know people personally who’ve been through it and have seen items that disappeared from our house the night of the séance that are under glass in that museum now.

BD: Do you know if that notebook was in their paranormal museum?

AP: No, it never was. Not that I know of. No, that was kept separately.

BD: What were your interactions with the Warrens like during the times that they were doing their investigation?

AP: Mrs. Warren didn’t really have anything much to do with us, with the children. She kind of turned us over to Ed, and he’s the one that interviewed us individually. My little sister, April, had a friend, a spirit friend, up in the chimney closet between the first and second bedroom. And she wouldn’t tell them about him. And he had identified himself to her as Oliver Richardson. But she wouldn’t tell Ed about him because she was afraid that the Warrens would make him go away and she loved him. And she felt very protective of him. And he was basically the same age as she was in life when he died. So, they had a very strong connection that she was not willing to jeopardize by telling them anything about him. But the rest of us just spilled our guts. It was kind of cathartic. It was a relief to be able to talk about the activity in that house with someone who believed us.

The night that Mrs. Warren originally came to the house, Mrs. Warren told my mother that I was in the room. I was a witness to this conversation. And she told my mother that the reason, even though she had known about our predicament for a number of weeks, she decided that she and her husband would not come out to the house until Halloween was because she said that’s when the veil has thinned. And I remember my mother looking at her and then kind of not laughing because it was certainly not a laughing matter, but kind of this incredulous grunt came out of her like, well, and then she just looked at her and she said, “Well then, I guess every day is Halloween at this house and there is no veil. I don’t know what you’re talking about, this veil. There’s no veil here. We share this with a lot of spirits.” One of the things that my mother resented about the film The Conjuring—I understand why they did what they did. I get it. But what they tried to do is juxtapose the devout Roman Catholic paranormal investigators, Ed and Lorraine Warren, against the godless heathen parent family. You know, like we were, I won’t say pagan because pagan is a religion also, but that we didn’t have any connection to the church. And my mother took great exception to that. She didn’t even watch the film until it had been out on DVD for more than a year.

I thought that she would be very upset about the way she was represented in the film. Some of it she thought was just so ridiculous that it was not anything that she would bother to take exception to. But the one thing that she was really offended by was that our portrayal was that of a family that had no faith. And nothing could have been further from the truth. My father was born and raised in a staunch Catholic tradition as the eldest of six boys. Church was an integral part of his childhood and his family’s life. He went to parochial school, and he served as an altar boy for years of his youth. And when he graduated from high school, he went into the Navy with the intention of serving the country and then going immediately into seminary to become a priest. That’s what my father’s life plan was. And in the interim, he met my mother and fell in love. And so, the priesthood thing was out the window. But my mother, who he met in Georgia, was a Southern Baptist. And she had to convert to Catholicism in order to marry him. All of us were baptized and all of us made our first communion and all of us were raised in the Roman Catholic Church.

It was the second year, the second Easter that we were at the farm. April was seven years old, and we went to Easter Mass, and we filled our own pew. There were so many of us. And at the very end of Mass, the priest said, “and the father and the son and the Holy Ghost.” And April turned and just with her big blue eyes just looked up at my mother and she said in her big girl, outdoor voice, “See, Mom, God has ghosts just like we do.” And every single head in that church turned and looked at our family. And as we got up to leave, the priest followed us out and he came up to my father and he said, “Mr. Perron, I would appreciate it if you would take your family and worship elsewhere.” My father was so angry and so hurt that he felt abandoned by the religion that he had invested himself into his whole life. I have rarely seen my father cry and he cried on the way home that day. As we were all getting out of our big Pontiac Bonneville car, which we called the Catholic Mobile because it had room for seven plus luggage and the family dog, my mother said, “Girls, if you want to know God, go to the woods. Go to the woods.” We never ever went back to church again. Ever. Our family has never been together in a church ever since then.

BD: That’s awful for a priest to react that way to a child.

AP: The priest was afraid. He was afraid that he had that weird family from the old, haunted house up on Round Top Road in St. Patrick’s Parish. And that others might not come back to the parish if we were there. I was already in catechism classes to make my confirmation and, you know, all my friends were Catholics. Everybody went to St. Patrick’s. I would just go and kind of sit in the back of the class and all my peers were there who were getting ready to make their final confirmation into the church. It was the nuns who were teaching us. But one night, the priest was there, and he recognized me. And sure as hell, not a week later, my parents received a letter from the Bishop, who was the head of the diocese of Providence, informing my parents that I was not welcome in confirmation classes because I asked too many questions. That was it. There was something about living in that house that made you more faithful. And I found out very early on that when all hell was breaking loose in that house and there was a lot of negative energy swirling in the house, or I felt threatened or any of my sisters felt threatened, all you ever had to do was say, “Oh God, help me. “And it stopped instantly. Good conquers evil and love conquers fear. And hatred is not the opposite of love. Fear is the opposite of love and hatred is born of fear.

I believe in my heart that the Warrens had the best of intentions. 40 years later, when I saw Mrs. Warren again out in California when she and I had been invited to preview The Conjuring before it was released, she recognized me immediately and came and wrapped her arms around me. During those three days that we spent in California together, she told me that she and Ed were in over their heads the moment they crossed the threshold of that house. They just didn’t know it. She admitted terrible mistakes were made. They didn’t mean to stir up activity, but she was a bona fide clairvoyant. She had great abilities, and she didn’t always use them to their greatest good. And I think that that was because of her fascination but also her reverence and respect for spirits. She knew that spirits were real, but unfortunately, because of her sensing Bathsheba in the house, who was really only a neighbor—Her sense of that spirit’s presence is what changed everything. Because not only did she have a sense of her presence and we didn’t find out until five decades later that her husband, Judson Sherman, died on that property. We still don’t know how he died. One of my historian friends dug up that he died at the Arnold state. We don’t know how, but that would explain why her presence would be there. You know, spirits are free to come and go as they please.

They’re not locked into an earthbound, specific location. There are differences of opinion even within our own family about how free the spirits are. My sister Cindy will still argue with me about it. She believes that they’re attached to the farm because she said that when we moved, they loved us so much that if they could have come with us, they would have. My response to her is that the spirit that was standing behind Nancy on the front porch of that house the day the whole rest of the family left for Georgia was the spirit that was standing behind my sister Cindy when we arrived at the new house in Georgia. Same exact woman; same entity standing right behind her. And Cindy’s like, “No, no, it must have been somebody else. It must have been one of my guides because the spirits are stuck there. They’re trapped there. And I’m like, “No, they’re not, babe.”

‘The Conjuring’ Movie House – Photo Credit: J. Patrick Swope

BD: How much of what we see in The Conjuring really happened?

AP: There are so many discrepancies between The Conjuring and the real story that is documented in House of Darkness House of Light, the trilogy of books that I wrote that they are unrecognizable except for the names. Everybody that was associated with the film read my books, including the actors, except for maybe the youngest children couldn’t read them. But everybody, all the adults for sure, read the books and said, “Oh, hell no, we can’t tell this story,” because they were about to invest somewhere between $25 and $30 million into making this film. And it was based predominantly on the case files of Ed and Lorraine Warren. It says right on the movie trailer, case files of Ed and Lorraine. But I gave them permission to use anything that was in my books that was the actual story, the authentic telling of our family memoir. And they wouldn’t. The screenwriters, Chad and Carey Hayes, twin brothers, lovely men, wanted desperately to include elements of the true story and they wrote some of the stories into the screenplay. And every single time the suits at New Line Cinema and Warner Brothers sent the script back and said, “Take that out, redact it. We’re not going to run people out of the theater. We’re not going to make a movie that nobody will stay to watch to the end because they are terrified.” So, The Conjuring is a very toned-down version of events.

BD: Why didn’t they want to use it?

AP: They thought it was too scary; it was too real; it was too raw. It was, I mean, people who read my trilogy of books are changed. They are never the same again. When they come up for air after that deep dive, they think about everything differently. Nothing is ever the same. A lot of my readers over the years have deemed it interactive literature. They feel like by the time they’re done reading volume three, that they lived there with us, that they grew up with us, that they know every member of my family intimately well, and that they had the same experiences that we did. There’s something about this story that unlocks a person’s third eye and opens them to the netherworld in a way that nothing else ever has or ever could. Actually, the ability to expand human consciousness is not the most important part of the trilogy. House of Darkness House of Light got its title from my mother when I was about 300 pages into the first book. And she asked me what I was going to title the trilogy, and I told her I didn’t know. And she stood next to me at her old cherry desk right here in the room in which I’m sitting speaking with you right now. I wrote those books in this house. And she just looked at me and she said, “House of Darkness House of Light,” it was both. No comma, it was both. And so, there is no comma. It’s House of Darkness House of Light as one thing because my mother believes the same way that I do; that everything is energy, and everything is consciousness, and everything is one thing.

There is no delineation between natural and supernatural, between normal and paranormal. At least there isn’t for us. This is just how our lives are now. That you cannot experience what we did immersed in that environment for a decade and be unchanged by it. And I think the greatest value in me finding the courage to finally tell our story more than, I didn’t even start writing it until more than three decades after we had left. But I finally got to an age and a place in my own mind where I didn’t care how people were going to react to it anymore. I knew that we would be scrutinized. I knew that we would be belittled. I knew that there would be mean-spirited people out there that would attack our family. And instead, we were embraced by the paranormal community worldwide.

I would not be one of the very best-selling authors in this genre worldwide had it not been for The Conjuring. So, I don’t hold any grudges. The power of a well-made feature film and the images that are placed in people’s minds is what causes them to dig deeper. And based on a true story, well where’s the true story? Who wrote the true story? All they have to do is Google the name Perron and up come the books. They’ve been read all over the world. Hundreds of thousands of copies have been sold. And they’re selling better now than they did after the film came out. So, the story is getting around. And I think that the great value of the story is not the expansion of human consciousness. It is liberating people to tell their own story. Because so many people have been touched by spirits and they’re afraid to share it. They’re afraid to speak out. They’re afraid to be criticized and to be treated as somehow less than. Or I’ve often been asked, “Was there ever a time that you questioned your own sanity?” Oh, hell yes. And that is true of every member of my family. We saw things in that house that there’s no plausible explanation other than spirits are real.

We’re still learning things about that house and about the spirits who quote unquote live there, who dwell there. And I love them. I even love the cranky ones. I do because to me it doesn’t even matter who they were, that they still are is a freaking miracle. That is magical. That is cosmic forces beyond our comprehension. One of my famous quotations is very simple, but it’s very true—To be touched by a spirit is not a curse, but a blessing. It is that rare glimpse into the realm from which we come and will all inevitably return. And I end it with, be not afraid.

Continue Reading