Quantcast
Connect with us

Interviews

[Interview] Mary Lambert On the Spookier, More Tragic Original Ending She Shot for ‘Pet Sematary’

Published

on

mary lambert horror

This week, Mary Lambert‘s Pet Sematary has received a brand new release in the form of a restored 4K UHD transfer with new bonus features, but one thing that no release of the film (including this one) has come packaged with is the original ending.

As you’ve probably heard, Lambert reshot the ending of Pet Sematary with Dale Midkiff and Denise Crosby, giving us the ending we’re all familiar with. Rachel returns from the Micmac burial ground, horribly mutilated, and approaches Louis with a knife in hand. The ending Lambert originally shot was less gruesome and, in her own opinion, a bit scarier.

Rachel still returns from the grave, but with a little more ambivalence.

The original scene as written was more spooky and sad… tragic,” Lambert explained to us this week. “It was more like the clanging of the bell and Louis is sitting in the dark kitchen playing Solitaire. He’s waiting to see what will happen, and then Rachel comes back and you see that she only has on one high heel and she’s dead.”

It was more ambivalent [originally],” she continued. “It’s like this isn’t gonna be good but what is it gonna be. It kind of leaves a question mark. I like ambivalence, especially in an ending honestly because rarely in life is there a resolution, a clean, happy ending resolution where oh, we know exactly what’s going to happen now. They’re going to live happily ever after or they’re not gonna live happily ever after if it’s a tragic ending.”

It was just felt it needed more of a punch,” Lambert added, explaining why the change was made. “Honestly I think the ending that we have is less scary but more fun. You know that something really bad is now going to happen to Louis; that she’s going to rip his head off probably.”

Because the original ending wasn’t all that different from the one we’ve all seen, Lambert thinks it’s probably just not worth even including as a bonus feature.

It’s not that different really,” she told us. “Really the only thing that’s different is that the makeup. It was a whole new makeup design. She didn’t have half her head eaten away like she does [now]. The prosthetics in Pet Sematary were great. The guys who did it were great. So they went back and did a full on new design and did a face cast of Denise which we hadn’t done previously. That was Lance Anderson. He did a great job. If the previous ending were really different it might [be worth showing], but basically it’s the same thing. Louis is playing cards in the kitchen, the clock strikes midnight and Rachel comes back. It’s just how big she comes back. She comes back grotesque and holding a knife and ready to carve him up and eat him, whereas in the other one it’s more bittersweet. We know it’s not going to be what he wants. She’s not coming back as his wife.”

Ultimately, Lambert was grateful that Paramount executives suggested that she give Pet Sematary a more definitive ending.

I think it was a good call actually on the part of the studio to make that suggestion and also to pay for it,” Lambert admits. “It was probably Lindsay [Doran], she was great. She was one of the executives in charge that I worked really closely with.”

Pet Sematary is now available on 4K UHD, Blu-ray, DVD and digital formats.

Click to comment

Interviews

Paul Tremblay on Fighting AI with Horror in New Novel ‘Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep’

Published

on

Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep Review - Paul Tremblay AI Horror

Paul Tremblay didn’t start his writing career believing he’d be battling machines over the sanctity of his job, but like so many writers of his generation, the battle found him. In the years since Large Language Models (LLMs) and neural networks started gaining traction as an advertised shortcut to creativity, Tremblay has been active in lawsuits to prevent the use of his works in training AI models, and he’s found that, with each new project, he has to consider the possibility that some LLM, somewhere, is going to latch on to what he’s creating. 

“Now I feel like I’m thinking about, ‘Man, how am I going to write things that would be really hard or impossible for an AI to replicate?’,” Tremblay told me, speaking by Zoom from his home in Massachusetts. “Maybe some of that is ego. I’m sure every writer thinks, ‘Oh, an AI could never write what I write.’ Yes, I’d be lying if I said that wasn’t part of the thought process.”

While that’s something Tremblay might consider with any new work at this point in his career, the Bram Stoker Award-winning author of A Head Full of Ghosts, The Cabin at the End of the World, and many other novels and short stories tackled it in a more direct way with his latest book. Inspired by Philip K. Dick, Harlan Ellison, and the quirky humor of the Coen Brothers, Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep is Tremblay’s attempt at a sci-fi-horror mash-up that’s both darkly funny and existentially nightmarish. It’s also, in his own words, a screed against the movement by AI companies to supplant human artists. 

I didn’t want to make it too didactic, but no, I playfully described this book as an anti-AI screed,” he said. “This book, in particular, was driven by anger and frustration, for sure. Not every book is going to be driven that way.

Despite the emotions that fueled it, Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep does not read like a screed. Instead, wielding offbeat humor and tech concepts that feel both lived-in and frighteningly tactile, the book lays out tandem narratives all building to the same conclusion, each of them exploring our relationship to machine learning in a different way. One of these narratives belongs to Julia, a former gaming streamer looking for a new challenge in life, who gets a call from a California tech company with an interesting offer.

Paul Tremblay in documentary series “First Word on Horror”

The company has, it seems, implanted some new technology in a brain-dead middle-aged man which will, in theory, allow them to pilot the man’s body through a rudimentary, still-developing system of controls. Julia, with her gaming background, would be the pilot, in her own way just as much a test subject as the human vegetable she’s controlling. 

Julia is a Gen Z streamer with an omnivorous pop culture appetite, inspired by Tremblay’s own adult children, who riffs on The Big Lebowski constantly and calls her strange new meat puppet “Bernie” in reference to Weekend at Bernie’s. Her wide frame of reference, and her interest in art and stories far beyond video games, is in part informed by Tremblay’s own experiences with Gen Z, and in part a response to AI companies who scrape art and culture as a means of consuming it for reference without really experiencing a story. 

“I know that one of the arguments that OpenAI and other tech companies are trying to make is like, ‘Hey, you writers, you artists, you take pop culture, you take your influences, and you create something. That’s just the same thing that the bots are doing.’ And it’s just not,” Tremblay said. “I wanted to have Julia have her outlook informed by all this pop culture, and I wanted to make that feel really human as a way to show how inhuman the AI is.”

The other side of the story belongs to “Bernie,” who’s addressed in his point-of-view chapters as “You.” In these chapters, the technology in Bernie’s body starts to flicker images through his seemingly dead brain, delivering half-remembered imagery and perspective in a nod to the “hallucinations” of an AI model groping for understanding it can never reach. These chapters in particular show off Tremblay’s flair for formalist shake-ups, and echo the kind of hyperstimulated writing that Dick and Ellison made so influential. 

“I think it was more just the general Philip K. Dick feeling of ‘The world is so strange,'” Tremblay said. “He’s a lot funnier, I think, than maybe a lot of people credit him. That’s definitely what I was thinking of when writing the book.

Bernie’s chapters embody the strangeness of Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep, presenting imagery that’s at times puzzling, at times eerily filmic, and always unnerving. They also mirror Julia’s own journey in fascinating ways as the odd couple – the Gen Z gamer and the middle-aged vegetable – traverse the United States, and the tech in Bernie’s body wakes up to the possibilities of using his flesh for its own purposes. It’s a compelling narrative technique, but it presented some new writing challenges for Tremblay. 

“I quickly realized I couldn’t write this book the same way I have in the past,” he said. “By that, I mean all my other novels I had written in the order in which it was presented, even things that are nonlinear, which is most of them. I knew I couldn’t do that in this book. It’s not a spoiler, but hopefully the readers figure out pretty early that the Bernie chapters are a little bit of a preview of the next chapter from Julia, what’s actually happening with Julia. It’s all refracted from him.”

Mary Roach’s Stiff

Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep began with a simple image, inspired by Tremblay’s reading of Mary Roach‘s book chronicling the history of our treatment of corpses, Stiff. As he read, Tremblay imagined a body sitting on an airplane, remote-controlled by someone else. At the time, it was a “silly what-if” concept, filed away in his head. Years later, when he became an author suing a tech company to keep AI from scraping his work for ideas, it started to feel frighteningly plausible, taking the “silly what-if” into the territory of a high-concept horror show about what happens when we try to exploit and commodify uniquely human aspects of consciousness. 

“It stuck with me,” Tremblay said of that what-if imagery. “And then a few years later, when I was a part of the case suing OpenAI on behalf of writers, that what-if suddenly didn’t seem as silly. The more I learned about how that corporation operates and without really any sort of ethical thought to anything, I was like, ‘Oh, I’m going to play with that. That’s actually happening.”

So, what if someone actually in favor of generative AI picks up Tremblay’s self-described “anti-AI screed?” He hopes that, at the very least, he’s made the ride enjoyable in a distinctly human way that might begin to reshape the conversation. 

“I think that was another reason why I wanted to have the humor,” Tremblay said. “If people are reading this book who aren’t on the side of like, ‘Hey, LLMs taking authors’ books is bad,’ maybe if they read something that’s cut with some humor, that maybe they’ll be more easily swayed.”

Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep is now in bookstores everywhere. 

Dead but Dreaming of electric sheep

Continue Reading