Connect with us

Interviews

Doug Morrow: The Mastermind Behind ‘Orphan: First Kill’s Miraculous Transformation [Interview]

Published

on

Orphan 3 - Isabelle Fuhrman

When news broke that Isabelle Fuhrman would be reprising her role as Esther in a surprise prequel to the 2009 film Orphan, many were skeptical that the now 23 year old actress would be able to convincingly play a young child. At just ten years old, Fuhrman shocked audiences with her terrifying performance as a malevolent 30-something woman masquerading as an innocent little girl in Jaume Collet-Serra’s original film. As the title implies, William Brent Bell’s prequel Orphan: First Kill follows Esther (originally known as Leena) and her murderous adventures before being adopted by the Coleman family, including her bloody escape from the Saarne institute and her affinity for blacklight painting.

Concerns about Fuhrman passing for a child proved to be unfounded and she once again turned in a fantastic performance as the baby-faced killer. Fuhrman does look remarkably young, but even the accomplished actress couldn’t pull off such a bold transformation without a little help. Crucial to the verisimilitude of Orphan: First Kill’s outlandish premise is makeup effects artist Doug Morrow. The veteran MUA has been working in the industry for more than three decades and boasts impressive credits such as The X-Files, Capote, Godzilla, Hunter Hunter, Channel Zero, and Station Eleven. As makeup department head for Orphan: First Kill, Morrow painstakingly crafted a design to transform the mature actress into a believable child.

Bloody Disgusting sat down with the talented artist to talk about how he pulled off such an impressive metamorphosis. 


Bloody Disgusting: It’s no easy feat to essentially turn an adult actress into a 9 year old girl. How did you approach the makeup design for Esther’s character? 

Doug Morrow: Well, it all started several months before we started shooting. I met with Brent, the director, and he really wanted to try and use Isabelle. Of course I’d seen the original movie so I knew she had to be at least 20 years old by then. So we came up with an idea of doing what we call a proof of concept test. We took an actress here where I am in Winnipeg, someone I had worked with before who I knew was probably around the same age. I didn’t find out till later she was actually in her early 30s, but she looked quite young. She looked like she could be 23 or 24. I had worked with her before and had a lifecast of her so I just quickly created what we call appliances, pieces that you glue on to make her face look more rounded. I think I might have made some dentures for her too because little kids’ teeth they’re kind of less teeth and more gum. We got a photographer here in my studio and did the zoom thing with Brent. We shot a whole bunch of “before” photographs from all kinds of different angles and different lighting. Then I went away for two hours and made her up. Brent came back on zoom and we shot a whole bunch of “afters” in the makeup with different lighting and different angles. Then they took all those pictures and created a storyboard kind of template of how we would approach this with Isabelle. 

Once the go ahead was then given to try it with Isabelle, I had her face and her teeth cast in L.A. Then I did the same thing. I built some appliances for her, some dentures. This was during Covid so I couldn’t actually go to L.A. to do the test. I had a friend of mine in L.A. do the test and I think they built a little set. She shot some scenes. They kind of edited that together and that was given the go-ahead to use Isabelle. This was over several months. Then there were more tests. I built some smaller things around her mouth to kind of make it a little more rounded. Isabelle has such a youthful countenance. What I ended up doing was just traditional highlight and shadow beauty techniques. We also used the dentures. Brent’s great idea was to have contact lenses made that made her eyes look bigger. The eyes you’re born with are the same size throughout your life and your whole body catches up to your eyes so that’s why little kids look like they have such big eyes. We had these contact lenses made that made her irises look bigger. That helped too with making her look younger. And then of course there was great lighting and all the angles to help sell the whole thing. 

BD: How much of a collaboration was it working with William Brent Bell once filming began?

DM: It was a big collaboration. Once we got past the whole makeup, costume, and hair process it was more lighting and camera angles to give the illusion that she was still nine or ten. It was always a collaboration and that was what was great about working with Brent. He is a great collaborator and that doesn’t always happen on every movie. He’s just a terrific person to work with. 

Orphan First Kill review

BD: It’s interesting because in the first film we’re watching a child actress who is supposed to be in her thirties and in this film it’s the reverse, an adult actress playing a little girl. How much of the look of the first film did you use for inspiration? 

DM: We pretty much just went with Isabelle’s own features. We did borrow significantly with things like her adult teeth. I created dentures that I tried to match as closely as possible to what they did in the first film. We also had an effect where you see Isabelle taking out her little kid teeth and you see her adult teeth underneath. That was an interesting makeup chore to create because you had to have a special set of dentures that would fit on top of the other dentures without making it look like she has a hockey mouth guard in her mouth. [Laughs] Isabelle performed it perfectly. She made it look like it was just a natural thing that she did every day. But yeah, we didn’t borrow too much from what they did in the first movie. It was more just trying to keep Isabelle looking fresh-faced and rounded like a little girl.   

BD: How long was the transformation process for a day of filming? 

DM: We boiled it down to probably 35-40 minutes at the most. As you do a makeup look more and more every day you get faster so it was probably about half an hour give or take. Then there’s always touch ups during the day so it’s constant maintenance 

BD: What was it like working with Isabelle Fuhrman? 

DM: Isabelle was a great person to work with and a great collaborator. She had good ideas and was up for whatever was needed to create the illusion. She never complained about anything and was just a joy to work with. I’ve been doing this for 33 years now and whenever you work with an actor you always hope that it’s a good working relationship. You’re working really closely with someone, but I never assume that we’ve created a friendship. If that happens that’s great and she’s one of the people that a friendship developed. We keep in touch now. She actually worked with another actress who I became friends with. They did a movie four or five months ago in the tropics somewhere and figured out that they had both worked with me. So they texted me and were emailing me that they were working together. She’s a consummate professional and I think just did an amazing job. That was a very difficult thing to pull off and I think she did it incredibly.

BD: What was the biggest challenge that you had on the film?

DM: Well the biggest challenge was trying to make her look as young as possible. [Laughs] It wasn’t that difficult because she was only 23 and has a really youthful countenance on top of that. We also had some blood effects. There’s the big fight at the end where Julia (Stiles) and Isabelle get all bloody. Sometimes actors don’t like to be covered in blood but they both loved it and again approached it as total professionals. It took several days to film all that and we gave them both what we call sclera contact lenses to make them look like they have broken blood vessels in their eyes. Those aren’t just simple contacts you can pop in, these are big. They cover the front of your eyeball.  We had a contact lens tech, but they both did it really well. They were just great collaborators and didn’t mind [Laughs] at least in my presence didn’t mind too much being covered in blood. 

BD: There are so many scenes that I love, but my favorite is when Esther has stolen the car from Tricia. She’s riding down the road and she’s kind of kicking back. [Laughs] What was it like to be able to style her as an adult for a change or was most of that transformation her in the scene?

DM: Most of it was her in the scene because she’s putting on lipstick and she has sunglasses. For me it was really interesting because as we’re watching the shoot she’s portraying herself as this little girl. When we shot that scene it was actually really weird because it was like, “oh yeah she is an adult and she is an adult in the story.” [Laughs] So it was weird to see that character become an adult but it didn’t look like it was a forced kind of thing. That was her natural state and she was like, “oh yeah, I can finally be myself for a few minutes.” It was just fun to watch. I seem to remember Isabelle and I collaborating and conferring on the color of lipstick with Brent. 

BD: Well, red lipstick is not easy to pull off, especially not when you’re driving. [Laughs]

DM: No, definitely not. [Laughs] I think we chose one that was kind of a burgundy red because that kind of color can make you look more mature. And Isabelle pulled it off really well. 

BD: I want to back up a little bit and ask what made you want to become a makeup artist? 

DM: I’ve loved movies ever since I can remember. I was born in the late ‘60s so I loved all the old universal horror movies like Dracula and The Wolfman and Frankenstein. I don’t know why, but I was just drawn to the makeup aspect of it. In 1973 I saw the original Planet of the Apes and that just blew my mind. And that was it. I had to know how they did it and I wanted to do that. I was a little kid so I just wanted to work on Planet of the Apes movies until I got a bit older [Laughs] but I had to understand the process. It took years because back then we didn’t have YouTube and the internet and phones that you could use to look stuff up. It was quite a laborious task especially for a kid who was eight or nine going to the library trying to figure this out. There weren’t a lot of materials out there that showed how to do it. That’s how it started for me. I was always kind of experimenting with it and messing my face up. 

I had great parents who were very supportive.  I remember once when I was probably about ten or eleven, there used to be a product called Derma Wax which was like a nose putty you could put on your face and make a new nose or something. In our basement I noticed my parents had these bricks of something called Paraffin Wax and I figured, “oh it’s gotta be the same thing. They’re both wax.” [Laughs] So my mom melted a brick of the Paraffin Wax in a double boiler and I took it up to the bathroom and proceeded to put it on my face and make myself look like I was the melting man. [Laughs] I had this like molten brick of wax that I probably easily could have burnt myself. [Laughs] As I got older, I just experimented more and more. I was born and raised in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada and they didn’t make movies here when I was a kid. They only made movies in Hollywood. I was about twenty when I finally told my parents I wanted to try and do this for a living. I don’t know how I’m gonna do it but I want to try. They were very supportive. And here we are! [Laughs]

BD: Looking over your career, you’ve done a lot of work in the horror genre. What is it about horror that you love and what are the biggest challenges? 

DM: Well, I’ve always loved horror. One of my all time favorite movies is The Exorcist. I’m not really a blood and guts kind of guy. When I was younger I went through that phase and I still do movies that require that kind of stuff, but the appealing part about that aspect of horror is the technical issues in dealing with how you make it look like somebody’s throat is cut and blood shoots out. My real love though is more character makeup, making someone look old or like making Isabelle look younger. You can create an alien or a wolfman and people are gonna think that’s awesome, but they’re not gonna tell you that’s not what it looks like. But if you do old age makeup on somebody, everyone sees old people every day. We know what’s right and what’s wrong. So to be able to achieve that and make it look real is a great artistic feat which I find quite satisfying. That being said, of course, working on horror movies, you have more or less a lot of freedom to create neat characters. I did a movie in the spring where I got to create this really interesting character that you’ll see next year. And hey, there’s nothing more fun than putting blood on people and making them look like they’ve had their necks sliced or their heads chopped off. [Laughs] 

BD: What’s your favorite example of makeup effects and what’s your favorite transformation from your own career? 

DM: I’ve never really done a movie like The Lord of the Rings. Or there was a movie that came out in 1985 called Legend with Tom Cruise that had these incredibly amazing characters created by Rob Bottin. I’ve never done something that fantastical which I think would be a lot of fun. As far as my most favorite thing that I’ve ever created myself, I did a Canadian TV movie about a very well-known politician by the name of Jack Layton who passed away at age 61 from cancer. He was a beloved politician and had a lot of impact on Canada. I had to take this actor through different stages of his life and not only make him look like Jack Layton, but when he was younger he was heavier. Then he gets older and then he gets sick so there were a lot of technical and artistic challenges. It’s the only project I’ve ever worked on that when I watch it now I don’t think about how he’s got makeup on. I just watch it for the story and it never crosses my mind that he’s covered in prosthetics and shaved his head, he’s got a wig and fake mustache and contact lenses and dentures. So that’s the one that I’m most proud of. 

BD: Are there any monsters, villains, horror characters, or franchises on your bucket list that you would like to work with in the future? 

DM: Well now that they do Planet of the Apes all digital that’s gone. So that’s too bad. [Laughs] I’m just content working on projects where hopefully I can create more interesting characters. My greatest joy is doing aging makeup so if I can just keep doing those that would be great. Last year I did four projects that required aging stuff and I think I have another one that I’ll find out about today. But in terms of franchises, I mean it would be neat to work on a James Bond movie. Or something like “The Lord of the Rings” would be fun. I wouldn’t want to be in charge of a project that huge though. I think that would be too stressful. [Laughs.] Yeah I can’t really think of anything now. If I was back in the 70s, it would be Planet of the Apes! I would pay you to work on a Planet of the Apes movie. [Laughs]

BD: You’ve got a lot of really exciting projects in post-production right now like Painkiller, with Uzo Aduba and Matthew Broderick. And this is the one that really caught my eye: Violent Night with David Harbour as Santa Claus! Is there anything you can tell us about these or anything else exciting that you have coming up? 

DM: Painkiller, that was a lot of fun. It was kind of a last minute thing. They needed aging makeup for an actor so I quickly built it and went to Toronto and worked on that. And I loved it. Violent Night was a hard movie. There were a lot of makeup effects, a lot of blood effects and then turning David into Santa Clause. I was the prosthetic makeup designer but Kristy Greig was the makeup department head. She did David most times. Sometimes I would help and then Kristy got Covid at the end of the shoot so I did David for the last week. It was crazy. It was a lot of work but it was a lot of fun. I think when that movie comes out people are just gonna be blown away by it. Nothing like this has come out that I can think of in a long time and it’s just so different and so fun. 

BD: I am very excited about it! [Laughs] But you mentioned something that caught my ear. You were the makeup department head on “Orphan: First Kill.” How much more challenging is it to be the head of that department or do you prefer to be more specialized like when you mentioned working on David’s look? 

DM: For years when I first got in the business all I wanted to do was glue rubber onto people. [Laughs] and that was pretty much what I did for the first seven or eight years. I lived in Vancouver my first seven years because they didn’t make movies in Winnipeg. Then we moved back to Winnipeg and started having kids and all the family was here. What happened was the year we moved back, we got a film tax credit and they started bringing movies here. The first few years I traveled a bit but I realized that if I wanted to continue making a living as a makeup artist I had to do the regular makeup. When I was younger, it didn’t interest me but when I lived in Vancouver, people kept telling me if you want to work all the time you should learn to do beauty makeup. And I did. So when I moved back to Winnipeg I started getting jobs as what we call the Makeup Department Head which means you’re in charge of looking after all of the actors and their looks. It’s a lot of work. It’s a big job because you have to deal with a lot of personalities. The director, the producers, and the actors all have input. Sometimes it’s a great experience and sometimes it’s not so great and can be quite stressful. 

So I did that for years and years. Then more movies started coming to Winnipeg that required more effects stuff so a lot of the time I was doing both jobs. I was doing the regular makeup and I was also building and applying whatever prosthetics makeup stuff would be required. A few years ago I did it on a TV series called Channel Zero. I did all of the seasons but the first season I did both Department Head, the regular makeup, all the prosthetic stuff, and all the prep leading up to shooting. I was working seven days a week because I’d have to be on set every single day. We were continually building stuff plus I would have to work on the weekends and it was just way too much. It also made me realize that why I really got into this business was because of movies like Planet of the Apes and The Exorcist. I don’t want to say more of the creative stuff but, I mean frankly I rather glue a rubber nose on somebody than do their blush nowadays. [Laughs] So I’ve kind of slowly segued from doing that to just doing special makeup work. For instance on Violent Night, I’m just there for the makeup effects. I’m just there doing all of David Harbour’s injuries and blood and the effects from all the fights. I’m building all the appliances required for that kind of stuff and then supervising that on set. And that’s the place that I really want to be.

It’s a different kind of stress but to me it’s just a more artistically satisfying stress.

Orphan: First Kill is now available on Digital and Paramount+.

Interviews

“Be Not Afraid”: Andrea Perron Shares the Chilling True Story Behind ‘The Conjuring’ [Interview]

Published

on

Pictured: 'The Conjuring'

Welcome back to DEAD Time. I hope you left a light on for me because this month we’re going inside The Conjuring house to find out the real story of what happened to Carol and Roger Perron when they moved their five daughters into a house in Burrillville, Rhode Island in the early 1970s.

In 2013, director James Wan unleashed the terrifying horror film The Conjuring, which was based on the case files of paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren and told the story of a family tormented by a demonic force after moving into their new home. In real life, the Warrens did investigate the activity in the Perron home, but the story goes a bit differently. You may think you know what really happened inside that house based on the horror movie alone, but you would be mistaken. The true story is much, much scarier.

Bloody Disgusting was delighted to have the opportunity to chat with Andrea Perron, the oldest of the five Perron daughters, who was witness to the paranormal activity in the family’s home. Andrea is a lecturer and the author of the trilogy of books, House of Darkness House of Light, which tells the story of what her family experienced while living in the house in Rhode Island for a decade. Read on for our exclusive interview.


Bloody Disgusting: Your family moved into the old Arnold Estate in 1970, correct? How long after you moved into the house did your family begin to experience unusual activity?

Andrea Perron: We bought the house in December of 1970, but we didn’t move in right away because my mother didn’t want to move during Christmas. My mother found the farm for sale and our family went to the farm a number of times and we loved it and we all felt like it was home to us. It was an original colonial home and a farm and 200 acres of land it was a big deal. My parents paid $72,000 for the house and back in 1970 that was a lot of money. All of the times we visited the house with Mr. Kenyon, who was the owner, none of us remembered having anything strange or otherworldly or mystical happen. We just enjoyed the property and the land, and the place itself was just so incredibly enticing. None of us have any memory of seeing anything strange or weird there until the day we moved in. It was as though the spirits were all just holding their breath [laughs] waiting for us to get there and live there.

The first thing that happened was my father opened up the back of the moving truck and handed me a box. We were in the middle of a snow and sleet and ice event, and the wind was whipping around, and it was freezing cold. I went into the nearest door with the box that was marked kitchen and my mother had already come in with my baby sister April and had gone into the kitchen. April was only five, she was too young to help unpack or help unload boxes, so she just stayed with mom. I walked into the parlor and took a right into the living room and Mr. Kenyon was packing a box of his wife’s china. I stopped and started chatting with him and then I picked up the box and turned to go into the kitchen through the front foyer, and there was a man standing there that I thought was oddly dressed. He seemed like flesh and blood to me to the extent that as I walked past him, I said, “Good morning, sir.” I didn’t see him when I walked into the room, but he was standing in the corner of the door when I picked up the box. So, I walked into the kitchen, and I remember asking my mother who that man was with Mr. Kenyon. Her response was, “There’s nobody with Mr. Kenyon. His son is on the way, but he’s not here yet.” So, I’m sure at the age of twelve, I assumed that a neighbor had stopped by, and my mom didn’t know it.

I went back outside to the moving van and meanwhile, my sister Christine walked in, and she saw him and walked into the kitchen and asked my mom the same question. Mom was busy; she had discovered that Mr. Kenyon had not packed anything in the kitchen. So, Christine asked who the man was. Then my sister Cindy walked through with her box, and she saw him and asked mom about the man that was with Mr. Kenyon and made some comment that he was dressed funny. Then Nancy walked in behind Cindy and said, “Cindy, did you see that man with Mr. Kenyon? I did, but he just disappeared.” That was our introduction to the farm, and it all happened within the first five minutes. Right before he left, Mr. Kenyon asked my father to go for a walk with him. He said to my father, “Roger, for the sake of your family, leave the lights on at night.” My father didn’t know how to interpret that statement. In his mind, Mr. Kenyon was saying that we were moving into a new house with one bathroom on the first floor and the girls would be sleeping upstairs, and that he should leave lights on, so the kids don’t go tumbling down the stairs in the middle of the night. That’s how he interpreted what Mr. Kenyon said to him. Over the first few months we were living there, we were told by various people in the area that there was never a time when it was dark outside that every light in the house would not be on.

BD: I read that you described the house as “a portal cleverly disguised as a farmhouse.” What led you to believe the house was a portal?

AP: It wasn’t just the house, it’s the property. The barn is as active as the house is. And the property is as active as both the house and the barn. There’s an awful lot of elemental activity. There’s tons of extraterrestrial activity there. And I think it has something to do with the fact that the farm is built on top of an ancient river which was lost during the last Ice Age. It’s known as the Lost River of New Hampshire, but it actually runs all the way underground. It’s buried about 700 feet underground. And on certain days when the water is very heightened and rushing, you can actually feel the vibration of it in the land. And you can lay on the stone walls and feel the stones vibrating from the river rushing underneath our feet. And it goes directly underneath the farm, but also there are two creeks or tributaries to the Nipmuc River, which runs right along the bottom of the property just beyond the stone wall that marks the backyard. So, the river is maybe 700 or 800 yards away.

I think it has something to do with all the water that it is surrounded by. Somebody sent me a drone shot of the farm from high enough up that it was probably, the drone was probably at least 3,000 feet. And it was the most interesting photograph that I have ever seen of the farm because from the angle that the shot was taken directly over it, it looks like a pyramid in the middle of a forest.

BD: Do you have an idea of how many spirits or entities you were dealing with in the house?

AP: Well, I can tell you that there were at least a dozen of them that we were very familiar with that we saw over and over and over again. Another interesting thing too is that the, none of us had any fear of this spirit that we saw that first day moving in. It was, it was not that kind of a vibe at all. In fact, he appeared to be very sweet-natured and cheerful, and he was really focused on Mr. Kenyon. But within the first couple of nights that we lived there, my sister Cindy came crawling into bed with me and she was obviously upset. She was only eight years old and asked if she could sleep with me. And I said, “Of course.” Then I pulled back the quilt and she hopped down.

I’m like, “What’s wrong?” And she said that she could hear voices in her room. Well, the upstairs of the house, every door opens into the next bedroom. And we had all of the doors open because the house was cold and that was the way, you know, to keep the heat moving instead of being trapped in one room or the other. And it was a new house to us even though it was 250 years old. And so, we always left the doors open between our bedrooms. And when she came in, she kept saying, “I hear voices. There’s voices in the room and I’m scared and it got louder and louder. I can’t believe you didn’t hear it.” I can’t believe it didn’t wake you up.” And at first, she was at that time sharing a room with Christine. And my sister Christine has a tendency to talk in her sleep from time to time.

So, I think I just assumed that Chris was doing that. And I asked her, and she said, “No, it’s not me.” She said, “It’s a whole bunch of voices and they’re all talking at the same time. And they’re all saying the same thing.” So naturally I asked her what they were saying, and her response was, “There are seven dead soldiers buried in the wall. There are seven dead soldiers buried in the wall” over and over and over. And she said all the voices were what you would describe as monotone, even though she did not use that word. She didn’t know that word at that time. But she said they all sounded the same. Like they were all talking together, and they all had basically the same voice. And they were all saying the same thing at the same time. And they were all around her bed to the point where the floorboards were shaking. The bed was shaking. And she put the pillow over her head to try to muffle the sound. And when it became so loud that she couldn’t tolerate it anymore, that’s when she jumped out of bed and ran into my room and got in bed with me. And about three years ago, the house, I mean, nothing could be buried in the walls of the house because the house is just clapboard with horsehair plaster. That’s it. There’s no insulation. There’s no, you know, there’s some eaves that go up under the roof line. But there’s just, there’s no place that bodies could have ever been stored or hidden.

So, it didn’t make any sense. But over the years other people speculated maybe there’s someone buried out near the retaining wall behind the house or down around the stone walls. And so, the previous owner, not the woman that owns it now, but the previous owners had some people come in with ground penetrating radar. And sure enough, they found seven distinct anomalies under the stone wall at the bottom of the property just before you go into the cow pasture. And because it is illegal to exhume anything in the state of Rhode Island, all they could do is offer the photographs as evidence. But there it is. There are seven distinct images that are buried just behind the stone wall on the side of the cow pasture. And that’s where they found whatever they found. But when you consider that that house was completed as it stands now in 1736, the property was originally deeded in 1680. And the house was finished as it is now 40 years before the signing of the Declaration of Independence. And so, it really is truly an original colonial home. And it survived the Revolutionary War.

It survived the door rebellion. The King Phillips War, the Civil War. And at the time of the Civil War, the owners, and it was all through marriage. It was eight generations of one extended family that built and then lived in the South for hundreds of years. And we were the first outsiders. We have absolutely no familial attachment to the Richardson family or the Arnold family. And that house was passed through marriage because at that time women were not allowed to own property. So, through marriage it became the Arnold estate, but it actually is the Richardson Arnold homestead.

The Real ‘Conjuring’ House – Photo Credit: Visit Rhode Island

BD: At what point did Ed and Lorraine Warren become involved? There were a few things I read that made it sound like they just showed up at your house because they’d heard about the case.

AP: Yes, they really did. They just showed up at our house. Just one day they just showed up.

BD: So, your family had no idea they were coming?

AP: Well, it’s actually a little bit more complicated than that. We’d already been there for about two and a half years. A group of college students came to the house. Keith Johnson and his twin brother, and some of their friends, were paranormal investigators. And Keith said that my mother had called him and asked him to come check the house out. And my mother said, “I never called anybody.” I never told anybody other than our closest friends about the activity in the house.” Our attorney, Sam, knew. Our babysitter, Kathy, knew. And my mother’s friend, Barbara, knew. And she can’t remember anybody else that she ever said a word to about it. It was a very taboo subject back then. And, yeah, nobody wanted to open Pandora’s box. It was way more than a can of worms. It was just not something that people would talk about except for some of my peers at school, kids that had grown up in that town and knew the reputation of the house, which we were never warned about before we moved in. But, you know, I guess the best way to look at this is that the college students that came, we will never know why they showed up. Keith said my mother called him.

My mother said, “I never called anybody.” But there was some reason, and this is a spirit thing. There is some reason that he was drawn to that house and brought his team and had such extraordinary experiences on the one afternoon that they spent there that he sought out. Ed and Lorraine Warren, he and his team sought them out. They were speaking. His team was from Rhode Island College, and the Warrens were doing a lecture in the fall of that year at the University of Rhode Island. And they told the Warrens about our predicament and where we lived and who we were. The Warrens came the night before Halloween in 1973. It was either the night before Halloween or the night after Halloween. When they showed up at the door, my mother let them in the house. It was freezing out and she offered them a cup of coffee and presumed that they were lost because the farm is very remote. And then they identified themselves. My mother had absolutely no idea who they were. She had never heard their names before. And Mrs. Warren walked over to our old black stove in the kitchen, and she put her hand over her eyes and her other hand on the corner of the stove and became very quiet. And she said, “I sense a malignant entity in this house. Her name is Bathsheba.” Now, Mrs. Warren knew absolutely nothing about the history of the house or the area. Nothing. And she plucked that name out of thin air.

Bathsheba Sherman never lived in that house. She lived at the Sherman farm, which was about a mile away. There were only a few homesteads in the area at that time. She was born in 1812 and she died in 1885. And there were stories that she was in that house and had an infant in her care and that the baby died. The autopsy revealed that a needle had been impaled at the base of its skull and it was ruled that the baby’s death was from convulsions. My mother only found one article about it and it was stored in the archives of Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts. She read about an inquest in the town of Burillville, Rhode Island. So, there was apparently a hearing in the neighboring town of Gloucester. And apparently there was an inquest and Bathsheba was questioned by a judge about her involvement with the death of the child. And apparently, she was very convincing that she had absolutely nothing to do with it. So it never went to a jury. There was never a formal indictment. It was let go and she was dismissed from the inquest. But in the court of public opinion, this young woman who had just married Judson Sherman was tried and convicted in the court of public opinion. And there were all kinds of accusations and innuendos and rumors that circulated around her for years and years, all the years of her life, that she had something to do with it.

Oh my God, if you were to ever go there and just go to a few of the graveyards around that farm, you would stumble over one little, tiny gravestone after another after another. I mean, infant mortality rates were through the roof. And it was actually bad luck to name your baby before it reached one year old. And Bathsheba Sherman was by some, I guess, accused of practicing witchcraft. She was apparently a very beautiful woman and the other women in town were threatened by her. It was back in the time when folklore and old wives tales and the accusation of being a witch could get you killed up in San Luis, which was just like an hour north of where we were living. And had it been a little bit different time, she could have paid with her life for being accused of that. But instead, it was just a vicious rumor that circulated that she had killed the baby for making a deal with the devil for eternal youth and beauty. We listen to all of that now and say, “Well, that’s just stupid. You know, that’s just superstitious nonsense. The woman would not be buried in the middle of hallowed ground in the Riverside Cemetery in Harrisville next to her husband and all of her children had there been any proof that she was a practicing witch.” I will spend the rest of my life defending her because even though I don’t know for certain if she had anything to do with the death of that child, I don’t think it’s fair to accuse someone of murder unless you have some evidence as proof. And there was no evidence back then. There was no DNA. There was nothing. And so, I just don’t think that she had anything to do with that.

I think that it was a very unfair condemnation of her. But unfortunately, the Warrens were asking my mother to be able to do an investigation of the house. My mother told her what she knew about the history of the house. After Lorraine came up with that name, my mother said, “Well, I’ve been doing some historical research on this property and some surrounding properties in the area.” And she showed Lorraine her notebook that was filled with stories and birth certificates and death certificates. On her second or third visit, Mrs. Warren asked for the notebook, and it was filled with descriptions of the spirits in the house. It was filled with drawings of the spirits that my mother had seen. And Mrs. Warren asked if she could borrow that thick notebook of absolutely invaluable information. And she wanted to make Xerox copies of it, so it tells you what time in history that was. My mother begrudgingly handed it over to her with the promise that she would get it back. But she never did return it. Mrs. Warren kept it. It was our understanding that when the movie The Conjuring was made that that notebook was sold as part of her case files. And it’s gone. We never ever saw it again. My mother asked for it back.

My mother felt that it was part of her legacy to her children. Mrs. Warren perceived it to be a haunted item and didn’t think that it belonged in the house. So, she told my mother she would return it, but then she never did and like 15 years later, she sold it. A number of things that we had found on the property went missing when they came one night with their team. It was the night of the séance that they foisted upon my mother, insisting that she was being oppressed and that she was right on the verge of possession and if they didn’t intervene on her behalf at that point that she would be lost. That was the most horrible night of my life. I was 15 when that happened. And I remember it like it just happened. It was absolutely traumatizing. I suffer PTSD from it. I swear to you I do. It was just a few minutes, but in those few minutes, I saw the dark side of existence and that is why I choose deliberately to live in the light. I will never let anything that evil touch me. I never will.

The Warrens only came maybe five times over the course of about a year and a half. And the last time that they came was after the séance. And when my father threw them out of the house that night along with their entourage, they left that house with my mother unconscious on the parlor floor. They came back to see if she had survived that night because when they left that house, they didn’t know if she was dead or alive. It was horrible. I don’t want to disparage them. They can’t defend themselves. Mrs. Warren, I think her heart was in the right place. I mean, she was a collector of objects. Their paranormal museum didn’t make itself. Every investigation she ever did, she had something from that investigation that went into their paranormal museum. And I know people personally who’ve been through it and have seen items that disappeared from our house the night of the séance that are under glass in that museum now.

BD: Do you know if that notebook was in their paranormal museum?

AP: No, it never was. Not that I know of. No, that was kept separately.

BD: What were your interactions with the Warrens like during the times that they were doing their investigation?

AP: Mrs. Warren didn’t really have anything much to do with us, with the children. She kind of turned us over to Ed, and he’s the one that interviewed us individually. My little sister, April, had a friend, a spirit friend, up in the chimney closet between the first and second bedroom. And she wouldn’t tell them about him. And he had identified himself to her as Oliver Richardson. But she wouldn’t tell Ed about him because she was afraid that the Warrens would make him go away and she loved him. And she felt very protective of him. And he was basically the same age as she was in life when he died. So, they had a very strong connection that she was not willing to jeopardize by telling them anything about him. But the rest of us just spilled our guts. It was kind of cathartic. It was a relief to be able to talk about the activity in that house with someone who believed us.

The night that Mrs. Warren originally came to the house, Mrs. Warren told my mother that I was in the room. I was a witness to this conversation. And she told my mother that the reason, even though she had known about our predicament for a number of weeks, she decided that she and her husband would not come out to the house until Halloween was because she said that’s when the veil has thinned. And I remember my mother looking at her and then kind of not laughing because it was certainly not a laughing matter, but kind of this incredulous grunt came out of her like, well, and then she just looked at her and she said, “Well then, I guess every day is Halloween at this house and there is no veil. I don’t know what you’re talking about, this veil. There’s no veil here. We share this with a lot of spirits.” One of the things that my mother resented about the film The Conjuring—I understand why they did what they did. I get it. But what they tried to do is juxtapose the devout Roman Catholic paranormal investigators, Ed and Lorraine Warren, against the godless heathen parent family. You know, like we were, I won’t say pagan because pagan is a religion also, but that we didn’t have any connection to the church. And my mother took great exception to that. She didn’t even watch the film until it had been out on DVD for more than a year.

I thought that she would be very upset about the way she was represented in the film. Some of it she thought was just so ridiculous that it was not anything that she would bother to take exception to. But the one thing that she was really offended by was that our portrayal was that of a family that had no faith. And nothing could have been further from the truth. My father was born and raised in a staunch Catholic tradition as the eldest of six boys. Church was an integral part of his childhood and his family’s life. He went to parochial school, and he served as an altar boy for years of his youth. And when he graduated from high school, he went into the Navy with the intention of serving the country and then going immediately into seminary to become a priest. That’s what my father’s life plan was. And in the interim, he met my mother and fell in love. And so, the priesthood thing was out the window. But my mother, who he met in Georgia, was a Southern Baptist. And she had to convert to Catholicism in order to marry him. All of us were baptized and all of us made our first communion and all of us were raised in the Roman Catholic Church.

It was the second year, the second Easter that we were at the farm. April was seven years old, and we went to Easter Mass, and we filled our own pew. There were so many of us. And at the very end of Mass, the priest said, “and the father and the son and the Holy Ghost.” And April turned and just with her big blue eyes just looked up at my mother and she said in her big girl, outdoor voice, “See, Mom, God has ghosts just like we do.” And every single head in that church turned and looked at our family. And as we got up to leave, the priest followed us out and he came up to my father and he said, “Mr. Perron, I would appreciate it if you would take your family and worship elsewhere.” My father was so angry and so hurt that he felt abandoned by the religion that he had invested himself into his whole life. I have rarely seen my father cry and he cried on the way home that day. As we were all getting out of our big Pontiac Bonneville car, which we called the Catholic Mobile because it had room for seven plus luggage and the family dog, my mother said, “Girls, if you want to know God, go to the woods. Go to the woods.” We never ever went back to church again. Ever. Our family has never been together in a church ever since then.

BD: That’s awful for a priest to react that way to a child.

AP: The priest was afraid. He was afraid that he had that weird family from the old, haunted house up on Round Top Road in St. Patrick’s Parish. And that others might not come back to the parish if we were there. I was already in catechism classes to make my confirmation and, you know, all my friends were Catholics. Everybody went to St. Patrick’s. I would just go and kind of sit in the back of the class and all my peers were there who were getting ready to make their final confirmation into the church. It was the nuns who were teaching us. But one night, the priest was there, and he recognized me. And sure as hell, not a week later, my parents received a letter from the Bishop, who was the head of the diocese of Providence, informing my parents that I was not welcome in confirmation classes because I asked too many questions. That was it. There was something about living in that house that made you more faithful. And I found out very early on that when all hell was breaking loose in that house and there was a lot of negative energy swirling in the house, or I felt threatened or any of my sisters felt threatened, all you ever had to do was say, “Oh God, help me. “And it stopped instantly. Good conquers evil and love conquers fear. And hatred is not the opposite of love. Fear is the opposite of love and hatred is born of fear.

I believe in my heart that the Warrens had the best of intentions. 40 years later, when I saw Mrs. Warren again out in California when she and I had been invited to preview The Conjuring before it was released, she recognized me immediately and came and wrapped her arms around me. During those three days that we spent in California together, she told me that she and Ed were in over their heads the moment they crossed the threshold of that house. They just didn’t know it. She admitted terrible mistakes were made. They didn’t mean to stir up activity, but she was a bona fide clairvoyant. She had great abilities, and she didn’t always use them to their greatest good. And I think that that was because of her fascination but also her reverence and respect for spirits. She knew that spirits were real, but unfortunately, because of her sensing Bathsheba in the house, who was really only a neighbor—Her sense of that spirit’s presence is what changed everything. Because not only did she have a sense of her presence and we didn’t find out until five decades later that her husband, Judson Sherman, died on that property. We still don’t know how he died. One of my historian friends dug up that he died at the Arnold state. We don’t know how, but that would explain why her presence would be there. You know, spirits are free to come and go as they please.

They’re not locked into an earthbound, specific location. There are differences of opinion even within our own family about how free the spirits are. My sister Cindy will still argue with me about it. She believes that they’re attached to the farm because she said that when we moved, they loved us so much that if they could have come with us, they would have. My response to her is that the spirit that was standing behind Nancy on the front porch of that house the day the whole rest of the family left for Georgia was the spirit that was standing behind my sister Cindy when we arrived at the new house in Georgia. Same exact woman; same entity standing right behind her. And Cindy’s like, “No, no, it must have been somebody else. It must have been one of my guides because the spirits are stuck there. They’re trapped there. And I’m like, “No, they’re not, babe.”

‘The Conjuring’ Movie House – Photo Credit: J. Patrick Swope

BD: How much of what we see in The Conjuring really happened?

AP: There are so many discrepancies between The Conjuring and the real story that is documented in House of Darkness House of Light, the trilogy of books that I wrote that they are unrecognizable except for the names. Everybody that was associated with the film read my books, including the actors, except for maybe the youngest children couldn’t read them. But everybody, all the adults for sure, read the books and said, “Oh, hell no, we can’t tell this story,” because they were about to invest somewhere between $25 and $30 million into making this film. And it was based predominantly on the case files of Ed and Lorraine Warren. It says right on the movie trailer, case files of Ed and Lorraine. But I gave them permission to use anything that was in my books that was the actual story, the authentic telling of our family memoir. And they wouldn’t. The screenwriters, Chad and Carey Hayes, twin brothers, lovely men, wanted desperately to include elements of the true story and they wrote some of the stories into the screenplay. And every single time the suits at New Line Cinema and Warner Brothers sent the script back and said, “Take that out, redact it. We’re not going to run people out of the theater. We’re not going to make a movie that nobody will stay to watch to the end because they are terrified.” So, The Conjuring is a very toned-down version of events.

BD: Why didn’t they want to use it?

AP: They thought it was too scary; it was too real; it was too raw. It was, I mean, people who read my trilogy of books are changed. They are never the same again. When they come up for air after that deep dive, they think about everything differently. Nothing is ever the same. A lot of my readers over the years have deemed it interactive literature. They feel like by the time they’re done reading volume three, that they lived there with us, that they grew up with us, that they know every member of my family intimately well, and that they had the same experiences that we did. There’s something about this story that unlocks a person’s third eye and opens them to the netherworld in a way that nothing else ever has or ever could. Actually, the ability to expand human consciousness is not the most important part of the trilogy. House of Darkness House of Light got its title from my mother when I was about 300 pages into the first book. And she asked me what I was going to title the trilogy, and I told her I didn’t know. And she stood next to me at her old cherry desk right here in the room in which I’m sitting speaking with you right now. I wrote those books in this house. And she just looked at me and she said, “House of Darkness House of Light,” it was both. No comma, it was both. And so, there is no comma. It’s House of Darkness House of Light as one thing because my mother believes the same way that I do; that everything is energy, and everything is consciousness, and everything is one thing.

There is no delineation between natural and supernatural, between normal and paranormal. At least there isn’t for us. This is just how our lives are now. That you cannot experience what we did immersed in that environment for a decade and be unchanged by it. And I think the greatest value in me finding the courage to finally tell our story more than, I didn’t even start writing it until more than three decades after we had left. But I finally got to an age and a place in my own mind where I didn’t care how people were going to react to it anymore. I knew that we would be scrutinized. I knew that we would be belittled. I knew that there would be mean-spirited people out there that would attack our family. And instead, we were embraced by the paranormal community worldwide.

I would not be one of the very best-selling authors in this genre worldwide had it not been for The Conjuring. So, I don’t hold any grudges. The power of a well-made feature film and the images that are placed in people’s minds is what causes them to dig deeper. And based on a true story, well where’s the true story? Who wrote the true story? All they have to do is Google the name Perron and up come the books. They’ve been read all over the world. Hundreds of thousands of copies have been sold. And they’re selling better now than they did after the film came out. So, the story is getting around. And I think that the great value of the story is not the expansion of human consciousness. It is liberating people to tell their own story. Because so many people have been touched by spirits and they’re afraid to share it. They’re afraid to speak out. They’re afraid to be criticized and to be treated as somehow less than. Or I’ve often been asked, “Was there ever a time that you questioned your own sanity?” Oh, hell yes. And that is true of every member of my family. We saw things in that house that there’s no plausible explanation other than spirits are real.

We’re still learning things about that house and about the spirits who quote unquote live there, who dwell there. And I love them. I even love the cranky ones. I do because to me it doesn’t even matter who they were, that they still are is a freaking miracle. That is magical. That is cosmic forces beyond our comprehension. One of my famous quotations is very simple, but it’s very true—To be touched by a spirit is not a curse, but a blessing. It is that rare glimpse into the realm from which we come and will all inevitably return. And I end it with, be not afraid.

Continue Reading