Connect with us

Exclusives

BD Sits Down With Zombie Maestro George A. Romero!

Published

on

While some of his peers have more or less sat the decade out, George Romero has had a second wind as of late, giving fans a whopping THREE zombie flicks in the past 5 years. His latest is Survival of the Dead, the 6th in his long running series, and like its predecessors, it’s not just a cookie cutter zombies vs humans movie. George has always had something to say with his films, and Survival is no different, tackling the notion that nowadays people have to go to war over pretty much everything, and spend so much time trying to prove that the other side is wrong that they lose sight of what they are fighting about in the first place. Our own BC sat down with the master to discuss this, as well as some of George’s other projects, and of course, the future of the Dead…
George A. RomeroBD: You had said that the film was inspired by The Big Country, which came out in 1958 – was this a concept you had been considering for a while, or did it just come to you recently?

George Romero: No… the idea was to make a film about war or entities that don’t die, conflicts, disagreements that people can’t resolve, whether its Ireland, or the Middle East, or the Senate… that was the idea. And then I decided that was the best way to depict it. And then I had this other idea about an island would be a logical place for people to go, an idea I sort of played with in some of the other films. So I said OK, the best way to tell this story I think is to have a protagonist go to the island only to find out that it’s in the middle of basically a war that won’t die, between these two old guys. And the moment that came together I remembered The Big Country. And I’m always looking for something different sort of stylistically with these films so that they’re not the same which makes it more interesting for us as filmmakers. All the people on the set, production design, DP, good friends of mine, we sort of work as a big family. So we all sat down and I made everyone watch the big country. And then my thought was “Hey why don’t we go full on with this, go widescreen, not mute the colors, really try to make it look like William Wyler”. So that was something we did as a fun exercise to give it a different taste.

BD: So was that the motive for shooting widescreen? Most of your films are the smaller ratio…

GR: Yeah, 1.85. Land was 2.35, but that was more of a studio decision than mine. I was OK with it though, because that film was the most like a Hollywood action film, you know?

BD: Do you find that you like the wider frame now?

GR: I do, I do like it. I remember Cinemascope man; I was a kid seeing the first one, The Robe I think. And it blew me away. And then Cinerama and all those formats… I always loved it.

BD: You mentioned Ireland, was that the reason for the Irish accents?

GR: In a way… I said “How can I put a little more salt and pepper on this?” I can’t make the two guys an Arab and a Jew! (laughs). So I thought of Irish families. There’s a couple islands off the coast of New England that are largely Irish populated. I just thought it made the most sense. I also loved Kenny Welsh, and I knew that he could really cut that. I didn’t know he’d say yes to DOING IT, but I was hoping!

BD: And the other lead, Alan Van Sprang, he was in Diary, playing the same character – this is the first time, I guess apart from Savini, that you brought a character back. Was that something that when you were doing Diary that you felt you wanted to do more with this character?

GR: No, because… after Land of the Dead, which was the big budget thing, I felt a little bit as if I’d sort of lost the roots of where I started this whole thing, and I wanted to go back to doing them smaller. And I had the idea; I wanted to do something about emerging media, social journalism, citizen journalism… and I needed to do it quickly because other people were surely going to do it too. So we found this company who was capable of financing small budget films internally, and willing to take the gamble; finance it and sell it later. So that was hog heaven for me, because I knew I could do that film for around 2.5 million. And it so cost so little to make that even though it had a limited release, it still made lots of bread worldwide, with DVDs and TV. So they wanted another one, and the one thing I’ve never been able to do with the first four, is cross collectivize, re-use characters. I mean, Savini we had to get all kinds of special permissions for that little cameo [in Land]. So I’ve never been able to do that. So I said “OK, here’s a deal for you!” And if this makes a lot of money, they’ll want another one, so I sort of set my mind on using three minor characters, with ideas for two more that would use my characters from Diary, and it would become this collage, the four films would be a unit.

BD: So Diary‘s kind of like “The Hobbit” and these three are “Lord of the Rings”.

GR: Yeah, exactly. And I don’t know if it’s going to happen, it depends on how this film does, I’m sort of standing by in case it does. And we’ll see! In the meantime my partner and I are developing a couple of other things, another horror idea that’s non-zombie, and then I have another idea, non horror – a small personal film. Again, on a scale that I think I could get the financing. I just don’t have the energy anymore, or the desire, to come out here and pitch for 2 years. Or the time left. I think I’ll stick with what I’m doing, you know? Smaller scale stuff, doing it at home with friends, have as much fun with it as I’ve been having.

BD: Seems to be working, this is the 3rd zombie film in 5 years – you’re really making it up to us for missing the 90s!

GR: (laughs) All those down years!

George A. Romero

BD: Given a choice, would you jump right into the zombies again for your next film, or would you want to work on those other two ideas you mentioned first?

GR: If it was MY choice? If this makes enough money I’d say let’s do both of them, and do them together as one production, and get it off my plate. And then meantime try to develop these others ideas. I don’t know how many films I have left, you know? Three, if I’m lucky…

BD: Ten.

GR: I don’t know about that, I smoke! (laughs).

BD: And you were working on a novel at one point, is that still in the works?

GR: Yeah I was contracted, but I didn’t SIGN the contract, by the publishing company, to do a zombie novel. Everybody seems to be doing it; it’s a little frustrating for me – what can I say that Max Brooks hasn’t already said, or some of these other guys. So I don’t know, I’m sort of idly working on it. I didn’t sign the contract because I didn’t want a deadline, I didn’t want the obligation to deliver, but I am working on it. I got about 150 pages finished. We’ll see. It’s really hard for me to get my head into that. On one hand it’s easy because I know I don’t have to shoot this shit, I can write anything! (laughs). But trying to do something UNIQUE with it, what’s NEW about these guys? I don’t know. Just trying to sell this more mystical idea… I don’t like these rage zombies or virus zombies. My stories have always been people stories, the zombies are an annoyance. It’s all about people, how they address the situation, or fail to address it. That’s the most fun for me. And I don’t want to know what caused it!

BD: The thing is, at this point, after six films, most of us fans don’t really care anymore what caused it. Maybe back with Dawn, we were looking for a big explanation, but by now they’re just THERE, and we don’t care why. So it’s interesting that you brought up the virus type, because that’s pretty much what they did with The Crazies

GR: (rolls his eyes)

BD: Oh man I wish this was on video now! But anyway, they did that, they’re remaking Night of the Living Dead again, there was a Day remake a couple years ago… do you take it personally when they do these remakes without you, or would you just rather NOT be involved?

GR: I don’t. I just think some of it… sometimes it’s just stupid to do it. My ex-partner did the Dawn remake himself, and he had the rights, when we split up he had the rights to Dawn and Day. He told the Day rights to someone, I forget who. I wouldn’t have done it. I don’t know why. And he’ll probably end up remaking Martin and Knightriders.

BD: He has those too?

GR: Yeah, he has everything we did together. It was part of the “divorce” settlement; it was a public company. So he could take those assets. So we’ll see, I don’t care, you know? My stuff is my stuff! It’s like people asking Steve King, “How do you feel about Hollywood ruining your books?” And it’s like, “They’re not ruined, they’re right there on the shelf.” I sort of feel the same way about my films. My films are what they are. Crazies was a bit of a disappointment, I thought I would have more involvement in it. They made a deal with my agent, they paid me some money to be an executive producer on it, so I was hoping I’d be involved, but all it meant was “Stay off; we’ll call you when we need you.”

BD: With something like Martin, if they offered you to be involved, would you want to? Or would you just rather stay clear?

GR: I wouldn’t want to touch it. Particularly that one. And Knightriders, those are my two most personal, heartfelt films. They’re ME. I don’t know how you can remake them without me, without my motivation. But sure, go ahead and try. There’s only one film, I made a film called Jack’s Wife when I made it, I think it’s called Season of the Witch on video. That’s the only one I’d want to revisit. We ran out of money, or actually, the people who were financing it never came across with the rest of the money; the acting’s not good… it was me trying to do this women’ lib thing and I was very uninformed about certain issues (laughs), and I think it could be stronger today, so I’ve actually toyed with the idea, I thought it would be interesting. That’s the only one that I would consider. And I do have access to the rights to that one, because that one was pre-Richard. So maybe, maybe, maybe… I don’t know. Again, I sort of have to pick and choose what I want to use my time on.

BD: One final question, I have to know, what it’s like working with such a prima donna actor like Uncle Creepy Steve Barton?

GR: (laughs) Hah! Gave me more trouble than anyone! No, what a sweet guy. He was like a pig in shit. He just couldn’t believe to do this, particularly this big gag, tearing this guy apart. But he was loving it! And I tell you, it was FREEZING, we had some really cold nights, and they couldn’t feel their fingers. He and Mike Felsher, they were right in the heart of that rig. They had a hard time because the stuff was freezing on them. We never really got a good shot of it, it was a great effect – the actor was actually there, but the zombies sort of cover it up, because they were having such a hard time they had to hunker in to get a good grab!

BD: Well thank you for your time, sir, good to see you again.

GR: Good to see you! Take care.

SURVIVAL OF THE DEAD hits theaters May 28. It’s now available on VOD, Xbox, PS3 and more.

George A. Romero

Advertisement
Click to comment

Exclusives

‘Tarot’ Filmmakers Spenser Cohen & Anna Halberg on Practical Creature Effects and ‘Insidious’ Inspirations

Published

on

Tarot horror movie exclusive images

An evil curse gets awakened in Screen Gems horror movie Tarot when a group of friends recklessly ignore a sacred rule: never use someone else’s deck. Writers/Directors Spenser Cohen & Anna Halberg unleash a variety of Tarot card-inspired entities on the group through practical effects, and create an unexpected connection to Insidious along the way.

The film comes exclusively to movie theaters on May 3, 2024.

Bloody Disgusting spoke with Cohen and Halberg ahead of Tarot‘s release, where the pair shared more about the film’s practical effects-driven horrors and revealed how Tarot drew from Insidious in a specific way.

To start, though, the filmmakers reveal just how closely their horror movie sticks to the source novel Horrorscope by Nicholas AdamsThe short answer is, well, it doesn’t at all!

Cohen explains, “It’s so different. We never even read the book and took nothing from the book. The only thingthe studio had a title that they liked, and so that’s why there was an association. Then we changed the title. So, now there’s literally zero connection to the book.

“Sony had come to us wanting to make a horror movie about astrology, but there’s nothing that’s inherently scary to us about Zodiac signs. So, we came up with the idea of combining tarot readings and tarot cards with astrology, and that’s what ended up becoming the movie. There’s such incredible iconography in these cards that we really had a plethora of amazing characters to choose from,” Halberg adds.

Cast of Tarot

Adain Bradley ‘Grant’ and Jacob Batalon ‘Paxton’ in Screen Gems TAROT

With a group of seven friends, expect to see their fates sealed by a number of cards. In other words, expect to see a wide variety of Tarot-inspired creatures tormenting the protagonists. The filmmakers stressed the importance of practical effects for their creatures.

Cohen tells us, “From the get-go, we said every creature is going to be practical. We were thinking of [David] Cronenberg, of Alien and The Thing, and we want our actors responding to real things, not a tennis ball. It always just looks better. You get better performances. With the designs themselves, if you look at the tarot cards and these specific characters, there’s nothing inherently terrifying about them, even though we associate the cards with being supernatural and terrifying. And [it’s] why we partnered with Trevor [Henderson]who was the only designer we met with. We were like, this is our guy because he has this ability to make the familiar feel unnatural.

“His designs are really grounded. I am sure you’ve seen a lot of his stuff where it’s like a hallway, and there’s something there, and something’s off about it, but it really feels like it’s in the space. We knew that he has a special brain for creating unique creatures, and he hadn’t done a movie, which is just shocking to us. Then, we knew that in order to pull that off, we would need a design team with equal skill. That was Dan Martin and his amazing team who worked hand in hand with Trevor to bring those to life.”

Tarot horror movie

Larsen Thompson ‘Elise’ in Screen Gems TAROT

Great designs and practical effects are one thing, but it also falls to the performers to infuse these monsters with personality to make them memorable. That was also at the forefront of the filmmakers’ minds.

In order for the creatures to translate, underneath all the prosthetics, you have to have great actors,” Cohen confirms. “We met with a lot of people. We were looking for people who were talking to us about the psychology and the movement and how they could move in a way that we hadn’t seen before or incorporate dance. We were looking for those outliers, and basically, everyone we hired approached the part as if there were no makeup or prosthetics. It’s like, ‘I am the Magician, so this is what I want to do. I’m going to have a limp. My body’s going to do this. I feel like my head is hunched.’ And we would watch these actors just embody these roles. It was really just picking great people, honestly. It’s hard to act through prosthetics and create emotion and fear and other things. You have to have an incredible control to be able to do that.”

Halberg elaborates,” Even though we enhanced some of the creatures with visual effects, we didn’t want to rely on that. So we needed people, like Spenser said, who each brought their own unique feel to these characters. They were just as important as all of the other actors in the movie and are so crucial to making sure that these sequences are scary and believable.”

Tarot The Hanged Man - Tarot Trailer Breakdown

Humberly González ‘Madeline’ in Screen Gems TAROT

One of the many Tarot creatures in the film is the Magician, who comes with an original song by the film’s composer, Joseph Bishara. While Bishara has delivered no shortage of great contemporary horror scores, including The Conjuring and Malignant, horror fans are likely more familiar with Bishara as the Lipstick Demon in the Insidious franchise. Cohen and Halberg can be counted among Insidious fans, so much so that they wanted an original song from the Lipstick Demon himself.

They explain, “We actually, in prep, we called Joe, and we said, ‘Hey, we’re going to do some kind of an old-timey song there.’ We knew something creepy, very Shining-esque. Then we had the idea to do a song called ‘I Saw You’ to be a pun on that whole thing. And actually use saws as the instrument. We found these YouTube videos, and our DP, I think, Elie [Smolkin] had found these videos of someone playing a saw. We were like, that’s terrifying.

“So we called Joeand we said, ‘You know Tiptoe through the Tulips, how that’s like in Insidious?’ That’s the thing you leave the theater thinking about, and it gets under your skin. We were like, ‘Can you do that for us with an original song?’ He said yes. What you hear in the movie is basically what he played for us the first time. He was just like, ‘I have an idea. I’ll talk to you guys in a week.’ And then that was what we heard, and it was amazing.”

With so many entities and horror sequences, Halberg can’t pick a favorite. Instead, she offers one last tease, “I hope people come away with the realization that each of the sequences is so unique and different, and that each of the creatures is so special because we took a lot of time trying to craft each of these kills or scares to be their own thing and to feel different.

“Hopefully everybody can choose their own favorite.”

Tarot poster

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading