Connect with us

Movies

[Review] FF ’11: ‘The Human Centipede 2 (Full Sequence)

Published

on

*Update: Read two more reviews on Bloody.

Reviews have begun pouring online so I figured we may as well post our first in a series hitting Bloody Disgusting. Brad McHargue (@BradMcHargue) reports in from Fantastic Fest following the world premiere of Tom Six’s The Human Centipede 2 (Full Sequence). Much like the reviews I’ve seen thus far, McHargue was NOT a fan, which actually makes me even more excited to see it myself.

You can watch the intro to the screening at Corey Mitchell’s online blog, with the first review inside. Watch this spot for David Harley’s thoughts in the coming week, with a potential third review if any of the staff like the film. I love a bit of controversy!! You’ll find the first theatrical listings here.

The Human Centipede 2 Full Sequence
Human Centipede 2The Human Centipede is not a bad film. It’s certainly not a great film, but when viewed within the context of its incredibly narrow and disturbing concept, writer/director Tom Six managed to construct a movie that, although slightly disturbing, was more than just extended scenes of forceful defecation and coprophagia. With The Human Centipede 2: Full Sequence, Six took a different route, eschewing subtlety in favor of serving up some of the disgusting acts known to man on a silver platter.

The sequel tells the tale of a man named Martin who is obsessed with the first Human Centipede film. When not watching the film ad infinitum and dissecting each scene during his boring desk job as a security guard for a parking garage, he’s knocking people out with a crowbar, tying them up, and taking them to a warehouse so he can create his own human centipede. Hatred of everything ensues.

Let’s start with the good. Laurence R. Harvey was excellent as Martin, spending the duration of the film exemplifying a seemingly mentally challenged man through nothing more than grunts, cries, screams, and the distant look of a man who is clearly insane. He lives with his mother, an old woman with aspirations of killing herself and her son, and through this glimpse of his home life we see a man whose sole source of joy comes from a movie. In this we get rare moments where he manages to elicit a modicum of sympathy; it’s not Bambi, but many can empathize with a lonely man lost in a film. This, of course, is abandoned when he, say, rips out someone’s tongue or rapes someone with barbwire covering his penis.

Beyond that, the cinematography was quite good, with the entire film being shot in black and white, giving it a distinctly…disturbing feel that most likely would have been lost had it been in color. It’s dark, it’s gritty, and when the blood flows (and believe me, it does), it’s black, much like Tom Six’s heart. It’s well shot, but that can do nothing for the “bad” of the film, which is, well, everything.

The Human Centipede 2 should not exist. It is disgusting, offensive, and does nothing but push every possible button and cross every boundary of human decency without making any sort of statement beyond “I’m doing this because I can.” With scenes ranging from masturbating with sandpaper (with nothing left to the imagination) to a veritable conga line of fecal consumption initiated by a well-placed syringe of laxatives in the buttocks, each scene in The Human Centipede 2 serves as nothing more than a reminder that there is no God, and, if He does exists, then he sent Tom Six as punishment for our misdeeds. If torture porn exists as a maligned sub-genre, this film exemplifies it.

The Human Centipede 2: Full Sequence is a complete one-eighty from the first film. Whereas the first was a unique exercise that managed to satisfy (despite its premise) with an interesting story supported by a creepy main character, the sequel manages to be nothing more than a demented pervert’s greatest hits. Devoid of anything redeemable, The Human Centipede 2: Full Sequence is an affront to mankind, and I hate Tom Six for its existence.

If this is Six’s natural progression, then the third film will be investigated for crimes against humanity.

0/5 Skulls

Advertisement
Click to comment

Movies

‘Mickey vs. Winnie’ – The Public Domain Horror Trend May Have Just Jumped the Shark

Published

on

In case you haven’t noticed, the public domain status of beloved icons like Winnie the Pooh, Cinderella and Mickey Mouse has been wreaking havoc on the horror genre in the past couple years, with filmmakers itching to get their hands on the characters and put them into twisted situations. In the wake of two Winnie the Pooh slashers, well, Pooh is about to battle Mickey.

It’s not from the same team behind the Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey films, to be clear, but Deadline reports that Glen Douglas Packard (Pitchfork) will direct the horror movie Mickey vs. Winnie for Untouchables Entertainment and the website iHorror.

Deadline details, “The film follows two convicts in the 1920s who escape into a cursed forest only to be dragged and consumed into the depths of the dark forest’s muddy heart.

“A century later, a group of thrill-seeking friends unknowingly venture into the same woods. Their Airbnb getaway takes a horrifying turn when the convicts mutate into twisted versions of childhood icons Mickey Mouse & Winnie-The-Pooh, and emerge to terrorize them. A night of violence and gore erupts, as the group of friends battle against their now monstrous beloved childhood characters and fight to break free from the forest’s grip.

“In a horrific spectacle, Mickey and Winnie clash, painting the woods in a gruesome tableau of blood—a chilling testament to the curse’s insidious power.”

Glen Douglas Packard wrote the screenplay that he’ll be directing.

“Horror fans call for the thrill of witnessing icons like the new Aliens and Avengers sharing the screen. While licensing nightmares make such crossovers rare, Mickey vs. Winnie serves as our tribute to that thrilling fantasy,” Packard said in a statement this week.

Producer Anthony Pernicka from iHorror previews, “We’re thrilled to unveil this unique take to horror fans. The Mickey Mouse featured in our film is unlike any iteration audiences have encountered before. Our portrayal doesn’t involve characters donning basic masks. Instead, we present deeply transformed, live-action horror renditions of these iconic figures, weaving together elements of innocence and malevolence. After experiencing the intense scenes we’ve crafted, you’ll never look at Mickey the same way again.”

Continue Reading