Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

‘IT’ is the Rare Remake That Actually Feels Necessary

Published

on

Sometimes, you have to be honest with your nostalgia.

In the wake of the IT teaser trailer hitting the net, I am incredibly excited to see Andy Muschietti’s vision for the Stephen King novel up on the big screen – but that’s an excitement that I personally felt long before I ever saw a single frame of the movie. For starters, I’m a huge fan of Mama, which proved that Muschietti is adept at making a pretty damn scary horror flick. But perhaps more importantly, I was excited that King’s novel was getting another adaptation because, well, I’m just going to come right out and say it: the book was not done any sort of justice back in 1990.

Director Tommy Lee Wallace’s lengthy miniseries adaptation of IT is easily the most beloved horror movie to ever debut on the small screen; Tim Curry’s portrayal of Pennywise, in particular, is still dishing out nightmares at a steady clip to this very day. There’s no denying that Curry was incredible in the role that Bill Skarsgard is taking over for Muschietti’s two-film adaptation, but the high points of the 1990 miniseries almost entirely begin and end with his talents.

What I’m trying to say is, there’s a reason most don’t remember much of anything about the adaptation aside from the fact that Curry, as Pennywise, was truly nightmarish. Many fans tend to have a nostalgic connection to the miniseries because they saw it when they were young, but when you revisit it in the present day, one thing becomes immediately clear: it’s a poor telling of a really great story, made iconic only by an unforgettable performance from the great character actor of a generation. Take Curry out of the mix and, well, let’s just be glad he was in it.

Of course, this is only my opinion, but a recent revisit of IT 1990 (just last year) admittedly let me wondering why the miniseries is even as beloved as it is; to an even greater extent, it left me wondering why the hell anyone was up in arms when the new adaptation was announced. And it’s not even that the special effects don’t look so great today, which many tend to hold against it when they revisit; if anything, the dated effects give the miniseries a charm that I can’t help but love. It’s more that the story is poorly conveyed and executed, the acting is shoddy, and it all around feels very much like what it is: a made-for-TV movie. It’s incredibly corny, and not just by today’s standards. And though it has its moments, it’s mostly just plain bad.

Furthermore, my most recent revisit made me realize that even Pennywise himself is poorly brought to the screen in the 1990 miniseries. Sure, Curry is fantastic and the costuming/makeup is exceptional, but Tommy Lee Wallace does a pretty bad job of actually making Pennywise scary; he’s more whimsical than he is threatening, and as a result, the incredible fear that the characters feel – both as children and later as adults – does not at all translate to what you’ve actually seen for yourself. It all comes off as being silly, awkward, and amateurish.

But my intention with this post wasn’t to sit here for an hour trashing the work Tommy Lee Wallace did back in 1990; it’s beloved for a reason, and it makes me happy that so many fans hold it so near and dear. Rather, I wanted to point to its flaws to illustrate that Stephen King’s IT, maybe more than any other iconic horror property out there, is in desperate need of a proper adaptation. As horror fans, we’ve become accustomed to perfect movies from the past being greenlit for remakes/reboots/re-adaptations, but IT is the rare film that actually warrants one. And now that I’ve seen the trailer for Muschietti’s rated R adaptation, holy shit has that become crystal clear to me.

Muschietti’s IT looks genuinely terrifying, and with King’s decades-spanning story being spread across two completely separate feature films, I’ve got a good feeling that it’s going to be done the epic justice that it has long deserved. If we’re all being honest with ourselves, the 1990 adaptation left much to be desired. And if you’re asking me, that makes it as ripe for a fresh new take as any piece of entertainment has ever been. Tommy Lee Wallace’s hands were tied when he made his TV miniseries. Muschietti, however, doesn’t appear to be holding anything back.

We may very well be in store for one of the great horror remakes of all time.

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has two awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

168 Comments

Editorials

Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel

Published

on

Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction

The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.

That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.

It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.

That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.

The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’

For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.

This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.

This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.

Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.

So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.

The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.

Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.

While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.

At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.

After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

Continue Reading