Connect with us

Movies

Heartless (VOD)

“Once Heartless gets rolling, its bizarre plotting and lack of explanation sometime threaten to derail the experience, but Ridley has injected the movie with enough raw momentum to carry the load.”

Published

on

Way back in 1998, in the middle of a knock-down/drag-out with my ex-wife, I spent the better part of an hour browsing the immense stacks of rental VHS in Seattle’s Scarecrow Video, looking for something just weird and intense enough to distract me from my own life. The Reflecting Skin––which turned out to be a visually rich and somewhat disturbing piece of gothic Americana starring Viggo Mortensen––certainly did the job. I became an immediate fan of writer/director Philip Ridley, and was disappointed to discover that he only had two movies on his resume: 1990’s The Reflecting Skin and 1995’s The Passion of Darkly Moon, also starring Aragorn. I eventually discovered that Ridley is a highly talented artist, author, and playwright who simply chooses to spend his time focusing on other forms of expression. Heartless is his first film in 15 years.

Jamie (Jim Sturgess; 21) is a soft-spoken photographer whose birthmark-splotched face, neck, and body have driven him into a spiral of loneliness and despair. As possible suicide looms on the horizon, Jamie gets a phone call from the devil, who requests a sit down. Being the devil, he proposes a Faustian bargain: he’ll remove Jamie’s unsightly birthmarks in exchange for “a splinter of chaos”. When Jamie asks for specifics, the devil replies that he’ll only require Jamie to scrawl some sacrilegious graffiti. Jamie agrees and they close the deal with a handshake. But when the devil’s “Weapons Man” (Eddie Marsan) makes a house call the next day with a different assignment, Jamie comes to realize what we’ve known all along…a deal with the devil always comes with a twist.

For the first 30 minutes, it’s hard to tell where Heartless is going. It’s established that Jamie works in a photo studio with his brother and nephew, and that he frequently hides in the dark room so the customers won‘t have to see his revolting birthmarks. Mourning his father’s death and increasingly introverted, Jamie begins to see lizard creatures in black hoodies. They prowl the streets and alleys of London, they crop up in his developed photos, they even burn a couple of people to death with Molotov cocktails while Jamie tries to snap a photo. At first glance, Heartless is your garden variety “man goes crazy” movie like Shutter Island or The Tenant, and the first 30 minutes drag with the weight of predictability. But then Jamie gets that phone call from Satan, and everything that follows is indie horror gravy.

Once Heartless gets rolling, its bizarre plotting and lack of explanation sometime threaten to derail the experience, but Ridley has injected the movie with enough raw momentum to carry the load. Just when you think you know where it’s headed, Heartless throws down the hammer and cranks a turn. That crafty Philip Ridley gives you just enough information to keep up, at least up until his royal mindfuck of an ending. It’s a crazy ride, with a sprinkling of overall weirdness that’s reminiscent of Phantasm or Cemetery Man. When I’m craving indie horror, movies like Heartless are exactly what I’m looking for.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Movies

‘Mickey vs. Winnie’ – The Public Domain Horror Trend May Have Just Jumped the Shark

Published

on

In case you haven’t noticed, the public domain status of beloved icons like Winnie the Pooh, Cinderella and Mickey Mouse has been wreaking havoc on the horror genre in the past couple years, with filmmakers itching to get their hands on the characters and put them into twisted situations. In the wake of two Winnie the Pooh slashers, well, Pooh is about to battle Mickey.

It’s not from the same team behind the Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey films, to be clear, but Deadline reports that Glen Douglas Packard (Pitchfork) will direct the horror movie Mickey vs. Winnie for Untouchables Entertainment and the website iHorror.

Deadline details, “The film follows two convicts in the 1920s who escape into a cursed forest only to be dragged and consumed into the depths of the dark forest’s muddy heart.

“A century later, a group of thrill-seeking friends unknowingly venture into the same woods. Their Airbnb getaway takes a horrifying turn when the convicts mutate into twisted versions of childhood icons Mickey Mouse & Winnie-The-Pooh, and emerge to terrorize them. A night of violence and gore erupts, as the group of friends battle against their now monstrous beloved childhood characters and fight to break free from the forest’s grip.

“In a horrific spectacle, Mickey and Winnie clash, painting the woods in a gruesome tableau of blood—a chilling testament to the curse’s insidious power.”

Glen Douglas Packard wrote the screenplay that he’ll be directing.

“Horror fans call for the thrill of witnessing icons like the new Aliens and Avengers sharing the screen. While licensing nightmares make such crossovers rare, Mickey vs. Winnie serves as our tribute to that thrilling fantasy,” Packard said in a statement this week.

Producer Anthony Pernicka from iHorror previews, “We’re thrilled to unveil this unique take to horror fans. The Mickey Mouse featured in our film is unlike any iteration audiences have encountered before. Our portrayal doesn’t involve characters donning basic masks. Instead, we present deeply transformed, live-action horror renditions of these iconic figures, weaving together elements of innocence and malevolence. After experiencing the intense scenes we’ve crafted, you’ll never look at Mickey the same way again.”

Continue Reading