Reviews
[TV Review] “Scream” Episode 1.08: ‘Ghosts’
After last week’s episode, and the major death that concluded it, Scream did what it did in episode 4 after Riley’s death and slowed it down for a bit, but to much greater effect. The show benefitted tremendously by focussing on Emma and giving her a tough-girl attitude. While I’m still not completely convinced she’s prime Final Girl material yet, she is starting to grow on me.
The bulk of the episode really was devoted to Emma, as she moved through the grieving process after witnessing her ex-boyfriend get sliced down the middle (that must have been quite the sight for his mother). My (and many of you guys’) issue with Emma is that she hasn’t had much of a presence on the show. She’s just sort of been there and hasn’t seemed to really care about anything going on around her.
From the opening moments of “Ghosts,” we see a hardened Emma. You would think that she would have been like this after Riley died four episodes ago, but I digress. This is a changed Emma, and the show is all the better for it. I will say that her hallucinations seemed to tell her a little too much. Will basically told her what Riley’s heart necklace meant. I’ve never had the psychological trauma Emma has had (because I’ve never seen an ex get split in half), but the explicitness of these hallucinations seemed just a bit more like a cheap plot device as opposed to an exploration of Emma’s psyche. Nevertheless, it was all a lot of fun to watch, as Scream got to use a lot of fun horror tropes in the process.
Her dad (Tom Everett Scott!) being a hallucination the whole time was a somewhat clever, if improbable, twist. It just seemed a little too easy for “him” to lead her directly to the video with the sonogram on it, but whatever. I’ll just go with it. This revelation that Maggie gave up Brandon James’ child and that that child may be back for revenge cements the fact that Scream: The Series is using Scream 3 as its template. I’m not sure why, out of all of the Scream films, they would choose the worst one to adapt, but it’s too early to fully judge the decision. Maybe (hopefully) that’s a red herring.
Let’s talk about Piper. First, she keeps mentioning that her dad is never coming back. This is clearly going to come up later, but could be a red herring. The only reason that might not be the case is because the show is all of a sudden forcing the super-friendship between Emma and Piper down our throats. Seriously, they seemed super buddy-buddy this week for no particular reason. That being said, Piper still doesn’t do much. Sure, she gave Sheriff Hudson the mayor’s blackmail tape and gave Emma a pep talk that motivated her to find answers, but that’s just using her as a plot device, not fleshing her out as a character.
The rest of the episode was mainly devoted to Mr. Branson, who is still terrible. He does lead us into another Brooke chase scene though (seriously, how many times has this girl been chased this season?), which is always fun. It would have been preferable for him to have been killed, since his arrest that closed the episode makes it look like the bulk of next week’s Ti-West directed episode will be devoted to his interrogation, but we’ll just have to wait and see.
“Ghosts” was a decent enough follow-up to last week’s episode. Emma has suddenly become much more interesting after Will’s death and is entering compelling Final Girl territory, but many of the the side characters and subplots still feel paper-thin. With two episodes left to go, Scream has its work cut out for it. That most of the episode was devoted to Emma’s transformation into a stronger character puts it on par with last week’s score.
Random Notes
- “The doctor said it was some kind of miracle. It missed all of his major organs.” -Brooke, on Jake getting stabbed in the chest last week.
- “Are they gonna arrest my dad?” “That’s kinda what sheriffs do.” -Sometimes the dialogue is just awful.
- “There are worse ways to go than being body snatched by Famke Jannsen.” -Noah, name-dropping The Faculty, of all things.
- I think I’ve been pretty good about not comparing the show to the film series, but dammit, give Piper some of Gale Weathers’ spunk! She will register more as a character that way.
- I swear this is the first time they’ve mentioned the mayor’s first name (it’s Quinn, by the way).
- “You don’t get to come back after all this time and be the hero.” -Emma to her dad. That’s exactly how I feel, but replace the word “hero” with “killer.” Don’t make a new character the killer, MTV (I thought this before it was revealed he was a hallucination the entire time).
- The Noah and Audrey scenes are winning me over. The chemistry between John Karna and Bex Taylor-Klaus has improved over the last few episodes.
- Maggie can apparently tell that it’s her ultrasound just from looking at the image. Alright.
- I’m now convinced that Tom Maden (Jake) is actually a good actor, but that Jake the character is one of the killers and just a bad liar. There is no other explanation for his terrible acting.
- On that note, it’s time for another round of Jake’s terrible reaction shots! This time, we’ve got his reaction to finding out about Will’s death:
Reviews
‘Hungry’ Review – Finally, a Film Brave Enough to Call Out Hippos for the Monsters They Truly Are
When it comes to the animal attack subgenre of horror, there’s a hierarchy of sorts with the wildlife in question. Killer shark movies are easily the most ubiquitous, while alligators/crocodiles, dogs, bears, and snakes probably lead the rest of the pack.
It’s often worth paying attention, though, when a filmmaker targets a more atypical animal threat, including the likes of Jonathan King’s Black Sheep or Juan Piquer Simón’s Slugs. A new contender rumbles its way onto the screen this month, and while we all grew up thinking hippos are rotund cuties, the truth is far more frightening – this hippo is Hungry.
Sistine (Madison Davenport) and her best friend, Hannah (Olivia Bernstone), are enjoying a vacation in New Orleans, hoping to drown out their troubles back home. They sign up for an early morning bayou tour known for its alligator sightings and are joined by four other tourists and the boat’s skipper, Rodrigo (Michel Curiel). An uneventful trip sees Rodrigo take the group off the beaten path, but when an animal in the water capsizes their boat, the group finds themselves trapped in the swamp by something unexpected and deadly.
It’s a hippo. There’s a hippo in the bayou, and it’s not happy about all these pesky people.

From Joy Houck’s Creature from Black Lake to Walter Hill’s Southern Comfort to Adam Green’s Hatchet, the movies have warned us time and again not to go into the swampy bayous of Louisiana. Those cautionary tales are appreciated, though, as bigfoot, inbred hicks, and undead serial killers are a very real threat. But hippos? In the bayou? Well, that just seems silly.
And yet, Hungry plays its blubbery, big-toothed threat with deadly seriousness, and it’s all the better for it. “But Rob,” I can already hear some of you saying, “just yesterday you reviewed the new shark attack film, Chum, and said it suffered from taking itself too seriously. What gives?” For one thing, you’re misquoting me, but more importantly, the reference there was more of an observation on the animal attack subgenre successes as a whole. The “fun” ones tend to succeed more often than their more serious counterparts, but a dramatic and thrilling time can still be found with filmmakers who know what they’re doing.
Chum may be serious, but it’s also poorly written/performed, lacking in any degree of tension, devoid of personality, and so on. By contrast, Hungry lets its suspense build on the backs of engaging characters, good performances, and believable writing. Only one of its ensemble is obnoxious – a major feat for this kind of film – but even then, their motivations are both well-written and understandable.
The rest of the characters are people you’d be happy to see survive the night, and rather than looking forward to the next kill, director James Nunn and his cast leave us uncertain and nervous about who’s going to go belly up. The nervous business traveler wanting to get back to her kids? The family of three celebrating lost loved ones while on their vacation? Joaquim de Almeida’s Walker, an old hunter, is introduced saying, “The only cute hippo is a dead hippo,” so you pretty much know where he’ll end up.

To that end, the film teases out its hippo’s first appearance until well into the ninety-minute running time. We get ripples and splashes, but it’s only around the midway point that we get our first real look at the beast, and it looks fantastic. Nunn goes on to show the hippo in all its glory, and it’s a convincing antagonist brought to life through practical prosthetic effects and digital work. From the ear twitches to the beast’s giant maw opening wide with awe and malice, the hippo’s presence feels part of the action. There’s a tangible nature to it, something practical effects excel at while digital effects sometimes fail to convince of, and both succeed here with quality work from all involved.
While we get brief exteriors early on and some visually appealing drone shots, the bulk of the film unfolds on what looks to be a highly believable, set-dressed water tank (but could very well be an actual location, in which case, kudos to the team). It’s wholly convincing as a section of the bayou, complete with shoulder-high water and arching, twisting trees emerging into the sky. The film was shot in Malta, which is, coincidentally, where Chum was filmed as well.
Nunn, who also wrote Hungry, is now ten films deep into a fairly interesting career as a genre filmmaker. He’s made four movies with Scott Adkins, three of which are certified action bangers (with 2016’s Eliminators in particular being an underrated gem). He dipped a toe into the animal attack subgenre back in 2022 with the aforementioned Shark Bait, and it’s clear he learned some lessons from that endeavor, as its first hour is an engaging, attractively shot feature that sinks fast as soon as its poorly rendered shark becomes a lead character. Hungry improves on every aspect of that film, with its biggest step up being in regard to the effects.

If there’s an area or two where Hungry lacks bite, it’s in both its gore and its ending. There are numerous kills here, but the nature of the attacks and the choices made by Nunn mean none of them result in gory assaults or outcomes. We’re shown the torn apart corpse of an alligator early on, but most of the human kills see them attacked and dragged underwater, leaving nothing but a blood spill behind. Similarly, while the ending encounter satisfies, it still feels like it should have been a bigger confrontation. Neither of these aspects really hurt the film, but a bolstering of the gore and ending antics would have definitely upped the film’s ultimate entertainment value and rewatchability.
When all is said and done, Hungry is a genuinely solid animal attack film that succeeds in making its creature threat thrilling, entertaining, and, dare I say, educational? Title notwithstanding, the film acknowledges that hippos are vegetarians, meaning the five hundred or so people they kill every year – a true fact! – are slaughtered not out of hunger, but out of spite, self-defense, or a desire to play “land orca” while tossing around us fragile humans like we’re little more than seals in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Characters are grounded and engaging, the film moves well between suspense, character beats, and action, and the effects used to bring the hippo to life are highly effective and never feel like distractions. Drop those expectations of a Hungry Hungry Hippo romp, and settle in for a terrific little survival thriller about an angry, angry hippo instead.
Chomp chomp.
Hungry releases in select theaters today, June 3, before arriving on VOD on June 23, 2026.




You must be logged in to post a comment.