Connect with us

Movies

[Review] ‘Mohawk’ Proves Man is the Most Dangerous Monster

Published

on

Man is the most dangerous monster. Demons possess and trick their hosts into committing stigmata upon themselves, vampires suck their victims dry and pick their teeth clean with their bones, and werewolves transform everyday people into ferocious beasts hell-bent on destruction by way of tearing innocent patrons apart, but no creature is as deadly or deranged as an animal that would use its thumbs to forge a fatal weapon which can end lives with the slight pull of a trigger. Creatures of the night pale in comparison to the entities lurking in the woods waiting for well-timed capture, surveying the land with greedy gold-speckled eyes, plotting how best to kill what stands in its way of profit. In this New World where the man with the biggest gun wins, no Native is safe from the destruction that the white man wields. No Indian goes to bed at night fearing the supernatural creatures lurking under his bed – they dread the chaos that the sun drenched day brings, when their Aryan brothers finally decide once and for all that they want this land for themselves.

The follow up to his 2015 crowd pleasing debut feature We Are Still Here, Ted Geoghegan is back furious vengeance in his latest film, simply titled Mohawk. Set during the War of 1812, the film follows the story of Oak, a strong Native American Mohawk princess who will do anything to protect her family from the white settlers slowly encroaching onto their land. At her side is her Indian lover Calvin Two Rivers, and her Red Coat lover Joshua – yes, that’s right, Oak is in an open bisexual relationship with two men from polar opposite sides of the globe. Despite the madness around her and all of the men seeking to divide her world into factions based on race, Oak manages to find the grace in the little community she has crafted here through her romance. The three people in this relationship succeed where strategic pioneers have failed – they look past surface skin color and find love nestled within each others’ eyes.

In the movie, a group of peaceful Mohawk Native American live in humble coexistence with New England settlers in their little corner of colonial America. That is, until one day when the white man has decided he’s had enough of this cohabitation and seeks to snatch up the land all for himself and himself only – even if that means killing every single Indian currently residing on this land in order to achieve it.

Undeniably, Mohawk has its issues – watching these characters race over the seemingly same patch of grass (where it was apparently filmed in upstate New York) makes the journey feel somewhat hard to follow after a while, as if these people were almost running around in circles, and the production value makes it quite apparent that this is a low budget film, especially when one stops to take a gander at some of the costumes. However, despite its small shortcomings, where Geoghegan succeeds is in his brave attempt to create a universe in which the settlers of the New World are not the heroes we’ve come to believe, but in actuality, thieves lying in wait to pillage and maim everyone in their path until they’ve snuffed out an entire group of people and their culture from existence. Where some filmmakers play it safe by crafting crowd pleasing universes in which everyone in the audience will adhere to and agree with what they’re witnessing onscreen, Geoghegan casts normality aside in favor of some hard truth – we white people stole this land, and our history isn’t as romantic and gratifying as some of us have been led to believe. It’s an intriguing story, not only because it’s one we haven’t heard very often, but also because it’s a flip on perspective, turning the “savages” we’ve grown accustomed to into innocent prey, and turning us, those who would rather dust the unfortunate truth under the rug, into the ones to fear. It will be interesting to see what this atypical filmmaker can conjure up next, especially given his already impressive track record thus far.

Movies

’28 Years Later’ Releasing Summer 2025!

Published

on

28 Years Later/ 28 Days Later Best Horror Films

Danny Boyle and Alex Garland are reteaming for the long-awaited 28 Years Later horror sequel trilogy, and the first film in that new trilogy now has a release date.

28 Years Later arrives in theaters on June 20, 2025 from Sony.

Jack O’Connell (Amy Winehouse: Back To Black) has joined the previously announced Jodie Comer (Alone in the Dark, “Killing Eve”), Aaron Taylor-Johnson (Kraven the Hunter), and Ralph Fiennes (The Menu) in the upcoming 28 Years Later.

Alex Garland will write the first film and Boyle will return to direct. Nia DaCosta (Candyman, The Marvels) will direct the second installment in the trilogy from Sony Pictures.

Cillian Murphy (Oppenheimer) is on board as executive producer.

The original movie in 2002 starred Cillian Murphy and was written by Alex Garland and directed by Danny Boyle. In the smash hit horror film, “Four weeks after a mysterious, incurable virus spreads throughout the UK, a handful of survivors try to find sanctuary.”

A sequel, 28 Weeks Later, arrived in 2007. Juan Carlos Fresnadillo took over as director. In the sequel, which starred Jeremy Renner, “Six months after the rage virus was inflicted on the population of Great Britain, the US Army helps to secure a small area of London for the survivors to repopulate and start again. But not everything goes according to plan.”

Talks of a third installment in the franchise have been coming and going for the last several years now – at one point, it was going to be titled 28 Months Later – but it looks like this one is finally getting off the ground here in 2024. Stay tuned for more updates soon!

Continue Reading