Quantcast
Connect with us

Reviews

[TV Review] ‘Channel Zero: The Dream Door’ Is a Madly Creative Treat

Published

on

I’ve said this before, but I think it’s worth reiterating that we’re living in a golden age of horror on television. Although some skeptics argue that shows like The Walking Dead and American Horror Story do more harm than good to the genre, look no further than SyFy’s criminally underrated Channel Zero as an example of scary stories done right on the small screen.

Nick Antosca‘s Creepypasta-based anthology series has been on the air since 2016, and four short but sweet seasons later, the show has yet to provide us with a bad time. This October, however, SyFy did things a little differently with The Dream Door, teasing us with the first episode and then releasing all the others at once on their streaming service a few weeks later (although they also broadcast the remaining episodes one at a time in the days leading up to Halloween).

While I enjoy the anticipation that usually came with waiting for new episodes, viewers can rest easy as it’s safe to say that The Dream Door‘s tightly crafted narrative actually benefits from binge-watching, and this is easily some of the best horror-related media that we’ve seen all year.

This season, based on Charlotte Bywater‘s Hidden Door, follows Jillian and Tom Hodgson, a newlywed couple played by Maria Sten and Brandon Scott that has just moved back into Tom’s childhood home. While both are initially happy with their new lives together, it soon becomes apparent that their relationship is plagued by terrible secrets. When a mysterious door materializes in their basement, things take a turn for the worst as Jillian is forced to face her childhood fears all over again.

A few unexplained murders and one nightmarish contortionist clown later, and we’re treated to one of the best seasons of Channel Zero so far, with the Hodgsons learning how easy it is for emotional baggage to (quite literally) kill a relationship.

While the earlier episodes are strange enough to make you question whether or not the writers have an end-game planned out at all, the show miraculously manages to tie up nearly all loose ends by the final episodes without ever over-explaining the supernatural elements of the story. In fact, The Dream Door somehow becomes even more fascinating as the mysteries behind the earlier episodes are slowly revealed, and it’s actually a shame that we don’t delve further into the mythology.

There are a few plot threads that feel rather undercooked (especially Barbara Crampton‘s woefully underused character), but the overall experience is entertaining and emotional enough to make up for these weaker elements. It’s also worth noting that despite the unusual subject matter and a preference for scenes set during daytime, scares are still plentiful this time around (most of which are due to Twisty Troy‘s incredible performance as Pretzel Jack), thought the script never loses track of the human element that drives the story either.

From the very beginning, every season of Channel Zero has boasted jaw-dropping cinematography, and The Dream Door is no exception. Unusual camera angles and movements not only set the mood for some unexpected scares, but also help to energize some of E. L. Katz‘s surprisingly intense and gory chase sequences in later episodes. The atmospheric yet vibrant soundtrack is also a plus, only adding to an already memorable package.

With this fourth season, Channel Zero continues to be one of SyFy’s best offerings, and I can only hope that even more horror fans will watch it so we can bless our television sets with frequent doses of creepypasta-based goodness. It may not be perfect, with a few twists that don’t quite land, but The Dream Door is consistently imaginative, managing to blend madly creative storytelling with eerily relatable relationship dynamics without ever devolving into a pretentious mess. This, coupled with great performances (Steven Robertson is one of several standouts as the Hodgson’s seemingly friendly neighbor Ian) and some of the best practical effects of the year, make this a must watch for any horror fan.

Channel Zero: The Dream Door is available now on SyFy’s streaming service!

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and filmmaker that spends most of his time thinking about movies.

Click to comment

Reviews

‘Hungry’ Review – Finally, a Film Brave Enough to Call Out Hippos for the Monsters They Truly Are

Published

on

Hungry Review

When it comes to the animal attack subgenre of horror, there’s a hierarchy of sorts with the wildlife in question. Killer shark movies are easily the most ubiquitous, while alligators/crocodiles, dogs, bears, and snakes probably lead the rest of the pack.

It’s often worth paying attention, though, when a filmmaker targets a more atypical animal threat, including the likes of Jonathan King’s Black Sheep or Juan Piquer Simón’s Slugs. A new contender rumbles its way onto the screen this month, and while we all grew up thinking hippos are rotund cuties, the truth is far more frightening – this hippo is Hungry.

Sistine (Madison Davenport) and her best friend, Hannah (Olivia Bernstone), are enjoying a vacation in New Orleans, hoping to drown out their troubles back home. They sign up for an early morning bayou tour known for its alligator sightings and are joined by four other tourists and the boat’s skipper, Rodrigo (Michel Curiel). An uneventful trip sees Rodrigo take the group off the beaten path, but when an animal in the water capsizes their boat, the group finds themselves trapped in the swamp by something unexpected and deadly.

It’s a hippo. There’s a hippo in the bayou, and it’s not happy about all these pesky people.

From Joy Houck’s Creature from Black Lake to Walter Hill’s Southern Comfort to Adam Green’s Hatchet, the movies have warned us time and again not to go into the swampy bayous of Louisiana. Those cautionary tales are appreciated, though, as bigfoot, inbred hicks, and undead serial killers are a very real threat. But hippos? In the bayou? Well, that just seems silly.

And yet, Hungry plays its blubbery, big-toothed threat with deadly seriousness, and it’s all the better for it. “But Rob,” I can already hear some of you saying, “just yesterday you reviewed the new shark attack film, Chum, and said it suffered from taking itself too seriously. What gives?” For one thing, you’re misquoting me, but more importantly, the reference there was more of an observation on the animal attack subgenre successes as a whole. The “fun” ones tend to succeed more often than their more serious counterparts, but a dramatic and thrilling time can still be found with filmmakers who know what they’re doing.

Chum may be serious, but it’s also poorly written/performed, lacking in any degree of tension, devoid of personality, and so on. By contrast, Hungry lets its suspense build on the backs of engaging characters, good performances, and believable writing. Only one of its ensemble is obnoxious – a major feat for this kind of film – but even then, their motivations are both well-written and understandable.

The rest of the characters are people you’d be happy to see survive the night, and rather than looking forward to the next kill, director James Nunn and his cast leave us uncertain and nervous about who’s going to go belly up. The nervous business traveler wanting to get back to her kids? The family of three celebrating lost loved ones while on their vacation? Joaquim de Almeida’s Walker, an old hunter, is introduced saying, “The only cute hippo is a dead hippo,” so you pretty much know where he’ll end up.

To that end, the film teases out its hippo’s first appearance until well into the ninety-minute running time. We get ripples and splashes, but it’s only around the midway point that we get our first real look at the beast, and it looks fantastic. Nunn goes on to show the hippo in all its glory, and it’s a convincing antagonist brought to life through practical prosthetic effects and digital work. From the ear twitches to the beast’s giant maw opening wide with awe and malice, the hippo’s presence feels part of the action. There’s a tangible nature to it, something practical effects excel at while digital effects sometimes fail to convince of, and both succeed here with quality work from all involved.

While we get brief exteriors early on and some visually appealing drone shots, the bulk of the film unfolds on what looks to be a highly believable, set-dressed water tank (but could very well be an actual location, in which case, kudos to the team). It’s wholly convincing as a section of the bayou, complete with shoulder-high water and arching, twisting trees emerging into the sky. The film was shot in Malta, which is, coincidentally, where Chum was filmed as well.

Nunn, who also wrote Hungry, is now ten films deep into a fairly interesting career as a genre filmmaker. He’s made four movies with Scott Adkins, three of which are certified action bangers (with 2016’s Eliminators in particular being an underrated gem). He dipped a toe into the animal attack subgenre back in 2022 with the aforementioned Shark Bait, and it’s clear he learned some lessons from that endeavor, as its first hour is an engaging, attractively shot feature that sinks fast as soon as its poorly rendered shark becomes a lead character. Hungry improves on every aspect of that film, with its biggest step up being in regard to the effects.

If there’s an area or two where Hungry lacks bite, it’s in both its gore and its ending. There are numerous kills here, but the nature of the attacks and the choices made by Nunn mean none of them result in gory assaults or outcomes. We’re shown the torn apart corpse of an alligator early on, but most of the human kills see them attacked and dragged underwater, leaving nothing but a blood spill behind. Similarly, while the ending encounter satisfies, it still feels like it should have been a bigger confrontation. Neither of these aspects really hurt the film, but a bolstering of the gore and ending antics would have definitely upped the film’s ultimate entertainment value and rewatchability.

When all is said and done, Hungry is a genuinely solid animal attack film that succeeds in making its creature threat thrilling, entertaining, and, dare I say, educational? Title notwithstanding, the film acknowledges that hippos are vegetarians, meaning the five hundred or so people they kill every year – a true fact! – are slaughtered not out of hunger, but out of spite, self-defense, or a desire to play “land orca” while tossing around us fragile humans like we’re little more than seals in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Characters are grounded and engaging, the film moves well between suspense, character beats, and action, and the effects used to bring the hippo to life are highly effective and never feel like distractions. Drop those expectations of a Hungry Hungry Hippo romp, and settle in for a terrific little survival thriller about an angry, angry hippo instead.

Chomp chomp.

Hungry releases in select theaters today, June 3, before arriving on VOD on June 23, 2026.

3 skulls out of 5

Continue Reading