Reviews
‘The Third Saturday in October Part V’ Review – Infectious Slasher Homage Recreates the Video Store Era
The Third Saturday in October Part V is technically the second entry in a slasher series– there are no Parts II, III, or IV- and the recommended starting point in your viewing. Described as a “kids movie for adults,” Part V captures the video store era, in which your rental selections were limited by availability and frequently led to watching horror franchises out of order. This unique slasher homage experiment playfully riffs on the subgenre with period and regional specificity.
Opening with a recap montage to catch viewers up to speed from the non-existent previous entries (outside of the first), Part V settles into a familiar slasher setup in a small Alabama town in the ’90s. It’s the doomed third Saturday in October. For the town, it’s a night to gather around and watch football. For young PJ (Poppy Cunningham), it’s a chance to talk her babysitter Maggie (Kansas Bowling) into taking her to Catfish Cabin before the night is through. Masked killer Harding (Antonio Woodruff) has returned from the grave to begin slaying again, right on cue. If only anyone would realize this before it’s too late.
Writer/Director Jay Burleson captures the era’s vibe well and bides his time in establishing the slasher archetypes. Burleson borrows heavily from Halloween, but it’s hardly the only overt influence tossed into this nostalgia blender. Lester (Bart Hyatt) spoofs Texas Chain Saw’s Franklin, and stuttering George (Daniel Cutt) seems to take his cues and personality from It’s Bill Denbrough. The killer, Harding, is an amalgam of icons, though primarily a giggly variation of Michael Myers.
Harding takes a while to really cut loose, pun intended. The masked maniac infiltrates a football gathering but mostly sneaks around for a lengthy build-up as Burleson lets his cast of slasher fodder establish personality and set up punchlines. Lampooning localized commercials on TV, subversions of slasher nudity, out of place party goers, and an entire town transfixed by football are among the silliness that endears this wacky experiment to viewers long before the actual slashing finally kicks into high gear.
Burleson offers a good time there, too. While Part V offers a variety of kills and employs practical effects, it’s more interested in the tongue-in-cheek humor than serious bloodletting. That means that the kills never get too mean or gory and, in the spirit of a fourth sequel, never that deep in plot. It’s just a party, attendees, and a sneaky killer out to have a great time on a Saturday night in October. It’s out to ensure you have a good time, too.
Part V doesn’t take itself seriously, but Burleson does approach the craft with care and authenticity. The filmmaker recreates that straight-to-video aesthetic through camera work, production design, and dialogue, even if not wholly accurate in the details. It’s a loving recreation of a hyper niche era in horror fandom, and Burleson and team give it their all to let you in on the joke.
The Third Saturday in October Part V is a clever slasher parody that aims to recreate that feeling of renting Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan on a weekend because someone beat you to the video store and snatched up all the other entries first. Using slasher shorthand means you don’t need to know anything about Harding or the town going in to enjoy. Part V never bothers filling in any blanks either; it’s not necessary to the fun. It’s an infectious and intentionally cheesy slasher made for and by horror fans. While its seams can and do show, it only adds to the charm.
The Third Saturday in October Part V made its world premiere at the Chattanooga Film Festival.


Reviews
‘Hungry’ Review – Finally, a Film Brave Enough to Call Out Hippos for the Monsters They Truly Are
When it comes to the animal attack subgenre of horror, there’s a hierarchy of sorts with the wildlife in question. Killer shark movies are easily the most ubiquitous, while alligators/crocodiles, dogs, bears, and snakes probably lead the rest of the pack.
It’s often worth paying attention, though, when a filmmaker targets a more atypical animal threat, including the likes of Jonathan King’s Black Sheep or Juan Piquer Simón’s Slugs. A new contender rumbles its way onto the screen this month, and while we all grew up thinking hippos are rotund cuties, the truth is far more frightening – this hippo is Hungry.
Sistine (Madison Davenport) and her best friend, Hannah (Olivia Bernstone), are enjoying a vacation in New Orleans, hoping to drown out their troubles back home. They sign up for an early morning bayou tour known for its alligator sightings and are joined by four other tourists and the boat’s skipper, Rodrigo (Michel Curiel). An uneventful trip sees Rodrigo take the group off the beaten path, but when an animal in the water capsizes their boat, the group finds themselves trapped in the swamp by something unexpected and deadly.
It’s a hippo. There’s a hippo in the bayou, and it’s not happy about all these pesky people.

From Joy Houck’s Creature from Black Lake to Walter Hill’s Southern Comfort to Adam Green’s Hatchet, the movies have warned us time and again not to go into the swampy bayous of Louisiana. Those cautionary tales are appreciated, though, as bigfoot, inbred hicks, and undead serial killers are a very real threat. But hippos? In the bayou? Well, that just seems silly.
And yet, Hungry plays its blubbery, big-toothed threat with deadly seriousness, and it’s all the better for it. “But Rob,” I can already hear some of you saying, “just yesterday you reviewed the new shark attack film, Chum, and said it suffered from taking itself too seriously. What gives?” For one thing, you’re misquoting me, but more importantly, the reference there was more of an observation on the animal attack subgenre successes as a whole. The “fun” ones tend to succeed more often than their more serious counterparts, but a dramatic and thrilling time can still be found with filmmakers who know what they’re doing.
Chum may be serious, but it’s also poorly written/performed, lacking in any degree of tension, devoid of personality, and so on. By contrast, Hungry lets its suspense build on the backs of engaging characters, good performances, and believable writing. Only one of its ensemble is obnoxious – a major feat for this kind of film – but even then, their motivations are both well-written and understandable.
The rest of the characters are people you’d be happy to see survive the night, and rather than looking forward to the next kill, director James Nunn and his cast leave us uncertain and nervous about who’s going to go belly up. The nervous business traveler wanting to get back to her kids? The family of three celebrating lost loved ones while on their vacation? Joaquim de Almeida’s Walker, an old hunter, is introduced saying, “The only cute hippo is a dead hippo,” so you pretty much know where he’ll end up.

To that end, the film teases out its hippo’s first appearance until well into the ninety-minute running time. We get ripples and splashes, but it’s only around the midway point that we get our first real look at the beast, and it looks fantastic. Nunn goes on to show the hippo in all its glory, and it’s a convincing antagonist brought to life through practical prosthetic effects and digital work. From the ear twitches to the beast’s giant maw opening wide with awe and malice, the hippo’s presence feels part of the action. There’s a tangible nature to it, something practical effects excel at while digital effects sometimes fail to convince of, and both succeed here with quality work from all involved.
While we get brief exteriors early on and some visually appealing drone shots, the bulk of the film unfolds on what looks to be a highly believable, set-dressed water tank (but could very well be an actual location, in which case, kudos to the team). It’s wholly convincing as a section of the bayou, complete with shoulder-high water and arching, twisting trees emerging into the sky. The film was shot in Malta, which is, coincidentally, where Chum was filmed as well.
Nunn, who also wrote Hungry, is now ten films deep into a fairly interesting career as a genre filmmaker. He’s made four movies with Scott Adkins, three of which are certified action bangers (with 2016’s Eliminators in particular being an underrated gem). He dipped a toe into the animal attack subgenre back in 2022 with the aforementioned Shark Bait, and it’s clear he learned some lessons from that endeavor, as its first hour is an engaging, attractively shot feature that sinks fast as soon as its poorly rendered shark becomes a lead character. Hungry improves on every aspect of that film, with its biggest step up being in regard to the effects.

If there’s an area or two where Hungry lacks bite, it’s in both its gore and its ending. There are numerous kills here, but the nature of the attacks and the choices made by Nunn mean none of them result in gory assaults or outcomes. We’re shown the torn apart corpse of an alligator early on, but most of the human kills see them attacked and dragged underwater, leaving nothing but a blood spill behind. Similarly, while the ending encounter satisfies, it still feels like it should have been a bigger confrontation. Neither of these aspects really hurt the film, but a bolstering of the gore and ending antics would have definitely upped the film’s ultimate entertainment value and rewatchability.
When all is said and done, Hungry is a genuinely solid animal attack film that succeeds in making its creature threat thrilling, entertaining, and, dare I say, educational? Title notwithstanding, the film acknowledges that hippos are vegetarians, meaning the five hundred or so people they kill every year – a true fact! – are slaughtered not out of hunger, but out of spite, self-defense, or a desire to play “land orca” while tossing around us fragile humans like we’re little more than seals in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Characters are grounded and engaging, the film moves well between suspense, character beats, and action, and the effects used to bring the hippo to life are highly effective and never feel like distractions. Drop those expectations of a Hungry Hungry Hippo romp, and settle in for a terrific little survival thriller about an angry, angry hippo instead.
Chomp chomp.
Hungry releases in select theaters today, June 3, before arriving on VOD on June 23, 2026.


You must be logged in to post a comment.