Movies
Meta Horror ‘I Know Exactly How You Die’ Was A Draft Away From Greatness [Review]
“Write what you know” might just be the oldest adage in the business, and that’s probably why meta horror narratives are so popular among genre fans. After all, it makes sense that genre writers would produce some of their best and most personal work when weaving tales about the unique thrills involved with dedicating your life to crafting fictional nightmares.
Of course, there’s always the risk that these ambitious stories will end up consuming themselves like a pretentious ouroboros, and that’s why I was only cautiously optimistic when I first heard about Alexandra Spieth‘s sophomore feature, the self-aware thriller I Know Exactly How You Die. Thankfully, I was fortunate enough to watch the film for its official world premiere, and I’m pleased to say that the movie has a lot more up its sleeve than merely pointing out genre tropes.
In the film, we follow the struggles of Rian (Rushabh Patel), a down-on-his-luck author who decides to isolate himself in a remote motel so he can finish writing his latest horror novel and process a recent break-up. Things take a turn for the bizarre once it’s revealed that the events of Rian’s book are unfolding right next door as his protagonist Katie (Stephanie Hogan) also checks into the motel in order to escape a psychotic mailman-turned-serial-killer. Rian must then team up with Katie in order to help her confront her stalker and complete his story – all the while uncovering the dark secrets of the motel itself.
Horror doesn’t get much more meta than a writer being forced to confront problems that he himself created, and I Know Exactly How You Die excels when it leans into the general absurdity of our protagonists’ predicament. Unfortunately, an unfocused screenplay and uneven performances sabotage what could have been a genuinely great mystery, which is a huge shame when you consider just how much effort went into making this ambitious little indie flick feel as eerie and atmospheric as possible on such a small budget.
While Patel makes for an undeniably charming lead and Hogan really sells the paranoia that haunts her character’s every waking moment, the story can’t quite make up its mind about who these characters are as people. It initially seems that Spieth is trying to depict our main duo as emotionally complex individuals with contradicting qualities, but the film doesn’t seem to know whether or not we should be rooting for the likable yet admittedly toxic Rian, or if Katie’s refusal to call the police is meant to be seen as brave rather than stupid.

The inconsistent character motivations and overall tonal confusion are only exacerbated by the flick’s strange sense of humor. I often got the sense that Mike Corey’s original script was meant to be much more of an over-the-top farce than Spieth’s somber direction made it out to be. That’s not to say that I don’t appreciate the film’s grungy digital photography and lived-in atmosphere (they really got their money’s worth out of the motel), but it’s a shame that all this effort was put into telling a story so conflicted about its own mood.
For instance, the extremely tense soundtrack only makes the flick’s humor seem even more out of place, but it simultaneously pairs perfectly with the lo-fi visuals and our characters’ deteriorating mental states. In fact, almost all of the individual ideas that make up the screenplay are excellent, and I even loved how Rian’s treatment of Katie (and her own experience trying to deal with an all-too common form of harassment) raised questions about how folks are fascinated with female suffering in horror while often choosing to ignore it in real life. And while I wasn’t a fan of the rather abrupt execution of Rian’s character arc, I appreciate the subtle hints at the narcissism lurking beneath his overall affable demeanor.
I was also surprised by the story’s attempts at justifying the film’s meta elements by hinting at how the motel has an Alan Wake-inspired history of bringing writing to life. However, I wish this detail had been explored further, especially since firmer worldbuilding would have helped the film in the tension department (while also making Rawya El Chab’s character much more interesting). In fact, the lack of a logical set of clear-cut rules makes our antagonist even less intimidating, as the movie never makes it clear if he’s aware that he’s in a story or not despite inexplicably gaining control of the narrative at one point – and that’s not even mentioning the disappointingly flat performance that sucks away any tension from what should have been a climactic encounter between Katie and her stalker.
Ironically enough, it feels like I Know Exactly How You Die was a mere draft away from greatness, as all the ingredients were in place to craft a memorable meta-thriller examining the cruel treatment of women in both fiction and reality. Unfortunately, these ideas were never properly combined into a cohesive whole. Though these blemishes aren’t enough to make this a bad film due to Spieth’s clear sense of style and a pair of likable protagonists, audiences will likely be left with an underlying feeling of wasted potential by the time the credits roll.
Of course, with such an interesting cocktail of meta inspirations behind the scenes and a memorable ambience that verges on neo-noir, I’d still recommend I Know Exactly How You Die to horror fans curious about what might happen when an artist can’t separate himself from his art.
I Know Exactly How You Die made its premiere at NYC’s Dances With Films on January 17. Release info TBD.


Editorials
Beyond the Bargain Bin: 5 Underrated Direct-to-Video Horror Sequels
The home video market used to be a chaotic industry wedged neatly between theatrical releases and television productions. It was where indie filmmakers could experiment with and profit from low-budget bangers while big studios could also squeeze extra money out of beloved properties without necessarily investing in blockbuster sequels.
There were plenty of cinematic duds during this time, and you never really knew whether you had just picked up a legitimately fun low-budget endeavor or a quick cash-grab from the rental store, but I’d argue that the good outweighed the bad because these flicks were allowed to be weirder than their big-budget counterparts – especially where sequels were concerned.
In honor of these home video hidden gems, today I’d like to recommend five underrated direct-to-video horror sequels that are still worth tracking down!
For the purposes of this list, I’ll be defining direct-to-video productions as films that were exclusively released on video/DVD, so no limited theatrical releases or TV movies that later made it big on home video. That means avoiding popular recommendations like Curse of Chucky and Wrong Turn 2 in order to focus on less-discussed horror flicks.
That being said, don’t forget to comment below with your own favorite sequels if you think we missed a particularly thrilling one.
With that out of the way, onto the list!
5. Tremors 4: The Legend Begins (2004)

The success of Ron Underwood’s original Tremors was lightning in a bottle that can’t ever be replicated, so as much as I understand the love for the second film and its campy thrills, Tremors 4 remains my personal favorite sequel simply because it dares to do something different with the franchise.
Directed by series co-creator S.S. Wilson, The Legend Begins is a surprisingly effective prequel that tells the story of how the town of Perfection earned its name after a terrifying 1889 encounter with the graboids. This horror western may not live up to the original, but it doesn’t really have to, with the period aesthetic and fresh story making it one hell of a standalone adventure.
4. Children of the Corn III: Urban Harvest (1995)

There are those who argue that there are no good Children of the Corn films, but I think the series has something to offer for every kind of horror fan if you’re willing to deal with low budgets and strange creative decisions. In fact, I’m of the opinion that the initial trilogy of Children films only got better over time, with the third entry being the most entertaining despite having the least to do with Stephen King’s original story.
In this urban horror romp, we follow a pair of siblings who enter foster care after their abusive father is transformed into a scarecrow by He Who Walks Behind the Rows. What follows is an effects-heavy descent into madness as the kids bring their particular brand of religious fury to 90s Chicago – with deadly results.
If that’s not enough to convince you to give this flick a try, you should know that this is the only entry in the series that King himself has admitted to liking. Not only that, but it also marks Charlize Theron’s feature film debut.
3. Boogeyman 2 (2007)

Jeff Betancourt had his job cut out for him when he was first contacted to helm the sequel to 2005’s Boogeyman. Not only was the first film a critical bomb, but the sequel was set to be produced for a mere $4.5 million – less than a fourth of the budget of the original flick.
Yet, Jeff decided to use this direct-to-video sequel as an opportunity to improve on the generic aspects of the flick’s predecessor by making the monster more uncannily human and focusing more on the script than elaborate set pieces. The best part is that Boogeyman 2 isn’t limited by a PG-13 rating, meaning that the deaths are more interesting in spite of the lower budget.
2. Maniac Cop 2 (1990)

The original Maniac Cop is a legitimately entertaining slasher even if it can’t compete with some of the other great franchises from the 80s, but fans know that the direct-to-video sequel is way more fun to revisit despite its shoddy production value and rushed script.
In fact, this rental store hit features more elaborate death sequences while also exploring more of what it means for a community when a police officer goes rogue. Director William Lustig also looks back on this project fondly, claiming that he considers it his personal favorite film of his career and a “terrific B-movie”.
I couldn’t have said it better myself.
1. Bloodstone: Subspecies II (1993)

More of a middle part of a sprawling trilogy than a standalone horror romp, Ted Nicolaou’s Subspecies II is still the pinnacle of the auteur director’s vampire series and a great example of why it was often worth diving into the bargain bin in order to pick up a Full Moon Features VHS tape.
This fast-paced sequel takes place immediately after the events of the 1991 original, meaning that Subspecies II wastes no time in getting to the lovable practical effects that likely motivated you to purchase the flick in the first place. Nicolaou and Anders Hove (who plays Radu, the iconic vampire) are also much more sure of themselves in this sophomore effort, and that’s why I’d argue that it’s worth watching even if you’re not a fan of the first movie.
You must be logged in to post a comment.