Connect with us

Exclusives

What Screams May Come: A Look at the Legendary Richard Matheson

Published

on

Warner Bros. Pictures’ The Box arrives in theaters this Friday, and while the focus is on Richard Kelly’s return to the genre that launched his career (with Donnie Darko), the real star is the man who wrote the original story. While the movie heads into new territories, Kelly’s film is adapted from Richard Matheson’s classic short story, “Button, Button.” To celebrate the film’s release, Bloody Disgusting’s Chris Eggertsen would like to reflect back on Matheson’s illustrious career in “What Screams May Come.”
“Button, Button”, Richard Matheson’s short story first published in Playboy in 1970, may seem an odd choice for a feature film adaptation. For starters, it’s only six pages long, written in the sort of sparse, minimalist style that has become one of Matheson’s trademarks. Sure, it made for a decent Twilight Zone episode (in a 1985 version scripted by Matheson himself), but as a two-hour movie it feels like something of a stretch.

On the other hand, in an age where movie studios are one step away from adapting the status updates of Facebook users into feature-length, focus-grouped nightmares, the screen version of a short story written by a celebrated and prolific author like Matheson feels something like a breath of fresh air, regardless of its brevity. The legendary writer, known mostly for his works of sci-fi/horror (although he himself might understandably bristle at that description), is inarguably one of the most adapted scribes of his generation, his works having made their way to the screen countless times over the last fifty years or so. From shrinking men to post-apocalyptic vampires, there’s no denying the indelible mark he has left on popular culture, not to mention on the worlds of film and television. When all is said and done, a six page short story by this virtuoso, with his peerless blend of imagination and intelligence, is worth a thousand full-length novels by a hack like, say, Stephanie Meyer or Dan Brown.

Which is perhaps why The Box, Richard Kelly’s upcoming adaptation of “Button, Button” being released by Warner Bros. on November 6th, is so eagerly anticipated by members of the movie-going public who prefer thoughtful, intelligent thrillers to the mind-numbing, tween-targeted CGI cheese-fests the studios have been churning out on a regular basis as of late. Kelly, the wunderkind director whose first film, 2001’s Donnie Darko, was elevated to modern classic status after being embraced by a legion of fans on DVD (following a brief, less-than-illustrious theatrical run), is a kindred spirit of sorts to Matheson. More than their first name, the two artists share in common the fact that both have made their careers on works that defy categorization; Kelly with Darko, and Matheson with his first published work, the disturbing and provocative short story “Born of Man and Woman”, about a deformed child chained in a basement room by his horrified parents. In that sense, The Box represents in part the melding of two rebel spirits who have spun mainstream success out of playing by their own rules.

Matheson, as mentioned before, is no stranger to Hollywood, “Button, Button” being merely the latest of his works to make it to the screen. His novels and short stories have been adapted into dozens of movies and television shows, many of them based off of screenplays written by Matheson himself. Rare among novelists, the author has not only been successful at adapting his own work, but has penned scores of films and teleplays not based on one of his existing stories. Truthfully, one would be hard-pressed to name more than a dozen other writers who have enjoyed such a large degree of success in both the Hollywood and publishing worlds.

In the scheme of his television work, Matheson is perhaps best known for writing several classic episodes of the original Twilight Zone (14 in all) between 1960 and 1964 (some of which were based on his own short stories). His contributions are fondly remembered by fans of the series, with several of his episodes (perhaps most notably “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet”, “The Invaders” and “Little Girl Lost”) routinely pegged as some of the best ever produced. The fact is, aside from Rod Serling and Charles Beaumont, no other writer penned as many episodes or was as responsible for the overall direction of the series as Matheson. Much like Serling, he possessed the uncanny ability to combine visceral scares with a complex and sophisticated view of human nature.

Aside from The Twilight Zone, Matheson contributed episodes to several notable programs, including The Alfred Hitchcock Hour, the original Star Trek, Rod Serling’s Night Gallery, and Amazing Stories (executive-produced by Steven Spielberg). In addition, he scribed the teleplays for a raft of well-received TV movies during the 1970’s. Among the most prominent of these are the cult-classic Trilogy of Terror anthology (he scripted the third, and most famous, segment entitled “Prey”, based on his short story about a killer-Zuni doll), the Kolchak movies (The Night Stalker and its follow-up The Night Strangler, based on the novels by Jeff Rice) and Duel, the brilliant paranoid thriller about a man terrorized by a psychotic tanker truck driver (directed by a pre-Jaws Steven Spielberg and based on Matheson’s own short story). Noteworthy also was his made-for-television adaptation of Bram Stoker’s Dracula starring Jack Palance, which is often cited as the most faithful filmed version of the original novel ever produced.

His resume also boasts some impressive contributions to the big screen. As previously noted, he scripted or partially contributed to the adaptations of many of his own novels and short stories, including The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957), The Last Man on Earth (1964), The Legend of Hell House (1973), and Somewhere in Time (1980), based on his novel Bid Time Return). He also engaged in a fruitful collaboration with Roger Corman and his American International Pictures in the early 1960’s, writing the screenplays for several (mostly-campy but in a fun and knowing way) Edgar Allen Poe adaptations, including House of Usher (1960), Pit and the Pendulum (1961), Tales of Terror, and The Raven (all of which starred Vincent Price).

Throughout every phase of his film and television career, Matheson remained strikingly consistent in his output of novels and short stories (with only a few notable gaps, likely due to his in-demand status as a Hollywood scriptwriter). However, few of his later creations would capture the public imagination with as much force as that of his earlier published works. His novel I Am Legend, first published in 1954, is perhaps the most well-known of all his inventions. It has famously been adapted three different times now as a feature, first as the aforementioned The Last Man on Earth, then as The Omega Man starring Charlton Heston in 1971, and most recently as I Am Legend starring Will Smith in 2007 (I won’t include the direct-to-DVD I Am Omega in the list of official adaptations, given that it was a film produced solely to capitalize on the big-studio Will Smith project released the same year). Two of the better-known recent adaptations of his published works (neither of which he wrote the final screenplays for) include the Robin Williams vehicle What Dreams May Come (1998) and the Kevin Bacon film Stir of Echoes (2000).

As with every author who has enjoyed some degree of success in Hollywood, Matheson is often asked about his opinions on the numerous adaptations of his published output, and historically he hasn’t been shy about voicing his true feelings. He has been extremely critical of What Dreams May Come in several interviews, feeling that the human elements of his novel were ignored in service of the special effects. Likewise with The Legend of Hell House (he was forced to water down much of the violence and sexual content during the adaptation process due to the strict British censorship system) and the two earlier filmed versions of I Am Legend, The Last Man on Earth (he felt Vincent Price was miscast) and The Omega Man (which he feels was so far removed from his novel that it hardly even counts as an adaptation). He has been equally forthcoming with his thoughts on the adaptations he considers worthy of the source material, most notably with Stir of Echoes (which followed the plot of his original novel very closely), Duel and Somewhere in Time (which he has often cited as his favorite adaptation and the most faithful to his original work).

Understandably, one of the most common complaints voiced by Matheson is that the filmed adaptations of his books deviate too much from his original vision, so it will be interesting to hear what he has to say about The Box, given that Richard Kelly has necessarily extended the simple narrative offered up in the original short story and added in a complex conspiracy plot in the final two acts. In essence, Kelly utilized the hook of the original story – what if you were delivered a mysterious box and told that if you pushed its button you would receive a large sum of money but someone in the world who you don’t know would die? – merely as a jumping-off point for a much larger and more complicated story, elements of which he reportedly lifted from his own life growing up in Virginia in the 1970’s and `80s, during which time his father worked at NASA (a character blueprint he used for James Marsden’s character). He reportedly even went so far as to invite his parents out to the set during filming to give insight to Marsden and Cameron Diaz, who plays a character modeled off of Kelly’s mother, right down to a medical accident she suffered earlier in her life.

All of this is indicative of the fact that Richard Kelly is perhaps the first filmmaker to literally inject so much of his personal history into adapting one of the author’s books; of course, this is an approach that Matheson, a self-described committed family man with a wife and four children of his own, might be able to appreciate. It also helps that the writer/director shares the boundless imagination, and genuine metaphysical curiosity, of the elder artist. In that sense, Matheson should feel lucky that Kelly, a gifted storyteller in his own right, is the filmmaker who has chosen to expand on the long-form potential of his original story. Indeed, given the considerable number of artistic qualities the two men share in common, perhaps this adaptation is less a stretch than a case of divine intervention.

Watch the “Twilight Zone” episode below:

Horror movie fanatic who co-founded Bloody Disgusting in 2001. Producer on Southbound, V/H/S/2/3/94, SiREN, Under the Bed, and A Horrible Way to Die. Chicago-based. Horror, pizza and basketball connoisseur. Taco Bell daily. Franchise favs: Hellraiser, Child's Play, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween, Scream and Friday the 13th. Horror 365 days a year.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Exclusives

‘Tarot’ Filmmakers Spenser Cohen & Anna Halberg on Practical Creature Effects and ‘Insidious’ Inspirations

Published

on

Tarot horror movie exclusive images

An evil curse gets awakened in Screen Gems horror movie Tarot when a group of friends recklessly ignore a sacred rule: never use someone else’s deck. Writers/Directors Spenser Cohen & Anna Halberg unleash a variety of Tarot card-inspired entities on the group through practical effects, and create an unexpected connection to Insidious along the way.

The film comes exclusively to movie theaters on May 3, 2024.

Bloody Disgusting spoke with Cohen and Halberg ahead of Tarot‘s release, where the pair shared more about the film’s practical effects-driven horrors and revealed how Tarot drew from Insidious in a specific way.

To start, though, the filmmakers reveal just how closely their horror movie sticks to the source novel Horrorscope by Nicholas AdamsThe short answer is, well, it doesn’t at all!

Cohen explains, “It’s so different. We never even read the book and took nothing from the book. The only thingthe studio had a title that they liked, and so that’s why there was an association. Then we changed the title. So, now there’s literally zero connection to the book.

“Sony had come to us wanting to make a horror movie about astrology, but there’s nothing that’s inherently scary to us about Zodiac signs. So, we came up with the idea of combining tarot readings and tarot cards with astrology, and that’s what ended up becoming the movie. There’s such incredible iconography in these cards that we really had a plethora of amazing characters to choose from,” Halberg adds.

Cast of Tarot

Adain Bradley ‘Grant’ and Jacob Batalon ‘Paxton’ in Screen Gems TAROT

With a group of seven friends, expect to see their fates sealed by a number of cards. In other words, expect to see a wide variety of Tarot-inspired creatures tormenting the protagonists. The filmmakers stressed the importance of practical effects for their creatures.

Cohen tells us, “From the get-go, we said every creature is going to be practical. We were thinking of [David] Cronenberg, of Alien and The Thing, and we want our actors responding to real things, not a tennis ball. It always just looks better. You get better performances. With the designs themselves, if you look at the tarot cards and these specific characters, there’s nothing inherently terrifying about them, even though we associate the cards with being supernatural and terrifying. And [it’s] why we partnered with Trevor [Henderson]who was the only designer we met with. We were like, this is our guy because he has this ability to make the familiar feel unnatural.

“His designs are really grounded. I am sure you’ve seen a lot of his stuff where it’s like a hallway, and there’s something there, and something’s off about it, but it really feels like it’s in the space. We knew that he has a special brain for creating unique creatures, and he hadn’t done a movie, which is just shocking to us. Then, we knew that in order to pull that off, we would need a design team with equal skill. That was Dan Martin and his amazing team who worked hand in hand with Trevor to bring those to life.”

Tarot horror movie

Larsen Thompson ‘Elise’ in Screen Gems TAROT

Great designs and practical effects are one thing, but it also falls to the performers to infuse these monsters with personality to make them memorable. That was also at the forefront of the filmmakers’ minds.

In order for the creatures to translate, underneath all the prosthetics, you have to have great actors,” Cohen confirms. “We met with a lot of people. We were looking for people who were talking to us about the psychology and the movement and how they could move in a way that we hadn’t seen before or incorporate dance. We were looking for those outliers, and basically, everyone we hired approached the part as if there were no makeup or prosthetics. It’s like, ‘I am the Magician, so this is what I want to do. I’m going to have a limp. My body’s going to do this. I feel like my head is hunched.’ And we would watch these actors just embody these roles. It was really just picking great people, honestly. It’s hard to act through prosthetics and create emotion and fear and other things. You have to have an incredible control to be able to do that.”

Halberg elaborates,” Even though we enhanced some of the creatures with visual effects, we didn’t want to rely on that. So we needed people, like Spenser said, who each brought their own unique feel to these characters. They were just as important as all of the other actors in the movie and are so crucial to making sure that these sequences are scary and believable.”

Tarot The Hanged Man - Tarot Trailer Breakdown

Humberly González ‘Madeline’ in Screen Gems TAROT

One of the many Tarot creatures in the film is the Magician, who comes with an original song by the film’s composer, Joseph Bishara. While Bishara has delivered no shortage of great contemporary horror scores, including The Conjuring and Malignant, horror fans are likely more familiar with Bishara as the Lipstick Demon in the Insidious franchise. Cohen and Halberg can be counted among Insidious fans, so much so that they wanted an original song from the Lipstick Demon himself.

They explain, “We actually, in prep, we called Joe, and we said, ‘Hey, we’re going to do some kind of an old-timey song there.’ We knew something creepy, very Shining-esque. Then we had the idea to do a song called ‘I Saw You’ to be a pun on that whole thing. And actually use saws as the instrument. We found these YouTube videos, and our DP, I think, Elie [Smolkin] had found these videos of someone playing a saw. We were like, that’s terrifying.

“So we called Joeand we said, ‘You know Tiptoe through the Tulips, how that’s like in Insidious?’ That’s the thing you leave the theater thinking about, and it gets under your skin. We were like, ‘Can you do that for us with an original song?’ He said yes. What you hear in the movie is basically what he played for us the first time. He was just like, ‘I have an idea. I’ll talk to you guys in a week.’ And then that was what we heard, and it was amazing.”

With so many entities and horror sequences, Halberg can’t pick a favorite. Instead, she offers one last tease, “I hope people come away with the realization that each of the sequences is so unique and different, and that each of the creatures is so special because we took a lot of time trying to craft each of these kills or scares to be their own thing and to feel different.

“Hopefully everybody can choose their own favorite.”

Tarot poster

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading