Connect with us

Editorials

‘The Town That Dreaded Sundown’ Proves Originality Can Come from Recreations [Revenge of the Remakes]

Published

on

town that dreaded sundown remake
Pictured: The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014)

Through my “Revenge of the Remakes” odyssey — today’s marks lucky number 20 — there haven’t been many disparities in quality like that between Alfonso Gomez-Rejon‘s and Charles B. Pierce‘s The Town That Dreaded Sundown. Pierce’s 1976 original adapts 1946’s Texarkana Moonlight Murders as a 40’s crime thriller that’s hokey, tonally abysmal, and dull with its point. Gomez-Rejon’s 2014 hybrid sequel and loose remake dares to confront the fearmonger tactics of popularizing true crimes through media and the darkness it nurtures. Pierce seems more focused on muddying the waters of a pre-80s slasher with police procedural downbeats and unfortunate comedic relief (but did create local jobs and commerce). Gomez-Rejon goes right for the jugular, giving audiences a The Town That Dreaded Sundown worth scandalous southern terror. 

The conversations around whether 2014’s metasequel belongs in the remake conversation are not of my interest. It’s the same reason why Fede Alvarez’s Evil Dead is a past entry, and someday Danishka Esterhazy’s Slumber Party Massacre will enter column canon. Producers Jason Blum and Ryan Murphy use Blumhouse’s frugal budget freedoms as a means of experimentation within remake culture. Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa‘s screenplay is anarchistic as the opening presents itself as a continuation, yet the killer’s spree mirrors what Pierce’s crew once filmed. Platinum Dunes had the era’s market cornered on serving iconic do-overs — Blumhouse made a statement by challenging how “old” and “familiar” could still become “new” and “fresh.”


The Approach

The Town That Dreaded Sundown (1976)

Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa and Alfonso Gomez-Rejon revisit Texarkana (border towns in Texas and Arkansas) almost 40 years after Charles B. Pierce’s film made the pitstop a national tragedy landmark. Narrative beats align with commentaries against true crime podcasters who seek popularity by peddling others’ pain. It’s not like Pierce’s film is outside these worries — Gerald Gedrimas confessed to finding inspiration in 1976’s The Town That Dreaded Sundown before shooting high school classmate James Grunstra. Not to say I’ll ever give the argument of horror cinema breeding psychopaths time of day, but “glamorizing” actual earthly maniacs treads a murky area.

Addison Timlin stars as a pre-university journalist Jami Lerner in the requel, who leaves another annual screening of The Town That Dreaded Sundown with boyfriend Corey Holland (Spencer Treat Clark). Corey drives his cherry muscle car into a “Lover’s Lane” hideaway so they can smooch, where the iconic “Phantom Killer” attacks from treelines. Jami is left alive with a message to spread of the Phantom Killer’s return, along with the name “Mary.” Texarkana once again finds itself crawling with law enforcement officers trying to locate the serial killer who reportedly still walks the streets — should Pierce’s movie tagline be believed — but what’s harder to imagine? That a town kept a legend alive long enough for it to reanimate like Jason Voorhees, or a murderer to return to the hometown that still posterizes his masterpiece?

The films work in tandem as Gomez-Rejon takes all the iconic horror shots — trombone, Phantom Killer costume, brutalized victims — and inserts said depravity into a ruthless post-aughts slasher. Jami’s inner dialogue replaces Vern Stierman’s stuffy narration, while the Phantom Killer becomes a more ferocious, vocal iteration who’s ten times the meanie. Aguirre-Sacasa introduces Reverend Cartwright (Edward Herrmann) as a disgusted theological protestor who reviles Texarkana’s godless appreciation of Pierce’s sinful creation and hammers down the idea that without Pierce’s original, there’d be no sequel. Of course, in the movie’s universe, “sequel” means repeat killings — which becomes so meta that Bradley Whitford and Richard Jenkins in Cabin In The Woods would blush. Hell, even Charles B. Pierce’s son is a prominent character in the film (played by Denis O’Hare) as if associations weren’t subtle enough when Pierce Sr.’s intentions sway to heroic in one of many conscious narrative shifts the film pushes.


Does It Work?

The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014)

The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014) pulls off the Trojan Sequel surprise with curious but clever subversion, staying an outsider to Charles B. Pierce’s in-flick universe. The film doesn’t attempt to reenact the 1940s murders anew nor correct Pierce’s creative liberties — body count, forgotten names — as fantasy. Instead, Alfonso Gomez-Rejon addresses 1976’s entry on the levels of realistic backlash. Snotty teenagers wear The Town That Dreaded Sundown merchandise while strutting around Texarkana since the movie overwrites inhuman acts of violence that forever stained territory soil. Characters die as the result of decades-prior theater entertainment, not because they’re in a movie — except, well, they are because 2014’s requel isn’t based on any fact.

Both titles share a strange relationship since Pierce’s original seems less damning despite being rooted in truth, while the continuation — completely fabricated — harbors rageful reverence for the heinous acts. Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa’s screenplay balances the greed of pastors with full churches against slighted survivor’s families and the eye-catching celebrity status of Texarkana’s Phantom Killer. Pierce’s intentions are questioned to ponder memorialization versus sensational exploitation; Jami interacts with a killer who feeds off the population’s panic for no reason other than her ties to Texarkana. As a result, The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014) becomes a heavy-meta embrace of any past generations’ traumas being something others can — or cannot — escape.

Although, Aguirre-Sacasa does fall back on slasher expectations despite the film’s ambitious structure. That seems to be the main complaint of most critics who scoffed away the “twist” ending for shock value or felt characters lack appropriate depth. Kills replicate Pierce’s death sequences — they’re copycats with purpose — but I’m not sure I can agree with shrugs in “predictability” here because practical and visual effects artists elevate deaths from off-screen stabs to barbaric displays of mutilations. Severed heads break windows, blood coats sedan windows, and bullets penetrate eye sockets that look like rotten raw meat. We know what’s coming because the Phantom Killer retraces steps rewatched year after year by Texarkana residents — that’s why there’s such a spiteful aesthetic upgrade.


The Result

The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014)

You cannot watch The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014) without first indulging The Town That Dreaded Sundown (1976), given the call-and-repeat act pulled into question. Alfonso Gomez-Rejon might ultimately champion Charles B. Pierce’s morbid addition to Texarkana’s history, but 2000s slasher finishes are a better look for The Town That Dreaded Sundown. Everything from the Phantom Killer’s inescapable glare to passionate hotel sex interruptions impact with a furiousness that Pierce never even scratches. I’ll admit there’s a certain buzzworthy nihilism in the film’s ending that does seem a tad for show – talking about Corey’s (Spencer Treat Clark) unmasking — but that also plays into the randomness of violence that could plague Texarkana, another Texas suburb, or anywhere else in America.

The requel benefits from a more stacked than you remember cast, whether that’s “Lone Wolf” Morales (Anthony Anderson) or Chief Deputy Tillman (Gary Cole) — two veteran presences who liven police exposition dumps. Addison Timlin holds her ground as a teenage detective with integrity, and Travis Tope sells himself well as the “obvious” too-sweet-for-comfort suspect until he’s dismembered — a reveal on par with My Bloody Valentine (2009) when Jensen Ackles becomes as The Miner 2.0. Then you clinch with Joshua Leonard playing sour and unhinged like a champ? The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014) is a feast of “that guy” character actors who embolden the mystery afoot.

Worth spotlighting is Michael Goi, cinematographer extraordinaire on this often striking Texas-slash-Arkansas slasher. Lighting, production design, and camerawork join forces to erase the drabness of Pierce’s all-swelter previous effort by drenching knife stabbings in red tail light glows or illuminating moments of innocence in angelic brightness. Two hormonal musicians flee the Phantom Killer in an industrial sign graveyard — Reverend Cartwright’s billboard-sized face staring at the gay lovers while discussing mutual masturbation. The camera follows one target through a maze of excessive signage built for highway advertisement, passing words like “Atone” or capturing “Legacy” after the other boy is trom-boned to death. The environment in which the Phantom Killer lurks is rich, thoughtfully detailed, and quite impressive compared to the usual drench-in-shadows standards that have you brightening your television settings.


The Lesson

The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014)

When I watch a title like The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014), I become even more frustrated by copy-and-pasters like Cabin Fever (2016) or Quarantine (2008). Give Jason Blum and Ryan Murphy credit because these producers deliver on their promise to let a reduced budget allow for those big swings we all love from independent cinema. There’s nothing safe about questioning the ethics of exploitation cinema while never outright villainizing Charles B. Pierce’s appropriation of horrific events. Mythos build upon legends and allow both films of the same namesake to become forever tethered, never compared — quite genius. All that, and it’s still a remake that goes above, flies beyond and becomes a far more accomplished slasher experience by a county-wide margin.

So what did we learn?

  • A remake can be a sequel, but you’ve already known that (you’ve got homework to do if not).
  • Fearlessness should be rewarded when flying close enough, never too close to the sun.
  • Originality can come from recreations.
  • Remakes themselves are an art form when respectfully seen as such.

I’ve tried twice now, and The Town That Dreaded Sundown (1976) pales in comparison to 2014’s Frankensteined union of nostalgia and creativity. Callbacks like precinct buffoon “Sparkplug” getting his nickname mentioned twice are cute, but the original is blandly lackluster outside the Phantom Killer’s predatory climaxes. Those terrible “Duke boys” car chase ADR bits, the slapstick humor that doesn’t belong — 2014’s second coming recorrects in ways that beat its chest like an alpha. It’s not often, but I’ll always choose the newer Texarkana screamer model while the outdated one sits rusting in the garage.


In Revenge of the Remakes, columnist Matt Donato takes us on a journey through the world of horror remakes. We all complain about Hollywood’s lack of originality whenever studios announce new remakes, reboots, and reimaginings, but the reality? Far more positive examples of refurbished classics and updated legacies exist than you’re willing to remember (or admit). The good, the bad, the unnecessary – Matt’s recounting them all.

The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014)

Editorials

‘A Haunted House’ and the Death of the Horror Spoof Movie

Published

on

Due to a complex series of anthropological mishaps, the Wayans Brothers are a huge deal in Brazil. Around these parts, White Chicks is considered a national treasure by a lot of people, so it stands to reason that Brazilian audiences would continue to accompany the Wayans’ comedic output long after North America had stopped taking them seriously as comedic titans.

This is the only reason why I originally watched Michael Tiddes and Marlon Wayans’ 2013 horror spoof A Haunted House – appropriately known as “Paranormal Inactivity” in South America – despite having abandoned this kind of movie shortly after the excellent Scary Movie 3. However, to my complete and utter amazement, I found myself mostly enjoying this unhinged parody of Found Footage films almost as much as the iconic spoofs that spear-headed the genre during the 2000s. And with Paramount having recently announced a reboot of the Scary Movie franchise, I think this is the perfect time to revisit the divisive humor of A Haunted House and maybe figure out why this kind of film hasn’t been popular in a long time.

Before we had memes and internet personalities to make fun of movie tropes for free on the internet, parody movies had been entertaining audiences with meta-humor since the very dawn of cinema. And since the genre attracted large audiences without the need for a serious budget, it made sense for studios to encourage parodies of their own productions – which is precisely what happened with Miramax when they commissioned a parody of the Scream franchise, the original Scary Movie.

The unprecedented success of the spoof (especially overseas) led to a series of sequels, spin-offs and rip-offs that came along throughout the 2000s. While some of these were still quite funny (I have a soft spot for 2008’s Superhero Movie), they ended up flooding the market much like the Guitar Hero games that plagued video game stores during that same timeframe.

You could really confuse someone by editing this scene into Paranormal Activity.

Of course, that didn’t stop Tiddes and Marlon Wayans from wanting to make another spoof meant to lampoon a sub-genre that had been mostly overlooked by the Scary Movie series – namely the second wave of Found Footage films inspired by Paranormal Activity. Wayans actually had an easier time than usual funding the picture due to the project’s Found Footage presentation, with the format allowing for a lower budget without compromising box office appeal.

In the finished film, we’re presented with supposedly real footage recovered from the home of Malcom Johnson (Wayans). The recordings themselves depict a series of unexplainable events that begin to plague his home when Kisha Davis (Essence Atkins) decides to move in, with the couple slowly realizing that the difficulties of a shared life are no match for demonic shenanigans.

In practice, this means that viewers are subjected to a series of familiar scares subverted by wacky hijinks, with the flick featuring everything from a humorous recreation of the iconic fan-camera from Paranormal Activity 3 to bizarre dance numbers replacing Katy’s late-night trances from Oren Peli’s original movie.

Your enjoyment of these antics will obviously depend on how accepting you are of Wayans’ patented brand of crass comedy. From advanced potty humor to some exaggerated racial commentary – including a clever moment where Malcom actually attempts to move out of the titular haunted house because he’s not white enough to deal with the haunting – it’s not all that surprising that the flick wound up with a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes despite making a killing at the box office.

However, while this isn’t my preferred kind of humor, I think the inherent limitations of Found Footage ended up curtailing the usual excesses present in this kind of parody, with the filmmakers being forced to focus on character-based comedy and a smaller scale story. This is why I mostly appreciate the love-hate rapport between Kisha and Malcom even if it wouldn’t translate to a healthy relationship in real life.

Of course, the jokes themselves can also be pretty entertaining on their own, with cartoony gags like the ghost getting high with the protagonists (complete with smoke-filled invisible lungs) and a series of silly The Exorcist homages towards the end of the movie. The major issue here is that these legitimately funny and genre-specific jokes are often accompanied by repetitive attempts at low-brow humor that you could find in any other cheap comedy.

Not a good idea.

Not only are some of these painfully drawn out “jokes” incredibly unfunny, but they can also be remarkably offensive in some cases. There are some pretty insensitive allusions to sexual assault here, as well as a collection of secondary characters defined by negative racial stereotypes (even though I chuckled heartily when the Latina maid was revealed to have been faking her poor English the entire time).

Cinephiles often claim that increasingly sloppy writing led to audiences giving up on spoof movies, but the fact is that many of the more beloved examples of the genre contain some of the same issues as later films like A Haunted House – it’s just that we as an audience have (mostly) grown up and are now demanding more from our comedy. However, this isn’t the case everywhere, as – much like the Elves from Lord of the Rings – spoof movies never really died, they simply diminished.

A Haunted House made so much money that they immediately started working on a second one that released the following year (to even worse reviews), and the same team would later collaborate once again on yet another spoof, 50 Shades of Black. This kind of film clearly still exists and still makes a lot of money (especially here in Brazil), they just don’t have the same cultural impact that they used to in a pre-social-media-humor world.

At the end of the day, A Haunted House is no comedic masterpiece, failing to live up to the laugh-out-loud thrills of films like Scary Movie 3, but it’s also not the trainwreck that most critics made it out to be back in 2013. Comedy is extremely subjective, and while the raunchy humor behind this flick definitely isn’t for everyone, I still think that this satirical romp is mostly harmless fun that might entertain Found Footage fans that don’t take themselves too seriously.

Continue Reading