Connect with us

Editorials

[Editorial] Why Are We So Against Romance In Horror?

Published

on

Do you believe in destiny? That even the powers of time can be altered for a single purpose? That the luckiest man who walks on this earth is the one who finds… true love?” – Count Dracula (Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992)

There was a time in horror when romance was an integral part of the story, where love and the actions that characters would take for it were what moved the plot forward. Films such as the aforementioned Bram Stoker’s Dracula spring to mind as do many of the classical Universal monster films, Cronenberg’s The Fly, Carpenter’s Big Trouble In Little China, and countless more.

With tomorrow being Valentine’s Day, I thought that I would share my thoughts on the topic of romance in horror and why it seems to have faded.

If we look at some of the great horror films for examples, we can see that many of them used romance as the foundation for the story.

Bram Stoker’s Dracula – The moment that Count Dracula sees the picture of Mina that Jonathan Harker carries with him, she becomes his ultimate mission. She is a physical copy of his beloved Elisabeta, his wife who committed suicide after false reports said that he had died in battle. Everything from this point on in the film centers on his belief that she is the reincarnation of his wife.

The Fly – What begins as a story of a journalist shadowing a scientist on what might be the most important invention of modern science turns into the story of two people falling in love. However, as with most films of this nature, something gets in the way and it just so happens to be the fact that Dr. Seth Brundle is turning into a giant fly. Still, throughout the entire transformation as his body literally falls apart and mutates, one things remains unchanged: his love for Veronica Quaife. And in the end as he lays on the ground, an aberration of nature, it is by her hand that he begs for release. Weeping, she grants him his final wish.

Big Trouble In Little China – I can already hear many of you scoffing and picking at this selection. Is it horror? Is it a love story? Let me clear the air by saying that this IS a horror film just as it is a comedy, action, romance, martial arts, fantasy film that is easily one of my favorite films of all time.
But coming at this from the prospective of horror and romance, let’s take into account the depths that both Jack Burton and Wang Chi for their personal romantic interests. Chi, from the beginning of the film, is infatuated with Miao Yin, the woman for whom he has saved every penny for years. Her being kidnapped in front of Chi and Burton is the impetus for the story. Chi’s only mission now is to do whatever it takes to get back Yin, even if it means going through the Hell Of The Upside Down Sinners, facing The Three Storms, and even entering the lair of Lo Pan.
Meanwhile, Burton has TWO love interests in this film: his truck (which is stolen by Wing Kong) and Gracie Law. In the end, the truck wins over Law, but Burton sure does have to go through a hell of a lot to get both of them. But as Jack Burton always says, “It’s all in the reflexes.”

And let’s not forget about the fantastic Shaun Of The Dead, the romantic comedy with zombies in it. The entire purpose of this movie is to show a “Guy who will do anything to show his love for the woman of his dreams,” and it just so happens to be during a zombie apocalypse.

What these movies have is a protagonist (or multiple protagonists) who makes it very clear that love will drive them to do anything, which is honestly somewhat terrifying if you think about it. Throughout literature, cinema, and even history, people have done insane things for love.

But somewhere along the lines, horror lost the element of romance. Instead, vengeance, family, or self-preservation became the focus. If we look at some of the most popular films of the past several years, we see that romance is not what drives the film.

For example, Scream is about a boy whose family disintegrated because of his father’s indiscretions. His vengeance upon Sydney and her family result from his own pain. Saw is about a man frustrated that people do not appreciate the value of the life they have. Cabin In The Woods is simply about saving the human race at the cost of a few souls.

Now, I’m not saying that the mixture of horror and romance isn’t a big box office draw. Just look at the Twilight saga or Warm Bodies, the former of which has drawn in over $3.3 billion dollars in worldwide box office while the latter surprised the industry by coming in number one on opening weekend with $19.5 million.

There is obviously a connection between the ideas of romance and horror but I would be completely wrong if I were to say that the audiences were the same. After all, the standard Twilight fan wouldn’t know the original A Nightmare On Elm St. if Freddy came into their dream and slaughtered them mercilessly.

I can’t say what it was that made love and romance in a horror film so repugnant and vile. Was it simply a fad, much like many of the other fads that horror goes through (such as the current found footage craze we’re in or the “torture porn” era)? Or is it something else, something deeper? Have our ideas of romance changed so dramatically in the 100 years of popular storytelling that film has given us?

If so, that’s a damn shame. Because just like how a person would do anything to save their family (such as in The Hills Have Eyes), the things a person would do for love are just as intense and visceral. After all, remember High Tension?

Got any thoughts/questions/concerns for Jonathan Barkan? Shoot him a message on Twitter or on Bloody-Disgusting!

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading