Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Good Or Bad? When a Movie Franchise Changes Direction

Published

on

When Horror Movie Franchises Change Direction

Make a Prequel

If I’m being honest (and I’m always honest), this is my least favorite kind of direction change that a franchise can make. I understand it’s purpose, but I don’t want to go back and see things that happened before. I want to move forward in time, not backwards, but I digress. I’ll go back to being objective.

Surprisingly, the prequel approach is something that is becoming more and more popular in recent years. The most recent effort, Insidious Chapter 3 is the perfect example. It is puzzling that the franchise went this route, since the ending of Insidious Chapter 2 deliberately set up a sequel with Specs and Tucker helping people with Elise’s ghost. Insidious Chapter 3 sort of followed through on that promise, except it shows how Elise met Specs and Tucker before the events on the original InsidiousInsidious Chapter 3 is a solid film, and it’s always nice to see more of Lin Shaye, but it severely underperformed after the high mark set by the second installment. Audiences also welcomed it with a rather lukewarm reception.

The issue that Insidious Chapter 3 runs into is that there was really no reason to go back in time and see how Elise came to team up with Specs and Tucker. Ironically, the film is so focused on that backstory that it completely ignores giving any backstory to the villain of the movie: a creepy-looking elderly man with an oxygen mask. It’s a peculiar move, but it is what it is.

A prequel can come across as hollow and pointless if it doesn’t justify its existence. The 2006 film The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning failed to justify its existence in any shape, way or form. While it may be incredibly gory (much more so than the 2003 remake), all of its prequel elements don’t add up to much of anything. The biggest revelation is how Sheriff Hoyt lost his two front teeth.

No one really wanted to know how Leatherface came to be Leatherface. It’s always scarier not knowing the “why” in a scary movie, as Scream famously pointed out. If The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning actually delved into Leatherface’s younger years in a meaningful way, the film might have been received a little bit better, but it doesn’t.

It (perhaps unjustly) has some of the worst reviews out of all of the films in the series, and only took in $46.6 million to the remake’s $104.1 million, despite featuring the likes of Jordana Brewster and a pre-Magic Mike Matt Bomer.

A more polarizing prequel takes comes in the form of Prometheus. This was a film that was never going to please everyone, and would have been received better had it not been touted as a prequel to the Alien franchise for years before its release. Taken as a standalone film, Prometheus is a gorgeous, poetic film that poses a lot of questions but fails to provide many answers, sort of like life itself.

Fan reaction was mixed upon its initial release, but it has grown a small following recently, especially with news of a sequel coming out in a few years. The film disappointed in terms of domestic box office, taking in a decent $130.9 million on a $134,7 million budget. Luckily, the film performed splendidly overseas, more than making up for its somewhat disappointing domestic box office take.

The verdict is still out on whether or not an Alien prequel was a good idea. We are going to have to wait until Alien: Paradise Lost Alien: Covenant comes out to see if the gamble Prometheus made paid off. The fact remains that it doesn’t really feel like an Alien movie. If director Ridley Scott wanted to distance himself from the Alien franchise so much, he probably should have not touted it as a prequel and just let it be its own film. I realize this is more on 20th Century Fox than Scott himself, but it doesn’t mean it’s not true.

One way to make a prequel work is to hide the fact that the film is a prequel. That is what Final Destination 5 did, and it paid off excellently. Unfortunately, it performed the worst domestically, pulling in $44.9 million (it more than doubled that gross internationally, though. While the original pulled in $73 million, the highest earner in the franchise was also its worst: The Final Destination with $73.6 million. It was given a boost thanks to 3-D ticket sales, but the fact that it was so terrible

What is interesting here is that, like Insidious Chapter 2, the worst film in the franchise performed the best. This means that the most people saw those installments in theaters when compared to the others. Since the worst film was seen by the most people, it had the misfortune of turning many of those people off of the  franchise because those installments were so bad. Then, when a quality sequel is made, a significantly lower number of people opt to go see it in theaters.

Surprisingly, Final Destination 5 garnered the best reviews out of every film in the franchise, and is the only one to have a fresh score on Rotten Tomatoes. While it wasn’t enough to win back viewers who had given up after the fourth installment, it still stands as one of the best examples of a horror prequel. Using the film’s identity as a prequel works in the films favor, and the only way you could have caught it is if you noticed the cell phones the characters were using in the film. It was a nice “gotcha” moment in an already solid film.

The prequel approach may not be my favorite approach to changing a franchise’s direction, but it can work sometimes. It just has to be handled delicately.

Pages: 1 2 3 4

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Denver, CO with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

87 Comments

Editorials

André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies

Published

on

André Øvredal's Troll Hunter

In this day and age, the wordtrollis often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.

It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shoutstrollat the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.

For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

troll hunter

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.

The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.

As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?

Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.

Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Troll Hunter

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.

There is always a small risk whenever using the termmockumentaryto describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.

In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.

Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.

Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we callfound footage.

troll hunter

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.

Continue Reading