Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Why a ‘Friday the 13th’ Origin Story is Probably the Smartest Move

Published

on

For the sake of recapping, Aaron Guzikowski is penning the next installment in the Friday the 13th franchise for Platinum Dunes and Paramount, which is tentatively set for release on January 13, 2017 – though likely to be pushed back again. What do we know about it so far? Well, for starters, it most definitely will not be a found footage film, and we just learned that it will delve into the origin story of Jason Voorhees. As revealed by producer Brad Fuller earlier this week, we’ll be getting a bit of a different Voorhees backstory than the one we’re all familiar with, which is almost guaranteed to piss off those who refuse to embrace the slightest bit of change.

Speaking of pissing off fans, the very suggestion of a Voorhees origin story has done just that in the wake of Fuller spilling those beans. At this point, seven years after the release of the 2009 remake, most are hungry for little more than another mindless bloodbath at Camp Crystal Lake, and the fear is that an origin story not only threatens to demystify Jason but would ultimately result in less time spent watching him do what he does best: kill, kill, kill, murder, murder, murder.

While it’s very true that origin stories are sometimes detrimental to horror villains, we mustn’t forget that the Friday the 13th franchise is an entirely different beast than, say, the Halloween franchise – the latter being at its best when we weren’t really provided with a reason as to why Michael Myers was killing. Jason Voorhees, on the other hand, is quite the opposite of a villain who’s a stronger character without a backstory. Because Jason Voorhees, when you really think about it, is a villain who doesn’t even exist without his tragic origin story.

The method to Jason’s madness and (understandable) reason for slaying horny teens was established so far before his actual arrival on screen that his franchise didn’t even begin as his franchise – the original Friday the 13th, boiled down to its essence, was an unintentional Jason Voorhees origin story. So how do you reboot the franchise without addressing any of that? To do so, if you’re asking me, would be to do a huge disservice to the Jason Voorhees character.

Of course, one could argue that a Jason origin story is pointless not because it would harm the character but because we’ve already been there and done that, which is a point that’s a bit harder to counterpoint. But let’s not misread what Brad Fuller said. He specifically pointed out that the origin story Guzikowski has written is different than the one present in the original franchise, suggesting that they’re taking the series to places it hasn’t been before. And that’s an exciting thought, especially since there’s so much about Jason’s past that hasn’t ever been addressed and is very much ripe for exploration.

Sure, we know Jason drowned due to the negligence of sex-happy camp counselors, and probably witnessed his beloved mother get beheaded, but the franchise hasn’t actually delved too deep into the specifics of any of that stuff. Who is Jason’s father, for example, and where was Jason on the night Pamela went on a murder spree? Furthermore, if Jason was still alive at that time, why didn’t he just show himself to her? Did he really even drown on that fateful day, and what exactly was he up to all those years before he started killing?

The answers to these and questions like them can only add to the mythology of Jason Voorhees and the Friday the 13th franchise as a whole, and I have a hard time viewing that kind of storytelling as anything but a good thing. You may think you want little more than 90-minutes of pointless murder, but when it comes down to it, wouldn’t you rather get a Friday the 13th movie that tries something different and adds new layers to the series – perhaps even fills in some of the blanks left behind by the original films? Once the hockey mask is on and the machete is in his hand, mindless killing is really all Jason’s good for, so I fully welcome an exploration of the character prior to the new reboot – and subsequent sequels – showering us with the red stuff.

Brad Fuller noted that you “kind of have to understand Jason Voorhees” in order for the franchise to really stay true to itself, and the smartest move on the path to bringing the machete-wielding maniac back to life may very well be starting from the beginning and making sure audiences both new and old understand what he’s all about. Because Friday the 13th isn’t ruined by making Jason a sympathetic character. It’s ruined by failing to acknowledge that he has always been one.

What say you? Am I as crazy as Ralph? Sound off below!

Image at top courtesy: Wickedbeard Creations

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has two awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

156 Comments

Editorials

André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies

Published

on

André Øvredal's Troll Hunter

In this day and age, the wordtrollis often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.

It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shoutstrollat the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.

For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

troll hunter

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.

The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.

As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?

Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.

Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Troll Hunter

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.

There is always a small risk whenever using the termmockumentaryto describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.

In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.

Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.

Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we callfound footage.

troll hunter

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.

Continue Reading