Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

‘The Fly’ Was Released 30 Years Ago Today

Published

on

The Fly Anniversary

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

Who says all remakes are terrible? One only needs to look at David Cronenberg’s remake of 1958’s The Fly (itself a more faithful adaptation of George Langelaan’s short story of the same name). The film is a masterclass in special effects as well as one of the best love stories in cinema history, as tragic as it is.

The film took some time to get developed, with its beginnings starting in the early 1980s when co-producer Kip Ohman brought the idea of a remake to screenwriter Charles Edward Pogue. After showing some interest, they both went to producer Stuart Cornfield with their idea and the money was given to Pogue to write the script. Rather than do a direct adaptation of the original film or its short story, Pogue decided to tell a story of slow evolution as opposed to one of an instantaneous transformation. Once a script was complete, the investors at 20th Century Fox wanted to pull out. Pogue made an agreement with them that they would distribute the film if he could find another source of financing.

Funnily enough, the new producer that was brought on board was comedian Mel Brooks and his production company Brooksfilms. Brooks suggested Pogue be removed from the project and Walon Green was brought in to re-write the script. When that draft was also deemed unworthy, Pogue was brought back in to rework the script again.

Robert Bierman was locked in fairly early on as the film’s director, but when his daughter was tragically killed in an accident while the family was on a vacation, Brooks let him out of his contract so that he could grieve. David Cronenberg, who had just abandoned the Total Recall adaptation that he had been working on for the past year (he wrote 12 drafts for it before breaking ties with in), was finally brought in as the director and was also tasked with rewriting Pogue’s script. Many set pieces and central themes (the main character’s loss of body parts, the vomiting of corrosive acid, etc.) were retained from Pogue’s draft, but Cronenberg re-wrote all of the characters and dialogue from scratch. That being the case, Cronenberg was classy enough to be insistent that Pogue retain a screenwriting credit.

There were several scenes deleted from the film after it screened with test audiences, the most infamous of which is the one in which Seth fuses a baboon and a cat together in a desperate attempt to find a cure for himself. He then falls off the roof of the building, and sees an extra appendage protrude from his side, which he then proceeds to amputate with his teeth. This scene was ultimately cut from the film because test audiences lost sympathy for Seth when they saw it.

Howard Shore’s grand orchestral score is appropriately chilling, and one of the only scores to have ever truly haunted me upon hearing it. The truly standout moment in his score comes during the film’s climax, when Brundlefly falls out of the Telepod after merging with the merging (see video below).  It’s a devastating piece of work.

Of course, it’s the performances that really make The Fly so special. Jeff Goldblum gives one of the best performances of his career as Seth Brundle. Up until his final transformation in the film’s closing minutes, Goldblum makes you feel for him even as he becomes a monster. Similarly, your heart breaks for Geena Davis as you watch her slowly come to the realization that the love of her life is lost. Even when he is clearly lost forever, she still hesitates before killing him. It’s almost unbearable to watch. Hell, even John Getz is sympathetic in what would otherwise be a throwaway jealous man stereotype.

Released on a production budget of $9 million ($19.7 million in 2016 dollars), The Fly went on to gross a respectable $40.5 million domestically ($88.9 million in 2016 dollars). Chris Walas (Gremlins) and Stephan Dupuis also won the Academy Award for Best Makeup and Hairstyling. Given the climax of the film, that win is not surprising, especially considering that it is one of the few categories horror films have an edge in with the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.

The Fly Anniversary

The Seven Stages of Brundlefly

The critical success of The Fly matched its commercial success, with even Gene Siskel, who was known for having an aversion to the horror genre, named it his tenth best film of 1986. So successful was The Fly that a sequel was immediately considered. Cronenberg declined returning, since he said he had never considered filming a sequel to one of his films. Directing duties went to Walas, with four writers being credited for the screenplay (one of whom was Frank Darabont). That film grossed about half of the original’s domestic gross but was a critical failure. It is known as one of the worse sequels ever made, though it does have a small, loyal cult following. Still, the existence of a lesser sequel doesn’t take away from the fact that Cronenberg’s original is a wonderful film.

Celebrate The Fly‘s 30th anniversary today with a re-watch, or watch it for the first time if you’ve never seen it. It stands as a landmark of the horror genre and is also one of the best films ever made.

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Denver, CO with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

15 Comments

Editorials

Taking a Closer Look at the ‘Christmas Carol’ Ghosts of Ti West’s ‘Ebenezer’

Published

on

The trailer for Ti West’s upcoming adaptation of A Christmas Carol raised a lot of eyebrows when it dropped earlier this week. While plenty of folks initially dismissed Ebenezer as a derivative project meant to cash in on the recent wave of unnecessary prequels that expand the backstory of beloved characters (such as 2023’s Wonka), Charles Dickens’ original novel already made a point of exploring Ebenezer Scrooge’s origins in detail – meaning that this new film is likely just a particularly faithful adaptation of the source material under a different name.

Couple that with the fact that the movie is being helmed by a genuine horror auteur and I think it’s safe to say that the latest iteration of the first modern ghost story is in good hands.

That being said, one detail that immediately jumped out at me during the brief teaser (other than a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it nod to Johnny Depp’s iconic bedroom death scene from the original A Nightmare on Elm Street) is the fact that many of Ebenezer’s ghosts appear to have been directly lifted from the iconic John Leech illustrations that accompanied the first edition of Dickens’ novel.

Here are a couple of stills from the trailer compared to the original artwork:

The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come in ‘Ebenezer’ and ‘A Christmas Carol’

The Phantoms in ‘A Christmas Carol’ and ‘Ebenezer’

Marley’s Ghost in ‘Ebenezer’ and ‘A Christmas Carol’

Mainly working with old-school wood and steel engravings that would later be transferred to print, Leech was instrumental in crafting the iconic look of history’s most influential phantoms – especially since Dickens is said to have been deeply involved with the creation of these so-called “comic illustrations.”

And since the novel is commonly said to have popularized spiritualism in Victorian England, much of the ghostly iconography that we still see in genre media to this very day (including some of Ti West’s previous films) can be traced back to the author’s partnership with Leech.

Ebenezer won’t be the first A Christmas Carol adaptation to borrow heavily from these designs, but I can appreciate how Ti West is incorporating an important part of horror history into his latest film.

Ebenezer will be available in theaters starting November 13.

Continue Reading