Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Dear New Line, Now is the Time to Make Freddy Krueger Great Again

Published

on

As Pennywise scares up record numbers, we pine for the return of another icon.

In the wake of Wes Craven’s A Nightmare on Elm Street coming along and changing the face of horror, New Line Cinema was appropriately dubbed “The House That Freddy Built”; after all, the ensuing franchise’s 10-year box office dominance turned the fledgling independent company into a major Hollywood player.

All these years later, New Line is once again on top of the horror world thanks to the continuing success of The Conjuring Universe and, of course, this past weekend’s IT. The final domestic numbers reveal that Andy Muschietti’s new adaptation of Stephen King’s novel pulled in $123 million over the weekend, making it the most successful opening weekend for a horror movie in the history of cinema. Furthermore, it’s already one of the most dominant rated-R movies of all time.

Horror, it seems, has never been more ALIVE.

What lessons should Hollywood be learning from IT‘s record-shattering performance? Well, for starters, it should now be crystal clear that horror films, like superhero films, can be big-budget tentpoles for studios. Furthermore, Muschietti and the gang have sent the message that audiences are hungry for the kind of truly terrifying, go-for-broke horror that made the genre so dominant in, well, the decade that Freddy Krueger reigned supreme.

Hey, that gives me an idea…

A NIghtmare On Elm Street

It’s no secret that the box office success (or failure) of one big horror movie starts to give studios ideas about other big horror movies they may be considering; Scream, for example, ushered in a whole new wave of teen slashers, while the recent under-performance of Rings effectively killed the in-the-works reboot of the Friday the 13th franchise. As fans, we may not measure the success of any given film by the money it has made, but the reality is that the studio heads in charge of the genre most definitely do.

With IT making such a killing in just three days, you can bet that every major studio is right about now holding boardroom meetings in an effort to capitalize on the fact that horror is the hottest thing in Hollywood at the moment. The landscape of horror is very likely going to be changing in the coming years… and the future is looking bright.

So then, what’s next? Well, if the Elm Street-esque IT made you hungry for the return of Freddy, you certainly weren’t alone this weekend. It’s impossible to look at IT‘s box office numbers and not think that New Line is sitting on a similar goldmine with the Nightmare on Elm Street franchise; a goldmine that has remained untapped for nearly ten years now.

Back in 2010, New Line and Platinum Dunes reached the #1 spot on the box office charts with Samuel Bayer’s A Nightmare on Elm Street, a remake that managed to turn a profit while also disappointing most fans of the franchise; a lifeless, uninspired reboot, Elm Street ’10 essentially killed the franchise that it was supposed to re-animate.

Seven years later, we haven’t heard a peep from Freddy Krueger. It was reported back in 2015 that New Line had hired David Leslie Johnson (The Conjuring 2) to write the script for another Elm Street reboot, but it seems the focus was soon shifted to the two-part IT and the aforementioned Conjuring Universe.

What’s the latest on all that, you ask?

We reached out to several sources who all tell us that, as of this past weekend, there is absolutely zero internal talk at New Line about the return of Freddy.

Of course, this could soon change. No matter what we’ve been told, I can’t imagine there’s a single person over at New Line who didn’t have an imaginary light bulb go off over their head at some point this past weekend. It would seem to be a no-brainer that a well-done reboot of A Nightmare on Elm Street could potentially kick as much box office ass as Pennywise and the Losers’ Club are right about now, as well as further solidify New Line’s status as The House Where Horror Icons Flourish.

And New Line sure could take a few notes from their own IT, if they choose to put the same amount of effort into making Freddy Krueger a dominant force of terror once more. Maybe the most impressive thing IT accomplished is creating a new Pennywise who has already become an icon in a completely new, standalone way. Muschietti’s IT has proven that you indeed can reinvent an iconic movie monster for a whole new generation without simply recreating the past, which would be a smart way to approach Freddy’s inevitable revival.

As for how exactly a new Elm Street movie could be executed, well, that ball is entirely in New Line’s court. But if they’re as unafraid to spend money and as committed to making a truly scary film as they were with IT, then I don’t see why New Line couldn’t enjoy the same level of success with a new take on Wes Craven’s dream demon.

Now is the time, New Line. And we’re hungrier than ever.

Wes Craven

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has two awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

108 Comments

Editorials

Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel

Published

on

Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction

The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.

That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.

It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.

That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.

The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’

For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.

This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.

This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.

Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.

So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.

The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.

Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.

While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.

At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.

After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

Continue Reading