Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

The Queer Horror of “Chucky”: Episode 2 – “Give Me Something Good To Eat”

Published

on

Each week Joe Lipsett will highlight a key scene or interaction in Don Mancini’s Chucky series to consider how the show is engaging with and contributing to queer horror.

After last week’s premiere tackled concerns about coming out to unsupportive parents, it’s fascinating to see parents back at the center of attention – albeit in a slightly different way – in Chucky’s second episode. 

Thus far, Chucky has adhered closely to the tropes of a young adult/coming of age property, so it makes sense that there is a marked division between the teens on the show and the adults. In the first episode this was explored primarily through Jake (Zackary Arthur)’s relationship with his father Luke, but creator Don Mancini and co-writer Kim Garland expand on this idea in “Give Me Something Good To Eat.”

In this busy second episode, each teen character of note has a scene that illustrates the complicated dynamic they have with their parent(s):

  • Lexy (Alyvia Alyn Lind) feels unsupported by hers, particularly in contrast with her (obviously sociopathic) younger sister Caroline (Carina Battrick) who receives plenty of praise for her artistic abilities.
  • Devon (Bjorgvin Arnarson) is actively lying to his mother, Detective Evans (Rachelle Casseus) about his interest in Jake, and also possibly about his queer identity. 
  • Even Junior (Teo Briones), who has incredibly supportive parents in Logan (Devon Sawa) and Bree (Lexa Doig), is unable to convey how pressured he feels to perform well.

And then there’s Jake and his new surrogate father/mentor figure, Chucky (voiced by Brad Dourif). The red headed doll gets into plenty of trouble in this episode – from killing the housekeeper to “tricking” a neighbor into taking a bite of a razor blade embedded-apple – but the most vital scene from a queer horror perspective is what appears to be a simple conversation between doll and owner.

In Jake’s darkened bedroom, Chucky confides that he’s protecting Jake because they both want the same thing. By episode’s end, Chucky literally encourages the teen to take up arms, but Chucky first reveals that he is father to Glen/Glenda in order to get into Jake’s good graces.

It’s a significant scene for a few reasons. Glen/Glenda hasn’t been seen since Seed of Chucky (2004), which is the last entry in the film franchise to go to theatres. That film received extremely negative reviews, thanks primarily to its very self-aware, campy tone (if you want a deep dive, check out the Horror Queers episode on it). While Bride of Chucky dabbled in similar content, that film proved nowhere near as polarizing thanks to the introduction of Jennifer Tilly’s Tiffany. 

To be clear, Chucky’s proud acknowledgement of Glen/Glenda’s existence, as well as their non-binary, gender fluid status, isn’t revelatory (by the end of Seed, Chucky is fully accepting of them, which is one of the reasons the long running franchise is also horror’s most queer friendly). One of the big developments in Seed, of course, is that Chucky’s acceptance of Glen/Glenda was superseded by his fixation of cultivating their murderous impulses. 

In this way, Seed ultimately confirmed that Chucky is more than happy to be a proud papa…so long as his child is a killer like him. And it’s clear from “Give Me Something Good To Eat” that he has similar designs for Jake. 

Unlike the other parents on the series who can’t speak their teens’ language, Chucky has the ability to talk the LGBTQ talk, thereby rendering himself cool and relatable to a queer, bullied outsider like Jake. The way Chucky gets Jake to trust him (and, in the process get him started down a murderous path) is by sharing his own relationship to the queer community. “I’m not a monster,” Chucky clarifies to Jake when pressed about his feelings regarding Glen/Glenda’s genderqueer status…and with that he begins grooming a new killer. 

It’s nefarious and more than a little predatory, but it’s also exactly what we have come to expect from Chucky. After all, we’ve been down this path before in Seed of Chucky


Chucky airs every Tuesday on Syfy. For more coverage, see Meagan’s review of episode two.

Joe is a TV addict with a background in Film Studies. He co-created TV/Film Fest blog QueerHorrorMovies and writes for Bloody Disgusting, Anatomy of a Scream, That Shelf, The Spool and Grim Magazine. He enjoys graphic novels, dark beer and plays multiple sports (adequately, never exceptionally). While he loves all horror, if given a choice, Joe always opts for slashers and creature features.

Click to comment

Editorials

‘Bloodstone: Subspecies II’ Revisited: A Bigger, Bolder Follow-Up to Full Moon’s Vampire Cult Classic

Published

on

Bloodstone: Subspecies II

Horror sequels are a peculiar thing. In most cases, follow-ups to scary movies tend to retread the same formula with different victims and more over-the-top scares. This is because audiences tend to be more interested in the antagonists of these pictures than anything else, with even main characters becoming disposable when the time comes to produce a sequel.

That’s why some of the most memorable horror sequels are the ones that actually manage to hold onto interesting survivors from previous films while also pushing the story forward instead of having the same thing happen again to a different group of people. From Scream 2 to Dream Warriors (and arguably even The Exorcist III: Legion), there are quite a few of these innovative sequels to go around.

However, if there’s one franchise that deserves more attention when discussing bigger and better continuations that make the most of episodic filmmaking, it has to be Ted Nicolaou’s Subspecies.

The Full Moon classic spawned an indie horror icon, but bizarre sequel Bloodstone: Subspecies II is even more beloved than its predecessor.

Building a Bigger Vampire Saga

While the film itself takes place almost immediately after the events of the first movie, Bloodstone only entered production a couple of years after the release of the original as both Charles Band and Nicolaou weighed the pros and cons of returning to Romania to continue the series. In an effort to maximize efficiency, the team decided to invest in a trilogy where parts II and III, now fully written by Nicolaou, would be filmed simultaneously over the course of a single grueling shoot.

Much like the first Subspecies, Bloodstone’s low budget meant that the filmmakers once again had to cut corners and re-use as many of their resources as possible. Thankfully, the process was much easier this time around as Nicolaou, with the help of Romanian cinematographer Vlad Paunescu and his wife Oana, became more acquainted with local customs and made new friends. Shooting abroad still came with its own unique set of challenges due to a lack of translators and the occasional safety concerns, but the crew managed to make things work by filming things guerrilla-style and setting up shop in abandoned caves and real medieval ruins.

The director’s newfound contacts, coupled with the relative success of the first movie, meant that he was basically given free rein over an assortment of shooting locations usually considered off-limits for indie horror. That’s why Bloodstone features insanely ambitious lighting and effects work even during scenes shot in the middle of a bustling Bucharest. The filmmakers went so far as to project Radu’s Nosferatu-like shadows over local monuments as if he were a Romanian boogeyman, an idea that was actually encouraged by local cinephiles.

In fact, many of the more elaborate scenes here had originally been planned for the first movie before being discarded due to the lack of available resources. It was only with the support of Romanian fans and filmmakers that Bloodstone was able to give Radu a chance to be even more menacing the second time around.

Michelle’s Transformation Takes Center Stage

However, when it came to the American part of the crew, not everyone was able or willing to return for another round of Romanian adventuring. That’s why Radu’s human-loving half-brother Stefan (Michael Watson) is unceremoniously killed off at the beginning of the film while the role of Michelle had to be recast. Denice Duff took over for Laura Mae Tate, with the character now being joined by her sister, Rebecca, played by Melanie Shatner (yes, that Shatner).

In the finished film, we follow Michelle as she awakens to her new life as a vampire and discovers that Radu has murdered her lover. Struggling with grief and her newfound bloodlust, Michelle contacts her sister overseas, with Rebecca soon travelling to Romania on an ill-advised rescue mission. Meanwhile, Radu (Anders Hove) reaches out to his undead Mummy (Pamela Gordon, underneath heavy layers of impressive makeup effects) and promises to deliver her the coveted Bloodstone artifact while also making Michelle his eternal consort.

Revisiting the movie, I was impressed with how introspective this story is when compared to the original. The sequel assumes that you’re already familiar with the previously established characters, so the story wastes no time in exploring the immediate aftermath of the previous film’s events. From Michelle’s reluctant transformation into a creature of the night to Radu’s obvious mommy issues, Nicolaou is way more interested in pushing these characters into new and uncharted territory rather than recycling existing plot points.

Practical Effects and Gothic Atmosphere Still Impress

Yet, much like the first film, it’s Romania itself that makes the movie worth watching. The ruins of Castle Vladislav are even more majestic now, and visiting the moody streets of Bucharest with its surprisingly punk-rock nightlife made for a nice change of pace when compared to the original film’s quiet village setting. Once again, the abundance of interesting locations makes the movie feel much more expensive than it really is, with the filmmakers surrounding our characters with a living, breathing environment that would be impossible to recreate in a studio.

The increased freedom also allowed Nicolaou to flex his filmmaking muscles and tackle more ambitious blocking/composition in the sequel. The low budget and tropey script mean that the visuals don’t always work, but it’s consistently clear that this neo-expressionist style could only come from a passionate team attempting to pay homage to the shadowy horror classics of yesteryear. If the retro atmosphere isn’t enough for you, there’s enough practical gore here to satisfy even the most demanding of horror hounds!

Radu himself is also far more interesting now that Hove is more comfortable working alongside an international crew, with the actor having gone on record explaining that, while he spent more time drinking vodka than working while shooting the first movie, the sequel was a much more creatively satisfying experience for everyone involved. The character’s relationship with his abusive Mummy is also a highlight of the expanded mythology, especially since the practical effects that bring her to life are just as freaky now as they were back in ’93.

My only real gripe with the horror elements of the picture comes from the glaring absence of the diminutive stop-motion minions from the first film, though I guess the surprisingly entertaining addition of Professor Popescu (Michael Denish) and his archeological antics mostly make up for that.

Bloodstone: Subspecies II is obviously the middle chapter of a trilogy, with the ending feeling a lot less definitive than its predecessor as several plot threads are left to dangle in the wind, but I appreciate how the flick explores new ground while remaining faithful to nearly all the ideas that made the original such a good time. While I don’t think it’s as big of an improvement over the first movie as some fans make it out to be, Bloodstone is definitely worth revisiting if you’re a fan of old-fashioned vampire yarns.

Tune in next time for the thrilling conclusion to this initial trilogy, Bloodlust: Subspecies III!

Continue Reading