Editorials
The Longest Night: The Original ‘Halloween II’ at 40
Halloween II has always stood in the long shadow of its practically perfect predecessor. In many ways, it is a meaner film than the original. While the first has more in the way of trick or treating, carving jack o’ lanterns, and teenage mischief, the sequel is the razor blades in apples, carved up bodies, and carnage following a drunken teenage party. Halloween begins as a long day’s journey into night. Halloween II is almost entirely the dark, seemingly endless night of terror. Even the horror film playing on television is darker—the brutal and visceral Night of the Living Dead as opposed to the more innocuous 50’s terror The Thing from Another World. While the first film is largely populated by optimistic teenagers and children with wild imaginations, Halloween II is filled with tired and cynical adults. This is Halloween after hours, and they are vicious hours.
It is this mean streak that many critics at the time and even some of the filmmakers connected with the original negatively responded to. Tommy Lee Wallace, a major player in the making of the first and eventually third films of the franchise, was originally hired to direct Halloween II, but was very unhappy with the script and decided to back out. “It felt like everything that Halloween was not,” Wallace said in an interview. “Where Halloween got it done with suggestion and shadows and true old school suspense technique, somehow to me Halloween II was summed up with that hypodermic in the eyeball.” Roger Ebert cited the exact same moment in his negative review of the film as indicative of everything he saw wrong with the film and the slasher subgenre. These criticisms may seem unfounded or excessive today, but they are not entirely unfair. It is a far more brutal and less suggestive horror film than the first. That said, most criticisms against the film stem from comparisons to the original. Taken on its own terms, Halloween II is one of the best slashers of the 80’s or indeed any era.
Halloween II is clearly influenced by some of Halloween’s imitators, particularly the first two Friday the 13th movies, Prom Night, and My Bloody Valentine. As a result, it is a bloodier film than the original, but still not on the level of many other slashers. Certain tropes like the “cat jump scare” and “opening a door to find nothing only to close it and reveal the killer” also found their way into the film. That said, it still feels like a Halloween film, a true continuation of the first. This is largely due to key players from the original returning for the second both in front of and behind the camera. John Carpenter and Debra Hill again co-wrote the script while the great Dean Cundey returned as Director of Photography, assuring a consistent look between the two films.
Unlike the only other major slasher sequel up to that time, Friday the 13th Part 2, Halloween II brings back several characters from the first film, which is necessary as it begins the moment the first film ends, also something of an innovation. Charles Cyphers as Sheriff Brackett only appears in a few scenes toward the beginning of the film. After seeing the body of his daughter Annie (Nancy Loomis) he leaves to tell his wife “before someone else does” in a powerful and emotional moment. Deputy Hunt (Hunter von Leer) then essentially takes over the role that Brackett played in the first film, assisting Dr. Loomis on his hunt for Michael Myers.
Donald Pleasance returns as Dr. Sam Loomis offering more of John Carpenter’s signature monologues about evil. This film features Dr. Loomis unbound, and more than a little unhinged, often wreaking almost as much havoc on Haddonfield as Michael. He is seen running down the sidewalk waving his gun, nearly shooting a teenager he suspects to be Myers before the boy is killed in a fiery crash (justice for Ben Tramer!), and firing a “warning shot” through a police officer’s windshield. This last scene also features Nancy Stephens as Nurse Marion who returns late in the film to reveal some shocking new information to Loomis.
We also get a number of new characters, many of whom work at Haddonfield Memorial Hospital where Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) has been brought for treatment for her wounds (more on Laurie later). Though they are largely destined to become victims, they are fully realized characters, fleshed out and very well performed even in relatively brief appearances. Jimmy (Lance Guest) and Budd (Leo Rossi), who offers a memorable rendition of “Amazing Grace,” are the paramedics who bring Laurie to the hospital with Jimmy fulfilling the love interest role. Gloria Giffords is formidable as Mrs. Alves, the head nurse, who is the only female character to meet The Shape offscreen. Ana Alicia as Janet, Pamela Susan Shoop as Karen, and Tawny Moyer as Jill all play nurses with memorable death scenes while Cliff Emmich as security guard Mr. Garrett and Ford Rainey as Dr. Mixter round out the hospital staff.
The ways each of these characters meet their end is another way that Halloween II was influenced by other slashers—the brutality and frequency of the death sequences. The deaths of women are particularly vicious and often protracted, especially when compared to the generally brief or offscreen deaths of Michael’s male victims. This reality is on full display in the sequence that serves as the film’s centerpiece, the hot tub scene. Budd is dispatched quickly by strangulation in the out of focus background, but Karen is submerged multiple times into the scalding water of the therapy tub until much of the skin on her face is burned away. The only exceptions to this are the offscreen death of Mrs. Alves, and the two male victims of Sam Loomis: Ben Tramer and Michael himself, who are both engulfed by flames in extended shots. This is more of an observation than anything as it was a very common element of most slasher films for a very long time, even those that tried to buck those trends like Scream.
In some ways, Halloween II continues, expands, and confirms the themes of the original, but in others undermines them. The opening sequences and the kills in the hospital all at least seemingly continue the random nature of death and evil, an important theme of the first film. After leaving the Doyle house lawn, Michael wanders into a house and steals a butcher knife, leaving the elderly couple that lives there unharmed, though shaken. In the next, he stabs a young woman in the heart after she has a phone conversation in which she is told about Michael’s escape. In these sequences Michael Myers is truly The Shape, the boogeyman, the embodiment of the uncaring, unstoppable force of fate that he was in Halloween.
Where the film diverges from the first is summed up in two important questions asked by Laurie that would shape the franchise from that point on: “why me?” and “why won’t he die?” In the opinion of many fans of the franchise, these questions are better left unanswered, particularly the first. Though the second question would not be explored for quite some time, the answer to “why me” became one of the more controversial elements of the film. Though Carpenter now blames a “night of heavy drinking” for the infamous “sister twist” it may also have had its roots in the zeitgeist of the era. Several early slashers include familial ties in the motive of their killers and the most successful sequel of all time, The Empire Strikes Back, released only the year before, features the most famous and effective use of the family twist. Whether these influenced Carpenter, consciously or unconsciously, may never be fully known, but making Laurie Strode Michael Myers’ sister certainly had lasting consequences. In one way or another, every other entry in the franchise (excluding Halloween III of course) deals with this issue, either by expounding on or erasing it.
Michael also becomes something different than purely “the boogeyman” when ascribed this motive of wanting to kill his other sister. At the end of the first film, the disappearance of his body followed by the sound of his breathing at multiple locations implies that Michael is not “anywhere” but everywhere. He is truly The Shape, unbound from a where, and there never was a why. Trauma visits some and not others, just like the force of fate discussed in the classroom scene of the first film. Just like The Shape. So, Laurie’s question of “why me” early in Halloween II is extremely powerful and very much in line with Halloween’s ideas of evil. The only answer in the original is that she is the one who dropped off the key at the Myers house, and Michael happened to see her do it. When Laurie becomes his sister, it brings purpose, reason, and a level of humanity, which Carpenter goes to great lengths to explain is not the case through many lines and monologues from Loomis. He “isn’t a man,” he is “purely and simply evil,” and has “the blackest eyes, the devil’s eyes.”
But despite some flaws that Halloween II has, it is still a great film and highly influential. As the original set the rules and the template of the slasher, this film sets the rules of a successful slasher sequel. To quote Randy Meeks from Scream 2, “the body count is always bigger.” Check. “The death scenes are more elaborate.” Check. And as revealed in the trailer for that film, “never, ever, under any circumstances assume the killer is dead.” Double check. This third rule is particularly demonstrated by the fantastic climactic sequence of the film which stands as one of the best of the series. After taking multiple shots to the heart from Loomis, the Shape rises to pursue Laurie and his former doctor, who escape into an operating room, where he is again shot by Laurie. Michael, blinded by her impeccably aimed gunshots to the eyes whipping a scalpel wildly through the air is one of the great moments in any slasher. Loomis then yells for Laurie to run, and he ignites the oxygen he has released from several tanks with a lighter. The image of Michael, engulfed in flames, walking toward Laurie before collapsing is unforgettable and a clear influence on unstoppable killers to come, including The Terminator and future iterations of Jason Voorhees.
As the film ends with its only daylight scene (besides a brief flashback/dream sequence) the film again confirms the fatalistic themes underlying both films. Laurie’s thousand-yard stare as she is being driven away in the ambulance is proof that she will likely never fully be free of these events. That stare has affected the series ever since. Even though the new Blumhouse films do not include Halloween II in their canon, Laurie in those films feels very much like the Laurie of that thousand-yard stare, determined that nothing like this will ever happen to her or anyone she loves again.
For me, Halloween II will always hold a special place. Not only was it my entrée into the Halloween franchise, but indeed to slashers period. As a kid, lurking in the horror section of my local video store, its poster art of a grinning skull emerging from a pumpkin emblazoned on the VHS cover haunted me more than any other long after we headed home with a handful of more family friendly fare. I did not know what to expect when I watched it with a group of friends at a sleepover a few years later but left the next morning knowing I had watched the scariest movie I had ever seen up to that point. Though that crown was transferred to John Carpenter’s masterpiece when I watched it a few days later, Halloween II remains a seminal film to me, to the Halloween franchise, and to the entire horror genre.
Editorials
What Mike Flanagan’s ‘Carrie’ Teaser Reveals About His Bold New Adaptation
Five decades ago, Stephen King published the story of a bullied girl with telekinetic powers and forever changed the world of horror.
Carrie follows a high school misfit who seeks revenge for a hideous prank by psychically destroying her senior prom. The name Carrie White has become synonymous with the concept of a formal dance thanks to a flawless adaptation from Brian De Palma. Now fifty years after the film’s release, Mike Flanagan is putting his own stamp on the troubling story.
Rather than a feature film, the writer/director will expand King’s relatively slim debut novel into an eight-episode miniseries for Amazon Prime set to premiere on October 7.
Flanagan is no stranger to the world of Stephen King. A long-time Constant Reader, he first made waves with his daring adaptation of Gerald’s Game (2017), a novel many fans considered un-filmable. His underrated Doctor Sleep merges the disparate plot of Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining with King’s original source material, and his 2024 genre-bending tearjerker The Life of Chuck faithfully executes one of the author’s most metaphysical novellas.
He’s currently mired in pre-production for an expansive adaptation of The Dark Tower series, keystone to King’s connected universe, and Warner Bros. recently announced that Flanagan will helm a new version of The Mist, King’s 1980 novella which sees a small Maine town overrun by otherworldly monsters.
Considering the vast array of the author’s previously unadapted material, an obvious question arises. Why reimagine Carrie in 2026? Noting the timeless nature of the content, Flanagan expressed his desire to bring the story of a bullied girl into modern times, mirroring his approach to Shirley Jackson’s The Haunting of Hill House and Edgar Allan Poe’s The Fall of the House of Usher. He explained, “The only way to approach it was to build something new out of the ingredients of Carrie. Otherwise, there’s really no purpose in trying to retread ground that’s been so beautifully walked before.”
His miniseries will maintain the novel’s bloody bookends while delivering “big surprises” along the way.
A New Prom Night Nightmare
The roughly 60-second teaser introduces Summer H. Howell as Carrie White just before the moment of catastrophe. Standing in a prom dress, she smiles at her applauding classmates with an ominous crown perched upon her head. Moments later, Carrie unleashes a rage-filled scream into the night air while promgoers rush for the exit doors. But careful examination of this scene shows Carrie wearing a different, albeit dirty dress as she seems to telekinetically punish her peers.
In an exclusive first look with Entertainment Weekly, Flanagan explains that in his version of the story, “the events of that prom are going to be completely different.” An open trunk emitting a crimson glow does hint at the pig’s blood dumped on Carrie’s head, but it’s likely Flanagan’s formal dance will be a different kind of horror altogether. Despite these changes, the series may end with the widespread destruction outlined in the source material. Unlike any previous adaptations, King’s novel ends with the near-total destruction of Chamberlain, Maine. A flaming street in Flanagan’s trailer promises similar carnage no matter what prank sparks Carrie’s deadly revenge.
The Monstrous Addition of Social Media

On the opposite end of this fiery conclusion is an extreme act of bullying that brings together the story’s main cast. King’s novel begins as Carrie gets her first period while showering in the girls’ locker room. Completely unaware of the concept of menstruation, the sheltered girl thinks she’s bleeding to death. Her classmates respond with vitriolic rage. Led by ultra-mean girl Chris Hargensen (Alison Thornton), they mock the terrified teen while pelting her with tampons. Glimpses of this disturbing event reveal that Flanagan has excised the scene’s nudity while adding a seismic update. As Carrie sobs in the shower stall, Chris and her friends film the breakdown with their phones.
Other scenes note the presence of social media, bringing King’s fifty-year-old story into the digital age.
Flanagan’s adaptation promises to explore the destructive power of social media, an often invisible entity with a potential for harm rivaling Carrie’s own powers. While King’s tormented heroine suffers in front of a small group of girls, Flanagan’s version of the incident will likely become a viral video, potentially circling the globe on social media. Similar to Katt Shea’s criminally underrated The Rage: Carrie 2, which includes elements of revenge porn exploitation, Flanagan’s modern retelling will distinguish itself by exploring the nebulous cruelty of online bullying, a force ten times more powerful than the irl pranks King first envisioned.
A Completely Reimagined White Family

In addition to modernizing these canon events, Flanagan hints at updates to Carrie’s oppressive upbringing at the hands of her mother, Margaret White (Samantha Sloyan). Dead before the novel begins, we never meet Carrie’s domineering father Ralph, known to carry a bible alongside his gun. Flanagan’s White household will be an altogether different beast. In his version of the story, Carrie and her mother have been hidden away in the unassuming home, forced out of hiding by Ralph’s unexpected death. Perhaps we will finally meet this elusive man whose shadow hangs over his wife and child. Considering the White family’s fundamentalist lifestyle, this reimagining hints at tradwife culture and a home ruled by staunch patriarchal control.
Whereas King’s Carrie has been tormented by her classmates since Kindergarten, Flanagan’s Carrie will be a wide-eyed newcomer to public school, eager to make friends and engage with her peers. We glimpse Carrie cozying up to Chris and the equally popular Sue Snell (Siena Agudong) as she navigates a new social scene. Of course, we know this kindness is part of an elaborate plot designed to lull Carrie into a false sense of camaraderie, setting up an atrocious act of public humiliation. These brief moments of feigned compassion put Sue’s own complicity into question. Will Flanagan’s version of the character find the courage to defend Carrie from vicious bullies or will she succumb to peer pressure and join in the mob mentality?
Perhaps the biggest deviation from King’s original text is the relationship between Carrie and her mother. King’s Margaret White is a horrifically abusive religious zealot whose worldview has been hardened by internalized misogyny. She shames Carrie for menstruating, locks her in a closet to “pray,” and regrets not killing her child in infancy. She’s also responsible for Carrie’s social ostracization. Known to berate her neighbors for their “sins,” Margaret forces her daughter to live by an extreme code of conduct and disallows any potential friends lest they corrupt the girl with their worldly ways.
Flanagan’s version of the character is perhaps just as much a victim as Carrie herself. Also trapped inside her home, his Margaret is overly vigilant, her own trauma manifesting as strict control. Describing a more sympathetic depiction of the iconic villain, Flanagan explains, “Our Margaret White is a woman who fiercely loves her daughter and wants to protect her from this world … [She] doesn’t know how to do that and thinks the way to protect her is to close her off; not punitively, but to create this private utopia.”
Despite this potential softening, Sloyan’s Margaret may still have a sharp edge. Though she has appeared in many Flanagan projects, from Hush (2016) to The Fall of the House of Usher (2023), she is best known for her role as the abhorrent Bev Keane in the poignant saga Midnight Mass (2021). Perhaps inspired by King’s Margaret White, Bev is pious and sadistic, willing to punish anyone who does not adhere to her warped approximation of Catholicism.
Flanagan specifically wrote Margaret with Sloyan in mind, likely remembering the actress’s eerie ability to create deceptive empathy and shift our allegiances on a dime.
Expanding Stephen King’s Telekinetic Universe

While most of King’s story deals with an unthinkable prom night in Chamberlain, Maine, large sections of the semi-epistolary novel see experts debating the nature of telekinesis. Do Carrie’s frightening abilities represent a new phase in human evolution or is the prom night carnage merely a fluke? King settles the debate with a shocking denouement in which a young mother recounts her infant daughter’s ability to dangle her crib toys in midair. We’re left to wonder if she will become another tormented girl who surprises the world with metaphysical strength.
Flanagan plans to build out this brief scene while amplifying themes of female empowerment. After introducing our main cast of characters, episode two will open with an unrelated story in which we meet another girl with the TK gene. Each subsequent chapter will expand this world, building out a roster of telekinetic young women. Considering King’s fondness for stories about powerful kids, often described as possessing “the shining,” Constant Readers will no doubt have their eyes peeled for various Easter Eggs nodding to the author’s vast catalogue.
Giving Carrie Her Own Voice

Perhaps the most striking distinction in Flanagan’s new trailer is the extent to which we hear Carrie’s voice. The sneak peek is fully narrated by the titular prom queen as she demands accountability. “I want to know why,” she explains while detailing Chris’ elaborate plan. Aside from the aforementioned coda, King’s book essentially ends with the aftermath of the prom night tragedy, leaving little time for Carrie to reflect. His shifting narrative does bring the reader into her fragile mind, though not before she’s been cowed by relentless cruelty. We watch Carrie sink into bloodthirsty revenge, but never hear a considered desire for justice or repair.
Flanagan’s original monologue allows Carrie to voice her pain and mourn the life she could have had. We’re also treated to a mug shot-style photo of Chris with a bruised and bandaged face, implying that the mean girl will have to answer for her senseless sadism.
Flanagan is known for filling his series adaptations with heartwrenching speeches that cut to the heart of his thematic intentions, and this teaser seems to follow suit. After years of fans, critics, and scholars analyzing Carrie’s pain, perhaps his modern retelling will offer the titular anti-hero a chance to finally speak for herself.






You must be logged in to post a comment.