Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

The Blood Rave from ‘Blade’ Remains an Epic, Unmatched Superhero Entrance [Scene Screams]

Published

on

Blade

Horror has finally seeped much more overtly into superhero cinema between the upcoming Moon KnightMorbiusWerewolf by Night, and an MCU update on Blade. But perhaps they all owe a debt to the early pioneers and one particular box office juggernaut. A decade before Iron Man effectively launched the ever-expanding MCU as we know it, changing the landscape of superheroes in cinema, there was the R-rated Blade, a half-vampire antihero with a massive grudge. Even after amassing an extensive catalog of superhero movies and series to choose from in the decades since release, none so far has managed to rival the show-stopping entrance of Blade (Wesley Snipes) and the blood rave it brings along with it.

After a brief scene of a woman giving birth after enduring a vampire attack, Blade opens to a couple racing to an underground rave tucked away in a meat-packing plant. The woman, Racquel (Traci Lords), guides her awestruck date (Kenny Johnson) through the heavy crowds to the middle of the dance floor. Racquel quickly ditches him for a more assertive dance partner, who shoves him aside. The unwitting meal has just enough time to realize his error in judgement when he notices a drop of blood that’d fallen into his palm. The overhead sprinklers kick on, spraying the dance floor and its eager inhabitants in a thick coating of blood.

Blade blood rave Wesley Snipes

Through viscous blood-soaked eyes, the poor date slowly realizes that ravenous fanged ravers surround him. He’s battered and thrown around in attempts to flee until he crawls straight into the boots of Blade. The hunters become the hunted as the leather-clad daywalker pulls out a shotgun and starts plowing his way through the horde.

Written by David S. Goyer and directed by Stephen NorringtonBlade‘s iconic blood rave introduction creates a stylish tone that makes it clear this won’t be your average Gothic vampire flick. Cinematographer Theo van de Sande employed a special anamorphic-lens camera that allowed hand-held shots to capture the action. A strobe light was also attached to the camera, enhancing the scene’s tension and giving a starker contrast with the blood. Considering the sheer volume of blood spray, the technical precision that went into this blood rave sequence is, pardon the pun, a marvel.

Blade blood rave scene

Narratively, this frenetic opening is a quick plunge into the deep end of an already established world. It doesn’t take long for the viewer to realize that Racquel’s date is in over his head, and his date ramps up from bad to worse in a dizzying way. That doomed feeling reaches a fever pitch when the date confusingly tries to determine the red substance on his fingers while the crowd eagerly reaches up for the rain of blood behind him. Blade’s arrival just as the man’s about to succumb to a feeding frenzy halts the intense scene in its tracks.

This memorable introduction conveys everything you need to know about the character. Snipes imbues Blade with a no-nonsense stoicism with one key exception: he lives for and revels in slaying vampires. He takes on a horde of blood-covered vampires with ease and stops to give himself a proud fist pump for nailing vampire enforcer Quinn (Donal Logue) to the wall with a stake. It’s a rare glimpse of humor for an otherwise straightforward character embittered by his half-vampire status. When the cops arrive, Blade vanishes, sending the clear message that the daywalker doesn’t care much for the human world either.

The technical prowess on display dramatically heightens the stylish, blood-drenched introduction to a Marvel antihero. It visually spells out all we need to know about the character at the story’s outset. It’s an iconic grand entrance, one that instantly comes to mind when mentioning the original Blade trilogy. Even though superhero fare has become far more mainstream and commonplace since Blade‘s 1998 release, the blood rave scene remains an unmatched standout.


Scene Screams is a recurring column that spotlights the scenes in horror that make us scream, whether through fear, laughter, or tears. It examines the most memorable, and often scariest, scenes in horror and what it is about them that makes them get under our skin. 

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon, SeriesFest, and Popcorn Frights Film Fest.

Click to comment

Editorials

Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel

Published

on

Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction

The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.

That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.

It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.

That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.

The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’

For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.

This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.

This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.

Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.

So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.

The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.

Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.

While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.

At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.

After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

Continue Reading