Connect with us

Editorials

‘Venom’ (2005): ‘I Know What You Did Last Summer’ Director’s Forgotten Slasher [Young Blood]

Published

on

Venom 2005

Venom was an unprecedented move for video-game adaptations when Dimension Films acquired rights to an unproduced game in 2003. Developers Flint Dille and John Zuur Platten said their concept for Backwater was “ready-made to become a horror film as well as a game,” and players were positioned to be “the prey of a modern-day boogieman” named Mr. Jangles. It was not a lot to go on, but producer Kevin Williamson and director Jim Gillespie were confident this was the beginning of a new horror franchise. Fast forward to 2005, and there was still no sign of Backwater on the game market. In any case, Miramax Films went ahead with a theatrical release even if the tie-in plans fell through.

Only a few weeks before Venom — formerly The Reaper after shooting under Backwater — was released in the U.S. in 2005, the Gulf Coast was hit by Hurricane Katrina. And with Southeast Louisiana being largely affected by one of the worst natural disasters in the country’s history, a slasher set in the Bayou State might have lost its appeal. The flopping film was subsequently pulled after about a month; whether or not current events had a bearing on that decision is unclear. Venom earning less than $900,000 against a $15-million budget was good enough reason to abandon ship. This was certainly not the note Dimension wanted to go out on after being sold off to The Weinstein Company the following October. 

Venom was dismissed as paint-by-numbers teen horror with only a change in scenery; now in place of an urban sprawl was a bayou backdrop. The screenplay is indeed fitted for a survival-horror game, but it would be a mistake to hold that against the film. This could have easily been another wanton killer in a mask. Venom, on the other hand, moves past convention by creating its own universe and mythos, and it embraces the supernatural. Slashers tend to avoid an outright fantastical element to maintain a sense of realism — notwithstanding the fact that the exceptions include the most iconic examples of this subgenre — yet the story here impressively unifies its two different worlds.

As slashers made their way back into the ‘90s, the villains started cropping up closer to home. They were no longer restricted to out-of-the-way locales like summer camps and forests. The next crop of slashers, those particularly from the 2000s, were not only more splattery, their stories took off for more distant destinations. Meanwhile, 2005’s Venom is a return to the classic remote setting of many golden-age slashers but with one important adjustment. The murderer’s would-be victims are neither indulging a small-town stopover, nor are they accidentally removing themselves from the safety of their city dwellings. No, they live smack dab in the middle of nowhere, in the very same place others would avoid to begin with. In spite of their residency, though, the characters are completely caught off guard by an underlying evil.

Parts of Louisiana can come across as a foreign country even to Americans. Venom immediately plays into that feeling when the story opens in an old Creole burial ground, and local mambo Miss Emmie (Deborah Duke) recovers a mysterious box. The development of a mall there threatens to unearth something she sealed away sometime ago. Magic exists in this neck of the woods, although it is treated with derision by nonbelievers. To be more specific, the white folks who describe the town as a place of “archaic beliefs and backward mentality.” The magic around these parts, principally practiced by the Black residents, has been stifled by the more dominant culture and religion. So when Miss Emmie digs up that box, she ends up freeing a shunned past.

It does not take long for the story’s tragic villain to be revealed. The resident outcast, a scarred and misunderstood trucker named Ray Sawyer (Rick Cramer), meets the business ends of evil-imbued snakes after he attempts to save Miss Emmie from a car accident. His last good deed is repaid in wickedness; the dead trucker is resurrected as an unstoppable killing machine with a thirst for souls. A standard slasher usually refrains from telling the killer’s origin story so soon or, in many cases, at all. Venom was intended to be the start of an expanded universe, though. Williamson, who heavily “tinkered” with Dille, Platten and Brandon Boyce’s script, expressed to Fangoria a desire for sequels. After all, they refrained from calling Ray “Jangles” here because they assumed the name would come up in a continuation.

Venom 2005 movie

The teen soap opera that is Eden Sinclair’s (Agnes Bruckner) podunk life is limited to the first act, and it is pretty much over once the contents of Miss Emmie’s box get out. Before then, she and ex-boyfriend Eric (Jonathan Jackson) harp on Eden’s desire to leave Louisiana and stay gone. Oddly enough, her difficult decision is made “easier” when Ray slays those standing in her way. So, Eden’s will to survive goes beyond the physical as she fights tooth and nail to escape a life she does not want. This all amounts to an incredibly arduous escape from small-town life.

Venom is not without its missteps. The story quickly disposes of Black characters who, besides Miss Emmie’s granddaughter Cece (Meagan Good), are given little to do before checking out. The racial divide is also only expressed when the white teens are forced to acknowledge Cece’s upbringing. “I don’t like it… All this voodoo shit weirds me out,” says Eden’s best friend, Rachel (Laura Ramsey). Of course magic is the only way to stop Ray. Those among the cast who still feel opposed to Cece’s ways are eventually dealt with in cruel fashion, whereas the ostensible final girl is afforded a higher chance of survival once she accepts the magic. Venom is surely another example of how Hollywood misrepresents Louisiana Voodoo, but there is a concealed message within about acceptance of other cultures.

Since Venom in 2005, Gillespie has stepped away from a genre he is so at home in. He eagerly directs his final outing, infusing the inevitably self-contained slasher with tenacity and aggression. The suspense fades quickly and lies on the surface more than in past efforts, but the external entertainment is pulled off well enough to overlook that flaw. Reinforcing the exterior strengths is director of photography Steve Mason, who brought out an increasingly eldritch quality in the characters’ Southern Gothic surroundings.

Venom 2005 slasher

Venom has gone on to find a small audience over the years, but its legacy is unduly harsh. If anyone remembers it all, they remember the bad timing and the significant thrashing from critics, many of whom were more fixated on the proximity to Katrina than the actual film. The objective critiques were not unwarranted; the script has shortcomings, and the characters are underdeveloped. The silver lining, however, is Venom is a well-directed stab of teen horror punctuated with pushy violence and the highest urgency. The worldbuilding is also to be admired, and had this become a full-on series of films, that aspect would have undoubtedly grown with Jangles’ body count. 

Putting some distance between 2005 and now, people are finally watching this Deep South slasher with fresh eyes, less biases, and a better appreciation for aughts horror. The odds were not in the film’s favor all those years ago, but despite its reputation, Venom is hardly the poison it was made out to be.


Horror contemplates in great detail how young people handle inordinate situations and all of life’s unexpected challenges. While the genre forces characters of every age to face their fears, it is especially interested in how youths might fare in life-or-death scenarios.

The column Young Blood is dedicated to horror stories for and about teenagers, as well as other young folks on the brink of terror.

Venom 2005 horror

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading