Connect with us

Editorials

‘Amityville in Space’ Fails to Live Up to the Fun of Its Own Title [The Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville in Space trailer

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

The law of horror movie franchises is that eventually, without fail, you go to space.

It’s fitting, then, that the final outing for prolific Amityville writer/director Mark Polonia takes the “franchise” into the furthest reaches of space in the year 3015.

It’s been a few entries since Polonia’s last outing. He’s the creative responsible for Amityville Island, Amityville Exorcism, and Amityville Death House. Of these, Island has some amusingly self-aware bits, Death House has a great spider walk finale, and…well, the less said about Exorcism the better.

Where does Amityville in Space fall? Alas, it skews closer to Exorcism than the others. Not helping matters is that this latest film shares a character – Father Benna (Jeff Kirkendall) – albeit one who didn’t make much of an impression the first time around.

Father Benna actually opens the film, entering the famed Amityville home to try, once and for all, to exorcize the evil inside. The brief cold open positions the event as a live news event, but – like too many developments in the film – it hardly matters. Father Benna’s prayers to God to relocate the evil ultimately instigates the extreme time and location jump, and then the film spends most of its remaining runtime playing silly fish out of water story beats.

Father Benna (Jeff Kirkendall) and Dr Nurmi (Cassandra Hayes) stand in front of a white wall with shadows visible

The new location Father Benna finds himself aboard (eventually) is Wyoming 227, a “deep space cruiser” with a small crew that’s tasked with blowing up black holes. The obvious connection to Alien is tangential at best and the visuals, be they Space: 1999 style practical sets or horrendous green screen backgrounds, feel like a parody.

Alas, the whole film is played straight.

It’s a perplexing creative decision because criticisms would be much kinder if the film were humorous or campy. Unfortunately Amityville in Space never embraces its terribleness; instead the film dedicates its ~75 minute runtime to shallow and forgettable characters confronting A Nightmare on Elm Street-style nightmares and disbelieving Benna before a hastily executed explosive climax.

Following the opening sequence, the film introduces flirty Captain Halstead (Titus Himmelberger), who is ordered by his shady corporate boss Madam Tyse (Natalie Himmelberger) to investigate two mysterious appearances. One is the Amityville house where they discover Father Benna; the other is a GIANT fiery pentagram floating in space next to a black hole.

Father Benna is brought on board for medical treatment by Dr. Nurmi (Cassandra Hayes), but he’s treated with suspicion by pilot Maitland (Tim Hatch) and weapons expert Jacowitz (Ryan Dalton). Meanwhile android Vox (Michael Korotitsch) is sent to the house where it is destroyed by the manifestation of evil, Legion (an undisclosed actor in robes and a really cheap demon mask).

From then on, the rest of the film follows Legion infecting crew members and/or faking them out with nightmares, while the others try to understand the 2021 concept of a “domicile” and whether to blow it up.

Madam Tyse (Natalie Himmelberger) speaks on a video com link

Aside from that, Amityville in Space is inert. The paper-thin characters aren’t memorable, the uninspired plot is predictable (and therefore quite tedious), and, most disappointingly, there’s nothing to latch onto visually due to the extremely low budget FX.

To be clear, expectations were always low because Polonia’s entries have always been modest affairs, but this entry feels particularly phoned-in and uninspired. This is a huge problem considering that the space element is the film’s first (and only) hook.

Sadly the look of the film is either ugly, distracting, or both. Its aesthetic is reminiscent of a Windows 98 screen saver, but not in a “so good it’s bad” playful, nostalgia way.

Like the overall film, it’s simply bad.

1 skull out of 5

‘Amityville in Space’ Trailer Brings the Infamous Evil House Into Outer Space [Exclusive]

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Parody Gone Wrong: Attentive readers will note that in the last entry on Amityville Scarecrow 2, we were going to discuss Amityville Gas Chamber (2022) in this editorial. However, after skimming the YouTube video, it is clear that it’s less of a film, and more of its own desperate cash grab. A 80 minute single take of a farting protagonist (ha ha?) and “pop up” facts about the other films doesn’t merit discussion.
  • Hand Homage: In the opening scene Father Benna loses his hand to the evil in what appears to be a homage to Evil Dead 2, but it looks (and plays) more like Thing from The Addams Family.
  • Tin-Earned Dialogue: At one point Captain Halstead tells Jocwitsz: “I need you here in case we need to launch a retaliatory strike against the pentagram” The fact that this line isn’t dripping in sarcasm or camp is frankly unforgivable.
  • Tin-Earned Dialogue 2: “Thanks for lending me a hand” Halstead jokes after they shoot Father Benna’s malevolent hand. This is *clearly* a joke, and yet it only plays within the world of the film (characters laugh, but the delivery isn’t actually funny). It’s all so perplexing.
  • Silver Lining – Visual Edition: The only remotely interesting visual component is a random stop-motion monster that attacks crew members in the house. It has a textured, hand-drawn element to it, which is intriguing, but this demon is visually out of synch with the rest of the film and makes very little logical narrative sense.
  • Confusing Visuals: Q: What’s more confronting: the cheapness of the “transporter” chamber (a direct rip-off on Star Trek) or the super soaker look of the “laser pistols” that crew members use? A: Both.
  • Silver Lining – Director’s Edition: While Polonia isn’t going out on a high with this title, his contributions to the “franchise” have thankfully come to an end, so there won’t be any more ragging on him in the future.

Next Time: the high concept entries continue as 2021’s Amityville Hex explores the well-trodden ground of The Ring’s viral death curse. It’s also the first of three (!) titles from writer/director Shawn C. Phillips.

Amityville in Space

Joe is a TV addict with a background in Film Studies. He co-created TV/Film Fest blog QueerHorrorMovies and writes for Bloody Disgusting, Anatomy of a Scream, That Shelf, The Spool and Grim Magazine. He enjoys graphic novels, dark beer and plays multiple sports (adequately, never exceptionally). While he loves all horror, if given a choice, Joe always opts for slashers and creature features.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading