Quantcast
Connect with us

Interviews

[Interview] Ralph Ineson and Kate Dickie Talk ‘The Witch’

Published

on

THE WITCH | via A24

There have been many programs featuring young women with magical powers as of late, but none as authentic and deeply disturbing as the 2016 horror period piece, The Witch. The success of this film can be attributed to many things, such as writer/director Robert Eggers’ insanely dedicated devotion to research, or the fact that much of the seventeenth century dialogue is exacted straight from written accounts during the time period. While all of these aspects undoubtedly factor in to the impact of the film, the experience wouldn’t be nearly as moving without the powerful performances of talented actors Ralph Ineson and Kate Dickie.

In the film, Ineson and Dickie play Puritan husband and wife William and Katherine, who struggle to maintain their faith when a rash series of events conspire to rip their family apart. Set during the 1600s, the family deals with the turmoil of daily life as a settler in New England territory. First, their crops wither and die, then their youngest, Samuel, mysteriously disappears, which the family attributes to a wolf stealing him; an act that happened often during the unruly early days of colonial life. Despite logical explanations for the horrible things that have been happening to this devout family recently, their steadfast dedication to their religion leads them to believe that dark magic is at play here, and the person doing the playing is none other than their own teenage daughter, Thomasin. Thomas makes for an easy scapegoat, as she grows into womanhood and begins making her family nervous with his recent increased sense of sexuality, but is she honestly to blame for all of the mischief that has been plaguing these good people, or are they simply going mad with delusions as a result of their hardship and their tendency to attribute every event as a will of God? No one can know, but that won’t stop them from drawing conclusions.

I was lucky enough to sit down and chat with stars Ralph Ineson and Kate Dickie on behalf of Bloody Disgusting about their exciting new exercise in faith-charged paranoia. In the interview, we discuss the duo’s decision to work with a first time director, the grieving process that leads to pointed fingers, and the inevitable shift of power in the household as Thomasin develops into a fully grown woman.

Bloody Disgusting: So, obviously, looking back now, we can all see what a talented and visionary writer and director Robert Eggers is, but coming in to the project, Eggers’ name wasn’t quite yet known. He’s made some very impressive short films, but this is his first real feature length film. With that in mind, what made you both say yes to this project, and take a chance on a relatively unknown director?

Kate Dickie: His fabulous script, honestly. It’s very rare that you read a script that comes through, that you might enjoy, but you it goes (moves hand forward) whoom! You want to come into this world, you know? But it was so beautifully written, and that’s what my initial gut reaction was, was just about his beautiful writing because I hadn’t met him at that point.

Ralph Ineson: No I mean, people say that, it seems bizarre, but right from the start – and I’d like to call it, I picked him right from the start, I really did – I didn’t have a second’s doubt.

Kate Dickie: Nope.

Ralph Ineson: From the moment I read the script and I saw the whole [look] book, and I met him on Skype. Obviously you can’t predict that a film’s going to be quite as good as this turned out, and getting the reviews and the notoriety that it’s already got. You couldn’t predict it to have this kind of success, but I knew right from the start, and was absolutely convinced, that it was going to be something of very, very high quality, and that he was somebody that I just had to work with.

Kate Dickie: You kind of just get instincts about things, and honestly it didn’t even enter my head that Rob was a first time feature [director] because his script was so brilliant and then when I went down to do a casting, Rob had been cast already so we did a slight introduction and we had such an amazing connection —

Ralph Ineson: It was amazing. We had this incredible chemistry!

Kate Dickie: We were shaking!

Ralph Ineson: Yeah we were physically shaking when we were doing this improv together it was like whoa!

Kate Dickie: Yeah and you just felt like you were in the safest hands ever, and I never once thought, “Actually, I’m going to the middle of northern Ontario with WHO?”

Ralph Ineson: Right, like this low budget film set in 1630? What? (laughs) And it just always felt right, at every stage of the way, which is kind of like, kind of boring in a way (laughs) but at every stage, no matter how hard it got, or physically demanding, I never questioned that it wasn’t going to be a really, really good piece of work.

Kate Dickie: It’s true! I never questioned anything.

Ralph Ineson: I never questioned that Rob wasn’t going to make it amazing.

Katie Dickie: Yeah, and I never thought at any point, unsafe with him in any way, it didn’t feel like a first time feature director, in a lot of ways, because he’d spent four years researching it, and was so ingrained in that world that he was like a walking Encyclopedia. So, any little thing, you’d go, “Oh, I wonder -” and he’d be like, “Oh I know”, so you were in brilliant hands, sometimes safer hands than the people who were experienced.

Ralph Ineson: And also with any film, and any crew, you’ve got all sorts of different people who’ve got lots of experience as well, so you get that experience from different departments. Not every department has to be the most experienced. Rob had this amazing vision that a lot of experienced people wanted to help him fulfill so it just worked.

Bloody Disgusting: What was it like on set? There’s such an intensity hanging overhead throughout the film, and such precision with each shot, that it feels very carefully crafted. Can you talk about Robert Eggers’ directing style? Was it very intense on set?

Kate Dickie: It was like, the work was intense, and yet the relationships were easy, if that makes sense?

Ralph Ineson: Yeah, because we were so far in the middle of nowhere, divorced from all our normal lives, all living in this job. So we’re in the middle of nowhere, in this tiny hotel, all living on top of each other and just living and breathing this film the whole way through. So, there was an intensity to it, but we all bonded so well, we had such fun together, that we also had a really good laugh, didn’t we?

Katie Dickie: Yeah, we did, we did. And there was such a support and love from everyone because we’d spent a week before we started filming. Rob gave us a week there, getting to know each other, going over things, trying wee bits out, rehearsals, and just trying to build a bond with the kids really, so that they felt that we were their mom and dad, so that they wouldn’t be acting like strangers around us. So, yeah it was intense and the scenes were very intense, but then we could come out of it, and we could have a laugh, or if one of us had a really intense scene, the others would be there, going, “Yeah, you can do it!” We were there to support each other, it was really incredible.

Ralph Ineson: Yeah, it was a very special job, even if it turned out to be a really shit film. It would be a job that I would remember for a very long time because of the bond that we all have as a cast and a crew, and the experience we went through. But obviously, because it was something that was very high quality, that drives you on as well, whilst you’re doing it.

TheWitch

Bloody Disgusting: There’s a fascinating dynamic between the three characters of Katherine, William, and Thomasin, as the blame bounces back and forth. Thomasin is quickly becoming a young woman, and she’s shifting into more of a motherly role, which seems to cause her mom to panic a little. How would you two describe the relationship of these family members?

Kate Dickie: It’s so complicated. But the time before, in England, before the script started, quite a normal easy-going family relationships, but I think the fact that Rob’s character, William, has taken the family, not only from kind of all of their support and their home in England, to the New England plantation, for then, for us to be banished from there and be on our own, it just puts the family into a different gear, and puts us all under these strains and pressures that we’d never really had to deal with as a family before as such.

Ralph Ineson: Yeah, and I think the essential thing is Thomasin’s age as well, as she gets to a certain age, that sexuality becomes threatening in all sorts of ways, and I don’t think William, the way I wanted to play it, was that William thought she was younger, and in his own mind, wouldn’t let her grow up. I always tried to make William think she was thirteen, or fourteen, as his little girl, and kind of always steadfastly refused to acknowledge the fact that she was growing up. Whereas, Katherine is threatened.

Kate Dickie: Yeah, it’s a lot for Katherine, because Katherine, you know, with Thomasin being the one who loses the baby, and being on the brink of womanhood and childbearing and all that, Katherine’s at the end of that, you know, that was her last baby. There’s so much resentment from me, and jealousy and things that I don’t even want to admit as a mother that I’m starting to feel towards Thomasin, about becoming a young woman and developing and starting to separate from the family and want to look at the outside world, and Katherine doesn’t deal well with that at all.

Bloody Disgusting: There’s such an interesting parallel in this film between sexuality, and exposing oneself, and the gaining of knowledge. What is your take on the idea of freedom of thought as shown in this film?

Ralph Ineson: I think it’s how terrified people are of freedom of thought, I think that’s what it is.

Kate Dickie: And hope, people think they can curtail it and make others love the way that they do. You know, Thomasin’s sexuality brings such a shift to the household and such a kind of free song that we never had experienced before then, and it just unsettles people and [Katherine]’s maybe not as beddable as she was a couple of years ago, and it’s just, as it’s almost like the freedom of thought is terrifying, especially if you live in religious constraints such as this family does.

Ralph Ineson: The way they have it, the constant praying, the fast days, all these kind of things, everything’s kind of brought back around —

Kate Dickie: And nothing’s allowed for vanity or ego or you know, not a lot of treats, or obviously, no treats, but everything being a point. You live kind of as Spartan a life as you could to be closer to God so Thomasin’s kind of burgeoning sexuality and freedom of thought —

Ralph Ineson: But it’s because these are all choices made by the parents; made by Katherine and William essentially, followed by Katherine, and obviously, Thomas’s kind of going, “Really? Why?”as any teenager would, and they kind of know as well, that Caleb’s going to be next.

Kate Dickie: Yeah, questioning things. And it’s a dangerous time for her because then, with witches being a real threat, and women being burned in wretched ways, I can imagine she feels almost as if she’s got something in her that she’s not really in control of and she doesn’t understand, and she’s got a mother and father who just won’t go there. I would never sit down with Thomasin, as Katherine, and let her tell me the throes of that because she wouldn’t be being a good Puritan. You have stay in this very rigid road, and you have to defer to God all the time, so it’s terrifying for the family. Really terrifying.

Bloody Disgusting: There’s a quiet tension that permeates nearly every scene between William and Katherine, and it almost feels kind of familiar. Is it possible that this isn’t the first time that William has let his pride put his family in harm’s way?

Ralph Ineson: Yeah, I think there’s an element of that, yeah.

Kate Dickie: I think it’s the first time I’ve questioned it as much, and also, it’s William’s fault that the baby wasn’t baptized, because he said, “Let’s wait, let’s wait” and now our baby’s dead in limbo, which to a Puritan is Hell.

Ralph Ineson: He can’t go to God if he’s not baptized.

Kate Dickie: He can’t go to God, I can’t live with myself, we left our son in this limbo and we blame William because it was William who said wait so there’s a lot…Katherine doesn’t have many choices for herself as a woman then, you know you can’t make your own decisions as a woman, it has to be your husband.

Ralph Inseon: Yeah, I think William’s pride, as you pointed out, has put them into these situations many times, I mean, I’m sure leaving England was to do with that, to go and be the great concrete Puritans, to go and conquer the New World. Being kicked out of the plantation was again, it was like, “No, you don’t know it, I am the master of this, I am the only one who understands it” and I think yeah, it’s happened a lot.

Kate Dickie: But I think, yeah I think Katherine shouldn’t question that, because that’s her role as a mother and as a wife. That’s, you know, William who makes the decisions, and then God.

Ralph Ineson: I think it’s always used as a cop out. I think a lot of times, William says, “It’s not me, it’s God”, and I think he’s hidden behind that and used it.

Kate Dickie: Yeah, I think over time there’s less and less to hide behind, and he gets more and more exposed for his kind of pride and things like that.

Bloody Disgusting: Yeah, and there’s such heavy themes of witchcraft and the settlers’ struggles that I feel like one thing that gets lost in the mix is the fact that the parents are grieving. You know, it’s not just their religion that’s making these parents act this way, they’re grieving over the loss of their child.

Kate Dickie: The grief for Katherine is all-consuming, you know, the praying, the crying, the praying —

Ralph Ineson: I like William’s justification, like, “Come on, this is the first child we’ve ever lost, you should be saying thank you that we’ve not lost more children”. It’s like, “What!? We lost a kid!” “Yeah, but only one!” But that’s the fucked up nature of the whole Puritan thing, is that, that’s essentially what he does, he goes, “No, stop fucking crying. We’ve only ever lost one. You should be grateful we’ve only lost one”, and it’s just like, “What?”

Kate Dickie: Yeah, it’s like although she does grieve all the time, she shouldn’t be, there’s no place for it, there’s no space for that kind of grieving. We should be getting on, and being grateful for what we have. But, the grief in it is the thing that attracted me to it. It was the real familiar story of a drama of a family falling apart, of losing a child, of the grieving from the loss and the love and that was a kind of theme for me that really stood out when I read it, and I found really interesting, as well.

Bloody Disgusting: One of my favorite things about the film is just how authentic it feels. It doesn’t feel like we’re watching a movie, it feels like we just stepped into this time period, and I think part of that is the dialogue being taken from real sources.

Kate Dickie: Absolutely, and everything of Rob’s is taken from reality. I mean, we’ve talked a lot today about how everything is hand stitched. Not a popper, not a button is fake. Ralph’s socks are made from the wool from the right sort of sheep from the plantation that would have made them. The set was built with the old tools because circular saws weren’t invented then, they would have made the wrong marks, so they were making them as you would in 1630 when they built the house. So, for us as actors, it was a dream, there was nothing to imagine, nothing was pretend. We were just saturated with detail, and that’s what makes it stand out is it’s so accurate and so to the point and every little detail, so there’s nothing that you go, “Oh, that jars” or “Oh, that doesn’t set right”.

Ralph Ineson: As an actor, having the weight of the right tools, you can feel that this is the real thing. This is the right tool that I’m cutting this stuff with, or, how they have single shank shoes, they’re not right and left.

Kate Dickie: So your shoes would do either feet and it was up to you which shoe you put on and how you broke them into that, it just depended how you broke in your shoes.

Ralph Ineson: These kind of things just make it so easy to really get into it and not be dragged down.

Bloody Disgusting: Were there any books that you were told to read in preparation for your roles?

Kate Dickie: Well I got obsessed with a prayer book called The Practice of Piety which is basically a Puritan prayer book. There were a lot of things [in the script] that said, “Katherine praying, Katherine praying”, and I thought, “What is she praying? And if I mumble and don’t say anything, it’s going to look bad, but if I make up modern prayers it’s going to sound bad”. So, I thought I could learn what prayer would go into that bit, and I found in it, like “Oh this bit talks about grief, I’ll talk about that”, and Rob supplied us with lit books and writings and so much research that we could use that, or just ask him anything and he’d be like, “I know that!”

Ralph Ineson: He’s like an Encyclopedia of the period. The depth of research is incredible.

Kate Dickie: He was the one that guided us about what sort of research material would be helpful. I had another thing called The Housewives’ Hand Book or something, and it was how to be a Puritan wife: what you made, how you made food, how you cleaned clothes, how you acted with your husband, how you acted with God, and these were really helpful for just making me not panic that I was doing it too modern, or was going to make something jar. But we had Rob who just is…I don’t know if there’s anything he doesn’t know about back then. So he was our great source if we needed to know. He was wonderful.

The Witch hits theaters on February 19th, 2016.

2 Comments

Interviews

Avalon Fast on Women, Witches, and the Intoxicating Nature of Girl Horror ‘Camp’

Published

on

Avalon Fast interview Camp

Of all the places to find a coven of witches, the attic above a Christian youth camp is probably the last place you’d think to look. But that’s just what we find in Camp, a surrealist nightmare of feminist empowerment from Canadian filmmaker Avalon Fast.

Emily (Zola Grimmer) is still reckoning with her involvement in a horrific tragedy when she accidentally contributes to the death of her best friend, Charlie (Giselle Morison). Unable to move on, the traumatized teen takes a job at a rural summer camp, hoping to forget her own sorrows by looking after at-risk kids. She quickly connects with a counselor named Clara (Alice Wordsworth) and finds comfort in her close-knit group of female friends. But a mysterious whisper from deep in the woods warns that they may be leading her down a darker path.  

Fast burst onto the scene in 2022 with Honeycomb, a psychological horror film that follows a burgeoning matriarchy. Known for their focus onGirl Horrorstories, the talented young filmmaker tackles similar themes in Camp as Emily leaves the modern world behind to embrace a dark vision of self-discovery through magic.

Ahead of the film’s U.S. release on June 26, Bloody Disgusting sat down with Fast to chat about the nebulous nature of good vs. evil and the intoxicating power of female-driven horror. 

Avalon Fast Camp Interview

Bloody Disgusting: What inspired this unique story? Did you go to religious summer camps when you were young? 

Avalon Fast: I did. I went to lots of different summer camps, but all of them were primarily Bible camps. The memory I have of camp is kind of strange. I was very homesick as a kid, and I didn’t necessarily enjoy all my time there. I definitely remember meeting some interesting girls at camp and having that presence of religion hovering around the whole experience. 

BD: I really love the film’s gorgeous natural setting. Camp is the kind of surrealist nightmare that you don’t just watch. You feel it too. How did you approach creating this world? 

AF: Well, a huge part of it was working with my cinematographer Eily Sprungman, who’s a very close friend. We spent years prepping, shot listing, storyboarding, and mood boarding. She’d had a similar experience to mine. We grew up around the same place, and so we understood each other’s visions from the get-go. But there are so many other pieces that came together. The costuming, the art, and the animated sequences were done by Sofiya Iurkevych. One of our producers, Taylor Nodrick, was obsessed with shooting on Super 8 film. I’ve always wanted to as well, so all the memory sequences were shot on Super 8. It was just a lot of people with an understanding and a vision for what this project was. I’m really happy with the way it turned out.

To the extent that you’re comfortable sharing, what’s your relationship to witchcraft, and what does Camp have to say about modern witches?

Well, that’s the question of Camp. It’s not that I don’t resonate with any of these things, but I specifically wanted Camp to be a little bit ambiguous around what witchcraft looks like. Is this witchcraft? Are these girls witches? Emily explicitly asks if that’s what’s happening here, and the answer isn’t yes. The film isn’t going to answer that question for you. My relationship to magic and witchcraft? It’s tough. I feel like there’s so much magic, connection, and spirituality that comes from these friendships, the closeness of these women, and what’s happening around them. A lot of what Camp is trying to say or show is just that magic can come out of friendship.

I loved watching these female friendships develop. And you’re right. No one ever says the wordcoven,but you can feel that connection, and you can see a change in Emily as those relationships grow. I’m also really fascinated with the way Camp plays with the idea of good and evil. At one point, Clara says,Maybe God drew us to the devil,which stopped me in my tracks. How do you view witchcraft or the magic these girls are experiencing in regard to good and evil? 

That was such a huge part of the script’s construction. The story is really trying to keep a balance between those two things. I like asking people if they think these girls are good or bad, because I feel like a lot of people come out of the film thinking one or the other. They’ll say things likethank God Emily found her peopleorGod, I really wish she’d gone home.I just don’t think there’s ever an answer. I wanted to explore the idea of going down the wrong path, especially coming out of grief. What makes you a bad person, and does healing mean you’re looking to become a better person? I don’t have an answer, but I do feel like that’s a huge part of what Camp is asking. What is good? What is bad? Why did God bring me to the devil? 

Yes, because this is all happening atGod campin Emily’s words. So how can both of those things exist at the same time? Along those lines, I’m also fascinated by the voice Emily hears in the woods. Without spoiling too much, what is this voice asking, and what is required in return?

Emily comes to camp with a shout into the void, asking can anyone hear me? Does anyone want to? And it’s answered so clearly by these girls, specifically responding only with love, care, support, and trust. It’s like her prayers were answered. It doesn’t mean that everything is going to be alright, but Emily is looking for peace. She’s looking for a moment where she feels pure good. And I think, even at its surface level, she does get that experience. 

Personally, I don’t really think people are good or bad. I think we all exist somewhere in the middle. Camp centers traditionally villainized characters, but that’s where Emily seems to find her peace, however you choose to define it. 

I also wanted to show the experience of having decided that you are a bad person, you’ve made mistakes, and you feel cursed. Then when you meet other people who have done things that you would consider worse, you can actually feel good in their presence. You feel like less of a bad person. I think that’s a huge part of the story as well. Emily’s finding her version of other fucked up people, and she feels less fucked up around them. I’ve found that in my own life. It’s a cool thing. I don’t think it’s bad.

I don’t think it’s bad either. It’s finding your home, your people. We meet Emily in the aftermath of unthinkable trauma. Is this a story about mental health and healing? 

Witnessing it myself. witnessing other people experience tragedy and then move through grief, you hear a lot of talk about healing or coming out the other side. There’s so much conversation around what that looks like, with self-care and showing up for yourself. I always felt really averse to it. It annoyed me. I think the beginning of the film speaks to that. The therapeutic version of what getting help looks like is obviously very different from what Camp is showing. And again, I don’t have an answer for what you’re supposed to do. But I think that’s another question I was asking: how do you heal? Do you heal at all? Is that the end goal, or are we just trying to get better? It’s something I experienced in my own grief. And the answer, for me, at least now, is just that I’m not looking to get better. So I felt like I hadn’t. I found it hard to find people to have those conversations with. And I think that’s what I ultimately wanted to make a film about. 

I love that unanswered question. In my own experience, I’ve had to reframe what healing actually looks like. There’s not really an endpoint. It’s just finding a way to keep going. There’s also an element of sacrifice in this story, particularly regarding another counselor named Jo (Sophie Bawks-Smith). What role does she play in Emily’s journey? 

For me, Jo is this human embodiment of Charlie, Emily’s friend. As Jo, she had a life at this camp before meeting Emily, and then was kind of taken over by Charlie’s spirit. I think a lot of people view Emily’s final choice as horrendous and tragic. In a way it is, but for me, if Jo becomes her angel, it’s almost like a self-sacrifice. Jo knows that by sacrificing herself, she’ll be giving Emily power to move forward. In the original script, the girls were supposed to bring out another counselor, JB (Aidan Laudersmith), and burn his body. But I just thought, there’s no way sacrificing this guy could give the girls enough power. There’s just no way, right? Logically, that just didn’t line up for me. 

I’m glad you mentioned JB, because he has his own tragic arc. How do men factor into the world of Camp? 

The way men factor into my world is so bizarre. I have such little respect for them in my films, which is something I’ve been called on. I think I have to challenge myself in the future to make a movie about a boy because, these boys … It’s not that the men in my films aren’t redeemable, but there’s no depth to these characters. They’re just treated with such disrespect. I don’t know why I do that, actually. That’s something for me to look into. It was the same with Honeycomb. They’re just such peripheral characters. I’ve had people ask about Kayne (Henri Gillespi), the scary guy at the fire, what happens to him? I just think, I don’t know. I don’t care. That’s not the point of the story. 

Well, I can say after a lifetime of watching women on the periphery of the story, the course correction feels nice. In a similar vein, I’m in love with your homepage, avalonfast.com. There’s an image of girls on a film set and then a still from Honeycomb in which a blood-covered girl is screaming at the sky. And in the middle, it just says Girl Horror. It’s a really powerful statement that gives me chills. How do you define Girl Horror, and what draws you to these types of stories? 

I was obsessed with the term when I started making my movies. It was something I’d come up with to kind of brand myself and describe what I was doing. Then I went through a period where I felt like it was a bit gender exclusive and didn’t interest me as much. But now I’ve come full circle on the term. I think it’s a bit of a commentary on youth and the horror of growing up female. But I think everybody can relate to that experience. I don’t want it to feel like this exclusive thing, that I make movies exclusively for girls, because I don’t think I do. I’m interested in exploring what Girl Horror means. Originally, it was just a title, something I came up with, and now it’s become something that resonates with people. You said it gave you chills. That’s cool for me to hear because there’s obviously some depth there. 

Are you working on anything new? 

Yes. I am actually making a movie about a boy. That’s the next thing. 

That’s exciting! The more I think about feminism, the more I end up coming back to men and boys, because they have a place in the world of Girl Horror too.  

Absolutely. It’s all just part of being human.

Continue Reading