Interviews
Directors Talk About Sequel Possibilities for ‘Ready or Not’ [Spoilers]
If there’s one thing we’ve learned it’s that every horror movie, no matter what it’s about, can lead to a sequel if it’s popular enough. And given the critical acclaim getting heaped on Ready or Not (read my review), starring Samara Weaving as a woman who marries into a rich family, only for her in-laws to hunt her for sport on her wedding night, it seems very possible that the new film from Radio Silence could yield a follow-up or two.
In a new interview with Bloody-Disgusting, the filmmaking team – Matt Bettinelli-Olpin, Chad Villella and Tyler Gillett – revealed some of their ideas for expanding the mythology of Ready or Not as well as directly sequelizing the events of the first film.
Needless to say… SPOILER ALERT.

In Ready or Not we learn that the Le Domas family owes their fortune to “Mr. Le Bail,” a mysterious supernatural figure who may also be responsible for the wealth of other powerful families all over the world. In order to keep their fortune, and in order to not die horribly themselves, the Le Domas family has to play “Hide and Seek” and sacrifice the newest member of the family, who is “it”, whenever a magical “Choosing Box” tells them to.
One of the keys to the sequel possibilities for Ready or Not stems from an ending that never made it into the film, confirming that rich people all over the world owed their wealth to the mysterious Mr. Le Bail, and implying that they all have to make their own human sacrifices to keep their fortunes.
But although they owe their financial success to Le Bail, the Le Domas family technically made their money by selling games. As such, their human sacrifice ritual takes the form of a board game.
According to Radio Silence, different wealthy Le Bail acolytes would probably have to make their sacrifices in different ways.
“The way we always sort of imagined it is, you know when Tony is spinning the yarn about the history this box and how it came into their family, that whatever it was in that instance, in that deal between Victor and Mr. Le Bail, that sets off that family’s specific trajectory of wealth, and maybe that’s different for every other family that’s made a deal with Mr. Le Bail,” Gillett explains. “But that it [the ‘Hide and Seek’ sacrifice] is specific to the Le Domas family, we kind of loved.”
“We also just loved this off-screen story of what are these other families? What are these other titans of industry, how does this game manifested in their lives?” Gillett asks.

But what about Grace, who survived the human sacrifice and even earned a seemingly respectful nod from Mr. Le Bail at the end of Ready or Not. Has her story concluded?
“We’ve talked a lot about what happens to Grace after the fact,” Gillett adds. She’s the only surviving member of the Le Domas family. She obviously has a marriage certificate. Does she inherit the wealth of this [family], and what does she do with that wealth and how does she get past…”
Gillett trailed off, but the questions his unfinished sentence raises are many. How does she get past the curse of Le Bail? Does she have to make sacrifices to keep the Le Domas fortune? Does she represent a threat to the other rich Le Domas acolytes?
“We’ve talked a lot about what that could be, and does the choosing box survive the fire?” Gillett wonders aloud, before confirming that, like a black box on an airplane, it would indeed stay intact no matter what.
Then, of course, there’s at least one prequel possibility that Radio Silence has pondered, if only playfully.
“We’d do the prequel with Fitch and Emilie and they’re just partying in Ibiza and having a good time and random death is occurring all around them,” Matt Bettinelli-Olpin laughs, referring to the scene-stealing, comically inept couple played by Kristian Bruun and Melanie Scrofano.
Of course, we’ll only find out for certain where a Ready or Not sequel will go if the first film is successful enough to justify making a follow-up. If you’re interested, go out and see Ready or Not in theaters now!
Interviews
Paul Tremblay on Fighting AI with Horror in New Novel ‘Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep’
Paul Tremblay didn’t start his writing career believing he’d be battling machines over the sanctity of his job, but like so many writers of his generation, the battle found him. In the years since Large Language Models (LLMs) and neural networks started gaining traction as an advertised shortcut to creativity, Tremblay has been active in lawsuits to prevent the use of his works in training AI models, and he’s found that, with each new project, he has to consider the possibility that some LLM, somewhere, is going to latch on to what he’s creating.
“Now I feel like I’m thinking about, ‘Man, how am I going to write things that would be really hard or impossible for an AI to replicate?’,” Tremblay told me, speaking by Zoom from his home in Massachusetts. “Maybe some of that is ego. I’m sure every writer thinks, ‘Oh, an AI could never write what I write.’ Yes, I’d be lying if I said that wasn’t part of the thought process.”
While that’s something Tremblay might consider with any new work at this point in his career, the Bram Stoker Award-winning author of A Head Full of Ghosts, The Cabin at the End of the World, and many other novels and short stories tackled it in a more direct way with his latest book. Inspired by Philip K. Dick, Harlan Ellison, and the quirky humor of the Coen Brothers, Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep is Tremblay’s attempt at a sci-fi-horror mash-up that’s both darkly funny and existentially nightmarish. It’s also, in his own words, a screed against the movement by AI companies to supplant human artists.
“I didn’t want to make it too didactic, but no, I playfully described this book as an anti-AI screed,” he said. “This book, in particular, was driven by anger and frustration, for sure. Not every book is going to be driven that way.“
Despite the emotions that fueled it, Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep does not read like a screed. Instead, wielding offbeat humor and tech concepts that feel both lived-in and frighteningly tactile, the book lays out tandem narratives all building to the same conclusion, each of them exploring our relationship to machine learning in a different way. One of these narratives belongs to Julia, a former gaming streamer looking for a new challenge in life, who gets a call from a California tech company with an interesting offer.

Paul Tremblay in documentary series “First Word on Horror”
The company has, it seems, implanted some new technology in a brain-dead middle-aged man which will, in theory, allow them to pilot the man’s body through a rudimentary, still-developing system of controls. Julia, with her gaming background, would be the pilot, in her own way just as much a test subject as the human vegetable she’s controlling.
Julia is a Gen Z streamer with an omnivorous pop culture appetite, inspired by Tremblay’s own adult children, who riffs on The Big Lebowski constantly and calls her strange new meat puppet “Bernie” in reference to Weekend at Bernie’s. Her wide frame of reference, and her interest in art and stories far beyond video games, is in part informed by Tremblay’s own experiences with Gen Z, and in part a response to AI companies who scrape art and culture as a means of consuming it for reference without really experiencing a story.
“I know that one of the arguments that OpenAI and other tech companies are trying to make is like, ‘Hey, you writers, you artists, you take pop culture, you take your influences, and you create something. That’s just the same thing that the bots are doing.’ And it’s just not,” Tremblay said. “I wanted to have Julia have her outlook informed by all this pop culture, and I wanted to make that feel really human as a way to show how inhuman the AI is.”
The other side of the story belongs to “Bernie,” who’s addressed in his point-of-view chapters as “You.” In these chapters, the technology in Bernie’s body starts to flicker images through his seemingly dead brain, delivering half-remembered imagery and perspective in a nod to the “hallucinations” of an AI model groping for understanding it can never reach. These chapters in particular show off Tremblay’s flair for formalist shake-ups, and echo the kind of hyperstimulated writing that Dick and Ellison made so influential.
“I think it was more just the general Philip K. Dick feeling of ‘The world is so strange,'” Tremblay said. “He’s a lot funnier, I think, than maybe a lot of people credit him. That’s definitely what I was thinking of when writing the book.“
Bernie’s chapters embody the strangeness of Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep, presenting imagery that’s at times puzzling, at times eerily filmic, and always unnerving. They also mirror Julia’s own journey in fascinating ways as the odd couple – the Gen Z gamer and the middle-aged vegetable – traverse the United States, and the tech in Bernie’s body wakes up to the possibilities of using his flesh for its own purposes. It’s a compelling narrative technique, but it presented some new writing challenges for Tremblay.
“I quickly realized I couldn’t write this book the same way I have in the past,” he said. “By that, I mean all my other novels I had written in the order in which it was presented, even things that are nonlinear, which is most of them. I knew I couldn’t do that in this book. It’s not a spoiler, but hopefully the readers figure out pretty early that the Bernie chapters are a little bit of a preview of the next chapter from Julia, what’s actually happening with Julia. It’s all refracted from him.”

Mary Roach’s Stiff
Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep began with a simple image, inspired by Tremblay’s reading of Mary Roach‘s book chronicling the history of our treatment of corpses, Stiff. As he read, Tremblay imagined a body sitting on an airplane, remote-controlled by someone else. At the time, it was a “silly what-if” concept, filed away in his head. Years later, when he became an author suing a tech company to keep AI from scraping his work for ideas, it started to feel frighteningly plausible, taking the “silly what-if” into the territory of a high-concept horror show about what happens when we try to exploit and commodify uniquely human aspects of consciousness.
“It stuck with me,” Tremblay said of that what-if imagery. “And then a few years later, when I was a part of the case suing OpenAI on behalf of writers, that what-if suddenly didn’t seem as silly. The more I learned about how that corporation operates and without really any sort of ethical thought to anything, I was like, ‘Oh, I’m going to play with that. That’s actually happening.”
So, what if someone actually in favor of generative AI picks up Tremblay’s self-described “anti-AI screed?” He hopes that, at the very least, he’s made the ride enjoyable in a distinctly human way that might begin to reshape the conversation.
“I think that was another reason why I wanted to have the humor,” Tremblay said. “If people are reading this book who aren’t on the side of like, ‘Hey, LLMs taking authors’ books is bad,’ maybe if they read something that’s cut with some humor, that maybe they’ll be more easily swayed.”
Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep is now in bookstores everywhere.


You must be logged in to post a comment.