Interviews
Don Mancini Breaks Down Some of “Chucky” Season One’s Biggest Questions [Exclusive]
The inaugural season of “Chucky” packed multiple storylines, twists, and surprise reveals into just eight episodes. Killer Good Guy doll Chucky (voiced by Brad Dourif) returned to his hometown to begin a new reign of slaughter and Tiffany (Jennifer Tilly) came to his aid, while Nica (Fiona Dourif) fought for control of her own body. Then there were flashbacks to Charles Lee Ray’s life milestones, an introduction to Hackensack’s residents, and the return of Andy (Alex Vincent) and Kyle (Christine Elise).
While Chucky’s plan started to come together by the season’s end, including the surprising return of the Tiffany doll, some lingering questions and loose ends remain. Where does the budding love triangle between Chucky, Tiffany, and Nica leave poor Nica now that she’s been, well, clipped? How exactly does the soul splintering among Good Guy dolls work?
Bloody Disgusting went to series creator Don Mancini for answers.
Chucky’s Army

CHUCKY — “An Affair to Dismember” Episode 108 — Pictured in this screengrab: Chucky — (Photo by: SYFY/USA Network)
Just as Andy and Kyle think they’ve culled the multiple versions of Chucky down to one last Good Guy doll, our favorite pint-sized murderer reveals he’s been busy building up another army. One that seems new to the world.
When asked how exactly the Chucky horde operates, Mancini answered, “It’s definitely not a hive mind. I considered both avenues when I started putting this together. It started in Cult of Chucky because we did three Chuckys there or actually four if you count the head that Andy had. It’s something that I wanted to do for a while. Once you get into your fourth decade in a franchise, it’s trying to forge ahead into unseen, unexplored territory. And the idea of multiple Chucky dolls always appealed to me.
“First, of course, just as a visual, it’s irresistible, but then conceptually, there are so many things you can do with it. I can’t talk too much about that because I don’t want to spoil fun coming in season two, but insofar as it impacted what we’ve already done in season one. Yeah, it was important that they not have a hive mind because I think it’s more interesting to do this and, again, turn Brad on subtle variations of the Chucky persona. On a lot of fronts, that’s something we were doing a lot of in this season of Chucky, which is dissecting the persona of Chucky and the persona of Charles Lee Ray. We have many different versions of that in the season and many different actors playing Charles Lee Ray or Chucky.”
It wasn’t just Mancini shaping how the multiple Chuckys behaved, but Dourif himself. Mancini explained, “One of the things that I know was important to Brad was that they seem sort of like fresh out of the egg. There’s a kind of innocence about them. We played a little bit with that in Cult, but I think we went further with it in this one, and I think he did an amazing job.“
The Chucky/Nica/Tiffany Love Triangle

CHUCKY — “Little Little Lies” Episode 105 — Pictured in this screengrab: (l-r) Jennifer Tilly as Tiffany, Fiona Dourif as Nica Pierce — (Photo by: SYFY)
One of the most exciting evolutions in Tiffany and Chucky’s fraught relationship this season was how Tiffany realized she might find a healthier partner in poor Nica, creating one warped love triangle. Mancini shared how that naturally evolved, “The love triangle was always really interesting for us to dig into, and the concept of having Nica’s body be the boxing ring for this dual between these two different personalities, these two souls- Chucky’s and Nica’s. I knew that would be interesting, but then factoring Tiffany into it. It just seemed like a fun twist, the idea that Tiffany would end up preferring Nica. It made sense because over the course of the franchise up to this point, that relationship with Chucky has always been very fraught, and he’s always been very abusive, and it’s very codependent. It ultimately always ends up with one of them killing the other.
“As absurd as that all is, it is grounded in reality. I think it seemed logical that Tiffany would suddenly see this new port in the storm. It’s like, wait a minute. Here’s someone because Nica herself, of course, is a kind spirit. And that’s one of the aspects of Tiffany that I’ve always loved writing, and Jennifer plays it so well, which is that she’s a demented, psychotic murderess, but she also has this weirdly gentle romantic side.”
Nica’s Future

CHUCKY — “Cape Queer” Episode 106 — Pictured in this screengrab: Fiona Dourif as Nica Pierce — (Photo by: SYFY/USA Network)
Of course, Tiffany’s psychotic side won out by season’s end, with the murderess deciding the best way to keep Nica for herself was to amputate all four limbs. Where does that leave Nica for season two?
Mancini teases, “It’s really fun to write for an actor and a character that you know well and to tailor it to their person and their particular strengths. Fiona is such a versatile actress. I just thought, wow, what new challenge could I give her? This being the horror genre, and, given that we are talking about Tiffany in her demented way. I think it’s believable that Tiffany would do such a thing to keep it. She clipped the butterfly’s wings to keep it, and she thinks that it’s for the best because we are meant to be together.
“But it’s not the end of Nica’s story by any means. And I’ve always had a plan for this. And I think that people will hopefully be really gratified when they see what lies in store for Nica.“
The Odds of Returning Characters Like Glenda

CHUCKY — “An Affair to Dismember” Episode 108 — Pictured in this screengrab: Alex Vincent as Andy Barclay — (Photo by: SYFY/USA Network)
Season one of “Chucky” carefully layered in legacy characters and marked the surprise return of Tiffany in doll form by the finale. That opens the door for more franchise players to return in the future, especially Glenda, who was referenced by dad Chucky in an early episode. Will we see them in season two?
“I love those characters, and you probably haven’t seen the last of them. Stay tuned.”
“Chucky” season one is available to stream now on Peacock.
Interviews
Paul Tremblay on Fighting AI with Horror in New Novel ‘Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep’
Paul Tremblay didn’t start his writing career believing he’d be battling machines over the sanctity of his job, but like so many writers of his generation, the battle found him. In the years since Large Language Models (LLMs) and neural networks started gaining traction as an advertised shortcut to creativity, Tremblay has been active in lawsuits to prevent the use of his works in training AI models, and he’s found that, with each new project, he has to consider the possibility that some LLM, somewhere, is going to latch on to what he’s creating.
“Now I feel like I’m thinking about, ‘Man, how am I going to write things that would be really hard or impossible for an AI to replicate?’,” Tremblay told me, speaking by Zoom from his home in Massachusetts. “Maybe some of that is ego. I’m sure every writer thinks, ‘Oh, an AI could never write what I write.’ Yes, I’d be lying if I said that wasn’t part of the thought process.”
While that’s something Tremblay might consider with any new work at this point in his career, the Bram Stoker Award-winning author of A Head Full of Ghosts, The Cabin at the End of the World, and many other novels and short stories tackled it in a more direct way with his latest book. Inspired by Philip K. Dick, Harlan Ellison, and the quirky humor of the Coen Brothers, Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep is Tremblay’s attempt at a sci-fi-horror mash-up that’s both darkly funny and existentially nightmarish. It’s also, in his own words, a screed against the movement by AI companies to supplant human artists.
“I didn’t want to make it too didactic, but no, I playfully described this book as an anti-AI screed,” he said. “This book, in particular, was driven by anger and frustration, for sure. Not every book is going to be driven that way.“
Despite the emotions that fueled it, Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep does not read like a screed. Instead, wielding offbeat humor and tech concepts that feel both lived-in and frighteningly tactile, the book lays out tandem narratives all building to the same conclusion, each of them exploring our relationship to machine learning in a different way. One of these narratives belongs to Julia, a former gaming streamer looking for a new challenge in life, who gets a call from a California tech company with an interesting offer.

Paul Tremblay in documentary series “First Word on Horror”
The company has, it seems, implanted some new technology in a brain-dead middle-aged man which will, in theory, allow them to pilot the man’s body through a rudimentary, still-developing system of controls. Julia, with her gaming background, would be the pilot, in her own way just as much a test subject as the human vegetable she’s controlling.
Julia is a Gen Z streamer with an omnivorous pop culture appetite, inspired by Tremblay’s own adult children, who riffs on The Big Lebowski constantly and calls her strange new meat puppet “Bernie” in reference to Weekend at Bernie’s. Her wide frame of reference, and her interest in art and stories far beyond video games, is in part informed by Tremblay’s own experiences with Gen Z, and in part a response to AI companies who scrape art and culture as a means of consuming it for reference without really experiencing a story.
“I know that one of the arguments that OpenAI and other tech companies are trying to make is like, ‘Hey, you writers, you artists, you take pop culture, you take your influences, and you create something. That’s just the same thing that the bots are doing.’ And it’s just not,” Tremblay said. “I wanted to have Julia have her outlook informed by all this pop culture, and I wanted to make that feel really human as a way to show how inhuman the AI is.”
The other side of the story belongs to “Bernie,” who’s addressed in his point-of-view chapters as “You.” In these chapters, the technology in Bernie’s body starts to flicker images through his seemingly dead brain, delivering half-remembered imagery and perspective in a nod to the “hallucinations” of an AI model groping for understanding it can never reach. These chapters in particular show off Tremblay’s flair for formalist shake-ups, and echo the kind of hyperstimulated writing that Dick and Ellison made so influential.
“I think it was more just the general Philip K. Dick feeling of ‘The world is so strange,'” Tremblay said. “He’s a lot funnier, I think, than maybe a lot of people credit him. That’s definitely what I was thinking of when writing the book.“
Bernie’s chapters embody the strangeness of Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep, presenting imagery that’s at times puzzling, at times eerily filmic, and always unnerving. They also mirror Julia’s own journey in fascinating ways as the odd couple – the Gen Z gamer and the middle-aged vegetable – traverse the United States, and the tech in Bernie’s body wakes up to the possibilities of using his flesh for its own purposes. It’s a compelling narrative technique, but it presented some new writing challenges for Tremblay.
“I quickly realized I couldn’t write this book the same way I have in the past,” he said. “By that, I mean all my other novels I had written in the order in which it was presented, even things that are nonlinear, which is most of them. I knew I couldn’t do that in this book. It’s not a spoiler, but hopefully the readers figure out pretty early that the Bernie chapters are a little bit of a preview of the next chapter from Julia, what’s actually happening with Julia. It’s all refracted from him.”

Mary Roach’s Stiff
Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep began with a simple image, inspired by Tremblay’s reading of Mary Roach‘s book chronicling the history of our treatment of corpses, Stiff. As he read, Tremblay imagined a body sitting on an airplane, remote-controlled by someone else. At the time, it was a “silly what-if” concept, filed away in his head. Years later, when he became an author suing a tech company to keep AI from scraping his work for ideas, it started to feel frighteningly plausible, taking the “silly what-if” into the territory of a high-concept horror show about what happens when we try to exploit and commodify uniquely human aspects of consciousness.
“It stuck with me,” Tremblay said of that what-if imagery. “And then a few years later, when I was a part of the case suing OpenAI on behalf of writers, that what-if suddenly didn’t seem as silly. The more I learned about how that corporation operates and without really any sort of ethical thought to anything, I was like, ‘Oh, I’m going to play with that. That’s actually happening.”
So, what if someone actually in favor of generative AI picks up Tremblay’s self-described “anti-AI screed?” He hopes that, at the very least, he’s made the ride enjoyable in a distinctly human way that might begin to reshape the conversation.
“I think that was another reason why I wanted to have the humor,” Tremblay said. “If people are reading this book who aren’t on the side of like, ‘Hey, LLMs taking authors’ books is bad,’ maybe if they read something that’s cut with some humor, that maybe they’ll be more easily swayed.”
Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep is now in bookstores everywhere.

You must be logged in to post a comment.