Quantcast
Connect with us

Interviews

‘Oddity’ Filmmaker Reveals How Ending Evolved and Confirms One Character’s Fate [Interview]

Published

on

Oddity Ending Explained

Oddity, the latest by writer/director Damian McCarthy, out now in theaters, offers a chill-inducing tale of supernatural revenge with one creepy mannequin at the center. One intense murder incites a feature-length trap of ghostly karma and justice.

The film stars Carolyn Bracken (You Are Not My Mother) as twin sisters Dani and Darcy. When Dani is brutally murdered at the remote country house that she’s renovating with her husband Ted (Gwilym Lee), the suspect dies soon after. But Darcy, a blind medium and oddity shop owner, arrives at Ted’s home a year later under the conviction that there’s more to Dani’s death than meets the eye, and she’s brought a creepy wooden mannequin with her to get meticulously crafted retribution.

Bloody Disgusting recently spoke with Damian McCarthy about his approach to horror and the importance of humor for the sake of entertainment. The humor is at its most apparent and whimsical in the film’s closing moments. 

Warning: Plot spoilers ahead.

Darcy has a unique ability to see the truth, thanks to her psychic gift of touch. It’s through touch that she realizes that the orderly from Ted’s employment isn’t the only one responsible for her sister’s murder and prompts her to find the primary culprit. Armed with a Wooden Man, Darcy eventually uncovers the ultimate killer: Dani’s husband, Ted. But Ted springs his own trap to cover his tracks, with Darcy falling to her death. 

Darcy in Oddity

Courtesy of Colm Hogan. An IFC Films and Shudder Release.

Darcy gets the last laugh from beyond the grave, sending Ted the same haunted bell that he noticed when visiting her oddity shop at the beginning of the film. A bell that comes attached with a vengeful bellboy’s spirit who kills whoever dares to ring it. Oddity’s closing moments see Ted ring the bell in amusement, unaware that the ghostly bellboy lurks behind him, waiting.

It’s a whimsical final punchline to Darcy’s elaborate scheme for justice. 

While Ted’s fate was sealed, the ending did evolve from its initial concept. McCarthy originally planned to wrap Oddity on a much more chilling note in the form of a jump scare. But that serendipitously shifted during production.

McCarthy tells us of the ending, “It was always going to be the same, but the closing shot of the movie was going to be Gwylim standing up and turning, and he’s face to face with the bellboy. So, he’s going to be rising, and bang, he’s there. But we’ve seen that a lot where you end up on this scary face. During setups, Gwylim was sitting down, and the actor playing the bellboy, Shane Whisker, couldn’t see anything because of his contacts. He was just standing very still like this, and I went, ‘Oh, that actually looks really nice. That’s a really cool shot. And the idea of using Little Willie Johns‘Now You Know, using that song at the start was always there, but I said, ‘Oh, let’s get that. That’s way funnier.

We obviously shot the other stuff where it ends in more of a horror closeup and this face, but this just seems just like a much better wide shot that just lets the audience – and I’ve seen it at SXSW when we watch with the audience- it gets a laugh, and it gets the imagination going. They’re like, ‘I wonder what’s going to happen to him once we hit the credits. So yeah, the idea was always there; it just changed slightly. As you make these things, better ideas come to you, so that’s how it evolved.

Gwilym Lee in Oddity

Courtesy of Colm Hogan. An IFC Films and Shudder Release.

That Darcy already warned that ringing the bell seals your inescapable doom, but the abrupt fade to black means viewers don’t see it happen. Considering that the Caveat bunny makes a brief appearance here, could that be an open thread to explore in a future film from McCarthy?

“I mean, we’ve talked about ourselves, McCarthy confesses. “Ted’s such a horrible smug character that for all we know, he became friends with the bellboy. But a girl did message me that she had seen it at SXSW, and she said she hated the character so much. She said, ‘I’d just like to hear that he does get killed, that that bellboy gets him killed.  I said, “Oh, yeah. Because Darcy does tell him, ‘Oh, be careful because everybody else that’s rang that bell has was found dead, So it’s pretty obvious the next day Ted was probably found dead in this house, so rest assured justice has served him.”

 

 

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon, SeriesFest, and Popcorn Frights Film Fest.

Click to comment

Interviews

Paul Tremblay on Fighting AI with Horror in New Novel ‘Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep’

Published

on

Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep Review - Paul Tremblay AI Horror

Paul Tremblay didn’t start his writing career believing he’d be battling machines over the sanctity of his job, but like so many writers of his generation, the battle found him. In the years since Large Language Models (LLMs) and neural networks started gaining traction as an advertised shortcut to creativity, Tremblay has been active in lawsuits to prevent the use of his works in training AI models, and he’s found that, with each new project, he has to consider the possibility that some LLM, somewhere, is going to latch on to what he’s creating. 

“Now I feel like I’m thinking about, ‘Man, how am I going to write things that would be really hard or impossible for an AI to replicate?’,” Tremblay told me, speaking by Zoom from his home in Massachusetts. “Maybe some of that is ego. I’m sure every writer thinks, ‘Oh, an AI could never write what I write.’ Yes, I’d be lying if I said that wasn’t part of the thought process.”

While that’s something Tremblay might consider with any new work at this point in his career, the Bram Stoker Award-winning author of A Head Full of Ghosts, The Cabin at the End of the World, and many other novels and short stories tackled it in a more direct way with his latest book. Inspired by Philip K. Dick, Harlan Ellison, and the quirky humor of the Coen Brothers, Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep is Tremblay’s attempt at a sci-fi-horror mash-up that’s both darkly funny and existentially nightmarish. It’s also, in his own words, a screed against the movement by AI companies to supplant human artists. 

I didn’t want to make it too didactic, but no, I playfully described this book as an anti-AI screed,” he said. “This book, in particular, was driven by anger and frustration, for sure. Not every book is going to be driven that way.

Despite the emotions that fueled it, Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep does not read like a screed. Instead, wielding offbeat humor and tech concepts that feel both lived-in and frighteningly tactile, the book lays out tandem narratives all building to the same conclusion, each of them exploring our relationship to machine learning in a different way. One of these narratives belongs to Julia, a former gaming streamer looking for a new challenge in life, who gets a call from a California tech company with an interesting offer.

Paul Tremblay in documentary series “First Word on Horror”

The company has, it seems, implanted some new technology in a brain-dead middle-aged man which will, in theory, allow them to pilot the man’s body through a rudimentary, still-developing system of controls. Julia, with her gaming background, would be the pilot, in her own way just as much a test subject as the human vegetable she’s controlling. 

Julia is a Gen Z streamer with an omnivorous pop culture appetite, inspired by Tremblay’s own adult children, who riffs on The Big Lebowski constantly and calls her strange new meat puppet “Bernie” in reference to Weekend at Bernie’s. Her wide frame of reference, and her interest in art and stories far beyond video games, is in part informed by Tremblay’s own experiences with Gen Z, and in part a response to AI companies who scrape art and culture as a means of consuming it for reference without really experiencing a story. 

“I know that one of the arguments that OpenAI and other tech companies are trying to make is like, ‘Hey, you writers, you artists, you take pop culture, you take your influences, and you create something. That’s just the same thing that the bots are doing.’ And it’s just not,” Tremblay said. “I wanted to have Julia have her outlook informed by all this pop culture, and I wanted to make that feel really human as a way to show how inhuman the AI is.”

The other side of the story belongs to “Bernie,” who’s addressed in his point-of-view chapters as “You.” In these chapters, the technology in Bernie’s body starts to flicker images through his seemingly dead brain, delivering half-remembered imagery and perspective in a nod to the “hallucinations” of an AI model groping for understanding it can never reach. These chapters in particular show off Tremblay’s flair for formalist shake-ups, and echo the kind of hyperstimulated writing that Dick and Ellison made so influential. 

“I think it was more just the general Philip K. Dick feeling of ‘The world is so strange,'” Tremblay said. “He’s a lot funnier, I think, than maybe a lot of people credit him. That’s definitely what I was thinking of when writing the book.

Bernie’s chapters embody the strangeness of Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep, presenting imagery that’s at times puzzling, at times eerily filmic, and always unnerving. They also mirror Julia’s own journey in fascinating ways as the odd couple – the Gen Z gamer and the middle-aged vegetable – traverse the United States, and the tech in Bernie’s body wakes up to the possibilities of using his flesh for its own purposes. It’s a compelling narrative technique, but it presented some new writing challenges for Tremblay. 

“I quickly realized I couldn’t write this book the same way I have in the past,” he said. “By that, I mean all my other novels I had written in the order in which it was presented, even things that are nonlinear, which is most of them. I knew I couldn’t do that in this book. It’s not a spoiler, but hopefully the readers figure out pretty early that the Bernie chapters are a little bit of a preview of the next chapter from Julia, what’s actually happening with Julia. It’s all refracted from him.”

Mary Roach’s Stiff

Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep began with a simple image, inspired by Tremblay’s reading of Mary Roach‘s book chronicling the history of our treatment of corpses, Stiff. As he read, Tremblay imagined a body sitting on an airplane, remote-controlled by someone else. At the time, it was a “silly what-if” concept, filed away in his head. Years later, when he became an author suing a tech company to keep AI from scraping his work for ideas, it started to feel frighteningly plausible, taking the “silly what-if” into the territory of a high-concept horror show about what happens when we try to exploit and commodify uniquely human aspects of consciousness. 

“It stuck with me,” Tremblay said of that what-if imagery. “And then a few years later, when I was a part of the case suing OpenAI on behalf of writers, that what-if suddenly didn’t seem as silly. The more I learned about how that corporation operates and without really any sort of ethical thought to anything, I was like, ‘Oh, I’m going to play with that. That’s actually happening.”

So, what if someone actually in favor of generative AI picks up Tremblay’s self-described “anti-AI screed?” He hopes that, at the very least, he’s made the ride enjoyable in a distinctly human way that might begin to reshape the conversation. 

“I think that was another reason why I wanted to have the humor,” Tremblay said. “If people are reading this book who aren’t on the side of like, ‘Hey, LLMs taking authors’ books is bad,’ maybe if they read something that’s cut with some humor, that maybe they’ll be more easily swayed.”

Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep is now in bookstores everywhere. 

Dead but Dreaming of electric sheep

Continue Reading