Quantcast
Connect with us

Movies

[Cannes Review] ‘The Killing of a Sacred Deer’ is an Epic Embarrassment

Published

on

I wasn’t much of a fan of Yorgos Lanthimos‘ last feature, the bizarre indie hit The Lobster, but The Killing of a Sacred Dear is a step too far. His latest doubles down on his annoying ticks and lacks the intriguingly off-the-wall premise of that ‘fall in love, or risk being turned into an animal’ modern romance satire.

Collin Farrell plays Steven, a doctor who has a bizarre “friendship” with 16-year-old Martin (Barry Keoghan). And, as Martin creeps further into Steven and his family’s lives, a sinister curse is revealed that will require Steven to make the ultimate sacrifice.

There are shades of The Gift and The Witch in the film’s exploration of a sinister force, both very real (The Gift) and supernatural (The Witch), invading family life. But Lanthimos’ film has none of the escalating intrigue and tension of those impressive recent films. Once we learn of the curse, any ambiguity is lost. We know exactly what will happen and the film proceeds to play out mechanically.

The film’s visuals, while striking at times, become monotonous and garish. Lanthimos uses wide angle lenses placed in the upper corners of rooms to provide a distorted perspective on the unfolding events. Think Terry Gillian’s Brazil, but far less intelligently used. By employing these shots in virtually every scene, they lose any discombobulating power they once had.

Not that filmmakers shouldn’t play with form, but conventions exist for a reason: they are usually the most efficient way of telling a story. Lanthimos avoids traditional over the shoulder shots, with his dialogue scenes instead playing out in these wide shots, which does absolutely nothing to enhance the performances.

And the cast is talented. Farrell can be wonderful when delivering raw humor through a straight face. It worked for the most part in The Lobster, but he has nothing to do here. No emotions to express, just an impressive beard to hide behind. Nicole Kidman is also wasted as Steven’s wife and the two kids are decent but it’s impossible to shine with this material.

Keoghan stands out the most. Speaking of The Gift, he has something of a young Joel Edgerton about him. His handsome, but almost brutish, features suggest a man misplaced and volatile, as if he could hide the world’s horrors beneath his stony exterior. He shows real promise, and who knows what a director with real skill could get out of this guy.

The horror does arrive but it’s emotionless. Our genre gets slated for cold, sadistic death and despair, but this is as glaring a culprit as I’ve seen in a while. The film’s stakes, on paper at least, should be huge, but I felt absolutely nothing.

Lanthimos’ stunted dialogue, which didn’t work for me in The Lobster, is downright grating here. Characters speak as if their lines have been Google translated. It’s alienating and tiresome. As is the score, which is assembled from a variety of pre-existing compositions and plays like a runt sibling of Mica Levi’s beguiling work on Under the Skin, with its strained strings and aggressive thwangs and clangs: bizarrely, the two films share a supervising sound editor.

The film draws from Greek mythology: with the title a reference to the myth of Iphigenia. I also picked up on Freudian sexual perversions and Oedipal undercurrents. But, while my knowledge of Greek mythology is minimal, it seems to me that Lanthimos just threw together a bunch of elements and idiosyncrasies from these classical tales and scattered them throughout his script. It never feels cohesive and I can only imagine it will alienate most audiences, rather than impressing or challenging them.

If you were a real fan of The Lobster, then maybe this scattershot film will work for you. But I was not amused. The Killing of a Sacred Dear is an insult to a talented cast and the biggest bum note yet from one of the most overrated directors in the art-house world.

19 Comments

Editorials

Meet the Actors Who Brought the ‘Backrooms’ Still Life Monsters to Life [SPOILERS]

Published

on

Renate Reinsve in 'Backrooms' - Horror ARGs

Judging from the unprecedented box office success of Kane Parsons’ Backrooms adaptation, you’ve likely already seen the liminal horror hit that managed to make audiences afraid of empty hallways and bad wallpaper. And now that so many of us have already entered the yellow labyrinth (some of us more than once), the time has come to discuss the spoiler-filled details that make the movie so fascinating in the first place.

And if there’s one element here that makes the Backrooms movie stand out from any previous lore/mythology, it has to be the genius addition of the Still Life entities. Warped recreations of real people that somehow wandered into the Complex, these misremembered creatures are responsible for some of the most disturbing imagery of 2026 – as well as laugh-out-loud memes created by one of the film’s very own concept artists.

However, true to Parsons’ word that the movie would rely heavily on practical effects, each of these distorted monsters was brought to life by real actors under heavy layers of makeup and prosthetics (with the occasional splash of CGI enhancements). While Anora and If I Had Legs I’d Kick You actress Ivy Wolk wasn’t among these performers, despite what Letterboxd might have you believe, the creature cast did benefit from veteran players with plenty of genre experience.

For starters, Alien: Romulus alumni Robert Bobroczkyi (who previously brought that film’s horrific Offspring to life during its most memorable sequence) plays the flick’s main antagonist, the Still Life version of Captain Clark. And though there was some obvious CGI involved in making the character’s peg-leg and nightmarish face more believable, Bobroczkyi’s monstrous performance and his natural 7’7″ frame helped to make that final chase sequence a clear highlight among this year’s genre offerings.

The film’s Texas-Chain-Saw-inspired “dinner” scene also features a freaky collection of less-aggressive Still Life creatures in the form of the Bearded Man, the Red-Headed Woman and, strangest of them all, the cheekily named “Archibald Leland Sutter Still Life” (who earned this title among fans and crewmembers as a reference to his apparent affinity for lamps).

While this was the first major horror outing for both Patrick Baynham (The Bearded Man) and Dana Mahmood (Archibald), Rhiannon Roberts has worked as a stunt performer in everything from Yellowjackets to HBO’s The Last of Us adaptation – which is probably why The Red-Headed Woman is the most active out of Clark’s impromptu “family.” That being said, the Archibald Leland Sutter Still Life is my personal favorite of the bunch simply because his anachronistic outfit suggests that the Backrooms phenomenon might be a lot older than the Async Foundation. I also love how hard he tries to be helpful with that little light of his!

That might be it for the Still Life entities, but I think horror fans will also be pleased to hear that the film’s Found Footage prologue stars none other than Resident Evil: Welcome to Raccoon City star Avan Jogia as Naren Warne – and American Mary herself Katharine Isabelle also shows up in a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it cameo at Mary’s house party towards the middle of the story (though I have a feeling that she originally had a bigger part that was likely cut for time).

At the end of the day, Parsons’ Backrooms may have been an auteur-driven project motivated by the young director’s unique take on the classic creepypasta, but film has always been a collective artform, so it’s fun to see just how many talented performers it takes to bring this kind of supernatural nightmare to life in a way that connects with so many people.

Continue Reading