Connect with us

Published

on

With the loss of R. Lee Ermey, we’ve lost a truly great horror villain.

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre franchise is an interesting one, as the villain isn’t merely one monster but rather an entire family of them. In each of the Chainsaw movies, Leatherface is flanked by colorful characters that he calls family, which sets him apart from lone wolves such as Jason Voorhees and Michael Myers. While Leatherface himself may be mute, characters like Chop Top, Drayton, Tex and Vilmer serve to bring a whole lot of personality to the proceedings; I’d go so far as to say that the success of any given Chainsaw movie is largely dependent on those secondary antagonists, who are the proverbial teeth of the big guy’s chainsaw.

It takes a special kind of actor to outshine the iconic Leatherface in a Texas Chainsaw Massacre movie, and I don’t suspect you’ll argue with me when I say that R. Lee Ermey did just that in the 2003 remake of Tobe Hooper’s 1974 classic. 

The casting of R. Lee Ermey as “Sheriff Hoyt” in The Texas Chainsaw Massacre ’03 was nothing short of a stroke of brilliance, as it essentially allowed Ermey to channel his most memorable role: Gunnery Sergeant Hartman in Stanley Kubrick’s Full Metal Jacket, a performance that nabbed the late actor a Golden Globe nomination. Ermey’s Hartman is unquestionably one of the most imposing and intimidating characters in the history of cinema, so much so that there are times when Full Metal Jacket feels like a full blown horror movie. You could say that Sergeant Hartman was the role Ermey, a real life Gunnery Sergeant, was born to play; and you could say the very same thing about Sheriff Hoyt, a war vet himself.

As Sheriff Hoyt, Ermey essentially took his Golden Globe-nominated performance to a whole new level, bringing to the screen a horror villain who hardly even needed Leatherface as his muscle in order to be truly terrifying. When it comes to Sheriff Hoyt, the fear isn’t that Leatherface is surely close behind, it’s that Sheriff Hoyt is right in front of your face, screaming in your ear and asserting his dominance over you. Hoyt doesn’t need a chainsaw. His voice alone cuts right through his victims, with its shocking, on-a-dime upticks in intensity proving more intimidating even than Leatherface’s iconic weapon of choice.

Take, for example, what is easily the most chilling and tense scene in the entirety of Chainsaw Massacre ’03. After Hoyt arrives on the scene, discovering the body of the young woman who blew her brains out, Hoyt makes Morgan get back into the van and re-enact the suicide; he forces Morgan to put the gun in his own mouth and demands he pull the trigger. Ermey is at his terrifying best in the scene, and if actor Jonathan Tucker wasn’t genuinely intimidated by his co-star as the cameras rolled, he damn sure could’ve fooled me.

The likely reason the ’03 remake spawned a prequel in ’06 rather than a sequel is that Leatherface had his arm lopped off in the final act of the remake, but you could make the argument that the prequel was the best route if only because it allowed for Ermey to reprise and expand upon the role of Sheriff Hoyt – he was pretty definitively killed off in the remake, you may recall. Ermey’s performance is once again the star of the show in Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning, the actor solidifying that he’s maybe the single biggest reason the remake was a success. Hoyt becomes an even stronger character in the prequel, as we learn the backstory behind his cannibalism and discover that, well, he’s not actually the real Sheriff Hoyt.

Just try to imagine either of those Texas Chainsaw Massacre films without R. Lee Ermey. Like Full Metal Jacket, you simply can’t. And that’s the truest testament to Ermey’s one-of-a-kind screen dominance. There will never be another like him. And we were fortunate that he spent some time in the world of horror, giving us an unforgettable horror villain for the ages.

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has four awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

Editorials

‘A Haunted House’ and the Death of the Horror Spoof Movie

Published

on

Due to a complex series of anthropological mishaps, the Wayans Brothers are a huge deal in Brazil. Around these parts, White Chicks is considered a national treasure by a lot of people, so it stands to reason that Brazilian audiences would continue to accompany the Wayans’ comedic output long after North America had stopped taking them seriously as comedic titans.

This is the only reason why I originally watched Michael Tiddes and Marlon Wayans’ 2013 horror spoof A Haunted House – appropriately known as “Paranormal Inactivity” in South America – despite having abandoned this kind of movie shortly after the excellent Scary Movie 3. However, to my complete and utter amazement, I found myself mostly enjoying this unhinged parody of Found Footage films almost as much as the iconic spoofs that spear-headed the genre during the 2000s. And with Paramount having recently announced a reboot of the Scary Movie franchise, I think this is the perfect time to revisit the divisive humor of A Haunted House and maybe figure out why this kind of film hasn’t been popular in a long time.

Before we had memes and internet personalities to make fun of movie tropes for free on the internet, parody movies had been entertaining audiences with meta-humor since the very dawn of cinema. And since the genre attracted large audiences without the need for a serious budget, it made sense for studios to encourage parodies of their own productions – which is precisely what happened with Miramax when they commissioned a parody of the Scream franchise, the original Scary Movie.

The unprecedented success of the spoof (especially overseas) led to a series of sequels, spin-offs and rip-offs that came along throughout the 2000s. While some of these were still quite funny (I have a soft spot for 2008’s Superhero Movie), they ended up flooding the market much like the Guitar Hero games that plagued video game stores during that same timeframe.

You could really confuse someone by editing this scene into Paranormal Activity.

Of course, that didn’t stop Tiddes and Marlon Wayans from wanting to make another spoof meant to lampoon a sub-genre that had been mostly overlooked by the Scary Movie series – namely the second wave of Found Footage films inspired by Paranormal Activity. Wayans actually had an easier time than usual funding the picture due to the project’s Found Footage presentation, with the format allowing for a lower budget without compromising box office appeal.

In the finished film, we’re presented with supposedly real footage recovered from the home of Malcom Johnson (Wayans). The recordings themselves depict a series of unexplainable events that begin to plague his home when Kisha Davis (Essence Atkins) decides to move in, with the couple slowly realizing that the difficulties of a shared life are no match for demonic shenanigans.

In practice, this means that viewers are subjected to a series of familiar scares subverted by wacky hijinks, with the flick featuring everything from a humorous recreation of the iconic fan-camera from Paranormal Activity 3 to bizarre dance numbers replacing Katy’s late-night trances from Oren Peli’s original movie.

Your enjoyment of these antics will obviously depend on how accepting you are of Wayans’ patented brand of crass comedy. From advanced potty humor to some exaggerated racial commentary – including a clever moment where Malcom actually attempts to move out of the titular haunted house because he’s not white enough to deal with the haunting – it’s not all that surprising that the flick wound up with a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes despite making a killing at the box office.

However, while this isn’t my preferred kind of humor, I think the inherent limitations of Found Footage ended up curtailing the usual excesses present in this kind of parody, with the filmmakers being forced to focus on character-based comedy and a smaller scale story. This is why I mostly appreciate the love-hate rapport between Kisha and Malcom even if it wouldn’t translate to a healthy relationship in real life.

Of course, the jokes themselves can also be pretty entertaining on their own, with cartoony gags like the ghost getting high with the protagonists (complete with smoke-filled invisible lungs) and a series of silly The Exorcist homages towards the end of the movie. The major issue here is that these legitimately funny and genre-specific jokes are often accompanied by repetitive attempts at low-brow humor that you could find in any other cheap comedy.

Not a good idea.

Not only are some of these painfully drawn out “jokes” incredibly unfunny, but they can also be remarkably offensive in some cases. There are some pretty insensitive allusions to sexual assault here, as well as a collection of secondary characters defined by negative racial stereotypes (even though I chuckled heartily when the Latina maid was revealed to have been faking her poor English the entire time).

Cinephiles often claim that increasingly sloppy writing led to audiences giving up on spoof movies, but the fact is that many of the more beloved examples of the genre contain some of the same issues as later films like A Haunted House – it’s just that we as an audience have (mostly) grown up and are now demanding more from our comedy. However, this isn’t the case everywhere, as – much like the Elves from Lord of the Rings – spoof movies never really died, they simply diminished.

A Haunted House made so much money that they immediately started working on a second one that released the following year (to even worse reviews), and the same team would later collaborate once again on yet another spoof, 50 Shades of Black. This kind of film clearly still exists and still makes a lot of money (especially here in Brazil), they just don’t have the same cultural impact that they used to in a pre-social-media-humor world.

At the end of the day, A Haunted House is no comedic masterpiece, failing to live up to the laugh-out-loud thrills of films like Scary Movie 3, but it’s also not the trainwreck that most critics made it out to be back in 2013. Comedy is extremely subjective, and while the raunchy humor behind this flick definitely isn’t for everyone, I still think that this satirical romp is mostly harmless fun that might entertain Found Footage fans that don’t take themselves too seriously.

Continue Reading