Connect with us

Editorials

[Special Report] On The Set Of ‘Deliver Us From Evil’!

Published

on

Last July I visited the set of The Exorcism of Emily Rose and Sinister director Scott Derrickson’s Deliver Us From Evil in the Bronx area of New York. Unfamiliar with the area and not especially knowledgeable about the material (aside from Derrickson’s involvement), it was a learning experience to say the least.

Starring Eric Bana, Edgar Ramirez, Olivia Munn, Joel McHale, and Sean Harris, “New York police officer Ralph Sarchie (Bana), struggling with his own personal issues, begins investigating a series of disturbing and inexplicable crimes. He joins forces with an unconventional priest (Ramirez), schooled in the rituals of exorcism, to combat the frightening and demonic possessions that are terrorizing their city. Based upon the book, which details Sarchie’s bone-chilling real-life cases.

The movie hits theaters July 2, 2014 via Sony Screen Gems, but you can read my report right now!
Deliver_Bronx

It’s a freezing, rainy night in the Bronx and, for the first time in my life I’m sort of scared of Joel McHale. He’s one of two NYPD officers questioning someone on the front stoop of their house when a suspect bolts out of the front door. McHale gives chase after the shirtless perp (played by Chris Coy), pursuing him the length of the block as the rain bears down on them both. When he comes back around as the shot is set back up for another take, it’s impossible not to notice how jacked McHale is – something not always evident on “Community.” I wouldn’t want this guy bearing down on me.

Residents of the neighborhood gather on their front porches to watch the shot. This isn’t a soundstage, this is on location – the rain is an unhappy accident – shooting in the very streets where the real life corollary to these events occurred. Director Scott Derrickson (The Exorcism of Emily Rose, Sinister) has partnered with über producer Jerry Bruckheimer to bring the real-life story of Ralph Sarchie to the screen, and they’re set on making it as authentic as possible. Lots of location shooting, with the real life Sarchie onhand to pipe up if they’re not getting something quite right.

It doesn’t seem like Sarchie would be shy about correcting them either. A 16 year veteran of the NYPD as well as a demonologist – he is nothing if not honestly blunt. Having studied with Ed and Lorraine Warren (the real-life demonologists portrayed in last summer’s The Conjuring), he decided to ply his trade in the same stomping grounds as his day job. A cop by day, by night he would help residents of the neighborhood combat evil supernatural elements (sometimes even assisting in exorcisms) without ever charging for his services. He spent over 10 of his 16 years on the force at Precinct 46 in the South Bronx, marrying policework with God’s work. At the time the FBI had designated his beat as “the most dangerous square mile in America.”
Deliver_Owl

Sarchie complied these experiences in his book, “Beware The Night,” which affected Derrickson so much that he’s been working on this film adaptation on and off for over a decade. In fact, it was research for what would eventually become Deliver Us From Evil that led to The Exorcism of Emily Rose. Derrickson explains, “I wrote the first draft of the script in 2004, and doing research here, I came to visit and I met Ralph, and he was still a cop in the 4-6. A very different guy than the guy you met; the guy you met now has kind of got a winsome manner. He was a very hardcore, angry guy back then, just working in the Bronx, all those guys seem like that, all those cops, you know? He was burned out and ready to retire. But he gave me the non-fiction book The Exorcism of Anneliese Michel, which was written by an anthropologist, that was out of print at the time. It was a photocopy of it, and that was how I learned about that case. And then when Bruckheimer didn’t make the script then I went and made Emily Rose. I optioned that book and went and made that.

Derrickson is also fond of the location, though not the rain so much. “The rain has been really hard on this show. We’ve lost a lot of time from the rain. It’s been an unusually rainy summer. But I don’t have any regrets, because there’s no place that looks like the Bronx. I mean really, shooting here, you start to go around the neighborhoods, and particularly, the neighborhoods I got to see, because we have a very good location scout, there’s just no place in the world that looks like it. And it’s where the real guy did his work. Ralph Sarchie was a cop in the 4-6 for over a decade, I believe. So it’s all authentic and it feels cool. It’s also free production design, because it’s just so cinematic. It makes the movie look at lot, I think, bigger and more expensive than it is.

We get a more specific taste of the location when we visit the basement of an adjacent building that is dressed for nefarious purposes. Cloves of garlic and dried peppers hang from the rafters. Bottles of dubious looking home brewed wine adorn the shelves. A bloody mannequin in the corner, a stand-in for a more elaborate dummy the crew is still working on. The first thing that occurs to me, aside from how creepy the setting is, is just how tight the space is. It’s authentic, but probably difficult to shoot in. I feel claustrophobic just being there and can’t imagine further constricting the space by bringing equipment and crew down there.
Deliver Us From Evil

It seems to work for Derrickson though, “The exteriors of the buildings are the obvious part, but the interiors of the Bronx, the hallways, the basements and the spaces that we’ve found, just these 150-year-old buildings with all these crevices and hallways and pipes. Everywhere we would go I’d go into places and I’d say, “You could look in LA for a year and you’d never find a space like this.

Back inside the church that serves as the production’s base camp for the day, we sit down with the real-life Ralph Sarchie. He immediately explains his role on set, “The only reason I’m here is for police procedure. As far as how the actors act, it’s up to Scott. He’ll be the first to tell me, “save it for the Police stuff.” It’s just procedure and the way cops act, the tactics. Making it as realistic as possible. I’m honored to be here because it doesn’t happen that often from what I hear. They keep people like me away. “Come down and say ‘Hello’ and get out!”

Derrickson had previously described the current, retired, Sarchie as being much more relaxed and affable than the “angry” guy he met ten years earlier. And while Sarchie is indeed affable now, he’s got a clear zero tolerance policy for bullsh*t that makes me glad I’m meeting the “happy” version. He’s also very much a true believer. “I always believed in the spirit realm. Whether or not I understood it or witnessed it or was involved in it. There wasn’t an incident that made be believe it was real, like I said I had an interest in it and as I grew older I realized that there are some people that are doing this for real. That’s when I realized this isn’t just a Hollywood thing. There’s an element of realism to it. I immersed myself more in the subject as a young adult. And I learned and decided that my Christian charity, what I wanted to do to serve God’s will, was to help people that were ensnared by the demonic. Somebody goes to a soup kitchen and serves the hungry, someone goes to a prison and tries to get people to turn their lives around – those are all Christian charities. This is just another charity the way I look at it. I don’t look at it as being special or different.

As far as the forces he encounters while performing his “charity” work are concerned, needless to say they’re not all friendly. “There is a primary evil that comes directly from the Devil. Even though all evil stems from the Devil, the Devil sometimes interacts with people in the physical world and the spiritual world and sometimes there’s just plain evil that people do to one another. And I’ve seen plenty of that over the course of 20 years. And I realized that there is something else that is influencing people to behave like that, and that’s the taking of the souls away from God. If you get people to sin, they get pushed further away from God and eventually God doesn’t really own the soul anymore. The Devil owns the soul and that’s where the danger comes in.

Whether or not Sarchie himself will be in the film is still up for debate, “It’s really not what I’m looking for. I’ve been arguing with Scott over it. He wants me to do it and I don’t want to do it and he says, “you gotta do it. I need you do do it.” But I don’t really want to do it.
Deliver_Bana

It’s always startling when the Hollywood version of a guy you’ve just been talking to enters the room. In this case, Eric Bana is quite a bit taller than Ralph Sarchie. He’s also Eric Bana. After the pleasantries are out of the way (“how is it playing a real life guy?” etc..) we find out that Bana was initially a little concerned about the script. Not its quality mind you, but its brutality. This is a gory hard “R” rated movie. “At the end of the day, I think you really have to put your total faith in the director in those instances because, I think, tonally and visually, that’s really in the edit. They can make it a smorgasbord of material, and it’s up to them then, according to taste and preference, to go and assemble that, because it’s really all in the edit, how that stuff plays out: how brutal or non-brutal, how gory or non-gory. So I’ve really got just complete faith in Scott. I’d met with him a couple of times long before we signed on and we got along extremely well. We got along extremely well and saw things very similar. So I have a lot of trust, a lot of trust in him.

And being a fan of Derrickson’s work certainly didn’t hurt. “And Scott’s films, the characters are very strong. Really, really strong. When I saw Sinister and Emily Rose I was really intrigued. I thought this script was in keeping with that strong character at the center of these really interesting, scary, potentially, stories. So, selfishly for me, it was Ralph that really jumped off the page, and Scott’s previous work. I’ve not worked in this genre and I’m really excited about it.

Back outside. Back in the rain. Back in the real Bronx. Joel McHale is still shooting the chase scene but takes a break to come over and speak with us. He’s… got a lot of knives. And a backwards Boston baseball cap. It’s certainly a look. “My character not only prefers knives to guns, police batons or Tasers, he just wears stuff to piss off other cops. I’m not joking, there’s a whole scene about the hat.” And while McHale might not be doing the kind of comedy he’s known for here, his character still knows how to have fun. In a dark way. “ He has fun, he kills people who are bad and protects people who are good. He enjoys it, he is like a robot, kind of, but a fun-loving robot. My character has zero… he has some fear but he doesn’t really care about a lot of stuff. So he sees bodies and shootings and stabbings, he’s happy to joke and have a warm meal afterwards. Because the movie is pretty dark, there are definitely jokes in it, but I don’t want anybody to think for a second it’s a comedy. It’s not.

At that point it’s time to leave the Bronx as shooting carries on in the rain. It’s the best of set visits in the sense that I have a real flavor for the type of film Deliver Us From Evil will be, but I’m not completely spoiled on the plot. I walk away intrigued… and a little more wary of Joel McHale.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading