Connect with us

Editorials

[BEST & WORST ’13 ] Patrick Cooper’s List of the Best Films of 2013

Published

on

Hey do you guys remember 2013? That sunovabitch went by fast, didn’t it? As far as horror goes, I think it was a pretty solid year. This was the first time in a few years where I didn’t have any real difficulty picking my favorites. There are only a few that would be considered 100% horror films – the others are cross-breeds and genre mutts. Some strong indie showings made the list, some big-budget flicks, as well as the return to form for a master director. Overall, 2013 was a mixed bag, but in the best way possible.

While I didn’t have trouble picking my 10 favorites, actually ranking them in order would probably give my a full on panic attack. So my list is presented in alphabetical order for my sanity’s sake.

Mr. Disgusting (Best/Indie) | Evan Dickson (Best) | The Wolfman (Festival Favorites) | Patrick Cooper (Best)
Lonmonster (Best/Worst) | Lauren Taylor (Best/Worst) | Ryan Daley (Best Novels)
Best Posters | Best Performances | Best Trailers

PATRICK COOPER’S TOP 10 OF 2013
10. YOU’RE NEXT (Aug. 23; Lionsgate)

I got to see You’re Next at its Fantastic Fest screening back in 2011. For the past two years, I kinda got sick of hearing myself hype it up to friends. It finally got released this year and was just as much of a blast the second time around. It’s a solid blend of humor and thrills with some top notch performances – particularly by badass heroine Sharni Vinson. It’s also got smarts to spare, making it a refreshing take on the home invasion genre that transcends the trappings of the genre. You’re Next also proved that there’s a place for indie horror in wide release.

9. STOKER (March 1; Fox Searchlight)

I knew back in early 2013 that Stoker would crack my best of list for the year. It’s a cold, exceptionally constructed film that’s also sexy as hell. Chan Wook Park is a master craftsman and it shows in every shot. There’s not one scene in Stoker that’s not brimming with details and subtleties. There are inspired moments of violence and sexual awakening, all wrapped around a genuinely compelling family drama. Mia Wasikowski’s portrayal of a darkly quirky girl coming of age is fantastic. By coming of age I mean she cums thinking about her uncle snapping someone’s neck. Good stuff!

8. SPRING BREAKERS (March 22; Lionsgate)

Watch the dubstep montages of hulking frat boys waving red Solo cups into the camera and tell me this isn’t a horror movie. Watch the destruction of Selena Gomez’s innocence at the bejeweled hands of James Franco and tell me this isn’t a horror movie. Watch Gucci Mane stone-cold threaten Alien in a darkened strip club and tell me this isn’t a horror movie. Harmony Korine is hit or miss with me, but homeboy can pack his backs after this one for all I care. He made his masterpiece in 2013. Spring Breakers is a barrage of unsettling neon decadence featuring 2013’s best performance: James Franco as the unnerving Florida rapper Alien. It’s either a poignant commentary on our Dionysian culture and the commercialization of it or a celebration of it. Either way, Spring Breakers is a downright terrifying and beautiful film.

7. SAVAGED (TBD; Raven Banner)

Brad sent me a lot of online screeners during the tail end of 2013. I didn’t get to them all (a guy’s gotta watch Full House reruns sometime!), but holy shit am I glad I took on Savaged. It’s a lean, mean take on the rape/revenge and Native American revenge genres that’s as over the top in its brutality as it is effective in its catharsis. Writer/director Michael S. Ojeda also manages to deftly incorporate a potent love story alongside the vicious revenge plot. The Native American elements of the film are treated with a lot of respect as well – something you don’t typically see in genre films. Across the board, Savaged was packing heat. Here’s hoping this kick ass hybrid can scalp the masses in 2014.

6. PRISONERS (Sept. 20; Warner Bros.)

Despite the star power of Wolverine, Prisoners didn’t make a lot of noise when it was released in 2013. It’s a wicked bleak movie – one that isn’t so much about the crime as it is the consequences of vigilantism. The film takes a realistic look at the effect of a child abduction on a family, which doesn’t make for a pretty picture. At the heart of the film is the character study of two men: Jackman’s patriarch Keller Dover and Jake Gyllenhaal’s Detective Loki. Dover is a blue-collar warrior – the embodiment of a Springsteen song – driven to vengeance. He’s great, but Gyllenhaal is something outta this world. After James Franco’s Alien in Spring Breakers, Gyllenhaal delivered my second favorite performance of the year. Loki is a consumed, stalwart character made up of equal parts tragedy and nobility. He’s so compelling and sad and handsome…so handsome…I could watch him forever. Also, Paul Dano plays a terrifically sympathetic scumbag who looks like he smells really bad.

5. PASSION (Oct. 25; Dark Dunes Productions)

Brian De Palma took a few years off after The Black Dahlia – that lazy shrug of a film. In 2013 the master craftsman came out swinging with Passion – his best film since 1992’s Raising Cain. He didn’t break any new ground with Passion or reinvent himself – instead he did what he does best: present a sexy as hell Hitchcockian thriller with style out the ass. Honestly, De Palma hasn’t seemed this confident since the ’80s.Passion is basically his thesis film containing all of the elements that have made him one of the best thriller directors of our time. Pretty much 100 percent of the marketing revolved around the Rachel McAdams/Noomi Rapace lesbian stuff, but that makes up such small part of the film. The rest is classic De Palma: style, sex, doppelgangers, and stylish sexy doppelgangers. The final scene is devilishly comforting for what it is. It’s so great to know De Palma is still out there doing his thing.

4. LORD OF TEARS (Oct. 25; Dark Dunes Productions)

Certain movies can really get under your skin. In 2013 one humble little indie submerged beneath my entire psyche and had its way with me: Lawrie Brewster’s Lord of Tears. The entire film feels out of time. It feels like a throwback without biting any other films. Lord of Tears is a true chiller drenched in gothic atmosphere and a solid mystery that left me genuinely shook. The indie market presented only a handful of triumphs in 2013 and Lord of Tears is certainly one of them.

3. DRUG WAR (July 26; Well Go USA)

Veteran Hong Kong filmmaker Johnnie To simply knows how to do the crime genre right. With the masterful Drug War, he presented one of his most badass and sincere films – one that understands the humanity of narcs, drug lords, and informants. A lot of critics compared it to The Wire because it comments on all sides of the “war on drugs.” In place of Omar are two deaf brothers who manage to be as badass as everyone’s favorite shotgun-toting gay man. Their riotous gunfight against dozens of cops is goddamn glorious. It’s also a very smart film – one that respects its audience’s intelligence. Drug War is simply a perfect entry into the crime genre.

2. THE CONJURING (July 19; Warner Bros.)

I dunno, man. While The Conjuring didn’t knock me on my ass like I hoped it would, there’s something I find infinitely watchable about the film. It has its weak jump scares like every other contemporary horror film, but it makes up for those moments with its strong setting. A lot of the film’s success has to do with Vera Farmiga (who is a goddess walking the earth), but even more is owed to James Wan’s passion for the craft. The scares are cheap at times, but overall The Conjuring employs its thick atmosphere and sincere belief in the supernatural to provide its chills. Also, the time spent establishing the geography of the house earns a strong payoff. Most contemporary genre directors don’t give a shit about stuff like that. Despite The Conjuring‘s cheap jump scares, with this film and Insidious 2, I think Wan is taking the mainstream in a positive direction.

1. CHEAP THRILLS (TBD; Drafthouse Films)

Cheap Thrills is 2013’s perfect party movie. It’s a total blast. Sadly, it’s also one of 2013’s most depressingly relevant ones. The plot concerning desperate men performing progressively more offensive dares for money rings true alongside America’s bullshit society. We live in some tough economic times and the prospect of earning money for being an immoral asshole is equal parts tempting and loathsome. It’s an angry and bloody film really well acted by Pat Healy, Ethan Embry, and its true madman, David Koechner. At its best, horror reflects contemporary society – Cheap Thrills certainly holds an ugly and complex mirror up to our current shitty class war.

HONORABLE NON-HORROR MENTIONS

Here’s some 2013 films outside of the horror genre I’d like to show some love to. With The Wolf of Wall Street, 71 yr. old Scorsese made younger filmmakers look like chicken shit fossils. Also, Leo is a physical comedy wizard. Jeff Nichol’s Mud is a brilliant and beuatiful coming of age film featuring that hunky weirdo Matthew McConaughey. Andrew Bujalski’s Computer Chess is a funny, interesting look at the dawn of the computer age through the eyes of obsessive programmers. I’m a sucker for David Gordon Green, so it was nice to see him return to his offbeat, poetic roots with Prince Avalanche. The Place Beyond the Pines made for one helluva depressing and beautiful ride. And lastly, I’d like to recommend the Jason Statham thriller Redemption, which is easily the best film of his career. It’s not your typical Statham fare (there are only like two fight scenes) and his fans might be surprised at the range he shows in this one. Dig it.

Patrick writes stuff about stuff for Bloody and Collider. His fiction has appeared in ThugLit, Shotgun Honey, Flash Fiction Magazine, and your mother's will. He'll have a ginger ale, thanks.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading