Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Why Horror Fans Should Be Excited About ‘Road of the Dead’

Published

on

One, Mr. George A. Romero, has gotten a lot of love from me recently. He, obviously, made my Top 10 Zombie Film List and landed on my 4 Fright Films for the 4th, and we just celebrated the 32nd birthday of my favorite Dead film, Day of the Dead. His name has been on my tongue a lot (that sounds wrong), but for good reason. Romero invented the zombies we have today. With one film, Night of the Living Deadhe created an entire subgenre. That film will be celebrating its 50th anniversary next year, and I couldn’t be more thankful to have it in my life.

The films that followed NightDawn and Day, join to create an amazing trilogy. Each is easily considered a classic of the horror genre. They’re important films that use the living dead as placeholders for societal ills, and critics and audiences adore them all. The series doesn’t stop there, of course. It has grown to encompass a total of six films. The last two of which were met with much less reverie than Romero’s previous efforts.

In the past few months there has been a steady drip of news regarding the future of his Dead films. Outside of Brad’s surprisingly timely April Fool’s joke, there was the zombie-noir Romero couldn’t get funding for, and most recently we got early word on the upcoming Road of the Dead. Fan reaction to this latest news has been tepid to say the least. In the comments section of this site and on twitter the remarks have not been too kind:


Master of Horror

I find it so upsetting to see fans turn their back on the man like this. I understand if you weren’t a fan of his last, Survival of the Dead. I wasn’t either. Even if you haven’t enjoyed the last three Dead pictures, you should appreciate that as a creative, as a director, he feels he has a story to tell. Directors certainly make films with an audience in mind, but they also do it because they have a passion to create. This is a man who has dedicated his life to the horror genre, and every time you sit down to watch Dawn of the Dead or even, The Walking Dead, you have George Romero to thank.  You might not want to see Road of the Dead; you certainly don’t have to (if it gets made). I just find it disrespectful that after the hours of entertainment he has provided us fans, we act as if we don’t even want to see what else he may have in store.

Growing up there were three horror directors that were massively influential to me: Wes Craven, Dario Argento, and George Romero. Craven was able to maintain respectable amounts of critical and commercial success until the end. Argento has continued to work fairly steadily, and despite fans generally being unimpressed by his recent filmography, there is still a level of excitement when he announces a new project. The hope being this one will be “the return to form”. I feel that way too (I’m still looking for Sandman), and I also feel that way when Romero’s name is attached to a film.

Mad Max…With Zombies!

Beyond Romero’s legacy, there’s another reason to cheer this film on: the plot! Yes, at first glance it does sound incredibly cheesy:

The story is set on an island where zombie prisoners race cars in a modern-day Coliseum for the entertainment of wealthy humans.

What gets me excited, though, is this is the perfect continuation of the living dead saga. In Land of the Dead we were shown a world far removed from the initial outbreak. The wealthy were living like kings, while the poor were left to try and scrounge a meager existence. There’s a set-piece early on where two zombies are locked in a cage match with “live bait” – Asia Argento, to be exact. It’s a fun scene that illustrates the chaos of a post apocalyptic society and the lengths people will go to just for entertainment. A look at most reality shows today proves it’s probably not that far off. It sounds like Road intends to tap into that same kind of pulpy Mad Max-ian territory.

Also, throughout the series we’ve seen a clear progression of the zombies’ evolution. In Day we were shown that the undead were “learning” and remembering their past lives. Even with Dawn the zombies were drawn to the mall because they “remember they want to be in here.” After Land delivered the smartest “stenches” we’d seen yet, Romero went back to the beginning of the outbreak with Diary and Survival. Now it sounds that Road will drive us forward again. It’s refreshing to me that he continues to push the narrative further than before.

On paper there doesn’t appear to be much you can do with a zombie tale. They’re reawakened dead who want to consume living flesh. Romero has managed to take that simple conceit and run with it. He’s allowed his living dead to evolve with our times, each incarnation representing something new. Simply look at The Walking Dead to realize it’s important to change things up and grow. That show continues repeating the same plot over and over. Even the spin-off, Fear the Walking Dead, after several strong episodes this season, ended up resorting to the same schtick as it’s sister show. They must fight for their land!

However you feel about Road of the Dead or Romero making another zombie flick, I couldn’t be more excited for the next chapter.

End Nerd Rant.

127 Comments

Editorials

The Mark of the Beast: The Lasting Impact of ‘The Omen’ at 50

Published

on

The Omen at 50

Of the three films that make up the Diabolical Trinity of classic religious horror films—Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), and The Omen (1976)—The Omen is the most purely entertaining.

While Rosemary’s Baby digs into the societal shifts of the 60s and The Exorcist explores spiritual tensions between faith and doubt in an ever-shifting world, The Omen seems most interested in just telling a thrilling story. It achieves this by blending two major trends of the 1970s, the devil movie and the paranoid thriller, into one crackling adventure yarn. In the process, The Omen has sparked fear and curiosity about what could happen in theend timesif such events are to occur.

After seeing The Exorcist, producer Harvey Bernhard contacted writer David Seltzer and said something along the lines of,Hey, write me one of those.Seltzer, having never read the Bible, thought it would be an interesting challenge, so, according to various interviews, he read the Bible and several commentaries in search of a story. Then he stumbled upon a passage in the book of Revelation, the image of a great Beast rising out of the sea, that sparked his imagination. In the commentaries, he found that the sea represented politics in some interpretations of the text, and he began building his story on that foundation.

Seltzer has told this story often, and I am inclined to believe him. However, from there, much of the theological-sounding lore of The Omen was created purely by Seltzer. Many of the ideas surrounding The Antichrist in the film appear to be drawn much more from the pop-eschatology sensation of the 1970s, The Late Great Planet Earth by Hal Lindsay, than any Biblical source.

Lindsay’s book was the bestselling nonfiction book of the 1970s and re-popularized views of thelast daysthat had been dying along with fundamentalism for decades, namely Dispensationalism, Millennialism, and the Pre-Tribulation Rapture. In dispensationalism, history is broken into several epochs of time (or dispensations) that culminate in the return of Christ and his thousand-year (millennial) reign.

Before this return, a seven-year Tribulation will occur in which the Antichrist comes to power and persecutes all who oppose him, culminating in a battle between the forces of good and evil at the valley of Megiddo, usually called Armageddon. Of course, in this worldview, the true believers in Jesus will be lifted out, or raptured, before all this takes place. Since the publication and popularity of The Late Great Planet Earth, this has been the prominent belief in Evangelical and Fundamentalist Christian circles, though Roman Catholic, Orthodox, and mainline Protestant denominations largely reject it.

Lindsay also did something unique that had not been the case even in dispensationalist circles before him—he posited that the creation of the modern state of Israel in 1948 started the countdown to Armageddon. Fans of the film will immediately realize where Seltzer ran with this idea in the first line of the poem created for the movie:When the Jews return to Zion…

Damien Thorn and the Creation of Horror’s “Innocent Villain”

The Omen

Seltzer’s next inspiration focused on the idea of the Antichrist as a child, what he would call the film’sinnocent villain.In watching The Omen, it is readily apparent that Damien Thorn (Harvey Stephens) does not really do anything evil beyond a bit of normal kid mischief. Even the moment in which Damien knocks Kathy Thorn (Lee Remick) over a second-floor railing can be read as an accident orchestrated by Damien’s diabolically connected nanny, Mrs. Baylock (Billie Whitelaw). The film takes this idea of the innocent villain a step further by casting Gregory Peck, best known for playing arguably the greatest father in film history, Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird (1962), as Damien’s earthly father, an element that greatly satisfied Seltzer.

The New Testament itself says very little about the Antichrist and certainly nothing about his childhood. In fact, the word antichrist is used twice (1 John 2:18 and 2 John 7 for the curious) and refers to groups of people, not a particular person. There is also a passage in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12 in which the writer (usually attributed to Paul) discussesThe Man of Lawlessnesswho willexalt himself over everything that is called Godandproclaim himself to be God.

Then there is the Beast of Revelation chapter 13 withseven heads and ten hornsthat Seltzer latched onto, which has been interpreted in a multitude of ways over the centuries. Powerful people throughout history, from Charlemagne, various Popes during the Protestant Reformation era, Napoleon and Hitler, to modern politicians, including Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump, have all had the label placed on them by various circles. Even religious leaders like Billy Graham have not escaped being called the Antichrist.

Lindsay and modern dispensationalists are certain the Antichrist will be a 21st-century individual as they are equally certain that the Rapture, Tribulation, and return of Christ are imminent, likely within their lifetime. Many scholars and theologians, however, interpret these passages as symbolic representations of the Roman Empire and the first-century Caesars who persecuted, tortured, and murdered Christians and Jews who refused to submit to Imperial rule and worship them as gods. For example, that the Beast from the sea in Revelation has seven heads is symbolic of the famous seven mountains of Rome, with the 10 horns referring to rulers and magistrates of the Empire.

But this is all really of no matter to Seltzer and the story of The Omen. Instead of being concerned with any historical or theological accuracy, he instead built his own lore, which sends Robert Thorn and photographer Keith Jennings (David Warner) on a globetrotting investigation into the nature of the Antichrist and how to stop him. Some of this lore includes the child being born of a jackal, the reaction of animals, the protective cult that arises around Damien, the daggers of Megiddo, and maybe most interesting of all, the peculiar flaws in Jennings’s photographs that presage the ways certain individuals will die.

All these aspects are where the paranoid thrillers come in, as films like Blow Up (1966), Z (1969), The Conversation (1974), The Parallax View (1974), 3 Days of the Condor (1975), and All the President’s Men (1976) were all the rage at the time. Especially in the wake of the Watergate scandal, the idea of journalists (like Jennings) as ordinary heroes who could bring down the powerful, nefarious forces in the world was exactly what audiences craved. And what greater hidden evil force was there than the Devil? This is also why the device of the daggers of Megiddo is so important to a movie like this. If Damien is indeed the Antichrist, there must be a way to stop him, though in the Biblical text, the only power capable of destroying the Devil is God Himself.

The Mark of the Beast, 666, and the Film’s Most Famous Religious Symbolism

The piece of lore created for the movie with the most solid Biblical grounding is the Mark of the Beast. Revelation describes a mark on the forehead or hand of those who worship the Beast and his image. Again, this is symbolic language differentiating those who belong to the power of the Roman Empire and those who belong to Christ, who have the Mark of the Lamb. In Seltzer’s hands, the mark is very literal, a birthmark that is borne by not only the Antichrist but all his followers, meaning they are marked from before birth as belonging to Satan, and there is no escaping it. This is all rather distressing to the priest Father Brennan (Patrick Troughton), who betrays his mark by warning Thorn about Damien and pays the price by memorably being impaled by a spire that falls from a church steeple after being struck by lightning.

Why is the mark three sixes? Again, this is drawn from a passage in Revelation that states that the Beast can be identified by calculating his number. In Biblical scholarship, this is believed to be the sum of the name of a man transferred into Hebrew numerology, a practice in which each Hebrew letter also represents a number. Using this method, the number of the name Caesar Nero, which many believe to be the most logical choice, is six hundred sixty-six. In the film and elsewhere, this number is changed to three individual sixes. According to the film, this represents the Diabolical Trinity (a designation also unique to the film) made up of Satan, the Antichrist, and the False Prophet. That Damien carries this unique birthmark under his hair convinces Robert that the child is the Antichrist, and it’s up to him to destroy him.

Part of what makes The Omen great is its ambiguity. Damien could be the Antichrist, or he could be at the center of a series of coincidences. Director Richard Donner stated in interviews that he believed Robert Thorn had gone insane by the end of the film, which, to Donner, is the only explanation for why Thorn would attempt to kill an innocent child. However, that enigmatic smile in the final shot suggests that Damien does embody a spirit of great evil. The sequels, however, all but erase this ambiguity.

In audiences, The Omen sparked a renewed interest in the concept of the Antichrist and the dispensationalist interpretation of the end times that continues to echo throughout the last five decades. Around the time of the film’s release, even Elvis Presley was photographed brandishing a paperback copy of Seltzer’s novelization. Dispensationalist authors like Hal Lindsay, Tim LaHaye, and John Hagee have made millions publishing books and giving lectures about the Antichrist and the end of the world.

The Legacy of The Omen, 50 Years Later

Though A Thief in the Night (1972) preceded The Omen in initial release, it gained quite a resurgence (along with the ability to create three sequels) in the wake of the popularity of The Omen and went on to scar the psyches of Evangelical children for decades. Hal Lindsay was also able to release a film version of The Late Great Planet Earth in 1978, complete with narration and a brief onscreen appearance from Orson Welles.

In the 1990s, the Left Behind series became a cultural phenomenon, spawning twelve books in the core series, a YA spinoff series, video games, and a movie series (2000-2005) starring Kirk Cameron. A bigger studio adaptation of the first book was released in 2014, starring Nicolas Cage. 20th Century Fox and The Omen got in on the renewedend-of-the-worldvigor by releasing a remake of the original film on June 6, 2006. The franchise was revived once again in 2024 with The First Omen, which explores ideas of the Antichrist and the motivations of those in power in our current religious, social, and political context.

But despite all the sequels, spinoffs, rip-offs, remakes, andend timesmoney grabs of the last 50 years, the original version of The Omen remains untouchable. Its greatest strength is that it seeks, first and foremost, to entertain. And it does so admirably.

After half a century, its influence can be felt in horror, the culture at large, and even in various faith circles. It is a testament to the power of story and film that, consciously or unconsciously, fans of The Omen and those who have never seen it alike are, to this very day, marked by the Beast.

Continue Reading