Connect with us

Editorials

Mr. Disgusting Picks the Best Horror Films of 2016!

Published

on

Mr. Disgusting’s Top 10 Horror Films | Several More Must-See Horror Films | Kalyn’s Top 10 | Trace’s Top 10 | Trace’s Worst 510 Best Posters | Worst Posters | Best Trailers | Luiz Picks the Best Horror Shows | Chris’ Best Blu-rays 2016: The Year Netflix Embraced Horror | 10 Sci-fi Movies You May Have Missed | 13 Most Disturbing Horror Movie Moments |
5 Pretty Good Horror Movies You Might’ve Missed in 2016
[Poll Results] The Bloody Disgusting Readers Chose the 10 Best Horror Movies of 2016
10 Biggest Horror Stories of 2016
Other Year’s Lists: 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020


If you could graph out the horror genre like the stock market you would see a massive spike over the past few years. Even with mainstream news outlets constantly crying “horror is dead”, we all know the truth – our genre is on fire. It’s so hot, in fact, that it’s even taken over television. Beyond “The Walking Dead”, there’s “American Horror Story”, “The Exorcist”, “Channel Zero”, “Ash vs Evil Dead”, “Stan Against Evil”, “The X-Files”, “Wolf Creek”, and even Netflix’s “Stranger Things”. It’s everywhere.

For 15 years I’ve put together a list of the best and worst films of the year, only it’s getting harder and harder to dwindle it down; the last two years (2014; 2015) I had to split it into two, while I’ve even been forced to make a special list highlighting the independent films that also blew my mind (it’s hard to celebrate a great year in the genre and leave some titles out). I’m in the exact same predicament this year as I was last, and even the year prior. There’s just an insane amount of good content out there that has to be seen. And unlike previous years, there’s a nice mix of studio films to go along with the independent productions, which is a healthy sign for our genre.

To kick things off, the first batch of films are first presented in no particular order, as usual, with the top ten shared on the next page.


Honorable Mentions

  • HUSH (Mike Flanagan)
  • BASKIN (Can Evrenol)
  • THE INVITATION (D. Karyn Kusama)
  • PROJECT AVALANCHE (D. Matt Johnson)
  • RATS (D. Morgan Spurlock)

THE WAILING (D. Hong-jin Na)

THE WAILING

What really sells The Wailing is the absolutely stunning cinematography that brings the locations to life. It’s a gorgeous genre film that mesmerizes the viewer with a terrifying trip around a small village in South Korea. The fish-out-of-water perspective for the viewer drops them into an unique environment that’s both strange and haunting. It all begins when a man arrives in the town, and a plague begins to spread. A quasi-zombie film, there’s plenty of scares to go along with gore, although what makes this one of the best films of the year is a strong screenplay with engaging characters. If you’re looking for a supplemental film to Train to Busan, The Wailing makes its case as the perfect opener.


IN THE DEEP/47 METERS DOWN (D. Johannes Roberts)

screen-shot-2016-11-22-at-12-05-39-pm

Johannes Roberts has the impossible task of having his In the Deep (possibly titled 47 Meters Down) compared to The Shallows, this summer’s other shark survival film that quietly took a chunk out of the box office. Fans of shark survival horror movies are going to love In the Deep, which is vastly different than The Shallows. In fact, they compliment, if not juxtapose each other into the perfect double feature. With Shallows, Blake Lively is trapped on a rock outside of the water with a great white shark circling to attack. In the Deep takes viewers to the bottom of the ocean floor with many other dangers, while sharks also happen to be swimming around. They’re two completely different beasts that both have their fair share of suspense. Deep is full of bite, and is vicious enough for the hardcore horror audience, while also providing an immense amount of thrills for everyone else. Don’t let this one swim past you.


THE SHALLOWS (D. Jaume Collet-Serra)

THE SHALLOWS

There was a lot of internal debate as to which I liked better, Jaume Collet-Serra’s The Shallows or Johannes Roberts’s Alex Aja-produced In the Deep/47 Meters Down, and I guess I give the edge to the former. Collet-Serra knows exactly what kind of movie The Shallows is and delivers exactly what’s promised; the shark thriller is more of a dumbed-down popcorn muncher that’s just straight-up fun, boasts stunning cinematography, wicked shark sequences, and of course tons of shots of Blake Lively in a skin-tight wetsuit. It was the perfect summer movie that also gifted us with one of the worst posters of the year.


SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD (D. Chris Peckover)

Safe Neighborhood

I loved Chris Peckover’s Undocumented and it kills me that we had to wait six years to see his followup feature, the awesome Safe Neighborhood, a suburban horror in which a babysitter must defend a twelve-year-old boy from intruders, only to discover it’s far from a normal home invasion. It’s hard to really talk about the film without spoiling anything, especially since it won’t be released until next year, but what I can say is that it truly is Scream meets Home Alone. It’s not only going to be a new horror classic, but will also be a holiday one as well. Pan‘s Levi Miller gives one of the best performances of the year, alongside The Visit‘s hilarious Ed Oxenbould. What I love about Safe Neighborhood is that the humor is situational, taking the grim out of home invasion subgenre and making it fun (think You’re Next). This is not to say that this slasher doesn’t have its fair share of gore, which come in crowd-pleasing moments that would have theatergoers erupting. This is one holiday horror you’ll be unwrapping every year.


THE BOY (D. William Brent Bell)

THE BOY

I’m not exactly sure what the majority of horror fans thought of William Brent Bell’s The Boy, but I thought it was brave, and thus paid off in spades. Starring “The Walking Dead’s” Lauren Cohan, the film went against the grain, pushing against what you’d expect out of a big studio release, and delivered a “Tales From the Crypt”-esque finale that surely divided audiences. Looking back at the January release, I loved that STX used false advertising (in a sense) to throw off viewers from being able to figure out the ending, which only aided in them landing one helluva punch that made The Boy the first great horror film of 2016.


FOUND FOOTAGE 3D (D. Steven DeGennaro)

FOUND FOOTAGE 3D

I reviewed Found Footage 3D out of the Bruce Campbell Film Festival this summer, calling it, “An absolute riot that’s also quite scary, setting up a multitude of payoffs that deliver a flurry of satisfying punches… Found Footage 3D, about a group of filmmakers who set out to make the first ever 3D found-footage horror movie, is a super-meta comedy that turns into a straight up horror film; if there were a comparison, it would probably be in the vein of Wes Craven’s Scream. The comedy is a bit inside baseball, but the execution makes the overall experience fun enough to reach outside of just genre fans. It truly is a modern indie gem that really, really deserves a place among the greats.”


UNDER THE SHADOW (D. Babak Anvari)

Under The Shadow | image via Sundance

The feature directorial debut of Babak Anvari follows a mother and daughter struggling to cope with the terrors of the post-revolution in a war-torn Tehran of the 1980s. The period setting gave authenticity to this indie horror that juxtaposes fear and paranoia from the war with that of a Jinn. The scares, albeit far and few between, were immensely impactful. Under the Shadow is a welcomed slow burn that’s carried by an outstanding performance by the mesmerizing Narges Rashidi.


10 CLOVERFIELD LANE (D. Dan Trachtenberg)

10 Cloverfield Lane

I forgot that I reviewed Dan Trachtenberg’s claustrophobic 10 Cloverfield Lane, the sister movie to the J.J. Abrams-produced Cloverfield. As I previously wrote, forget the Cloverfield connection, though, what we have here in a masterclass in suspense that can only be described as Alfred Hitchcock and Richard Matheson’s lovechild. John Gallagher Jr. and Winstead’s outstanding performances will, unfortunately, be overlooked because Goodman hits God-level. Goodman is having a renaissance career; his character walks a fine line between sympathetic and terrifying in what could be his coup de grâce. A mic-drop if you will. The early Oscar chatter was fully warranted, and I hope it pops back up in the coming months. Forget all about Cloverfield and just soak in the immense claustrophobia and paranoia that’s so unrelenting you’ll have to dig your nails out of the theater’s armrests.

Up Next: My Top 10 Horror Films of the Year

Pages: 1 2

Horror movie fanatic who co-founded Bloody Disgusting in 2001. Producer on Southbound, V/H/S/2/3/94, SiREN, Under the Bed, and A Horrible Way to Die. Chicago-based. Horror, pizza and basketball connoisseur. Taco Bell daily. Franchise favs: Hellraiser, Child's Play, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween, Scream and Friday the 13th. Horror 365 days a year.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading